Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Terrorist Attack in Manchester (Read MOD WARNING in OP Updated 24/05/2017))

13940424445112

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,257 ✭✭✭Yourself isit


    Exeggcute wrote: »
    16 years after 9/11 it amazes me that people still ask why this is happening.

    Two days after the U.S. signs the biggest ever arms deal with Saudi Arabia

    The same Saudi Arabia that funds ISIS and Al Qaeda.

    That supported the 9/11 hijackers, the vast majority of whom were Saudi

    That builds mosques all over Europe to spread their radical wahabi ideology, the same ideology of ISIS

    How many innocent men women and children have been slaughtered in the Middle East by Obama's (and now Trumps) indiscriminate drone strikes?

    The West continues to feed this Monster through arms, money and our own bombing in the Middle East.

    Couple that with the ghettos across Europe where Muslims have been left to rot for decades...

    Opening the floodgates to refugees (created by our wars) so that ISIS can take advantage of the situation

    We need to take a long, hard look in the mirror

    I agree that the US (not the "west" - that's too broad a term) is responsible for the destabilisation of Europe and the ME. Generally because of its neocon wars and pro Saudi sympathies.

    I also think this is in part deliberate.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 54,225 ✭✭✭✭tayto lover


    First victim named is just 18 years old. RIP Georgina..


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 3,246 ✭✭✭judeboy101


    Have you any suggestions yourself how to stop these monstrous atrocities? What may I ask is your primary objection to burying one who commits such an act in pig's blood? Do you genuinely believe these extremists deserve any better in death?

    there are no islamic terrorist cells in North Korea, are doing something right?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 17,387 ✭✭✭✭Jayop


    I agree that the US (not the "west" - that's too broad a term) is responsible for the destabilisation of Europe and the ME. Generally because of its neocon wars and pro Saudi sympathies.

    I also think this is in part deliberate.

    Rubbish. The Russians were in there too, the French, the British, they've all been involved in wars in the middle east for decades if not centuries. The US is involved since the second world War but the problem is older than that.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 319 ✭✭spoonerhead


    Amazing that an Islamist has killed 22 people and the only thing some people can say is 'what about the middle East bombings'. Given it's the same 'people' doing it in both cases it's a paradox so to try compare them rather than face the facts, the loopy left..... The Quran permits its followers to kill infidels


  • Advertisement
  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,505 ✭✭✭infogiver


    bubblypop wrote: »
    The European court of human rights is around a lot longer than the EU that Britain is leaving.

    It can be around for 1 million years but once Britain have left the EU Britain won't be subject to the courts rulings anymore.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,774 ✭✭✭✭RobertKK


    On Good Friday when I was in Rome, I went to see the Pope at the Colosseum for the way of the cross.
    The army and armed police had a large area cordoned off before you could get near the area and all people were checked out.

    The thing is, if somehow what happened last night became more common, something similar might be needed for big events like sport, music and other large public gatherings to offer protection, but the cost would be high.

    I believe a lot of people have the thought of being caught up in a terrorist event in the back of their minds, given one does not know where it will happen. But at the same time I don't know anyone who allows it affect their plans - unless they always dreamed of going to somewhere like Syria before foreign powers turned it into a place to fight each other.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 17,387 ✭✭✭✭Jayop


    infogiver wrote: »
    It can be around for 1 million years but once Britain have left the EU Britain won't be subject to the courts rulings anymore.

    Clueless. If Britain wants to trade with European counties they'll bend the knee to the court but won't have any input in how it's run.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 618 ✭✭✭Thomas__


    Thomas__ wrote: »
    Munich was in 1972, Lockerbie in 1988. Inbetween was the hijacking of the Landshut (Lufthansa Flight 181) in 1977, Entebbe in 1976. Look at the distances of years that are between them and then look at what happened since 9/11 2001. Radical Palestinians, radical Islamists, all of them mostly from Arabic countries and also Muslims by their faith.

    And are you honestly claiming that all of the aforementioned had a religious angle and were not meant as revenge for an exploitative Western foreign policy towards the Middle East at the time?

    It had both then, it has both still to this day, just depending on the hate propaganda of Islamist fanatics preached to their followers.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,489 ✭✭✭SnakePlissken


    Podge_irl wrote: »
    pjohnson wrote: »
    Yes this is how it is. This time like all the others and all the future times its a standstill. People who wish to see a change get shouted down by those happy with the status quo. A status quo that has lead, does lead and will continue to lead to innocent deaths. So ok. Lets keep doing nothing at this point we dont even need to say "and see how it goes", we have seen how doing nothing works. We saw how doing nothing works lastnight. If people could actually come up with a "acceptable" solution these discussion things might get somewhere. Instead each and every suggested change is shouted down because of "the innocent refugees" "but they are from 'x' country", "some of the muslims are ok." Then nothing changes and a month or so later the same thing happens again. If this cycle is the only acceptable thing for some people innocents will keep dying.

    Suggesting things like burying them in pigs blood is infantile at best.

    It's not though, it's just an unsavoury thought for those who live cossessted lives far removed from the horrors these fanatics are inflicting.

    I'll simplify it for you;

    These extremists kill with the full belief they're martyrdom will bring them to paradise.

    These extremists believe that to be tainted by pig's blood will prohibit them from entering said paradise.

    Bury the remains of any terrorist who commits such atrocities in pig's blood and it will perhaps dissuade the next jihadist waiting in the wings.

    It's a ludicrous proposition but then the beliefs they kill for are similarly ludicrous so what's to lose by at least making an attempt at trying something different because what we've done so far isn't bloody working now is it?


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,759 ✭✭✭jobbridge4life


    infogiver wrote: »
    It can be around for 1 million years but once Britain have left the EU Britain won't be subject to the courts rulings anymore.

    Wrong. The ECHR exists outside of the structures of the EU, was primarily written by British lawyers and Teresa May has signaled that she intends to remain within it.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 898 ✭✭✭Schwanz


    First victim named is just 18 years old. RIP Georgina..

    Some mam on ITV searching for her daughter that's missing.

    Nobody deserves to go through the trauma these people are being put through.

    The devil's work here.

    God bless all the dead and the people fighting for their lives.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,745 ✭✭✭✭NIMAN


    I have now doubt we will hear 'the perpetrator was known to police' later on.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,248 ✭✭✭kstand


    infogiver wrote: »
    It can be around for 1 million years but once Britain have left the EU Britain won't be subject to the courts rulings anymore.

    Not true unfortunately. We will still have to answer to the EHRC - it is completely separate from Brexit. It was something Blair signed up to and which May has very recently said we will remain signed up to.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,489 ✭✭✭SnakePlissken


    RayM wrote: »
    Have you any suggestions yourself how to stop these monstrous atrocities? What may I ask is your primary objection to burying one who commits such an act in pig's blood? Do you genuinely believe these extremists deserve any better in death?

    Like you, I don't have a single useful suggestion.

    Good man yourself, excellent contribution.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 402 ✭✭Exeggcute


    I agree that the US (not the "west" - that's too broad a term) is responsible for the destabilisation of Europe and the ME. Generally because of its neocon wars and pro Saudi sympathies.

    I also think this is in part deliberate.

    Primarily the U.S. yes - but also NATO (Libya & Gaddafi)

    And the servile cowardly manner in which we suck up to Saudi Arabia - that includes our own government.

    Allowing them to head the human rights commission at the U.N. and women's rights council is particularly galling.

    And the silence from Western countries over the recent hundred billion dollar arms sale by the U.S. to the Saudi's.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,416 ✭✭✭sjb25


    RobertKK wrote: »
    On Good Friday when I was in Rome, I went to see the Pope at the Colosseum for the way of the cross.
    The army and armed police had a large area cordoned off before you could get near the area and all people were checked out.

    The thing is, if somehow what happened last night became more common, something similar might be needed for big events like sport, music and other large public gatherings to offer protection, but the cost would be high.
    .

    Yep and if this happens some people will complain that they are having there human rights infringed by being searched
    Was in Disney in Paris just before Christmas and a stupid English women was complaining to security for searching her bag you can't win


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,798 ✭✭✭✭DrumSteve


    I don't think I have ever been as depressed about an incident as this one.

    All those poor kids just having a good time.:(

    I will never remember the name of the perpetrator but I will do my best to remember the victims.

    RIP


  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 10,463 Mod ✭✭✭✭xzanti


    Scenes of panic at the Arndale Centre in Manchester, reports of glass being smashed.

    Seems to have been a false alarm though. Everyone must be just on high alert.

    https://www.facebook.com/granadareports/videos/1534615089892586/?hc_ref=NEWSFEED


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,237 ✭✭✭mcmoustache


    NIMAN wrote: »
    I have now doubt we will hear 'the perpetrator was known to police' later on.

    Or known to a foreign police force who notified british authorities. These guys are almost always known and already had warning labels placed on them.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,745 ✭✭✭laugh


    Are there really as many right wing clowns in Ireland as this thread seems to indicate?

    Stop immigration because of attacks carried out by British or European citizens? This attack and others were not the result of immigration. Immigrants have been displaced by the same ideology that likely prompted this attack though. An ideology that emanates from Wahhabist clerics in Saudi Arabia and becomes more widespread every time the west becomes involved in the Middle East.

    Donald Trump made a statement singling out Iran for blame, but look at the very recent election in Iran, the people came out in huge numbers to elect a more progressive leader.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,942 ✭✭✭Beta Ray Bill


    Podge_irl wrote: »
    People aren't doing "nothing" - clearly what is being done is not being 100% successful however. Changes needs to be made, but it is far from straightforward to know what those changes are.

    Suggesting things like burying them in pigs blood or deporting entire families is infantile at best. Even ignoring issues such as due process and potential abuses, I think its absurd to expect it to actually work. The easiest people to radicalise are those who feel isolated and rejected from society - it would just make life easier for those orchestrating the whole mess.

    And there in lies the Dilemma.
    When you have one large society and one small society who's values are so completely different, there will always be this kind of problem. In particular with young men.

    Western Society:
    Freedom
    Democracy
    Equality
    Tolerance
    Alcohol/Drugs
    Casual Sex
    Capitalist
    Nothing forbidden unless "It's Forbidden"

    Middle-eastern Society (from which Muslims originate):
    Most countries have a Dictator or Royal Family
    Religious Control
    Women subjugated
    Intolerance for those that break state or religious law
    Strict laws around Alcohol/Drugs
    No sex before marriage, arranged marriages
    Your born rich or poor and will stay in that group of people for the rest of your life.
    Everything is forbidden unless "It's permitted"

    The two cultures are so fundamentally different that (as I see it) it is literally impossible for them to co-exist in the same state.

    Is it any wonder that young Muslim men are resorting to this crap?

    It's been made very clear by Trevor Phillips documentary What British Muslims Really Think
    The Muslims in the UK have no interest in integrating into British Society, and that's fine. But it begs the question why did they ever come to the UK in the first place?

    Obviously it's unlikely that there would ever be an attack like this in Ireland in the very near future, but if more and more Muslims, or people of any religious denomination that differs so much from our own culture, we could end up with these kind of problems here.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 54,225 ✭✭✭✭tayto lover


    NIMAN wrote: »
    I have now doubt we will hear 'the perpetrator was known to police' later on.

    So what?? They can't lock up everyone "known to them" for being cranks, ex-cons, nut-jobs etc.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 618 ✭✭✭Thomas__


    NIMAN wrote: »
    I have now doubt we will hear 'the perpetrator was known to police' later on.

    That´s what makes it even more worrying.


  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 29,634 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    Bury the remains of any terrorist who commits such atrocities in pig's blood and it will perhaps dissuade the next jihadist waiting in the wings.

    Or it will make it easier to radicalize the next one. It's not exactly much of a leap to suggest someone could contort Islam to someone so as dying as a martyr before being buried in pigs blood simply made the sacrifice greater or some such nonsense. There is something that makes people susceptible to this radicalization in the first place - deliberately going out of the way to use people's religion in such a manner is hardly going to help that.

    I couldn't, in general, care less what happens to his remains. I just think your idea is completely stupid, unhelpful and potentially harmful. If the solution seems too easy it's because it probably is.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,489 ✭✭✭SnakePlissken


    Jayop wrote: »
    Have you any suggestions yourself how to stop these monstrous atrocities? What may I ask is your primary objection to burying one who commits such an act in pig's blood? Do you genuinely believe these extremists deserve any better in death?
    The original suggestion was anyone suspected of being involved in anything radical be force feed pork and interned for ten years in solitary confinement.
    .

    That was not my suggestion and well you know it, I stated that the remains of one who commits such an atrocity should be buried in pig's blood.

    As you've purposely ignored my post to go off on your own tangent I'll ask again, what is your primary objection to burying these murderers in pig's blood? Do you believe they deserve better in death?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,257 ✭✭✭Yourself isit


    Jayop wrote: »
    The original suggestion was anyone suspected of being involved in anything radical be force feed pork and interned for ten years in solitary confinement.

    Anyone who wouldn't have a problem with that kind of fragrant disregard for human rights is no better than those who support terrorism. Then again most of those who think like that don't consider western bombing of the middle east a problem but are outraged when anything happens here.

    Christ on a stick. The only time most of you anti bombing in the Middle East guys turn up is after an Islamist atrocity. You are not to be found otherwise. Certainly not in the actual threads about the bombing in the ME.

    Andwhat do mean exactly? That Isis should be left alone in Syria?

    It's the Russians who started to halt the spread of Isis. The reason why Isis is a threat is because the US left them grow.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 454 ✭✭b_mac2


    RayM wrote: »
    You don't have to be an "apologist" to feel that hatred and inhumanity will only breed more hatred and inhumanity.

    Says the man with an image of a fücking hammer and sickle after his username.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,416 ✭✭✭sjb25


    So what?? They can't lock up everyone "known to them" for being cranks, ex-cons, nut-jobs etc.

    They could the Brits well able to do it in the north not so long ago
    Internment


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,437 ✭✭✭✭gmisk


    laugh wrote: »

    Donald Trump made a statement singling out Iran for blame, but look at the very recent election in Iran, the people came out in huge numbers to elect a more progressive leader.

    While also signing a 110 billion dollar arms deal with Saudi Arabia, the same country where the majority of the 9/11 terrorist attackers came from (15/19), a country which wasn't included in Trumps immigration ban.

    This article has a really good breakdown
    https://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2017/01/trump-immigration-ban-terrorism/514361/


Advertisement