Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Sky finally closing in on Cam Sharing on Satellite (or so it appears)

245

Comments

  • #32
    ratracer
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,464 ✭✭✭ratracer


    So I take it now would not be the time to buy one of those 'Dreambox' type yokes??


  • #33
    irishfeen
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,067 ✭✭✭irishfeen


    ratracer wrote: »
    So I take it now would not be the time to buy one of those 'Dreambox' type yokes??
    It may well be like lighting your money on fire... possibly just an expensive FTA box.


  • #34
    irishgeo
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,706 ✭✭✭irishgeo


    lertsnim wrote: »
    People will flock to IPTV or use foreign providers.

    a lot of people dont have the broadband for iptv.

    the drop in viewing figures and the huge sums paid for the premier league rights was always going to lead to the end of cardsharing.


  • #35
    lertsnim
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,914 ✭✭✭lertsnim


    gerry sat wrote: »
    Of course they will, but IPTV will not last for long as most taken of pirate services, as with foreign providers.

    When I mentioned foreign providers I mean a legitimate sub. It's the choice I would make before subscribing to Sky.


  • #36
    irishfeen
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,067 ✭✭✭irishfeen


    lertsnim wrote: »
    When I mentioned foreign providers I mean a legitimate sub. It's the choice I would make before subscribing to Sky.
    Which may well be costly too and all PL games on the continent now cannot have English commentary.

    Cost and hassle of installing a motorised dish and the likes may well put off many from going down the subs route.


  • Advertisement
  • #37
    gerry sat
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 82 ✭✭gerry sat


    lertsnim wrote: »
    When I mentioned foreign providers I mean a legitimate sub. It's the choice I would make before subscribing to Sky.

    The only legitimate sub available in Ireland are robbing SKY.
    Any other satellite service is from another country, so technically no, i.e. : canal plus, bein etc.


  • #38
    lertsnim
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,914 ✭✭✭lertsnim


    irishfeen wrote: »
    Which may well be costly too and all PL games on the continent now cannot have English commentary.

    Cost and hassle of installing a motorised dish and the likes may well put off many from going down the subs route.

    A lot of people do not care about commentary. A 12 month sub to polish tv for €250 compared to whatever it is Sky are charging is huge. Who needs a motorised dish to access Hotbird?
    gerry sat wrote: »
    The only legitimate sub available in Ireland are robbing SKY.
    Any other satellite service is from another country, so technically no, i.e. : canal plus, bein etc.

    Domestic subs from other providers in the EU is perfectly legal.


  • #39
    gerry sat
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 82 ✭✭gerry sat


    I think I'll buy a 2.4 metre dish and watch Bein Package, 26degs east, all in HD and english, about 3K : :D


  • #40
    TallGlass
    Closed Accounts Posts: 4,908 ✭✭✭TallGlass


    Looks to be coming to an end alright.

    I was looking at packages with Sky and my word it is extremely expensive. I understand, they've to pay staff, taxes etc..

    Also seen some other football serviced launched outside of UK and ROI, you select your team and then you get access to all there games online. Can't go wrong with that.

    I think personally they are getting it from all angles, Online, Card Sharing, Netflix then pirate DVDs and then the rise of the Android boxes. Then if you a football fan, your paying out your arse and not guaranteed seeing all your team games.

    As always, it's cat and mouse, they'll close something down and it will just start something back up again.


  • #41
    gerry sat
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 82 ✭✭gerry sat


    Quote : Domestic subs from other providers in the EU is perfectly legal.

    Not anymore.
    Try giving Canal plus your Irish address,
    All loop holes are been blocked.


  • Advertisement
  • #42
    irishfeen
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,067 ✭✭✭irishfeen


    gerry sat wrote: »
    The only legitimate sub available in Ireland are robbing SKY.
    Any other satellite service is from another country, so technically no, i.e. : canal plus, bein etc.
    Nope, not true ... as long as it is not for public broadcast...

    Per EU ruling...


  • #43
    liam7831
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,822 ✭✭✭liam7831


    IPTV will keep the dodgy boxes going no sweat


  • #44
    irishfeen
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,067 ✭✭✭irishfeen


    liam7831 wrote: »
    IPTV will keep the dodgy boxes going no sweat
    I suppose that will depend on the source for the content... I would imagine the vast majority at the moment are sourced from stable satellite cam-sharing streams.

    Satellite cam-sharing was/is very stable - sky block this and reliable sourcing becomes a problem.


  • #45
    AllForIt
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,680 ✭✭✭AllForIt


    I'm really curious about how SKY managed to do this because if they didn't change something in the SD box or the card then it is just some software technique...which they could have done at the very beginning of illegal card sharing.


  • #46
    FightingIrish
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 99 ✭✭FightingIrish


    irishfeen wrote:
    I suppose that will depend on the source for the content... I would imagine the vast majority at the moment are sourced from stable satellite cam-sharing streams.


    With cam sharing having lost a host of channels recently, iptv have lost none, so my guess is that iptv are not sourcing from cam sharing in the first place?


  • #47
    lertsnim
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,914 ✭✭✭lertsnim


    gerry sat wrote: »
    Quote : Domestic subs from other providers in the EU is perfectly legal.

    Not anymore.
    Try giving Canal plus your Irish address,
    All loop holes are been blocked.

    EU ruling says otherwise. As long as it is used privately then it is ok.


  • #48
    JJJJNR
    Closed Accounts Posts: 4,791 ✭✭✭JJJJNR


    I'll just listen to the matches on the wireless.


  • #49
    Schwanz
    Closed Accounts Posts: 898 ✭✭✭Schwanz


    Icam is in use by Sky on a slow roll-out including NDS encryption on the channels shut down recently.

    Which means these cams can't handle it.

    It's a modified cam from that used by Sky Italia successfully a few years back.

    it won't be breached quick but those who think people who previously illegally subscribed to these servers will pay the sky-high prices to Sky must be smoking something stronger than a benson & hedges.

    IPTV will be the next thing, already working well.


  • #50
    irishfeen
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,067 ✭✭✭irishfeen


    AllForIt wrote: »
    I'm really curious about how SKY managed to do this because if they didn't change something in the SD box or the card then it is just some software technique...which they could have done at the very beginning of illegal card sharing.
    From what I understand they have started to employ "ICAM" encryption. This is a 2 way encryption system opposed to the current "NDS Encryption".

    Sky Italia introduced this 2 way system and from what we understand has proved 100% effective in stopping cam-sharing.


  • #51
    Schwanz
    Closed Accounts Posts: 898 ✭✭✭Schwanz


    FightingIrish wrote: »
    With cam sharing having lost a host of channels recently, iptv have lost none, so my guess is that iptv are not sourcing from cam sharing in the first place?

    Lots do but that will change when 28e CS is gone.


  • Advertisement
  • #52
    irishfeen
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,067 ✭✭✭irishfeen


    FightingIrish wrote: »
    With cam sharing having lost a host of channels recently, iptv have lost none, so my guess is that iptv are not sourcing from cam sharing in the first place?
    No I have seen many reports online of channels going down on IPTV too - I presume cable cam-sharing is along similar lines... sky may well insist on strengthening prevention on these platforms too.


  • #53
    TallGlass
    Closed Accounts Posts: 4,908 ✭✭✭TallGlass


    Schwanz wrote: »
    Lots do but that will change when 28e CS is gone.

    But, all the HD Sky's are available on ITPV along with the channels that are blocked.


  • #54
    TallGlass
    Closed Accounts Posts: 4,908 ✭✭✭TallGlass


    My guess is your going to end up with a dark web type of setup or one in which it will cost nearly as much as getting the real deal in or set up's severely limited.


  • #55
    irishfeen
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,067 ✭✭✭irishfeen


    TallGlass wrote: »
    But, all the HD Sky's are available on ITPV along with the channels that are blocked.
    I wonder what bandwidth would be needed to run HD channels over a period of a day.... certainly not everyone will have access to that facility,


  • #56
    Schwanz
    Closed Accounts Posts: 898 ✭✭✭Schwanz


    irishfeen wrote: »
    No I have seen many reports online of channels going down on IPTV too - I presume cable cam-sharing is along similar lines... sky may well insist on strengthening prevention on these platforms too.

    The source can be from a Sky receiver. Anything with a HDMI out that opens the channel.

    Obviously idents in certain places on the channel is required though.

    Have seen it myself.


  • #57
    Schwanz
    Closed Accounts Posts: 898 ✭✭✭Schwanz


    TallGlass wrote: »
    But, all the HD Sky's are available on ITPV along with the channels that are blocked.

    Mostly cable streams but my previous post still counts.

    Anything with a HDMI out leaves it open to being outputted to IPTV servers.


  • #58
    irishfeen
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,067 ✭✭✭irishfeen


    Schwanz wrote: »
    The source can be from a Sky receiver. Anything with a HDMI out that opens the channel.

    Obviously idents in certain places on the channel is required though.

    Have seen it myself.
    Yes I have seen it too but sky are getting smart to this - they are starting to move the on-screen numbers around the screen... during the boxing they kept switching from Top/Right, Top/Left and Bottom/Left continuously.


  • #59
    jimmycrackcorm
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,413 ✭✭✭✭jimmycrackcorm


    PAKNET wrote:
    It is possible to transparently watermark video that is immune to re-encoding, compression or post-processing that doesn't make the image practically useless anyway.

    It won't take long for software to be developed that will identify those watermarks and process it. Compare the output from two streams for variations.


  • #60
    afatbollix
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,126 ✭✭✭afatbollix


    Sky Italia changed the codec they were using a couple of years ago. They upgraded the decoder in the boxes so looks like with a mixture of that and new encryption mean a no with illegal streams.

    If they are increasing the encryption on Sky they would demand it on Virgin/ iptv services also.

    Don't know if you noticed but the last big fight on pay per view they had that code come up in random places on the screen instead of above the logo.


  • Advertisement
  • #61
    Phil.x
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,785 ✭✭✭Phil.x


    Cam sharing is like the modern day Robbin Hood.

    Long live the Hood.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement