ratracer wrote: » So I take it now would not be the time to buy one of those 'Dreambox' type yokes??
lertsnim wrote: » People will flock to IPTV or use foreign providers.
gerry sat wrote: » Of course they will, but IPTV will not last for long as most taken of pirate services, as with foreign providers.
lertsnim wrote: » When I mentioned foreign providers I mean a legitimate sub. It's the choice I would make before subscribing to Sky.
irishfeen wrote: » Which may well be costly too and all PL games on the continent now cannot have English commentary. Cost and hassle of installing a motorised dish and the likes may well put off many from going down the subs route.
gerry sat wrote: » The only legitimate sub available in Ireland are robbing SKY. Any other satellite service is from another country, so technically no, i.e. : canal plus, bein etc.
liam7831 wrote: » IPTV will keep the dodgy boxes going no sweat
irishfeen wrote: I suppose that will depend on the source for the content... I would imagine the vast majority at the moment are sourced from stable satellite cam-sharing streams.
gerry sat wrote: » Quote : Domestic subs from other providers in the EU is perfectly legal. Not anymore. Try giving Canal plus your Irish address, All loop holes are been blocked.
AllForIt wrote: » I'm really curious about how SKY managed to do this because if they didn't change something in the SD box or the card then it is just some software technique...which they could have done at the very beginning of illegal card sharing.
FightingIrish wrote: » With cam sharing having lost a host of channels recently, iptv have lost none, so my guess is that iptv are not sourcing from cam sharing in the first place?
Schwanz wrote: » Lots do but that will change when 28e CS is gone.
TallGlass wrote: » But, all the HD Sky's are available on ITPV along with the channels that are blocked.
irishfeen wrote: » No I have seen many reports online of channels going down on IPTV too - I presume cable cam-sharing is along similar lines... sky may well insist on strengthening prevention on these platforms too.
Schwanz wrote: » The source can be from a Sky receiver. Anything with a HDMI out that opens the channel. Obviously idents in certain places on the channel is required though. Have seen it myself.
PAKNET wrote: It is possible to transparently watermark video that is immune to re-encoding, compression or post-processing that doesn't make the image practically useless anyway.