Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.

Lions 2017 [MOD WARNING IN OP]

16768707273150

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 732 ✭✭✭penybont exile


    Bridge93 wrote: »
    Well theres an ever increasing chance that Murray wont even make the trip which leaves Webb as a close to nailed on starter bar something dramatic.
    ......twas another factor in my reasoning. Murray may not be fully fit in the early games.

    Is Farrell a 10 or a 12? Will Webb get an early start with Sexton? Will Webb / Farrell go better than Murray / Sexton? It kinda gets intriguing with only 6 games to test out the combinations.

    Will Biggar get his mojo back ...... I've been on three of these tours ..... the test team (especially on the successful tours) always contains a few surprises .....


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,018 ✭✭✭Bridge93


    bilston wrote: »
    I thought Murray was back this weekend? Although we've heard that before!

    I thought someone on the Munster thread he could be out until after the final?!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,258 ✭✭✭✭Buer


    Can't see that happening ..... personally I think Webb will be the starting 9.

    Memories are short. 8 months ago, a lot of people had Webb as the more likely starter. 18 months ago, a lot of people considered him the test scrum half in waiting and then he suffered that horrific leg break. Then Ireland beat NZ and Murray was brilliant against them. That will have counted for a lot but not everything.

    Webb started 3 tests against NZ down there last summer and had a very good tour. Gatland will be very eager to see how him and Sexton pair together. With Murray's injury having restricted him to 45 minutes since February, I would probably say Webb is now a more likely test starter than Murray. When Sexton starts his first warm up game, I expect it to be outside Webb.

    I hope Murray gets a game or two in before the tour and hits the ground running. He's 28 for this tour (as is Webb); this is the tour that he'll be aiming to really stake his claim as a great and has every chance if he's fit and in form.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 37,978 ✭✭✭✭irishbucsfan


    This on reddit made me think of FF

    bs102xwfa2vy.jpg


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,058 ✭✭✭✭bilston


    Bridge93 wrote: »
    I thought someone on the Munster thread he could be out until after the final?!

    Possibly, I rarely look there!


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 1,485 ✭✭✭Ben Bailey


    Justin Marshall was quoted a few years ago that he reckoned that no 9 who was doing his job could last more than 60 minutes.

    Webb coming on for the last 20 sound like a plan !


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,258 ✭✭✭✭Buer


    Interesting comments from Gatland in relation to how NZ are going to try and stop Itoje. Implication is very much that he sees Itoje as a starting player for him.

    Also said he sees Te'o as more of a 12.

    If I had to guess a test team right now (what Gatland will pick, anyway), I think we'll see Halfpenny, North, Davies, Henshaw, Watson, Sexton, Webb, Vunipola, Warburton, Itoje, Kruis, AWJ, Furlong, Owens, McGrath.

    I think he'll be all about setting a platform and winning the set piece.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 37,978 ✭✭✭✭irishbucsfan


    Buer wrote: »
    I think he'll be all about setting a platform and winning the set piece.

    It has been foretold by the great fat-as-a-propstrodamus.
    I think we'll see a difference to the 2013 approach as well. Instead of attempting that disciplined possession focused game I think we'll see them go after NZ's set piece because it's one of the only areas they've been exposed in the past couple of years. So rather than going after 15 phase possessions I think we'll be looking at Murray/Farrell/Sexton using the kicking game much more often. if that is our style i think it'll also have a big influence on our selection in the back row (maybe POM is a test Lion this year...).


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,258 ✭✭✭✭Buer


    I think that's a pretty solid assessment of how they're going to approach things, especially if Coles is ruled out. The Lions will love a crack at a slightly unfamiliar NZ line out set up although there won't be too many concerns if Taylor comes in. Beyond him though, could be a worry for NZ.

    I've been surprised by how few people have mentioned Itoje as a flanker option given his ability to play there comfortably. If there aren't real stand out performances from someone else, I think he's going to be the default selection there.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 37,978 ✭✭✭✭irishbucsfan


    Buer wrote: »
    I think that's a pretty solid assessment of how they're going to approach things, especially if Coles is ruled out. The Lions will love a crack at a slightly unfamiliar NZ line out set up although there won't be too many concerns if Taylor comes in. Beyond him though, could be a worry for NZ.

    I've been surprised by how few people have mentioned Itoje as a flanker option given his ability to play there comfortably. If there aren't real stand out performances from someone else, I think he's going to be the default selection there.

    I think you're right about Itoje. When I was thinking of POM as a possible test Lion it was with the idea that Gatland used Croft as that rangy athletic back row option in Australia. Itoje offers that option while also offering a little more power.

    I think if they select Itoje and Warburton (which is a strong possibility) then it'll help Stander's chances at winning the 8 jersey over Faletau. I think they'll be looking to get good position in the ABs half and then score quickly and so they need a couple of guys who offer that carrying threat and Stander is a huge threat for that.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,258 ✭✭✭✭Buer


    I think if they select Itoje and Warburton (which is a strong possibility) then it'll help Stander's chances at winning the 8 jersey over Faletau. I think they'll be looking to get good position in the ABs half and then score quickly and so they need a couple of guys who offer that carrying threat and Stander is a huge threat for that.

    Vunipola surely nailed on for No. 8, I'd have thought?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,530 ✭✭✭dub_skav


    I think you're right about Itoje. When I was thinking of POM as a possible test Lion it was with the idea that Gatland used Croft as that rangy athletic back row option in Australia. Itoje offers that option while also offering a little more power.

    I think if they select Itoje and Warburton (which is a strong possibility) then it'll help Stander's chances at winning the 8 jersey over Faletau. I think they'll be looking to get good position in the ABs half and then score quickly and so they need a couple of guys who offer that carrying threat and Stander is a huge threat for that.

    Stander might well be ahead of Faletau, but as an 8 I'd say they're both well behind Vunipola in the pecking order.
    So, Stander's best chance of a spot is still at 6 I'd say, but as you say there is serious competition there too.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 37,978 ✭✭✭✭irishbucsfan


    Buer wrote: »
    Vunipola surely nailed on for No. 8, I'd have thought?

    We'll see on that one, I'm not so certain that he'll suit these guys.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 609 ✭✭✭English Lurker


    Buer wrote: »
    I think that's a pretty solid assessment of how they're going to approach things, especially if Coles is ruled out. The Lions will love a crack at a slightly unfamiliar NZ line out set up although there won't be too many concerns if Taylor comes in. Beyond him though, could be a worry for NZ.

    I've been surprised by how few people have mentioned Itoje as a flanker option given his ability to play there comfortably. If there aren't real stand out performances from someone else, I think he's going to be the default selection there.

    Itoje really doesn't look comfortable standing as wide out on the pitch as you want a flanker to be able to play, particularly against New Zealand.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,320 ✭✭✭Teferi


    Rala coming out of retirement to bagman the Lions apparently. Handy jaunt for him.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 1,485 ✭✭✭Ben Bailey


    Teferi wrote: »
    Rala coming out of retirement to bagman the Lions apparently. Handy jaunt for him.

    No real challenge for that position. First name on the sheet :D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,198 ✭✭✭Mr Tickle


    Teferi wrote: »
    Rala coming out of retirement to bagman the Lions apparently. Handy jaunt for him.

    Class is permanent


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,258 ✭✭✭✭Buer


    Ben Youngs out of the Lions tour due to a family illness.

    No replacement yet but I know Care is injured so may not be an option. He's due back for England's tour but may not be available for the warm ups if he was called upon. Don't rule out Gareth Davies but I can see Laidlaw getting the call after the Scottish outcry.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,040 ✭✭✭✭Clegg


    His brother's wife has terminal cancer. It's a tragic situation. Perfectly understandable that he's withdrawing from the Tour.

    I'd guess Laidlaw is the next call up if Care isn't fit. Maybe Wigglesworth is in with an outside chance. Starting 9 for the best club side in Europe.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,258 ✭✭✭✭Buer


    Wigglesworth would be an interesting call but I think he's an excellent operator in the system that he plays in. I'm not sure he could get up to speed in a different system where he's not behind the best pack in Europe.

    In other news, Biggar went off early limping today after hurting his ankle. No update on situation yet. I'd imagine he's out of the semi final anyway.


  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 20,606 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Clegg wrote: »
    His brother's wife has terminal cancer. It's a tragic situation. Perfectly understandable that he's withdrawing from the Tour.

    I'd guess Laidlaw is the next call up if Care isn't fit. Maybe Wigglesworth is in with an outside chance. Starting 9 for the best club side in Europe.

    She must be very young. That is absolutely tragic, awful to hear.

    I'd say Laidlaw is a shoe in but I doubt he sees a test and if Murray or Webb get injured someone will be brought in ahead of him.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,058 ✭✭✭✭bilston


    Terrible news for the Youngs family.

    Puts rugby into perspective.

    It almost seems off to speculate on his replacement but I guess that's what we do on here. Wigglesworth would be my pick.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 45,433 ✭✭✭✭thomond2006


    Confirmed that Laidlaw is the callup.
    Awful circumstances for the Youngs family.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,308 ✭✭✭✭.ak


    Awful for Youngs and his family. Dark times. :(


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,258 ✭✭✭✭Buer


    I'm sure he'd much rather be involved in more pleasant circumstances but Laidlaw will be delighted regardless.

    If Gatland knew this would happen, I reckon Biggar would be left out (and he might still be out with this ankle injury which apparently has to go for a scan). Laidlaw's ability to kick goals and play 10 in a pinch would give them a solid option there and allow them additional depth elsewhere.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,930 ✭✭✭jr86


    Tom pulled out of an English summer tour a few years ago as his wife was bad so must be a recurrence

    Horrible news

    Laidlaw will be called up I suspect although I'd have care, Davies and wigglesworth ahead


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,300 ✭✭✭✭razorblunt


    Ben Bailey wrote: »
    No real challenge for that position. First name on the sheet :D

    The Scots will still complain.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,300 ✭✭✭✭razorblunt


    jr86 wrote: »
    Tom pulled out of an English summer tour a few years ago as his wife was bad so must be a recurrence

    Horrible news

    Laidlaw will be called up I suspect although I'd have care, Davies and wigglesworth ahead

    It is unfortunately. She's been battlin it for 3 years and it's now being diagnosed as terminal. Sad times.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,207 ✭✭✭durkadurka


    Laidlaw will be a cracking midweek player. Captain material, goal kicker, brains.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,258 ✭✭✭✭Buer


    durkadurka wrote: »
    Laidlaw will be a cracking midweek player. Captain material, goal kicker, brains.

    He is precisely the sort of player the tour needs. Some players don't have a prayer of the test team. Seymour and Nowell are already nailed on wingers for the midweek side. Laidlaw won't have a sniff of playing NZ. This whole "we can only pick guys who are capable of starting the tests" is rubbish. You'll wind up with 40 lads who will slit each others throats for a test spot with zero team ethic.

    If Laidlaw can help consolidate this squad through experience and leadership then his presence will be worth its weight in gold. His value as an actual scrum half isn't as important as what he can bring to the group overall, as stupid as that sounds. Players who foster the right mentality and atmosphere are as important and more so than some guys who might start a test.

    I always found it telling that Ian McGeechan said the greatest Lion of all time for him was Jason Leonard. He went on 3 tours but only ever started 2 tests (both in 1993) but his contribution off the pitch was massive through motivating and preparing the other players.


Advertisement