Advertisement
Please note that it is not permitted to have referral links posted in your signature. Keep these links contained in the appropriate forum. Thank you.

https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2055940817/signature-rules
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Witnesses to car crash with Gardai required [Dublin city 7 years ago]

  • 24-04-2017 07:50PM
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22


    Hi,
    I wondered if anyone might have witnessed a car accident with the Gardai that occurred between 6 and 7 pm in central Dublin on 30th April, 2010. I know that this is almost a full 7 years after the incident but I thought it would do no harm to ask anyway! 
    The Details ..
    The accident occurred at the junction of the SCR and Victoria Street (Portobello area) just short of the one-way system around Harcourt St./Richmond St./Bleeding Horse pub. An unmarked Garda car was travelling at speed inbound along the SCR toward the one-way system mentioned above with no blue lights or sirens in operation. Their vehicle impacted my car at high speed at the SCR/Victoria St junction. My car was thrown 30 feet through the air and ended up embedded in the railings of No 31/29 SCR. Their unmarked patrol vehicle then smashed into the railings plinth right beside my car at No 31 SCR. Both cars were completely written off in the accident, and the railings were very badly damaged. 
    The Gardai at the scene assured me they were completely responsible for the accident because their driver was untrained, and had de-activated his emergency lights and sirens prior to the impact because he was having difficulty contacting his control room on the garda radio. They said that I would have to make a legal claim against them to have my resultant expenses addressed. However, when I finally received the internal garda report about the accident (some 6.5 years later) they have painted a very different picture in which they now had their lights and sirens in operation and that I wasn't indicating my intention to turn right into Victoria St. This is completely untrue and they are fully aware of this. The street was crowded with pedestrians at the time, and there would have been plenty of witnesses to the accident. Indeed, one man approached me at the scene to say he saw everything and would be happy to be a witness. Mug that I was, and totally believing that the Gardai would be honest about the matter, I sent my witness to the investigating Garda at the scene to supply his details. I saw my witness approach the investigating Garda and having a conversation with him. However, the Gardai are now saying that they could not find any witnesses to the accident on the crowded street, not even the witness I guided in their direction!! If anyone remembers this accident on the Friday before the May Day Bank Holiday weekend in 2010 please contact me on this thread. It will be the 7th anniversary of the accident this coming Friday.


«13

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,971 ✭✭✭✭bear1


    You really need to get legal advice.
    Judging by the description of the accident it shouldn't be something someone would forgot easily I'd imagine.
    It's going to be hard going after the police but seems strange to me that the conclusion took 6.5 years.
    Seriously though get straight onto a lawyer.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22 ThirstyWerk


    Hi Bear1,
    thanks for your reply. I contacted my solicitors immediately and I have full legal representation in play since early May 2010. It took the 6.5 years just to legally acquire the disclosure documentation from the Gardai as they were extremely reluctant to part with the information. It took a High Court Order to finally dislodge the paperwork from their grasp.
    It seems that they are counting on the fact that it is now almost 7 years ago and they seem to be betting on the notion that it will be too long ago for people to remember. You are correct - anyone who saw this accident would never forget it. I'm hoping that the people of Dublin have much longer and more detailed memories than the Gardai give us credit for!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,999 ✭✭✭✭mickdw


    That whole situation is disgraceful but I don't fancy your chances unless you can come up with something concrete.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,196 ✭✭✭Mech1


    I would advise that you dont directly communicate with any witnesses if you find them. instead immediatly direct to your legal rep.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,417 ✭✭✭✭vicwatson


    6.5 years :eek:

    I suppose they've been very busy doing other things.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,971 ✭✭✭✭bear1


    What's the statute of limitations out of curiosity? Must be pretty close to it by now?
    Long shot but maybe go back to the scene and see if any establishments have cctv. Seriously be surprised if it would work out but maybe ask if they keep tapes from that period.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 625 ✭✭✭rubberdungeon


    Broadcaster, Gerry Ryan died that day afaik if that helps to remind people of the day.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,366 ✭✭✭jimbis


    What about posting a few notices at that junction? Not sure how that works legally.
    Also long shot but contacting taxi/courier companies.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22 ThirstyWerk


    Sorry, I had to go out for a while. Many thanks for all your posts. Some good ideas suggested that I will follow up on. The case was started in 2010 so I don't think the statute of limitation applies afaik, but will verify that with the solicitors tomorrow. They did hit me from behind, and I have excellent photographs of the scene. I would really like to find an actual eyewitness though. I will be following Mech1's advice and directing any witnesses that might be discovered to my legal team. Thanks again folks.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,971 ✭✭✭✭bear1


    They hit you from behind? I wonder under which illusion are they saying it's your fault then?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,014 ✭✭✭Miike


    bear1 wrote: »
    They hit you from behind? I wonder under which illusion are they saying it's your fault then?

    I assume their defence is him not indicating however to the best of my knowledge that has no bearing on an accident when you've been hit from behind as they didn't exercise due caution?


  • Moderators, Music Moderators Posts: 11,163 Mod ✭✭✭✭humberklog


    I might have missed it in your post OP but you might want to mention the cars involved.

    Cop car was silver mondeo and yours a blue fiesta iirc?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 126 ✭✭FitzElla


    The statue of limitations is 2 years. I presume you have already initiated civil proceedings? Makes no sense that liability would be an issue if they hit you from behind. Best of luck with it anyway.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,971 ✭✭✭✭bear1


    FitzElla wrote: »
    The statue of limitations is 2 years. I presume you have already initiated civil proceedings? Makes no sense that liability would be an issue if they hit you from behind. Best of luck with it anyway.

    It's a civil case so 6 years.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 126 ✭✭FitzElla


    bear1 wrote: »
    It's a civil case so 6 years.

    Unless something has changed very recently it was always 2 years for personal injury resulting from negligence, nuisance, or breach of duty - except if they were a minor at the time.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,014 ✭✭✭Miike


    He has had legal representation from the get-go. The statue of limitations is the time which you have to begin proceedings.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 16,438 ✭✭✭✭loyatemu


    Broadcaster, Gerry Ryan died that day afaik if that helps to remind people of the day.

    I'd have thought witnessing a car thrown 30 feet into the air and landing on iron railings would stick in the mind too.

    Put your money where yer mouth is... Subscribe and Save Boards!

    https://subscriptions.boards.ie/



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 817 ✭✭✭shar01


    Would it be worthwhile calling into businesses / offices in area in the hope that a staff member there remembers.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,787 ✭✭✭✭ScumLord


    What about the insurance companies? Would they have required details at the time and made their own assessment?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,341 ✭✭✭I love Sean nos


    they have painted a very different picture in which they now had their lights and sirens in operation and that I wasn't indicating my intention to turn right into Victoria St. This is completely untrue and they are fully aware of this
    However, the Gardai are now saying that they could not find any witnesses to the accident on the crowded street, not even the witness I guided in their direction!!
    GSOC.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 21,723 ✭✭✭✭Fred Swanson


    This post has been deleted.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,302 ✭✭✭Galadriel


    This post has been deleted.

    The OP stated he started the case in 2010.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 21,723 ✭✭✭✭Fred Swanson


    This post has been deleted.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22 ThirstyWerk


    Hi All,
    Thanks again for your may useful observations. With respect to some of these ..
    humberklog (Moderator) - post #13: wrote .. I might have missed it in your post OP but you might want to mention the cars involved. Cop car was silver mondeo and yours a blue fiesta iirc?
    Hi humberklog, I wanted to hold back the details about specific vehicle types of colours etc. to allow for some basic sanity check questions for anyone who might come forward with pertinent information. Do you think this is wise?

    shar01 (User) - post #19: wrote .. Would it be worthwhile calling into businesses / offices in area in the hope that a staff member there remembers.
    Good idea shar01, but I already printed fliers seeking witnesses and in 2015 delivered to every residence and business along the SCR in the relevant area. I have never heard anything back unfortunately. I also talked to the owner of the only newsagent in the immediate vicinity with CCTV on their shopfront in the slim chance that CCTV footage might still be available, or a member of staff might remember the incident - but no joy I'm afraid. Thanks though for this excellent suggestion.

    ScumLord (Moderator) - post #20: wrote .. What about the insurance companies? Would they have required details at the time and made their own assessment?
    Another good idea ScumLord, I have dug out the contact details for the actual AXA representative whom I talked to 4 days after the collision. I will contact the party agin next week to see if I can access her notes on my description of the incident just 4 days afterwards. This should help to demonstrate consistency, because my version of events has remained constant throughout the 7 year period. I do have other email correspondence from the days immediately following that relay exactly the same version of events, but it would be useful to augment these with the notes by the AXA representative. I also wrote a detailed description of the series of events as I remembered them within days of the RTA. This has proved to be invaluable over time. Thank you for your thoughts on this matter.

    I love Sean nos (User) - post #21: wrote .. GSOC.
    Hi "I love Sean nos", I'm going to contact my solicitors and the GSOC next week to lodge a complaint about the subsequent written reports pertaining of the events immediately before and after the collision. I thought that my legal team had already contacted the GSOC at the beginning of the case, but I have reviewed my emails from the period and can find no acual written reference to contacts made with GSOC. There is a 1 year time limit during which complaints should be registered. However, the objectionable report by the scene of incident officer did not come into my possession until early October 2016, so I hope that the GSOC may accept my complaint on this basis. Many thanks for this excellent suggestion.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,994 ✭✭✭ironclaw


    Did you damage any public property as a result of the crash? E.g. ESB cables, eircom lines, water mains? Long shot but if you did, the ESB (and similar bodies) are called upon to make the area safe before extraction of the property, hence they would not have been touched in the interim. They would also have a record of the call out and the nature of it. The crews have been called upon to give evidence before. The position of the cars would help your legal position I would imagine. Not much, but a possible lead.


  • Posts: 19,174 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Hey OP, just wondering, given the seriousness of the crash, was it not investigated at the time? Surely Gardai & ambulance were called?
    Usually a sergeant has to go to RTCs involving official vehicles.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22 ThirstyWerk


    ironclaw wrote: »
    Did you damage any public property as a result of the crash? E.g. ESB cables, eircom lines, water mains? Long shot but if you did, the ESB (and similar bodies) are called upon to make the area safe before extraction of the property, hence they would not have been touched in the interim. They would also have a record of the call out and the nature of it. The crews have been called upon to give evidence before. The position of the cars would help your legal position I would imagine. Not much, but a possible lead.
    The only property damaged were both vehicles which were insurance write-offs, the cast iron fences of 29/31 SCR, and a black bollard on the edge of the pavement which the Garda vehicle struck between their 1st and 2nd impacts. It seems that this bollard saved my life because when the front right bumper of the Garda vehicle struck it, it smashed into many pieces (that I assume flew through the air like shrapnel) but it was enough to impede their RHS progress and spun their car just a few degrees to the right and they then impacted the plinth of the railing about a meter to the right of the drivers side of my smashed vehicle. Had this not happened I expect that their car would have impacted the driver's side of my vehicle with all of their remaining momentum which was significant. The bollard could not be located subsequently AFAIK.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22 ThirstyWerk


    bubblypop wrote: »
    Hey OP, just wondering, given the seriousness of the crash, was it not investigated at the time? Surely Gardai & ambulance were called?
    Usually a sergeant has to go to RTCs involving official vehicles.
    bubblypop wrote: »
    Hey OP, just wondering, given the seriousness of the crash, was it not investigated at the time? Surely Gardai & ambulance were called?
    Usually a sergeant has to go to RTCs involving official vehicles.
    Hi bubblypop, 
    Yes the scene was managed by a sergeant. He arrived a short time after the impact. I found him to be a charismatic and credible character, and he admitted responsibility for the accident on behalf of AGS, and reassured me that the whole incident was entirely the fault of the young untrained Garda driver. Unfortunately his subsequent report misrepresented some of the events and statements made before, during, and after the impact.
    Today is the 7th anniversary of the accident. I'm sure you can all judge for yourselves just how low and slanting the evening sun is between 6 and 7 pm at this time of year. I was travelling east along the SCR near portobello that day with this extremely strong sunlight coming from the west behind me. This strong sunlight completely filled my rear-view mirrors with glare. The truth is that the Garda car came flying out of this strong sunlight at an excessive speed on the wrong side of the road with no lights or sirens in operation. He was overtaking a string of several vehicles at the time and failed to notice my indications of my impending RH turn until it was too late. How many experienced drivers out their have not witnessed first-hand this totally rooky mistake? As if all this wasn't bad enough, it would appear that the emergency call that they were speeding toward at the time had already been resolved by the Garda at that scene some 5 minutes before they impacted my vehicle!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22 ThirstyWerk


    The Gardai have since strengthened the rules around the driving of Garda vehicles (in 2014 I think). There are now 2 levels of training that a Garda must go through to be eligible to drive a Garda vehicle. This is eminently sensible. AFAIK a Garda must have undergone both levels to drive a Garda vehicle under this new system. I think that a Garda with level 1 can drive a Garda vehicle, but must adhere to the general rules of the road, and may not activate the emergency lights and sirens. I've read that if a level 1 Garda driver is observed breaking these rules then s/he can be docked a weeks wages.
    Can anyone shed any light on the situation prior to the introduction of the new rules? The Garda driver in my case was completely untrained and  was driving on what was known as Chief's Permission for that single day. Were those Gardai driving on Chief's Permission also precluded from activating the emergency lights and sirens. Besides heavy Garda radio traffic on that day, I have often wondered if the Garda driver in question was turning off his sirens to prevent his radio control room from hearing them, to avoid forfeiting a week's pay. Any information would be greatly welcome.


  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 19,174 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    There were no restrictions on the old driving on chiefs permission.
    Was there no court case as a result? If there was no prosecution, did your insurance company not just claim from the state at the time?


Advertisement
Advertisement