Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Louise O Neill on rape culture.

1757678808183

Comments

  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,390 ✭✭✭please helpThank YOU


    Donal trump 15 Women alleged he sexual assault them groped them assaulted them. so why is he President of America? ask Louise o Neill go in to a public meeting with President of America Donal trump a live Tv debate and tell him I am Louise o Neill and we have a rape culture in Ireland Like the rape culture in America and he would put her in her place . the have it to rape culture America it start in 1970s by feminist just google iT so is Louise o Neill a copy cat its cool in America we can do the same thing in Ireland.


  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 14,539 Mod ✭✭✭✭johnnyskeleton


    Grayson wrote: »
    You're saying that culture is everyone. It's not. No-one would say that. I belong to loads of different cultures. Lad culture, gaming culture, irish culture etc... Saying that a culture exists doesn't mean that everyone belongs to it. I could say that there's a culture of homophobia in the catholic church. It doesn't mean that all catholics are homophobic. It just means there's a group within the church that are.

    Let's not be jesuitical about this. LON and others are trying to assert that there is a pervasive culture that endorses or supports rape. She is not saying that some people are rapists even if most people disapprove of rapists. So saying that "rape culture" doesn't apply to everyone just a few people renders the whole thing meaningless. There is simply no insight or controversy in saying that some people are rapists or facilitate rapists and others are not. So what LON is saying is that the majority of our culture is supporting rape.

    So pick one of two of your strawmen. Either you believe that there is a pervasive majority culture that supports and endorses rape and we can discuss it with you, or you believe that a tiny minority of people support and endorse rape and we will agree with you, end of discussion.
    This story below is intensely disturbing. The fact that so many people would turn up to support a man convicted of rape is freaky. It shows that in Kerry at least there is a culture (Or sub culture depending on how you classify it) which supports rapists rather than the victim.

    Yes. As every other poster on this thread has said, that was an awful situation. Luckily though, society through it's media got wind of this awful occurrence and brought widespread attention and condemnation towards those people.

    As an aside though, if this were a murder trial, and the accused was convicted of murder, I would be confident that many of his friends, family and acquaintances in the community would stand by him, and would maintain his innocence. This happens all the time.

    So while it is wrong that he got such overwhelming support after a guilty verdict, it is not that unusual. Sure Bob Dylan wrote a song about someone who he believed to have been falsely convicted (although later changed his mind). Making a murderer was also a popular show that heavily suggested that the subjects were falsely convicted.

    Again, not saying that it is right. As someone who believes in the jury system, I think people should respect that verdict while in court. But it happens all the time.

    If people standing by the person convicted of murder doesn't amount to murder culture, why is that case indicative of rape culture?

    Let me ask you another question - if a rape accused is acquitted and is sitting alone in the courtroom while dozens of people come up and console the complainant, is that equally wrong? If not, why not?
    It does show that there are some people with very regressive attitudes.

    I agree with that. But it completely misses the point. No one is disputing that there is a lot of bad stuff in the world. But people on this thread take issue with the fact that these often unconnected bad things are sewn together into a theory that we live in a patriarchal rape culture, and that if I complement a random woman on the street I am implicitly endorsing rape occurring in Kerry or Galway or indeed anywhere.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,956 ✭✭✭✭Omackeral


    Donal trump 15 Women alleged he sexual assault them groped them assaulted them. so why is he President of America? ask Louise o Neill go in to a public meeting with President of America Donal trump a live tv debate and tell him I am Louise o Neill and we have a rape culture in Ireland Like the rape culture America and he would put her in her place . the have it to rape culture America it start in 1970s by feminist just google i. t so is Louise o Neill a copy cat its cool in America we can do the same thing Ireland thing

    Is that his Irish cousin?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,114 ✭✭✭ivytwine


    Vela wrote: »
    THIS is what really gets to me re: the whole rape culture debate. There are people who have experienced the worst of the worst side of this, and they can still look at it objectively and say 'no, there isn't a rape culture in Ireland'. And then you have eejits like LON who write fictional stories and call themselves representatives of actual victims? No. It doesn't work like that. And it's fcuking insulting, to say the least.

    I know myself what it's like when people don't handle it well. Some people just aren't able to. And I think that's something you eventually learn to accept, but damn - it's hard, because you lose those people from that very moment. Sure, you can stay in touch, but there will always be something broken in that relationship - be it romantic, platonic, or familial - that can never be fixed. And that's the kind of sh1t that can ruin you. I'm really sorry you had to experience that too.

    And if anyone who has experienced all of that, can look at the situation objectively and say 'well, look, I've had some sh1tty experiences but it doesn't mean there's a rape culture in Ireland', then why the hell are these idiots on social media claiming that there is?

    Thank you for that Vela. That's articulated what I couldn't quite do.

    For me, without going into too much detail, it was a romantic relationship and he would probably be on here arguing there's a rape culture in Ireland if he uses boards. So I felt safe and that he was a "woke" person and he'd get it and he did not. At all. It damn near destroyed my mind. I again went into denial (not just a river in Egypt but Ivy's favourite place) and minimised how terrible he made me feel. Until again the psych pulled it out of me. it was a while ago and I've had a few flirtations since, I'm nearly back to square one with dating. And I resent him so much. And by extension people who talk a good game and act like they give a ****e when they actually don't.

    There isn't a going back with something like that, as you say. I've been really fortunate. I have only told a handful of people. One male friend has been incredible, in particular. And if there's a rape culture why have the vast majority of people I've spoken to about it been nothing but kind?

    People use "rape culture" as a meme are by and large using it to fuel their own agenda, whether that's an anti-male or anti-female agenda, or a way to further their career, or to curry favour. Not all of them have bad intentions, not by any means. They get outraged at something that is wrong and they want to stop it. But the problem is this is a CRIME. Have we ever had campaigns to "stop murder"? No cos that would be daft. People are taught murder is wrong, just as they are taught rape is wrong. And every year people disregard both of these basic social rules and decide to do it anyway. We can try and punish these people but some get away with it. Many campaigners I feel forget that there's tons and tons of us out there, people trying to negotiate their way through a world that won't be quite the same, and every one of us are different. Where's the practical help? Because hysteria is not helpful.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,386 ✭✭✭RabbleRouser2k


    Regarding therapy, I sought therapy, myself, for OCD and depression-and yes, some of the folks I got were so unprofessionaly, or so rubbish, it was depressing, tbh. And yes, moreso than the depression. ONe therapist I went to put me on effexor (I was taking prozac, still am) and it messed me up entirely-my sleep pattern was all over the place-I was getting up at 7 pm, and going to bed at 7 or 8 am. Then sometimes I did odd things, and I Was just messed up. And that was after two weeks or so of taking it-I stopped, went back to prozac, but it took me months to get back onto the right pattern that I had before (i was making progress, then reverted-ugh-then I started making progress again). Some of the therapists I met, I dunno, you'd get some that were in the mid process of training, and had no empathy, and others that were great-really great. And then some were like 'yeah, you get 12 weeks, and after that, you're on your own'.

    Regarding the OCD-again, some folks were great, and some-not so. Again, the guy who put me on effexor (which will most undoubtedly help some-just not me) told me to 'wear an elastic band on your wrist, and snap it every time you have an OCD thought'-well, I didn't even try it-as all it does is give you a sore wrist. (And from my reading, the thoughts will just get stronger-so the elastic band will be useless in a short spell of time).
    Attacking a pillow can help, strangely (I always laugh at 'Analyze this' when De Niro's character shoots the pillow-then feels better).
    I did wear a 'just a thought?' wrist band tho-got it from an OCD site I donated to. But what helped me with my OCD was my curiousity-I read, a lot. And so I went on book sites, and bought books, tons of em, on OCD-and they helped, enormously. I went from freaking out at the sight, sound or smell of some things, to sort of 'let it wash over you' and then slowly but surely the symptoms lessened. It's sort of like when you ignore a bully, they get bored.
    I found therapists lacking-one I Really liked, but travelling to an fro was a problem-others were like 'here's some medication-I don't wanna know'.
    Grayson wrote: »

    This story below is intensely disturbing. The fact that so many people would turn up to support a man convicted of rape is freaky. It shows that in Kerry at least there is a culture (Or sub culture depending on how you classify it) which supports rapists rather than the victim.

    Dear sweet God...did you actually type that with a degree of how blinkered and ridiculously insulting it is? You've blanket statemented an entire county, and said that the people of that county support rape.

    What kind of mentality is that??? That's so wrong, on so many levels, that the language I want to use right now would get me banned from boards. So I won't.

    You could cite this case in Clare as 'the entire county of clare supports rape'. http://www.breakingnews.ie/ireland/rape-victims-horror-as-attacker-walks-free-301990.html

    You could even say that because she had to travel home, on the same train, with her rapist, that the 'train company supports rape'...as do all the passengers on that train.

    Do you see how ridiculously stupid such a claim is? But it's not far from what you have said.

    Yet here we are. That case was anything but based on 'supporting rape'...the '50' locals came out to support him, yes-and they were stupid to do so. Those 50 people were vilified, both within and without the county-and mocked and derided nationally. And rightfully so. NOBODY who knew the rapist was surprised he was a complete D-bag. I have friends who knew him, before his conviction, and said that he was the reason they avoided the club he was a bouncer at-he was scummy. His claim to 'help the guards' was balderdash-many of those same guards testified he was often a cause of concern or his behaviour made folks uncomfortable.

    I grew up in Kerry-I know the town in question. Nobody supports rape there-nobody. Everyone was horrified by the case, and horrified even more by the actions of the people, and that one priest in particular.
    I cannot imagine how alone that poor girl felt seeing that happen.
    But that was an incident that nobody but the most insane would blame the entire 'people of Kerry' for.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,409 ✭✭✭✭Grayson


    Omackeral wrote: »
    There ya go.

    That's providing a background to the issue but doesn't dismiss the fact that it happened. It's like me saying "Someone was speeding" and you saying "It was a blue car".

    The point of rape culture is that it diminishes rape in a number of ways. At the start of this article it gives two definitions of rape culture.
    The Oxford English Dictionary defines rape culture as “A society… whose prevailing social attitudes have the effect of normalising or trivialising sexual assault and abuse”. Wikipedia adds: “Behaviours commonly associated… include victim blaming, sexual objectification, trivialising rape, denial of widespread rape, refusing to acknowledge the harm caused by some forms of sexual violence, or some combination of these.”

    The fact is that in the Kerry case they did try to dismiss it. Even after knowing the details of the case (which are pretty horrific) the parish priest still said "well, she was a single mother and that doesn't look good". What the **** does being a single mother have to do with anything.
    Of Foley’s victim, Father Sheehy said: “I don’t want to make any judgment on her at all, but obviously the whole situation must have been embarrassing, for the police to happen upon them and what-not. She’s the mother of a young child as well and, you know, that in itself doesn’t look great.”

    If you lived in Kerry do you think you'd feel comfortable reporting a sexual assault or do you think you'd fear the social ramifications of reporting it. Would you want to turn up at a trial when all the rapists friends turn up and support them in that manner?

    The majority of rapes go unreported because women are scared of the social stigma or are scared that they won't be believed. What sort of society is it where a woman who's raped is scared of societies judgement? And that's not just Kerry. That's throughout Ireland.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 437 ✭✭Vela


    ivytwine wrote: »
    Thank you for that Vela. That's articulated what I couldn't quite do.

    For me, without going into too much detail, it was a romantic relationship and he would probably be on here arguing there's a rape culture in Ireland if he uses boards. So I felt safe and that he was a "woke" person and he'd get it and he did not. At all. It damn near destroyed my mind. I again went into denial (not just a river in Egypt but Ivy's favourite place) and minimised how terrible he made me feel. Until again the psych pulled it out of me. it was a while ago and I've had a few flirtations since, I'm nearly back to square one with dating. And I resent him so much. And by extension people who talk a good game and act like they give a ****e when they actually don't.

    There isn't a going back with something like that, as you say. I've been really fortunate. I have only told a handful of people. One male friend has been incredible, in particular. And if there's a rape culture why have the vast majority of people I've spoken to about it been nothing but kind?

    People use "rape culture" as a meme are by and large using it to fuel their own agenda, whether that's an anti-male or anti-female agenda, or a way to further their career, or to curry favour. Not all of them have bad intentions, not by any means. They get outraged at something that is wrong and they want to stop it. But the problem is this is a CRIME. Have we ever had campaigns to "stop murder"? No cos that would be daft. People are taught murder is wrong, just as they are taught rape is wrong. And every year people disregard both of these basic social rules and decide to do it anyway. We can try and punish these people but some get away with it. Many campaigners I feel forget that there's tons and tons of us out there, people trying to negotiate their way through a world that won't be quite the same, and every one of us are different. Where's the practical help? Because hysteria is not helpful.

    One thing I've learned about romantic partners is that they often think they understand until they're faced with it head-on. And that's the kicker. I've had similar situations, one in particular, and I'd never excuse that behaviour from someone who's meant to care about you. Or from anyone. I understand the resentment so much, because when someone who's meant to 'know' you turns on you when you need them most - it's fcuking soul destroying. It set me back so much in my own recovery. But there is one thing that I've come to realise and that's that some people just aren't emotionally equipped to deal with it. And that's not your fault. That's just how it is. And it's on them - not you. That's not 'playing the victim' either, that's looking at a situation objectively and saying 'this person is a negative influence on my life and can't deal with my situation' and being strong enough to walk away.

    In the two main instances where I've experienced something like this, the people involved both had their own mental health sh1t going on at the time that I was unaware of. They've both since explained and apologised. It was too little too late in both cases, for something that had a devastating affect on me in both instances, but you can't carry that sh1t around with you so I've tried to accept those apologies. It's just a lot harder to forget.

    Anyway, my point from that is; it's very hard for someone who isn't a fully trained therapist to understand what a victim goes through, so it must be almost impossible for a friend or partner to understand. What it boils down to, is whether or not they try to understand. And if they don't, then it's inexcusable regardless.

    Also, similarly to you, my closest confidant and the person who got me through most of it was a male friend.

    So, rape culture? No. Narrow-mindedness? Selfishness? Narcissism? A lack of empathy? Yes - there's loads of that. And that's something that reveals itself in a lot of people once they're confronted with something like this. I guess it shows you who your real friends are.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,409 ✭✭✭✭Grayson


    I grew up in Kerry-I know the town in question. Nobody supports rape there-nobody. Everyone was horrified by the case, and horrified even more by the actions of the people, and that one priest in particular.
    I cannot imagine how alone that poor girl felt seeing that happen.
    But that was an incident that nobody but the most insane would blame the entire 'people of Kerry' for.

    I wouldn't say everybody. There were enough people lining up to support the rapist. But that's the problem. If you look through my posts I'm made certain not to say that everyone is like that. It's a culture all right but a subculture might be a better word.

    There's one good thing about the kerry case and that's that those idiots who supported the rapist got ripped apart for it. They now realise that that sort of behaviour is unacceptable.
    The problem is that those attitudes do exist in society and they do pollute the discourse. That's why so many women fear saying they were raped. What we need is more of the reaction to the Kerry case whilst at the same time not denying that these people exist and that there is a problem.
    It's better than it was. 30 years ago rape victims would have faced a lot worse. Now at least the pendulum of public opinion has swung the other way.



    As for medication. I was placed on seroxat. It was horrible. I was placed on lexepro afterwards. about 90% of my symptoms disappeared in a week. I think just like therapists you have to shop around to get the right treatment and if it's not working for you, then you should go somewhere else. But as Vela said, unfortunately most people when they go to therapy are very vulnerable. And they also tend to see the therapist as an authority figure. So saying "this isn't working for me. And by this, I mean you" isn't something most feel comfortable with.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,390 ✭✭✭please helpThank YOU


    Let's not be jesuitical about this. LON and others are trying to assert that there is a pervasive culture that endorses or supports rape. She is not saying that some people are rapists even if most people disapprove of rapists. So saying that "rape culture" doesn't apply to everyone just a few people renders the whole thing meaningless. There is simply no insight or controversy in saying that some people are rapists or facilitate rapists and others are not. So what LON is saying is that the majority of our culture is supporting rape.

    So pick one of two of your strawmen. Either you believe that there is a pervasive majority culture that supports and endorses rape and we can discuss it with you, or you believe that a tiny minority of people support and endorse rape and we will agree with you, end of discussion.



    Yes. As every other poster on this thread has said, that was an awful situation. Luckily though, society through it's media got wind of this awful occurrence and brought widespread attention and condemnation towards those people.

    As an aside though, if this were a murder trial, and the accused was convicted of murder, I would be confident that many of his friends, family and acquaintances in the community would stand by him, and would maintain his innocence. This happens all the time.

    So while it is wrong that he got such overwhelming support after a guilty verdict, it is not that unusual. Sure Bob Dylan wrote a song about someone who he believed to have been falsely convicted (although later changed his mind). Making a murderer was also a popular show that heavily suggested that the subjects were falsely convicted.

    Again, not saying that it is right. As someone who believes in the jury system, I think people should respect that verdict while in court. But it happens all the time.

    If people standing by the person convicted of murder doesn't amount to murder culture, why is that case indicative of rape culture?

    Let me ask you another question - if a rape accused is acquitted and is sitting alone in the courtroom while dozens of people come up and console the complainant, is that equally wrong? If not, why not?



    I agree with that. But it completely misses the point. No one is disputing that there is a lot of bad stuff in the world. But people on this thread take issue with the fact that these often unconnected bad things are sewn together into a theory that we live in a patriarchal rape culture, and that if I complement a random woman on the street I am implicitly endorsing rape occurring in Kerry or Galway or indeed anywhere.
    this by far the best post I have read so far in the thinking and its very fair to all


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 437 ✭✭Vela


    Grayson wrote: »
    I think just like therapists you have to shop around to get the right treatment and if it's not working for you, then you should go somewhere else. But as Vela said, unfortunately most people when they go to therapy are very vulnerable. And they also tend to see the therapist as an authority figure. So saying "this isn't working for me. And by this, I mean you" isn't something most feel comfortable with.

    I actually did do this in the RCC. That woman was so fcuking incompetent and pushed me so much that I was hysterical in there. So I went back one more time and said 'I don't think you're qualified to help me, so I won't be coming back'. She did not react well - or at least like you'd think a therapist should. Which was a lot of what my complaint was based on.

    Looking back, I still don't know how I did it tbh. I think it was out of sheer rage and desperation.


  • Advertisement
  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,390 ✭✭✭please helpThank YOU


    I was just thinking for a min could Louise o Neill the rape culture expert be a member of boards and post here? ? just a thought came into my head ?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,844 ✭✭✭py2006


    I was just thinking for a min could Louise o Neill the rape culture expert be a member of boards and post here? ? just a thought came into my head ?

    Nope, apparently only straight and white males do.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,114 ✭✭✭ivytwine


    Grayson wrote: »
    That's providing a background to the issue but doesn't dismiss the fact that it happened. It's like me saying "Someone was speeding" and you saying "It was a blue car".

    The point of rape culture is that it diminishes rape in a number of ways. At the start of this article it gives two definitions of rape culture.



    The fact is that in the Kerry case they did try to dismiss it. Even after knowing the details of the case (which are pretty horrific) the parish priest still said "well, she was a single mother and that doesn't look good". What the **** does being a single mother have to do with anything.



    If you lived in Kerry do you think you'd feel comfortable reporting a sexual assault or do you think you'd fear the social ramifications of reporting it. Would you want to turn up at a trial when all the rapists friends turn up and support them in that manner?

    The majority of rapes go unreported because women are scared of the social stigma or are scared that they won't be believed. What sort of society is it where a woman who's raped is scared of societies judgement? And that's not just Kerry. That's throughout Ireland.

    The fact is that it's extremely relevant. Ireland is in denial about its class system but I can guarantee you as someone on the bottom rung of it in a rural town, as I grew up on, it exists. Is it rape culture to dismiss the experience of a lower class victim? Nope, it's class discrimination.

    In fact one of my main criticisms of much of the debate around rape culture is the focus on college campuses and consent classes. It excludes those who don't go to third level completely. Especially in the US. At least you've some chance of going to college in Ireland if you're working class.

    That priest is a moron. Wouldn't waste my time on him. He's not emblematic of a wider culture, not even in the Church, where such open discrimination against single parents is no longer acceptable.

    I think sexism was a factor, for sure, but class and "family reputation" and all sorts of bull that unless you grew up in a town like that it, it's hard to quantify all mixed up together to create a toxic mix.

    You've had a Kerry person point out to you the feeling towards this man in the county. Why would a Kerry rape victim be less willing to report?


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,390 ✭✭✭please helpThank YOU


    py2006 wrote: »
    Nope, apparently only straight and white males do.
    there is tears come out my eyes from your post:)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,114 ✭✭✭ivytwine


    Vela wrote: »
    One thing I've learned about romantic partners is that they often think they understand until they're faced with it head-on. And that's the kicker. I've had similar situations, one in particular, and I'd never excuse that behaviour from someone who's meant to care about you. Or from anyone. I understand the resentment so much, because when someone who's meant to 'know' you turns on you when you need them most - it's fcuking soul destroying. It set me back so much in my own recovery. But there is one thing that I've come to realise and that's that some people just aren't emotionally equipped to deal with it. And that's not your fault. That's just how it is. And it's on them - not you. That's not 'playing the victim' either, that's looking at a situation objectively and saying 'this person is a negative influence on my life and can't deal with my situation' and being strong enough to walk away.

    In the two main instances where I've experienced something like this, the people involved both had their own mental health sh1t going on at the time that I was unaware of. They've both since explained and apologised. It was too little too late in both cases, for something that had a devastating affect on me in both instances, but you can't carry that sh1t around with you so I've tried to accept those apologies. It's just a lot harder to forget.

    Anyway, my point from that is; it's very hard for someone who isn't a fully trained therapist to understand what a victim goes through, so it must be almost impossible for a friend or partner to understand. What it boils down to, is whether or not they try to understand. And if they don't, then it's inexcusable regardless.

    Also, similarly to you, my closest confidant and the person who got me through most of it was a male friend.

    So, rape culture? No. Narrow-mindedness? Selfishness? Narcissism? A lack of empathy? Yes - there's loads of that. And that's something that reveals itself in a lot of people once they're confronted with something like this. I guess it shows you who your real friends are.

    Absolutely. I also believe that for some people there's an element of being sheltered, of maybe having a certain idea of a rape victim being an absolute wreck... and when you're able to hold down a job, laugh and joke and live normally that disconnect can shock them profoundly.

    I have great friends and I am really lucky. And they are real, they're there for me.

    Yeah in my case the other person had issues too. But he didn't really try. Hugs to you. It's hard I know x


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,386 ✭✭✭RabbleRouser2k


    Grayson wrote: »
    I wouldn't say everybody. There were enough people lining up to support the rapist. But that's the problem. If you look through my posts I'm made certain not to say that everyone is like that. It's a culture all right but a subculture might be a better word.

    No, you've very clearly insinuated that Kerry, in particular, has this 'rape culture'. And you've only now tried to back pedal on it. Your quotes below, just a selection, show a clearly wrong headed view.
    If you lived in Kerry do you think you'd feel comfortable reporting a sexual assault or do you think you'd fear the social ramifications of reporting it. Would you want to turn up at a trial when all the rapists friends turn up and support them in that manner?

    The majority of rapes go unreported because women are scared of the social stigma or are scared that they won't be believed. What sort of society is it where a woman who's raped is scared of societies judgement? And that's not just Kerry. That's throughout Ireland.

    This story below is intensely disturbing. The fact that so many people would turn up to support a man convicted of rape is freaky. It shows that in Kerry at least there is a culture (Or sub culture depending on how you classify it) which supports rapists rather than the victim.

    Seriously, what is your issue with this place in particular? There is no 'subculture' there is no 'culture' there either-you've implied it quite often, but each time it's just adding insult to injury. And the worst thing is-you don't get it. You don't get what you are saying-and how you're ignoring other cases in order to make a, arguably, heinous and abhorrent claim about an entire county, and the people within-many of whom have gone through the courts in order to prosecute their rapists (I know one person in particular who went to court as a teenager, to convict her rapist-she grew up in Kerry too, and your statement would insinuate that she was also supporting a rape culture-and that by even setting foot in court, she hadn't a hope of proving she was raped. Yet her rapist did 10+ years in jail).

    Tim Allen, Darina's husband, was convicted of posession of child pornography-instead of going to jail, he paid 40 grand, and did community service. This, despite paying for images of children being abused and molested, and thus actually helping support a paedophilia network (he was tracked based on his credit card purchases). Do we now say that Ballymaloe cookery school, of which he was a part (and is still seen there, on occassion, from what I've heard) supports paedophiles, or a 'rape culture'? I mean, he brought his family to court with him, kids and wife in tow-does that mean everyone associated with Ballymaloe is now a 'rape apologist'? What the Allen's did was a completely scum bag thing to do-I wouldn't have allowed the guy any where near any member of my family. But I cannot paint the entire people of Ballymaloe, be they employed by the cookery school or locals near it, as rape apologists. I would also be angry at the judge who claimed the images 'were on the lesser scale of abuse pictures'...
    Yet Darina and her family got a ton of support and 'hugs' after Allen's conviction-arguably far more than 50 people. People visted Darina at farmer's markets and offered her 'support'. Does that imply a 'paedophilia' culture there too?

    RTE even aired a Darina Allen cooking show, shortly after the case-when people were 'FURIOUS' with it, RTE made the 'oh, she wasn't involved in what Tim did'-so now RTE are paedophilia apologists too? (Well, kind of. Allen had filmed one series for RTE, of a cooking show, but it didn't return-this was years before his arrest).

    Do you think any of the children within those images were supported? No, they continued to be abused...and Allen helped.

    (In the same week Allen avoided jail, another guy went to prison for 7 days on a conviction of throwing a cigarette out a window-this despite the guard who made the claim being unable to tell what type of cigarette it was-a rolled up one, a herbal one, or one of those pre-made box ciggies).


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,409 ✭✭✭✭Grayson


    ivytwine wrote: »
    The fact is that it's extremely relevant. Ireland is in denial about its class system but I can guarantee you as someone on the bottom rung of it in a rural town, as I grew up on, it exists. Is it rape culture to dismiss the experience of a lower class victim? Nope, it's class discrimination.

    In fact one of my main criticisms of much of the debate around rape culture is the focus on college campuses and consent classes. It excludes those who don't go to third level completely. Especially in the US. At least you've some chance of going to college in Ireland if you're working class.

    That priest is a moron. Wouldn't waste my time on him. He's not emblematic of a wider culture, not even in the Church, where such open discrimination against single parents is no longer acceptable.

    I think sexism was a factor, for sure, but class and "family reputation" and all sorts of bull that unless you grew up in a town like that it, it's hard to quantify all mixed up together to create a toxic mix.

    You've had a Kerry person point out to you the feeling towards this man in the county. Why would a Kerry rape victim be less willing to report?

    I'd be less likely to report a crime if I thought my town would turn against me. And if I thought my attacker would be surrounded by his friends in court who'd stand there and shake his hands after he was found guilty. What's worse in this case is that he wasn't even her alleged attacker. The trail was nearly complete.

    And here's the thing about rape culture. In a discussion about whether or not it exists, the causes don't matter. If you try to say that it's class etc then you admit it does exist but you're just saying why.

    I'm not a rapist. I'm assuming that most of the guys I know aren't rapists. I've heard nothing from them or anyone else to suggest they have bad attitudes towards any women. That doesn't mean that there aren't people out there who have backwards attitudes.

    In a European survey on attitudes to gender based violence, including rape, 7% of irish women and 11% of irish men said that sex without consent is OK if the woman is wearing sexy clothing.
    The good news is that a huge majority said it wasn't acceptable, but still the number that said it was is shocking. (As a side note, the best performing countries in Europe were in Scandanavia where 3% said it was ok. The worst was Romania where 25% of people said it was ok).


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,409 ✭✭✭✭Grayson


    No, you've very clearly insinuated that Kerry, in particular, has this 'rape culture'. And you've only now tried to back pedal on it. Your quotes below, just a selection, show a clearly wrong headed view.



    Seriously, what is your issue with this place in particular? There is no 'subculture' there is no 'culture' there either-you've implied it quite often, but each time it's just adding insult to injury. And the worst thing is-you don't get it. You don't get what you are saying-and how you're ignoring other cases in order to make a, arguably, heinous and abhorrent claim about an entire county, and the people within-many of whom have gone through the courts in order to prosecute their rapists (I know one person in particular who went to court as a teenager, to convict her rapist-she grew up in Kerry too, and your statement would insinuate that she was also supporting a rape culture-and that by even setting foot in court, she hadn't a hope of proving she was raped. Yet her rapist did 10+ years in jail).

    Tim Allen, Darina's husband, was convicted of posession of child pornography-instead of going to jail, he paid 40 grand, and did community service. This, despite paying for images of children being abused and molested, and thus actually helping support a paedophilia network (he was tracked based on his credit card purchases). Do we now say that Ballymaloe cookery school, of which he was a part (and is still seen there, on occassion, from what I've heard) supports paedophiles, or a 'rape culture'? I mean, he brought his family to court with him, kids and wife in tow-does that mean everyone associated with Ballymaloe is now a 'rape apologist'? What the Allen's did was a completely scum bag thing to do-I wouldn't have allowed the guy any where near any member of my family. But I cannot paint the entire people of Ballymaloe, be they employed by the cookery school or locals near it, as rape apologists. I would also be angry at the judge who claimed the images 'were on the lesser scale of abuse pictures'...
    Yet Darina and her family got a ton of support and 'hugs' after Allen's conviction-arguably far more than 50 people. People visted Darina at farmer's markets and offered her 'support'. Does that imply a 'paedophilia' culture there too?

    RTE even aired a Darina Allen cooking show, shortly after the case-when people were 'FURIOUS' with it, RTE made the 'oh, she wasn't involved in what Tim did'-so now RTE are paedophilia apologists too? (Well, kind of. Allen had filmed one series for RTE, of a cooking show, but it didn't return-this was years before his arrest).

    Do you think any of the children within those images were supported? No, they continued to be abused...and Allen helped.

    (In the same week Allen avoided jail, another guy went to prison for 7 days on a conviction of throwing a cigarette out a window-this despite the guard who made the claim being unable to tell what type of cigarette it was-a rolled up one, a herbal one, or one of those pre-made box ciggies).

    No, I've always said that it's not everyone. I've always said "culture" does not imply everyone. I know you're taking it personally but I've never said that Kerry as a whole has a rape culture.

    And I stand by what I said about society as a whole. Women should not be afraid of stigma when reporting a sexual assault. As a society we need to make sure that it doesn't happen. The reason women feel afraid of reporting is partly because of incidents like that in Kerry.


  • Registered Users Posts: 10,633 ✭✭✭✭Widdershins


    Grayson wrote: »

    And here's the thing about rape culture. In a discussion about whether or not it exists, the causes don't matter. If you try to say that it's class etc then you admit it does exist but you're just saying why.
    ..................

    I think that shows that people will support their peers despite what they did. It's not rape specific. I can guarantee you that's what would happen if I, as an outsider, non drinker, non hurling supporter and non church goer who isn't particularly chummy with the neighbours, in a rural area, took a stand against one of my neighbours, for any reason.

    [/QUOTE]In a European survey on attitudes to gender based violence, including rape, 7% of irish women and 11% of irish men said that sex without consent is OK if the woman is wearing sexy clothing.
    The good news is that a huge majority said it wasn't acceptable, but still the number that said it was is shocking. (As a side note, the best performing countries in Europe were in Scandanavia where 3% said it was ok. The worst was Romania where 25% of people said it was ok).[/QUOTE]

    I'm fairly sure that survey result was debunked as deeply flawed and skewed


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,114 ✭✭✭ivytwine


    Grayson wrote: »
    I'd be less likely to report a crime if I thought my town would turn against me. And if I thought my attacker would be surrounded by his friends in court who'd stand there and shake his hands after he was found guilty. What's worse in this case is that he wasn't even her alleged attacker. The trail was nearly complete.

    You're not getting this at all.

    I think I've a little bit of insight into this woman's mindset. I wouldn't presume to speak for her, but she would have had this **** her entire life. She probably knew that people would side with her rapist. And yet she went on and reported it anyway. I apologise if you're actually from a small town- different from a village, or the depths of the countryside. It's hard to survive if your family doesn't have a "name" or if you're different.
    Grayson wrote: »
    And here's the thing about rape culture. In a discussion about whether or not it exists, the causes don't matter. If you try to say that it's class etc then you admit it does exist but you're just saying why.

    Ok. So this lady gets fired in favour of her bosses niece (not uncommon in this kind of situation honestly). So is that rape culture, or class discrimination?

    Say if this man had raped the local solicitors wife, or the captain of the ladies golf club, do you think the MINORITY of ****ing idiots who shook his hand would have still done so?

    Is rape culture in action then? What do you believe causes rape culture? Because I don't believe in it. And I'm a victim of the crime. The person who did that to me chose to do so. He was the only person who made that decision. And I've faced almost nothing but kindness and support from people I've told- except from one who made the biggest noise about these kind of issues on social media.
    Grayson wrote: »
    I'm not a rapist. I'm assuming that most of the guys I know aren't rapists. I've heard nothing from them or anyone else to suggest they have bad attitudes towards any women. That doesn't mean that there aren't people out there who have backwards attitudes.

    In a European survey on attitudes to gender based violence, including rape, 7% of irish women and 11% of irish men said that sex without consent is OK if the woman is wearing sexy clothing.
    The good news is that a huge majority said it wasn't acceptable, but still the number that said it was is shocking. (As a side note, the best performing countries in Europe were in Scandanavia where 3% said it was ok. The worst was Romania where 25% of people said it was ok).

    I don't think any of the men posting here would agree with those statements in the survey. And most of them would agree wholeheartedly with the first paragraph quoted there. I believe it's when they're hearing people saying that they're responsible for stopping rape and so on by people like LON they understandably get a little frustrated.

    I've said about ninety million times now that I believe there's a conversation to be had about the judiciary, practical help for victims etc. That's not the one being had tho.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,114 ✭✭✭ivytwine


    Grayson wrote: »
    No, I've always said that it's not everyone. I've always said "culture" does not imply everyone. I know you're taking it personally but I've never said that Kerry as a whole has a rape culture.

    And I stand by what I said about society as a whole. Women should not be afraid of stigma when reporting a sexual assault. As a society we need to make sure that it doesn't happen. The reason women feel afraid of reporting is partly because of incidents like that in Kerry.

    And more to do with dealing with gardai, barristers, judges, the cost of the whole ****ing thing, being brought to notice in front of everyone (in Ireland, it doesn't matter if you're officially anonymous, people will know who you are). I again have largely encountered kindness. But I don't want people to look at me and think "oh the poor thing". Because it's one night out of my life at the end of the day. One awful night, but I'm here. People have their own reasons for doing things, and it may sound strange, being treated with kid gloves can be just as irksome.

    There was a high profile rape in my town. The little scrote who did it was almost ripped limb from limb. Does my town have a rape culture?


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 6,309 Mod ✭✭✭✭mzungu


    Grayson wrote: »
    That's providing a background to the issue but doesn't dismiss the fact that it happened. It's like me saying "Someone was speeding" and you saying "It was a blue car".

    The point of rape culture is that it diminishes rape in a number of ways. At the start of this article it gives two definitions of rape culture.
    The Oxford English Dictionary defines rape culture as “A society… whose prevailing social attitudes have the effect of normalising or trivialising sexual assault and abuse”. Wikipedia adds: “Behaviours commonly associated… include victim blaming, sexual objectification, trivialising rape, denial of widespread rape, refusing to acknowledge the harm caused by some forms of sexual violence, or some combination of these.”
    Do some people in the country engage in the above? Yes, they sure do. However, I don't think that could be used to describe society at large. Could we say Americans are pro-castration because the audience laughed at Sharon Osbourne's joke about some man having his bits chopped off by his wife? Also, Lorena Bobbitt is not exactly a hate figure either, so could we not say that kind of violence is accepted among the population? I don't think so anyways. We can pick and choose stuff like the above and draw conclusions from it, but that does not mean they are in any way accurate.
    Grayson wrote: »
    The fact is that in the Kerry case they did try to dismiss it. Even after knowing the details of the case (which are pretty horrific) the parish priest still said "well, she was a single mother and that doesn't look good". What the **** does being a single mother have to do with anything.
    They are utter imbeciles, but I would imagine if he had beaten a man to death he would have got the same reception. They were there to support him no matter what the crime. As for the priest....well, that is a scumbag comment. But I don't think we can take the utterances of a parish priest as some kind of social critique. That might be the one and only time in the past 25 years that anybody in the country took notice of anything a priest has said. Mainly because they were disgusted by what he said.
    Grayson wrote:
    I wouldn't say everybody. There were enough people lining up to support the rapist. But that's the problem. If you look through my posts I'm made certain not to say that everyone is like that. It's a culture all right but a subculture might be a better word.
    Yep, you didn't say everyone was at it, but a subculture could mean anything one wants it to mean and it could be as large or small depending on who you wish to ask. This casts a net far and wide to the point of making things pretty meaningless. There is probably a subculture out there that claims Tony McCarroll* was the brains behind Oasis. It doesn't mean that wider society thinks so, or that other Oasis subculture groups might share the same view. A few outliers does not equate to society at large.
    Grayson wrote:
    There's one good thing about the kerry case and that's that those idiots who supported the rapist got ripped apart for it. They now realise that that sort of behaviour is unacceptable.
    Aye, they were ripped apart by a society that abhors what they did. When has Irish society (other than those folks in Kerry) ever reacted with anything other than horror over a rape case? If that kind of thing in Kerry was happening consistently then there might be something to it. But it made headlines and everybody remembers it precisely because it was out of the norm.
    Grayson wrote:
    The problem is that those attitudes do exist in society and they do pollute the discourse. That's why so many women fear saying they were raped. What we need is more of the reaction to the Kerry case whilst at the same time not denying that these people exist and that there is a problem.
    I don't deny for a second that these people exist and that those attitudes do exist. All kinds of horrible attitudes exist in Irish society. Thankfully in a minority otherwise we would all be facing violence as part of everyday life. I just don't believe it equates to Ireland having a "rape culture" any more than we have a "murder culture" or "assault culture". What we have is the dregs of society acting like like dregs of society do, and always will do.

    As regards sentencing, I think they are too lenient (same for most crimes) and much longer sentences for sexual offences would be a good starting point.



    *They say the drumming on Definitely Maybe is crap, but I think it suits the sound of the album just fine. On balance, they were right to sack him all the same.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,386 ✭✭✭RabbleRouser2k


    Grayson wrote: »
    No, I've always said that it's not everyone. I've always said "culture" does not imply everyone. I know you're taking it personally but I've never said that Kerry as a whole has a rape culture.

    And I stand by what I said about society as a whole. Women should not be afraid of stigma when reporting a sexual assault. As a society we need to make sure that it doesn't happen. The reason women feel afraid of reporting is partly because of incidents like that in Kerry.

    No county in ireland has a rape culture-to even imply there is a 'sub culture', as you have, is insulting society and people as a whole. I'm taking it personally, as a person, not as a kerry person. Your back pedalling, as well as trying to say 'as a whole'...is going back to your word 'sub culture'. And yet you don't see the damage your words imply. And that's tragic.

    IT's similar to how Limerick people get insulted with the 'stab city' label-when Dublin has a higher rate of crime. But that's the media's obsession with projection. I cited the Allen case as one case where folks didn't even parade the 'rape culture' myth, at the time, despite Allen's actual involvement in sexual abuse of kids. He helped fund and create it.
    And yet Darina Allen received far more support from common folks-and is allowed on TV all the time. Yet her husbands crime is far from innocent-and she gets all this support from RTe. Does it cite an example of supporting paedophilia?

    No person should be ashamed to report rape-but the Kerry case was about nothing to do with the rape-we had incidents where politicians gave character references for rapists-saying they were of 'good character'-that is far more damaging. Far more horrific. The priest and the locals were idiots- but they were just that, idiots.
    The support of Allen and co was FAR more damaging to victims of sexual abuse-far more. The coverage, the 'kindness' shown to the allens-we have had a number of high profile cases of sexual abuse-by people who were afraid to report their abuser. Just look how long it took Saville's victims to feel comfortable coming forward.
    Imagine being a child/ adult, and survivor of child abuse, seeing that.

    But that doesn't imply we have a paedophile culture here in IReland, no more than the examples you cited.

    But I Feel my words falling on deaf ears, tbh.


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 6,309 Mod ✭✭✭✭mzungu


    Grayson wrote: »
    I'd be less likely to report a crime if I thought my town would turn against me. And if I thought my attacker would be surrounded by his friends in court who'd stand there and shake his hands after he was found guilty. What's worse in this case is that he wasn't even her alleged attacker. The trail was nearly complete.
    Would that not happen in all types of court cases? Being surrounded by family and friends?
    Grayson wrote:
    And here's the thing about rape culture. In a discussion about whether or not it exists, the causes don't matter. If you try to say that it's class etc then you admit it does exist but you're just saying why.
    Nobody disputes rapes happen. What is disputed is that there is a "rape culture".
    Grayson wrote:
    I'm not a rapist. I'm assuming that most of the guys I know aren't rapists. I've heard nothing from them or anyone else to suggest they have bad attitudes towards any women. That doesn't mean that there aren't people out there who have backwards attitudes.
    Unfortunately, there are some people out there with backwards attitudes. It wouldn't make it a culture, though.
    Grayson wrote:
    In a European survey on attitudes to gender based violence, including rape, 7% of irish women and 11% of irish men said that sex without consent is OK if the woman is wearing sexy clothing.
    The good news is that a huge majority said it wasn't acceptable, but still the number that said it was is shocking. (As a side note, the best performing countries in Europe were in Scandanavia where 3% said it was ok. The worst was Romania where 25% of people said it was ok).
    Is this the study you are referring to?

    The results don't seem to make much sense.

    For example, the results state that 21% said sex without consent is acceptable in certain situations and 11% said being drunk or on drugs justifies sex without consent.

    But at the same time....

    97% said violence against women was not acceptable.
    99% said that sending unwanted texts/pictures of a sexual nature was wrong.
    97% said making lewd remarks in public was wrong.
    99% thought that making unwanted physical contact with a colleague was wrong.

    How exactly do these two sets of figures add up? Violence against women, lewd remarks, unwanted pictures and contact is shown to be unacceptable by 97% and higher, but then 21% believe sex without consent is fine?

    Something is not right with the above.

    Also, we don't know how they defined consent (or even if they did define it) for the study. I think clues to the results may lie in the wording of the wording of the questions.

    Here is the question from it concerning consent that the figures were taken from:
    QB10 Some people believe that having sexual intercourse without consent may be justified in certain situations. Do you think this applies to the following circumstances?

    (SHOW SCREEN - READ OUT - MULTIPLE ANSWERS POSSIBLE)

    Wearing revealing, provocative or sexy clothing
    Being drunk or using drugs
    Flirting beforehand
    Not clearly saying no or physically fighting back
    Being out walking alone at night,
    Having several sexual partners
    Voluntarily going home with someone, for example after a party or date
    If the assailant does not realise what they were doing
    If the assailant regrets his actions
    None of these
    Refusal (SPONTANEOUS)
    Don't know

    Take the wording of the question itself. It starts off with "Some people believe that having sexual intercourse without consent may be justified in certain situations." So, immediately it is guiding the respondent to think of other people rather than him or herself. Then asks "Do you think this applies to the following circumstances?"

    That leaves a hell of a lot of room for misinterpretation.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,386 ✭✭✭RabbleRouser2k



    The case in Kerry was indeed horrific but it was also exceptional. It seems to me to be very insensitive and misguided to make a claim that there is a culture in Kerry that supports rapists based on one exceptional case , as appalling as it is! I know if I was a proud Kerry person, I wouldn't be too happy about that!

    We see class systems all the time-Tim Allen, the chef, as I mentioned. He got so much support from locals, it was disgusting.

    OR the Judge Curtin case- where the warrant used to obtain child porn off of his computer was a day out of date. So he walked free from court, despite him being clearly guilty. Do you honestly think that if he was 'Joe Curtin, the plumber' that he'd have gotten away so easily? He only stepped down from his job by claiming health problems-he could still be working as a judger but for people clamoring for him to 'do the right thing' regarding not presiding over cases.
    (His ex-wife was also the mayor of tralee at one point, and is a former solicitor who lectures in the college in Tralee). Class played a huge part in his case.
    It plays a huge part all the time-the IRish presenters caught for drink driving, who go on TV all the time.
    Some of them read the weather to us...to me, that would show a sad symptom of our drink culture-but there is far more evidence of that than 'rape culture'.


  • Advertisement
  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,390 ✭✭✭please helpThank YOU


    We see class systems all the time-Tim Allen, the chef, as I mentioned. He got so much support from locals, it was disgusting.

    OR the Judge Curtin case- where the warrant used to obtain child porn off of his computer was a day out of date. So he walked free from court, despite him being clearly guilty. Do you honestly think that if he was 'Joe Curtin, the plumber' that he'd have gotten away so easily? He only stepped down from his job by claiming health problems-he could still be working as a judger but for people clamoring for him to 'do the right thing' regarding not presiding over cases.
    (His ex-wife was also the mayor of tralee at one point, and is a former solicitor who lectures in the college in Tralee). Class played a huge part in his case.
    It plays a huge part all the time-the IRish presenters caught for drink driving, who go on TV all the time.
    Some of them read the weather to us...to me, that would show a sad symptom of our drink culture-but there is far more evidence of that than 'rape culture'.
    I was up in front of judge curtin he told he would sent me to jail for not paying a parking ticket in Kerry years ago and I got smart with him and he told 3 times he would jail me for contempt of court and the garda in the court came over and never to speak to judge in that manner and look what he was doing I bet the same garda from the court made a mistake in the summons thats old trick the garda use with there mates wink wink brown envelope


  • Registered Users Posts: 10,633 ✭✭✭✭Widdershins


    I was up in front of judge curtin he told he would sent me to jail for not paying a parking ticket in Kerry years ago and I got smart with him and he told 3 times he would jail me for contempt of court and the garda in the court came over and never to speak to judge in that manner and look what he was doing I bet the same garda from the court made a mistake in the summons thats old trick the garda use with there mates wink wink brown envelope

    The term cute hoors springs to mind


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,386 ✭✭✭RabbleRouser2k


    I was up in front of judge curtin he told he would sent me to jail for not paying a parking ticket in Kerry years ago and I got smart with him and he told 3 times he would jail me for contempt of court and the garda in the court came over and never to speak to judge in that manner and look what he was doing I bet the same garda from the court made a mistake in the summons thats old trick the garda use with there mates wink wink brown envelope

    That's interesting, and also a tragedy if it was true. The claim made at the time was that they could not get the summons to him, because he had been travelling, or away from his home-so they could not guarantee him seeing the warrant. Then when it ran out...
    Things got real serious.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,409 ✭✭✭✭Grayson


    mzungu wrote: »
    Do some people in the country engage in the above? Yes, they sure do. However, I don't think that could be used to describe society at large. Could we say Americans are pro-castration because the audience laughed at Sharon Osbourne's joke about some man having his bits chopped off by his wife? Also, Lorena Bobbitt is not exactly a hate figure either, so could we not say that kind of violence is accepted among the population? I don't think so anyways. We can pick and choose stuff like the above and draw conclusions from it, but that does not mean they are in any way accurate.

    They are utter imbeciles, but I would imagine if he had beaten a man to death he would have got the same reception. They were there to support him no matter what the crime. As for the priest....well, that is a scumbag comment. But I don't think we can take the utterances of a parish priest as some kind of social critique. That might be the one and only time in the past 25 years that anybody in the country took notice of anything a priest has said. Mainly because they were disgusted by what he said.

    Yep, you didn't say everyone was at it, but a subculture could mean anything one wants it to mean and it could be as large or small depending on who you wish to ask. This casts a net far and wide to the point of making things pretty meaningless. There is probably a subculture out there that claims Tony McCarroll* was the brains behind Oasis. It doesn't mean that wider society thinks so, or that other Oasis subculture groups might share the same view. A few outliers does not equate to society at large.

    Aye, they were ripped apart by a society that abhors what they did. When has Irish society (other than those folks in Kerry) ever reacted with anything other than horror over a rape case? If that kind of thing in Kerry was happening consistently then there might be something to it. But it made headlines and everybody remembers it precisely because it was out of the norm.

    I don't deny for a second that these people exist and that those attitudes do exist. All kinds of horrible attitudes exist in Irish society. Thankfully in a minority otherwise we would all be facing violence as part of everyday life. I just don't believe it equates to Ireland having a "rape culture" any more than we have a "murder culture" or "assault culture". What we have is the dregs of society acting like like dregs of society do, and always will do.

    As regards sentencing, I think they are too lenient (same for most crimes) and much longer sentences for sexual offences would be a good starting point.



    *They say the drumming on Definitely Maybe is crap, but I think it suits the sound of the album just fine. On balance, they were right to sack him all the same.

    Once again. Saying Ireland has a rape culture is not the same as saying Irish culture is a rape culture. At no point am I throwing a saying that everyone is a rapist and/or fine with rape. I'm not even saying the majority are.

    And posting that someone laughed at sharon osbourne is not the same thing. Did 10% of americans say that they support castrating men? Do 10% think that a man should have his bits chopped off because of what he's wearing?
    10% of Irish people think that it's ok to have sex with a woman without her consent if she's dressed sexy. That's a sizeable amount.
    Think of it the next time you're on a bus. Look around and think that 10% of those people think it's ok to rape a woman if they're wearing sexy clothes.

    It's not everyone. At no point have I said it's everyone. I've gone to great pains to say it over and over again (Yet some still think I am).


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,390 ✭✭✭please helpThank YOU


    That's interesting, and also a tragedy if it was true. The claim made at the time was that they could not get the summons to him, because he had been travelling, or away from his home-so they could not guarantee him seeing the warrant. Then when it ran out...
    Things got real serious.
    you are spot on there where is the public inquiry into Judge Curtin and the garda?:confused: he jailed a guy from tralee and when your man saw Judge Curtin your not the Judge now and he give a box into the face you Jailed me and look what your where doing he was a very unfair Judge he would Jail for put a sweet wrapper on the ground .


  • Advertisement
  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,390 ✭✭✭please helpThank YOU


    why are the Feminist groups not talking about this Judge Curtin in Kerry and the Garda in kerry and we want a public public inquiry ? because if the went the minster of justice Frances Fitzgerald Louise o Neill the rape culture expert should meet Frances and have cup of tea and tell her I want a public inquiry into Judge Curtin in kerry and the Garda in kerry and bring with you rape/networks go with the Feminist groups and see whats happens to them you know what happens whistle blower in Ireland.


  • Registered Users Posts: 52 ✭✭Smegmaniac17


    We see class systems all the time-Tim Allen, the chef, as I mentioned. He got so much support from locals, it was disgusting.

    OR the Judge Curtin case- where the warrant used to obtain child porn off of his computer was a day out of date. So he walked free from court, despite him being clearly guilty. Do you honestly think that if he was 'Joe Curtin, the plumber' that he'd have gotten away so easily? He only stepped down from his job by claiming health problems-he could still be working as a judger but for people clamoring for him to 'do the right thing' regarding not presiding over cases.
    (His ex-wife was also the mayor of tralee at one point, and is a former solicitor who lectures in the college in Tralee). Class played a huge part in his case.
    It plays a huge part all the time-the IRish presenters caught for drink driving, who go on TV all the time.
    Some of them read the weather to us...to me, that would show a sad symptom of our drink culture-but there is far more evidence of that than 'rape culture'.

    Was this post supposed to be addressed at me?


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,390 ✭✭✭please helpThank YOU


    why are the Feminist groups not talking about this Judge Curtin in Kerry and the Garda in kerry and we want a public public inquiry ? because if the went the minster of justice Frances Fitzgerald Louise o Neill the rape culture expert should meet Frances and have cup of tea and tell her I want a public inquiry into Judge Curtin in kerry and the Garda in kerry and bring with you rape/networks go with the Feminist groups and see whats happens to them you know what happens whistle blower in Ireland.
    but Louise o Neill is go around tell us. we are rapist and we are a from a rape culture. march up to Dublin demand a public inquiry into Judge Curtin in kerry and the Garda in kerry and watch and see what will happen by putting the spot light on minster Frances Fitgerald Louise o Nell never talked about this Judge Curtin


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,386 ✭✭✭RabbleRouser2k


    Grayson wrote: »
    Once again. Saying Ireland has a rape culture is not the same as saying Irish culture is a rape culture. At no point am I throwing a saying that everyone is a rapist and/or fine with rape. I'm not even saying the majority are.

    And posting that someone laughed at sharon osbourne is not the same thing. Did 10% of americans say that they support castrating men? Do 10% think that a man should have his bits chopped off because of what he's wearing?
    10% of Irish people think that it's ok to have sex with a woman without her consent if she's dressed sexy. That's a sizeable amount.
    Think of it the next time you're on a bus. Look around and think that 10% of those people think it's ok to rape a woman if they're wearing sexy clothes.

    It's not everyone. At no point have I said it's everyone. I've gone to great pains to say it over and over again (Yet some still think I am).

    Your language is all over the place at times, sometimes not coherent enough or saying one thing, then changing your mind-quite a lot of it is incredibly insensitive. Even if many of us are not using our real names on here, there is no need to make ridiculous statements.

    As for the '10 percent on the bus thing'-that's just paranoia. Really twisted paranoia-it's verging on the 'guilty without a trial' but in this case guilty without a crime. That poll, as mentioned, was skewed. One couldn't even guess what the questions on that poll were, since it may have been very badly worded, or in the case of one feminist writer, alleging one thing, when another thing was most likely.
    Saying that 'ten percent of people on a bus are potential criminals' is far too similar to 'every man is a rapist'. Plus, that kind of thinking can lead to 'but maybe me, sitting on this bus, noticing the ten percent...is the ten percent!!! I need to lock myself away from people so I don't harm anyone'. Then if you try to deny it, you realise 'that's exactly what a ten percenter would say'.

    And quotes can be taken out of context.

    No, not everyone-but at times singling out an entire county for a start, and then an entire gender for another. Yet at other times, you don't get how blinkered you are, at times, with your statements.
    Was this post supposed to be addressed at me?



    Yes, but supporting you.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,386 ✭✭✭RabbleRouser2k


    but Louise o Neill is go around tell us. we are rapist and we are a from a rape culture. march up to Dublin demand a public inquiry into Judge Curtin in kerry and the Garda in kerry and watch and see what will happen by putting the spot light on minster Frances Fitgerald Louise o Nell never talked about this Judge Curtin

    Louise O'Neill wasn't in journalism at the time-but there was literally nothing they could do to Curtin. Zilch. Only thing they could potentially do is get him fired. That was it.

    After that, yeah, he was in the clear.

    LoN doesn't really care about helping-remember, she didn't even march for 'women'. (I hyphenate that because I know many women who did not agree with the march-a few youtubers have made comments of their own on this).


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,390 ✭✭✭please helpThank YOU


    Louise O'Neill wasn't in journalism at the time-but there was literally nothing they could do to Curtin. Zilch. Only thing they could potentially do is get him fired. That was it.

    After that, yeah, he was in the clear.

    LoN doesn't really care about helping-remember, she didn't even march for 'women'. (I hyphenate that because I know many women who did not agree with the march-a few youtubers have made comments of their own on this).
    the Garda in kerry are still there.?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,386 ✭✭✭RabbleRouser2k


    the Garda in kerry are still there.?

    Yes, they are, but Curtin's case went to court, and he was found not guilty. Unless new evidence was uncovered, he cannot go to trial for the same thing again.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,114 ✭✭✭ivytwine


    Grayson wrote: »
    Once again. Saying Ireland has a rape culture is not the same as saying Irish culture is a rape culture. At no point am I throwing a saying that everyone is a rapist and/or fine with rape. I'm not even saying the majority are.

    And posting that someone laughed at sharon osbourne is not the same thing. Did 10% of americans say that they support castrating men? Do 10% think that a man should have his bits chopped off because of what he's wearing?
    10% of Irish people think that it's ok to have sex with a woman without her consent if she's dressed sexy. That's a sizeable amount.
    Think of it the next time you're on a bus. Look around and think that 10% of those people think it's ok to rape a woman if they're wearing sexy clothes.

    It's not everyone. At no point have I said it's everyone. I've gone to great pains to say it over and over again (Yet some still think I am).

    Culture: "the ideas, customs, and social behaviour of a particular people or society.
    "Afro-Caribbean culture""

    So do you feel that Ireland has ideas, customs, and social behaviour supporting rape? If so could you give me cross-society examples of such. The Listowel case isn't one- it's so shocking precisely because it's an anomaly.

    By definition it's the majority of people. Even a subculture needs the support of *all* its members. You wouldn't be a member of a goth subculture if you didn't wear the clothes, listen to the music etc.

    Rapists are generally rather secretive about their crimes. They're separated from the general prison population for a reason. If Ireland really did have a rape culture, wouldn't they be boasting down the pub about it?

    You keep saying you believe it's not the majority. Good, I agree with you. A culture needs numbers to exist. And the numbers aren't there.

    You sound like a man who is disgusted by the existence of rape. So please listen to me when I say that I greatly dislike this term. And this term does NOTHING to help me and people like me. It's too black and white. It takes a nut and uses a sledgehammer to break it. It takes the blame from the individual and assigns it to wider society. Again the man who did what he did to me CHOSE to do so. Ireland's "rape culture" didn't make him do so. Do you think his friends would be impressed with his actions? I doubt it. Saying Ireland has a rape culture does... what, exactly? We'll wring our hands and say isn't it awful men don't police their friends' language and bla bla bla. Or we can say yeah services for victims are poor. Judges and barristers need to be coached to realise they're dealing with trauma victims. Rural services need to be improve. Instead of surveying people's attitudes to rape (because that achieves what exactly?) maybe we could survey victims in Ireland and ask them what could be improved.

    Rape won't be eliminated. Sorry. Let's get that out there now. There will always be evil ****ers. But let's punish them, let's look at our sentencing and bail which allows serial attackers free to offend again- that's not just for this, but for all crime.

    Finally I want to add- my ex policed my language. He never would have spoken crudely about an actress etc. (He seemed almost afraid to express desire). But he wasn't there for me when it counted. I'd rather someone who might crack a terrible joke on ocassion but would TRY to understand me and how this has affected me.


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 6,309 Mod ✭✭✭✭mzungu


    Grayson wrote: »
    Once again. Saying Ireland has a rape culture is not the same as saying Irish culture is a rape culture. At no point am I throwing a saying that everyone is a rapist and/or fine with rape. I'm not even saying the majority are.
    Grayson wrote:
    It's not everyone. At no point have I said it's everyone. I've gone to great pains to say it over and over again (Yet some still think I am).
    Considering you were responding directly to my post can you please state where you think I did it? May I remind you I specifically stated in my post that I did not think that you were doing that. As you can see below....
    mzungu wrote:
    Yep, you didn't say everyone was at it
    As you can see, that ground has already been covered. Anyways, moving on....

    Grayson wrote:
    And posting that someone laughed at sharon osbourne is not the same thing. Did 10% of americans say that they support castrating men? Do 10% think that a man should have his bits chopped off because of what he's wearing?
    10% of Irish people think that it's ok to have sex with a woman without her consent if she's dressed sexy. That's a sizeable amount.
    Think of it the next time you're on a bus. Look around and think that 10% of those people think it's ok to rape a woman if they're wearing sexy clothes.
    You may have missed my earlier post in response to those figures, so I will repost it here again.

    Is this the study you are referring to?

    The results don't seem to make much sense.

    For example, the results state that 21% said sex without consent is acceptable in certain situations and 11% said being drunk or on drugs justifies sex without consent.

    But at the same time....

    97% said violence against women was not acceptable.
    99% said that sending unwanted texts/pictures of a sexual nature was wrong.
    97% said making lewd remarks in public was wrong.
    99% thought that making unwanted physical contact with a colleague was wrong.

    How exactly do these two sets of figures add up? Violence against women, lewd remarks, unwanted pictures and contact is shown to be unacceptable by 97% and higher, but then 21% believe sex without consent is fine?

    Something is not right with the above.

    Also, we don't know how they defined consent (or even if they did define it) for the study. I think clues to the results may lie in the wording of the wording of the questions.

    Here is the question from that study concerning consent that the figures were taken from:
    QB10 Some people believe that having sexual intercourse without consent may be justified in certain situations. Do you think this applies to the following circumstances?

    (SHOW SCREEN - READ OUT - MULTIPLE ANSWERS POSSIBLE)

    Wearing revealing, provocative or sexy clothing
    Being drunk or using drugs
    Flirting beforehand
    Not clearly saying no or physically fighting back
    Being out walking alone at night,
    Having several sexual partners
    Voluntarily going home with someone, for example after a party or date
    If the assailant does not realise what they were doing
    If the assailant regrets his actions
    None of these
    Refusal (SPONTANEOUS)
    Don't know

    Take the wording of the question itself. It starts off with "Some people believe that having sexual intercourse without consent may be justified in certain situations." So, immediately it is guiding the respondent to think of other people rather than him or herself. Then asks "Do you think this applies to the following circumstances?"

    That leaves a hell of a lot of room for misinterpretation.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,114 ✭✭✭ivytwine


    Yeah if you asked me "some people think black people are inferior to white people. Do you agree that is the case?" I'd be genuinely confused as to whether I was supposed to agree that yes, some people do (and they're morons for the record) or yes, I personally think black people are inferior.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,732 ✭✭✭✭Sand


    ivytwine wrote: »
    Yeah if you asked me "some people think black people are inferior to white people. Do you agree that is the case?" I'd be genuinely confused as to whether I was supposed to agree that yes, some people do (and they're morons for the record) or yes, I personally think black people are inferior.

    And its not accidentally misleading either. A lot of time would have been spent drafting and redrafting the it. The question is crafted to be misleading and lend itself to wilful and negative misinterpretation.

    I think the people drafting this survey are either wilfully crafting the questions to get the answer they have already determined. Or are just seeking attention and funding. You don't get much media or professional reaction or money if your survey confirms what everyone already knew. It has to be shocking.


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 60,183 Mod ✭✭✭✭Wibbs


    Sand wrote: »
    I think the people drafting this survey are either wilfully crafting the questions to get the answer they have already determined. Or are just seeking attention and funding.
    Or most likely both S. Outside the professionals who derive benefit from this kinda "statistic", the foot soldiers who buy into this stuff do so because it already confirms what they believe and the professionals have told them.

    Rejoice in the awareness of feeling stupid, for that’s how you end up learning new things. If you’re not aware you’re stupid, you probably are.



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 6,309 Mod ✭✭✭✭mzungu


    ivytwine wrote: »
    Yeah if you asked me "some people think black people are inferior to white people. Do you agree that is the case?" I'd be genuinely confused as to whether I was supposed to agree that yes, some people do (and they're morons for the record) or yes, I personally think black people are inferior.
    Not only that, but when you delve further into the answers it gets even stranger. Here is the gender breakdown for that particular question:
    Being drunk or using drugs
    Male - 11 Female - 11


    Voluntarily going home with someone, for example after a party or date
    Male - 9 Female - 8


    Wearing revealing, provocative or sexy clothing
    Male - 7 Female - 11

    Not clearly saying no or physically fighting back
    Male 6 Female - 10


    None of these
    Male - 74 Female - 78
    According to those stats for the question, it appears that more women than men seem to see no problem with rape in certain cases.

    I think it is safe to say, a lot of the respondents misinterpreted the question (not their fault) and hence we have these bizarre results.

    Just to remind, these were the results from the other questions:
    97% said violence against women was not acceptable.
    99% said that sending unwanted texts/pictures of a sexual nature was wrong.
    97% said making lewd remarks in public was wrong.
    99% thought that making unwanted physical contact with a colleague was wrong.


    So, are we supposed to believe that the same women (and men) who (rightfully) find violence, lewd texts, remarks and unwanted physical to be completely wrong....those same people then turn around and say that rape is justified in certain circumstances? Sorry, I just don't buy it.

    The ambiguous wording of that question has a lot to answer for.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 868 ✭✭✭Icemancometh


    mzungu wrote: »
    Not only that, but when you delve further into the answers it gets even stranger. Here is the gender breakdown for that particular question:

    According to those stats for the question, it appears that more women than men seem to see no problem with rape in certain cases.

    I think it is safe to say, a lot of the respondents misinterpreted the question (not their fault) and hence we have these bizarre results.

    Just to remind, these were the results from the other questions:
    97% said violence against women was not acceptable.
    99% said that sending unwanted texts/pictures of a sexual nature was wrong.
    97% said making lewd remarks in public was wrong.
    99% thought that making unwanted physical contact with a colleague was wrong.


    So, are we supposed to believe that the same women (and men) who (rightfully) find violence, lewd texts, remarks and unwanted physical to be completely wrong....those same people then turn around and say that rape is justified in certain circumstances? Sorry, I just don't buy it.

    The ambiguous wording of that question has a lot to answer for.

    There's a technique in political polling called push polling, where you phrase a question to get a certain answer. By starting off the questions with the opening line of "Some people believe," you may get a different response than if you had a more neutral question. I wonder would the question "Do you believe sexual intercourse without consent is justified in the following circumstances?" have produced the same results without the preamble saying other people think this is ok.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,423 ✭✭✭✭Outlaw Pete


    See a female judge in UK who was accused of contributing to rape culture a few years back has again been accused of victim blaming by a Police Commissioner:
    Police commissioner Vera Baird accuses Lindsey Kushner of blaming victims by warning them about risks of disinhibition.

    A female judge who told women they were at greater risk of being raped if they got drunk has been accused of victim-blaming by a police commissioner.

    During her sentencing of a rapist in Manchester, Lindsey Kushner said there was “absolutely no excuse” for sex attacks, but that men gravitated towards vulnerable women.

    In her final case before retiring, the judge said women were entitled to “drink themselves into the ground”, but their disinhibited behaviour could put them in danger and they were less likely to be believed than a sober victim.

    The Northumbria police and crime commissioner, Dame Vera Baird, said the comments were “victim-blaming” and would stop victims coming forward.

    The former solicitor-general told the BBC Radio 4 Today programme: “When somebody is raped they feel guilt and shame and they find it very hard to report it.

    “If a judge has just said to them ‘well, if you drank you are more likely to get raped, we are not likely to believe you and you have been disinhibited so you’ve rather brought it on yourself’ then that guilt is just going to get worse.”

    Surely altering people to what increases their chances of any crime is primarily good advice. If the Gardai distribute leaflets telling people that there has been a spate of burglaries and cars broken into then I am not going to feel that advice telling me not to leave windows ajar or valuables on display inside my car is victim blaming. I mean, if I did leave a laptop on my passenger seat and it was stolen, they would still prosecute should they catch the guy (sexism) I'm sure. They're not going to say 'Well, tis your own fault and sure you could hardly expect him not to smash your window with that kind of temptation'. That would be victim blaming. Not the advice on what would increase my risk.


  • Registered Users Posts: 10,633 ✭✭✭✭Widdershins


    See a female judge in UK who was accused of contributing to rape culture a few years back has again been accused of victim blaming by a Police Commissioner:



    Surely altering people to what increases their chances of any crime is primarily good advice. If the Gardai distribute leaflets telling people that there has been a spate of burglaries and cars broken into then I am not going to feel that advice telling me not to leave windows ajar or valuables on display inside my car is victim blaming. I mean, if I did leave a laptop on my passenger seat and it was stolen, they would still prosecute should they catch the guy (sexism) I'm sure. They're not going to say 'Well, tis your own fault and sure you could hardly expect him not to smash your window with that kind of temptation'. That would be victim blaming. Not the advice on what would increase my risk.

    My friend was burgled and the garda who came out told him as he had no gate, a lock he never bothers to actually lock on the shed door, he was ''leaving himself wide open to theft''. They still investigated and found the getaway car. He was right, though. No sense in making it easier for a burlgar. Having said that it depends on how it's said, obviously it's not helpful to rub the nose of a distressed rape victim in it, although that's not what has happened in your link.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,039 ✭✭✭✭retro:electro


    People are confusing and renouncing personal responsibility for victim blaming. Victim blaming would be saying "you deserved it, what else did you expect would happen", not "best not to leave your bag open waking through town, there are serious weirdos about who would take advantage of the fact that it's left open". I detest that people can't even be told to mind themselves now or it's assumed you're blaming them for whatever could potentially happen them.

    Que some people "ya well I deserve to have the right to walk around town with my bag open if I so please! If some creep takes my money that is their fault! I won't be oppressed and told to close my bag for fear of being robbed in this male privilege society! Ugh!"
    No. There will always be weirdos. And any man women or child could rob your money, so do what you can do to potentially prevent that and close your bag. That is not me victim blaming. That is me telling you to have some cop on for yourself.
    People take measures to avoid being in ****ty situations all the time, that is not victim blaming, that is called being a responsible adult.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,423 ✭✭✭✭Outlaw Pete


    Here's said Police Commissioner, Vera Baird (2nd from the left) on one of her day's off. Colour me surprised.


    vera.jpg


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 617 ✭✭✭Ferrari3600


    Yes, they are, but Curtin's case went to court, and he was found not guilty. Unless new evidence was uncovered, he cannot go to trial for the same thing again.

    He was found not guilty on a technicality because the warrant was a day out of date! Not surprisingly this verdict or more specifically the reason it had to be given led to a cynical reaction by the general public and media.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,797 ✭✭✭✭hatrickpatrick




This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement