Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Scotland vs Ireland, 4th Feb 2017, Murrayfield, 2:25, RTÉ 2

1343537394057

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,708 ✭✭✭ScissorPaperRock


    aled wrote: »
    It is hard to credit somebody to score players associated with such an appalling performance. So I responded as such. A lot of questions to be answered by Irish rugby today. Hugely disappointed

    What does that even mean? A statement from the IRFU? All the clubs in Ireland issue an apology? It's a game... a team tries, sometimes the result doesn't go your way... nobody owes you anything...suck it up.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,734 ✭✭✭CMOTDibbler


    awec wrote: »
    Sorry hagz, but henshaw was on the ground long enough for heaslip not to throw it. It is not as if he slipped just as the ball was leaving heaslips hand.

    It was a mistake on his part.
    You can't offload while trying to protect the ball in the tackle and simultaneously look over your shoulder for the recipient. That's why players call for the offload. Robbie ran a line up behind Heaslip, called the offload and ran right which took him behind Heaslip and then slipped. He got up quickly and then slipped again. Heaslip had to assume he was going to be where he said he would be. How many times does a supporting player fall?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,992 ✭✭✭✭mfceiling


    Only saw the first ten minutes and then relied on the radio for the rest.

    Thankfully I have this forum to decipher what went wrong.

    So we're absolutely rubbish but so were Scotland. JS is a hopeless coach. All of our players are over rated and too old...that's all of them.

    Where to from here then....I hear St Marys have a couple of decent young 14 year olds...surely they must be better than the 50 - 60 capped lads we have available?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,257 ✭✭✭Hagz


    awec wrote: »
    I'm not criticising his performance really, I don't really think we should single out any forward because they were all very poor for at least 40 minutes today and none of them come out with any credit.

    I am arguing against the idea that Heaslip was our best player today or that he had a good game. He didn't have a good game. In the second half it was SOB and Stander who dragged us into the game.

    I think he made mistakes, they didn't contribute to the result and are not a big deal but they are glaring errors if you want to argue he was good today.

    I know you aren't. Just like I'm not arguing he was good. I was responding to someone who brought up the offload in the context of 'we need to start thinking of 2019.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,734 ✭✭✭CMOTDibbler


    awec wrote: »
    I'm not criticising his performance really, I don't really think we should single out any forward because they were all very poor for at least 40 minutes today and none of them come out with any credit.

    I am arguing against the idea that Heaslip was our best player today or that he had a good game. He didn't have a good game. In the second half it was SOB and Stander who dragged us into the game.

    I think he made mistakes, they didn't contribute to the result and are not a big deal but they are glaring errors if you want to argue he was good today.
    I think that's a bit harsh. SOB definitely had a good game, especially carrying where he had two clean breaks and beat four defenders. Stander was heavily marked and had 24 carries for 43 metres. Heaslip had 22 for 60. So to say he had a bad game is a bit harsh.

    Iain Henderson had six carries for three metre for example. I would have expected a lot more from him.


  • Advertisement
  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 229 ✭✭aled


    What really cracks me up about this team is such a lack of trust by Joe in his players. It is mindblowing, Murray cannot be replaced by Marmion. Earls Kearney Trimble cannot be replaced. Nobody can be replaced. And to top that off we have a game strategy that borders on, well, simply terrible.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,178 ✭✭✭Quint2010


    .ak wrote: »
    This will sound like sour grapes but the officiating was shocking. Really do feel had an impact on the result.

    Ah come now. Shocking? This drives me mental when people can't accept that we were dogsh*t for an hour today let in a try that wouldn't have looked out of place in a junior cup match. What about our defence? Where was Zebo for the first try? AWOL. Farrell needs to be asked serious questions. This is Scotland we played not New Zealand. Blaming the ref in any way is disingenuous. For me the only players who stood out for Ireland were Furlong and Henshaw.

    PS just looking at Irelands second try again and Heaslip went so blatantly in from the side at a ruck that it should have been a penalty to Scotland-so yeah the ref was poor. As for his offload Henshaw slipped well in time for Heaslip to have made the right decision and not offloaded. Oh-and it was Heaslip who gave away both the last two penalties for Scotland to win the game. And some people think he was Irelands best player???


  • Administrators Posts: 55,061 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec


    I think that's a bit harsh. SOB definitely had a good game, especially carrying where he had two clean breaks and beat four defenders. Stander was heavily marked and had 24 carries for 43 metres. Heaslip had 22 for 60. So to say he had a bad game is a bit harsh.

    Iain Henderson had six carries for three metre for example. I would have expected a lot more from him.

    Henderson definitely very poor and should lose his spot.

    I think Toner was poor too TBH. It's interesting how poor he looks when the line out isn't working. He should definitely keep his spot though.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    aled wrote: »
    What really cracks me up about this team is such a lack of trust by Joe in his players. It is mindblowing, Murray cannot be replaced by Marmion. Earls Kearney Trimble cannot be replaced. Nobody can be replaced. And to top that off we have a game strategy that borders on, well, simply terrible.

    We've the most youthful team we've ever had in the professional era. You are completely wrong, you just want to pick the team your way.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 45,433 ✭✭✭✭thomond2006


    aled wrote: »
    What really cracks me up about this team is such a lack of trust by Joe in his players. It is mindblowing, Murray cannot be replaced by Marmion. Earls Kearney Trimble cannot be replaced. Nobody can be replaced. And to top that off we have a game strategy that borders on, well, simply terrible.

    Nobody with a brain is going to take off Murray for Marmion bar when the game is over. Earls was replaced by Bowe. The props were replaced. Dillane and JVDF came on. Keatley wasn't really an option considering Jackson's second half performance.

    You repeating the same thing over and over again doesn't make it any more plausible.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,734 ✭✭✭CMOTDibbler


    aled wrote: »
    What really cracks me up about this team is such a lack of trust by Joe in his players. It is mindblowing, Murray cannot be replaced by Marmion. Earls Kearney Trimble cannot be replaced. Nobody can be replaced. And to top that off we have a game strategy that borders on, well, simply terrible.
    You've flogged that dead horse until it's skeletal at this stage. And people have responded to it with clear and concise reasons.

    Einstein's definition of madness comes to mind here.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,545 ✭✭✭swiwi_


    .ak wrote: »
    This will sound like sour grapes but the officiating was shocking. Really do feel had an impact on the result.

    It does sound like sour grapes, yes.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    awec wrote: »
    Henderson definitely very poor and should lose his spot.

    I think Toner was poor too TBH. It's interesting how poor he looks when the line out isn't working. He should definitely keep his spot though.

    Toner was our top tackler today. I'd imagine his breakdown stats weren't massive but almost certainly also top. Then again we had most of the possession, just weren't taking our chances and we lacked direction at 10.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,734 ✭✭✭CMOTDibbler


    awec wrote: »
    Henderson definitely very poor and should lose his spot.

    I think Toner was poor too TBH. It's interesting how poor he looks when the line out isn't working. He should definitely keep his spot though.
    The funny thing is Toner was our best tackler. 14 and missed 1. Two more than Rory Best and three more than Garry Ringrose.

    Some strange stats from today really.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,910 ✭✭✭shootermacg


    Donnacha Ryan will be looking at this thinking he's the best second row in Ireland......which he is. :cool:

    ?width=630&version=490013


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,257 ✭✭✭Hagz


    I couldn't really fault the officiating. There was one moment where I thought a Scottish knock down was worth a TMO look, and perhaps Scotland were lucky to escape a yellow card with the number of infringements close to their line. But other than that I have no real complaints. Poite will be relieved I'm sure.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,520 ✭✭✭nagdefy


    We didn't have an answer to Scotland being offside and/or in our faces meaning it was extremely difficult to get the ball out to the wings.

    And we should have had a plan for the that as all my life Scotland have lived on the offside line.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 229 ✭✭aled


    You've flogged that dead horse until it's skeletal at this stage. And people have responded to it with clear and concise reasons.

    Einstein's definition of madness comes to mind here.

    You have a point :-)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,734 ✭✭✭CMOTDibbler


    nagdefy wrote: »
    And we should have had a plan for the that as all my life Scotland have lived on the offside line.
    It's really difficult to mitigate agaiinst without affecting your gain line success. You go a bit deeper, but then you're getting hit behind the gain line and lose ground.

    We tried the pragmatic approach and it probably worked pretty well. It didn't help though that we gave up so many soft tries early. The one at the lineout was particularly stupid. Joe will have the forwards doing counting exercises for that one. :o


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,308 ✭✭✭✭.ak


    swiwi_ wrote: »
    It does sound like sour grapes, yes.

    So sue me! ;)


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,520 ✭✭✭nagdefy


    I don't like being overly critical of Joe Schmidt but..

    It's time to be blooding alternatives on the bench other than Tommy Bowe, great servant, but 33 and coming back from injury, with the World Cup in 2019 in mind. Also O'Halloran surely offers as much as Kearney. Ian Keatley our 2nd number 10?

    I know the 6 Nations is important for World Cup seeding but we can be competitive and blood a few guys aswell.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,290 ✭✭✭✭PTH2009


    I knew Scotland would shock us but it's very very disappointing from an Irish perspective. Obv the grand slam/triple crown are gone but it's hard to see us win all the other games with bonus points unless we improve a lot


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,308 ✭✭✭✭.ak


    Quint2010 wrote: »
    Ah come now. Shocking? This drives me mental when people can't accept that we were dogsh*t for an hour today let in a try that wouldn't have looked out of place in a junior cup match. What about our defence? Where was Zebo for the first try? AWOL. Farrell needs to be asked serious questions. This is Scotland we played not New Zealand. Blaming the ref in any way is disingenuous. For me the only players who stood out for Ireland were Furlong and Henshaw.

    PS just looking at Irelands second try again and Heaslip went so blatantly in from the side at a ruck that it should have been a penalty to Scotland-so yeah the ref was poor. As for his offload Henshaw slipped well in time for Heaslip to have made the right decision and not offloaded. Oh-and it was Heaslip who gave away both the last two penalties for Scotland to win the game. And some people think he was Irelands best player???

    Ah hang on now - where did I say I don't accept we were dog****?

    We were by far the worst team, we were awful, Scotland were excellent and deserved the win.

    That doesn't mean I can't have the opinion Poite was shocking. He was shocking for both sides. Unfortunately it had a bigger impact on us.

    If I was the captain I'd be in his ear over the infringements in their 22. A simple word; we're conceding tries sir, they're conceding penalties.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 229 ✭✭aled


    awec wrote: »
    Henderson definitely very poor and should lose his spot.

    I think Toner was poor too TBH. It's interesting how poor he looks when the line out isn't working. He should definitely keep his spot though.
    Both are really good players. So do you blame them or why did it go wrong for them?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 45,433 ✭✭✭✭thomond2006


    PTH2009 wrote: »
    I knew Scotland would shock us but it's very very disappointing from an Irish perspective. Obv the grand slam/triple crown are gone but it's hard to see us win all the other games with bonus points unless we improve a lot

    Who says we need to win all the other games with bonus points?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,257 ✭✭✭Hagz


    Quint2010 wrote: »
    As for his offload Henshaw slipped well in time for Heaslip to have made the right decision and not offloaded. Oh-and it was Heaslip who gave away both the last two penalties for Scotland to win the game. And some people think he was Irelands best player???

    The first penalty was given against Paddy Jackson. This along with the comment "Henshaw slipped well in time" gives your post a certain complexion.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,440 ✭✭✭The Rape of Lucretia


    aled wrote: »
    What really cracks me up about this team is such a lack of trust by Joe in his players. It is mindblowing, Murray cannot be replaced by Marmion. Earls Kearney Trimble cannot be replaced. Nobody can be replaced. And to top that off we have a game strategy that borders on, well, simply terrible.

    Its not a question of trust. Murray is leagues above Marmion and subbing Murray is madness. Earls, Kearney, Trimble, and Zeebs next are clearly our best back three quartet.
    If there were better alternatives, Joe would indeed replace them. But there arent. So you keep going with the best options in town.
    Game strategy was poor today yes. But thats a rare one for Joe. Painfuk to take, but I would give him a bye on this one. He has more than enough credit in the bank. Its how he will alter it for the other tough games that will be the test.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,017 ✭✭✭clsmooth


    A lot of similarities between today and Argentina in RWC15. Both games we started slowly and passively in defence. We gave 14 point leads up. In both games we clawed ourselves back into the game. Today we actually went in front but just couldn't get that next matching winning score. And thats was the problem. We had several chances from attacking lineouts and line breaks that we didn't take. It was an off day at the office unfortunately. We were flat from the get go. Luckily this time we don't have to wait 4 months for the next chance of redemption.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,520 ✭✭✭nagdefy


    It's really difficult to mitigate agaiinst without affecting your gain line success. You go a bit deeper, but then you're getting hit behind the gain line and lose ground.

    We tried the pragmatic approach and it probably worked pretty well. It didn't help though that we gave up so many soft tries early. The one at the lineout was particularly stupid. Joe will have the forwards doing counting exercises for that one. :o

    Intelligent kicking in behind to keep them honest as the saying goes but it didn't happen today. You need imagination, guys that get hands in behind defenders also and can offload like Drico etc.

    That first half was the problem, mentally they weren't on their game collectively. That happens in every sport.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,047 ✭✭✭Clonmel1000


    Just shows I suppose winning meaningless challenge games means nothing in tournament sport.


Advertisement