Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Will Sligo Services be Stopping at Broombridge?

  • 19-01-2017 10:19PM
    #1
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,121 ✭✭✭


    Irish rail should do this. I think a lot of people would find the transfer very useful. Especially when the campus at Grangegorman gets going. For people going to the Mater too. It'll be very handy.

    I know IE don't understand connections, but this will make sense.


«134

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,271 ✭✭✭Elemonator


    Ah sure, at least giz a pay rise first :D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,363 ✭✭✭✭Del.Monte


    When I saw the thread I thought somebody was taking up my suggestion of terminating all inter-city trains at outer suburban stations and transferring to commuter services. :D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,295 ✭✭✭n97 mini


    Del.Monte wrote: »
    When I saw the thread I thought somebody was taking up my suggestion of terminating all inter-city trains at outer suburban stations and transferring to commuter services. :D

    Outer suburban? It's as far out as Sydney Parade.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,931 ✭✭✭✭riffmongous


    Ah Broombridge, that takes me back..fires, horses and dirtbikes on the platforms


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,650 ✭✭✭Infini


    Ah Broombridge, that takes me back..fires, horses and dirtbikes on the platforms

    Nah never beat the time a horse raced a train from broomer to o reillys.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,943 ✭✭✭tabbey


    Ah Broombridge, that takes me back..fires, horses and dirtbikes on the platforms

    For many years the city end ofthe down platform had the footprint of a burnt motorbike cut into the tarmac.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 168 ✭✭Jem72


    This would be extremely useful. You'd be able to do a cross-platform transfer to avoid the walk into the city centre or on to the south city centre or even Sandyford. The commuting potential is fantastic - Mullingar to Sandyford would even be viable at that.

    But I'd be quite surprised if it happened. The usefulness of Luas BXD will end up seriously diminished because of lack of connections and in particular lack of fare integration. Sad really.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,050 ✭✭✭Hilly Bill


    Just change at Maynooth.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 710 ✭✭✭MrMorooka


    Jem72 wrote: »
    But I'd be quite surprised if it happened. The usefulness of Luas BXD will end up seriously diminished because of lack of connections and in particular lack of fare integration. Sad really.

    Very true. The main problem I see is the frequency(or lack thereof) on the Maynooth line will really hamper the connection. The reality of trying to arrive at Broombridge in time for an hourly train on a tram that can get caught in traffic etc will be very offputting. Maynooth line really needs to electrified and brought up to a DART-style 15-minute frequency to make the most out of BXD.

    As for the anti-social aspect, Broombridge is an awful lot better these days, but we have seen nothing yet, Dominic Luas stop is going to have a lot of problems.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 168 ✭✭Jem72


    Hilly Bill wrote: »
    Just change at Maynooth.

    Changing at Maynooth would add 25 minutes to the journey assuming there is a stopping train leaving 5 minutes after the intercity and would involve crossing quite a steep footbridge in Maynooth.

    Given that intercity trains are generally crawling along stuck behind another service at that point, stopping at Broombridge will make practically zero difference to the end-to-end journey time. As a Sligo-line commuter who would not use this facility to change as I work close to Connolly, I would not object at all to the train making a stop at Broombridge both ways to enable transfers.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,295 ✭✭✭n97 mini


    Really all interchange stations should have stops. Maynooth, Clonsilla, Broombridge, Drumcondra.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 18,268 ✭✭✭✭uck51js9zml2yt


    I hope not..Broombridge is bad enough without culchies landing there as well;)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,943 ✭✭✭tabbey


    I suspect if the Green line extension to Broombridge proves popular, there will be demands for longer distance trains to stop there. It is not as bad stopping there as elsewhere, because trains move slowly being close to the sharp curve at Liffey Jn.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,318 ✭✭✭✭Grandeeod


    Hilly Bill wrote: »
    Just change at Maynooth.

    2 changes when 1 will do.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 611 ✭✭✭MGWR


    ClovenHoof wrote: »
    Irish rail should do this. I think a lot of people would find the transfer very useful. Especially when the campus at Grangegorman gets going. For people going to the Mater too. It'll be very handy.

    I know IE don't understand connections, but this will make sense.
    No. Slowing down intercity service never makes sense. Even if one is looking to connect to a future light rail service that nobody will want to ride due to on-board conditions.

    Then again, the BXD Luas does not make a shred of sense either. Things would have been better if the Luas Green Line were rebuilt as metro including an underground connector to a restored Broadstone as a commuter/intercity railway station. But things even being as they are or will be, the Sligo trains still ought not stop at Broombridge.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,363 ✭✭✭✭Del.Monte


    @ MGWR

    I tend to agree with you and would have preferred to see the Broadstone/Liffey Jn alignment used by heavy rail and, as I have predicted elsewhere, the cross-city Luas will be a playground for junkies and get caught in traffic collisions just as the Red Line already does. Plus, if there was any case for it - it should have turned right at the bottom of Dawson Street and extended to Connolly via Pearse Station.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,091 ✭✭✭The_Wanderer


    This actually a very good idea (and I wouldn't always agree with clovenhoof's posts!). It has a lot of benefits especially if going to the south west of the City Centre (St. Stephen's Green area etc). Something I would like to see happen.

    Remember back in the day the Rosslare service went non-stop Connolly to Bray. Then Tara St, Pearse & Dun-Laoghaire appeared in one of the mid 2000 timetables to welcome applause. The idea of the DL stop was for Ferry and a major bus termination point. The ferry option didn't work as history shows, but the bus connections to south and west Dublin are still there.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,050 ✭✭✭Hilly Bill


    Grandeeod wrote: »
    2 changes when 1 will do.

    Change in Connolly then.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,318 ✭✭✭✭Grandeeod


    Hilly Bill wrote: »
    Change in Connolly then.

    Connections CIE style. You've been there too long.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,363 ✭✭✭✭Del.Monte


    This actually a very good idea (and I wouldn't always agree with clovenhoof's posts!). It has a lot of benefits especially if going to the south west of the City Centre (St. Stephen's Green area etc). Something I would like to see happen.

    Remember back in the day the Rosslare service went non-stop Connolly to Bray. Then Tara St, Pearse & Dun-Laoghaire appeared in one of the mid 2000 timetables to welcome applause. The idea of the DL stop was for Ferry and a major bus termination point. The ferry option didn't work as history shows, but the bus connections to south and west Dublin are still there.

    From memory, the pre-recorded message on the 22000s still suggests that passengers de-train at Dun Laoghaire for ferries. :rolleyes:


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,834 ✭✭✭✭Jamie2k9


    Perhaps the 05.45 and 16.00 which serve Drumcondra should also serve the stop which gives people beyond Longford a connection and both return Longford services also stop already. Then if demand is there maybe a lunchtime service in each direction but no need for every train to stop. The vast majority of traffic would be catered for.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,834 ✭✭✭✭Jamie2k9


    Del.Monte wrote: »
    From memory, the pre-recorded message on the 22000s still suggests that passengers de-train at Dun Laoghaire for ferries. :rolleyes:

    In Waterford we have been waiting almost 9 years for the "automatic exit barriers operating at this station ". :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,091 ✭✭✭The_Wanderer


    Jamie2k9 wrote: »
    In Waterford we have been waiting almost 9 years for the "automatic exit barriers operating at this station ". :)


    Add Portlaoise to that as well. I do remember sending off a "suggestion" that this be removed. Still waiting......


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,366 ✭✭✭goingnowhere


    Del.Monte wrote: »
    From memory, the pre-recorded message on the 22000s still suggests that passengers de-train at Dun Laoghaire for ferries. :rolleyes:

    Taken out more than a year ago


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,363 ✭✭✭✭Del.Monte


    Taken out more than a year ago

    I was on a train within the last couple of months that had the message - just can't remember what class of a yoke it was - could even have been a DART.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,943 ✭✭✭tabbey


    In 2010, the year of two winters, I was on the road at (the unopened) Kishogue station hoping to get photos of trains in the snow. I was stunned when I heard "Please stand behind the yellow line, train now approaching".
    Over six years later we are still waiting for the station to open, do ghost passengers still hear this announcement? or have the speakers died?.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,834 ✭✭✭✭Jamie2k9


    tabbey wrote: »
    In 2010, the year of two winters, I was on the road at (the unopened) Kishogue station hoping to get photos of trains in the snow. I was stunned when I heard "Please stand behind the yellow line, train now approaching".
    Over six years later we are still waiting for the station to open, do ghost passengers still hear this announcement? or have the speakers died?.

    Unless they have been vandalized (wouldn't surprise me as there has been issues around there) they should be in working order and hear the same announcement.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 168 ✭✭Jem72


    Ordinarily, I would agree that stopping intercity trains is a bad idea, but there are numerous reasons why Broombridge is an exception

    1. The connectivity from Broombridge will be among the best in the city giving very frequent one-change connections to important destinations including O'Connell Street, St. Stephen's Green, Docklands, Dundrum and Sandyford.
    2. Relatively few people find Connolly itself a useful destination. The utility of going direct to Connolly is limited to the connectivity offered from Connolly.
    3. The time penalty of a stop at Broombridge is minimal since there is a slow curve immediately after it and many inbound trains will be stuck behind a Maynooth service here anyway.

    The journey time to the north city centre will be about equal (but a lot drier) from a change to Luas as from going to Connolly and walking. For everywhere else it will be far quicker to change at Broombridge.

    If this were to be tried on a few trains, I'd echo Jamie2k9's suggestion of having the 0545 and the 1600 stop, but would also add the 1705 as this is an important commuter service for Mullingar and Longford.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,121 ✭✭✭ClovenHoof


    MGWR wrote: »
    No. Slowing down intercity service never makes sense.

    So we should run the services from Sligo to Connolly without a single stop in between? Why not take this to the maximum potential then?

    If anything, the connectivity would boost passenger numbers. I would reckon that people going from the Sligo services to south side would love this option. Considering the vastly greater population of the Green Line catchment area.

    The DART only serves people on one side of the line and seagulls and fish on the other.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 611 ✭✭✭MGWR


    ClovenHoof wrote: »
    So we should run the services from Sligo to Connolly without a single stop in between? Why not take this to the maximum potential then?

    If anything, the connectivity would boost passenger numbers. I would reckon that people going from the Sligo services to south side would love this option. Considering the vastly greater population of the Green Line catchment area.

    The DART only serves people on one side of the line and seagulls and fish on the other.
    Mere connectivity is not key to passenger numbers; reliability and time-competitiveness of service is. Start slowing down trains and interfering with their timeliness and those trains bleed passengers. And that's not mentioning the lack of speed that a north-south Luas is going to exhibit inherently, which would not be in existence in a metro line that would bypass the surface traffic of all kinds.

    This identified (herein) possible market would need to be studied, especially as to how much demand there would be, especially since there would be pre-existing connecting service at Maynooth, and how disrupting the timetable would affect all trains on this service for a questionably-sized segment of this market.


Advertisement