El Presidente Trump

PopePalpatine · 17-12-2016 01:42PM

DEFTLEFTHAND wrote: »

Donald reigned as The King of New York. Now he he reigns as the King of the Unites States.

You will respect him my son.

Poor Drumpf, there's no lése majesté laws for him or his cultists to use. :rolleyes:

HellSquirrel · 17-12-2016 02:35PM

Professor Moriarty wrote: »

It's not going to help Clinton because there will be only a handful of faithless electors and they will vote for another Republican. Best outcome is that there are enough faithless electors to further inflame divisions within the GOP.

Oh quite, there's no way that the Rep part of the electoral college would vote Clinton. Maybe some protest votes for Romney or Ryan.

Professor Moriarty · 17-12-2016 02:56PM

HellSquirrel wrote: »

Oh quite, there's no way that the Rep part of the electoral college would vote Clinton. Maybe some protest votes for Romney or Ryan.

You know you've followed the white rabbit down the hole when you find yourself wishing for a President Romney instead of what's coming.

HellSquirrel · 17-12-2016 02:59PM

Professor Moriarty wrote: »

You know you've followed the white rabbit down the hole when you find yourself wishing for a President Romney instead of what's coming.

This year is so bat**** crazy that I'd nearly support President Reagan again!

We appear to be in the future where Biff Tannan won.

Professor Moriarty · 17-12-2016 03:11PM

HellSquirrel wrote: »

This year is so bat**** crazy that I'd nearly support President Reagan again!

We appear to be in the future where Biff Tannan won.

Biff is smarter and better looking than Chump though.

Skommando · 17-12-2016 03:19PM

Unfortunately in this election it boiled down to two choices . . .

Do you prefer the leader of the western world to be obviously evil and stupid for all to see . . .

Or do you prefer them to be just as evil but crafty enough to fool some people they are not, and much better at covering their tracks . . .

Which is more dangerous ? It's a hard choice, but I think the second option is more dangerous.

Professor Moriarty · 17-12-2016 03:46PM

Skommando wrote: »

Unfortunately in this election it boiled down to two choices . . .

Do you prefer the leader of the western world to be obviously evil and stupid for all to see . . .

Or do you prefer them to be just as evil but crafty enough to fool some people they are not, and much better at covering their tracks . . .

Which is more dangerous ? It's a hard choice, but I think the second option is more dangerous.

Considering the appointments he has made to cabinet, i.e. loons and greedy piggies, his appointment to the EPA, his choice of ambassador to Israel, his goading of China, and so on, I think the world would have been far safer with Clinton in charge.

RobertKK · 17-12-2016 03:50PM

Michelle Obama talked a lot of rubbish about how Barack brought hope and now we can see what it is like when there is no hope - which is a pop at Trump.

She is so far up her own arse and that of her husband to see that people had lost hope in them many years ago, if they were foolish to believe their slogan of hope to begin with.

Life goes on and we make our own hope.

Skommando · 17-12-2016 04:09PM

Professor Moriarty wrote: »

Considering the appointments he has made to cabinet, i.e. loons and greedy piggies, his appointment to the EPA, his choice of ambassador to Israel, his goading of China, and so on, I think the world would have been far safer with Clinton in charge.

As bad as they might be, I actually prefer the what you see is what you get brigade, at least you can see clearly what they are about, rather than the cowardly slimey smooth talking forked tongue spin doctor types we're more used to having in recent years.

Professor Moriarty · 17-12-2016 04:21PM

Skommando wrote: »

As bad as they might be, I actually prefer the what you see is what you get brigade, at least you can see clearly what they are about, rather than the cowardly slimey smooth talking forked tongue spin doctor types we're more used to having in recent years.

You have a cohort of people who come from the extremes. Transparent or not, the problem is that they are very bad. They are led by a celebrity, rich kid, business failure who has zero political experience. His gaffes, bizarre behaviour and political appointments simply reflect who and what he is. What would you expect from a pig but a grunt.

A Little Pony · 17-12-2016 04:26PM

RobertKK wrote: »

Michelle Obama talked a lot of rubbish about how Barack brought hope and now we can see what it is like when there is no hope - which is a pop at Trump.

She is so far up her own arse and that of her husband to see that people had lost hope in them many years ago, if they were foolish to believe their slogan of hope to begin with.

Life goes on and we make our own hope.

She and Obama are great at just talking. Trump hammered her mate and she should just go into the wilderness now and think about her decision to back Hillary Clinton who wasted over a billion on her awful campaign.

Billy86 · 17-12-2016 05:23PM

So Trump's been hammering on about Chinese military activity on Twitter now - one step closer to war, and one step closer to the jokes/predictions that he would give 'going nuclear on social media' a whole new meaning.

The Taiwan issue is becoming more and more troublesome also to add to this, which not only are the Chinese unhappy about, but the Taiwanese legitimately very worried about.

#Trumpforworldpeace!!

Steve012 · 17-12-2016 06:02PM

RobertKK wrote: »

Michelle Obama talked a lot of rubbish about how Barack brought hope and now we can see what it is like when there is no hope - which is a pop at Trump.

She is so far up her own arse and that of her husband to see that people had lost hope in them many years ago, if they were foolish to believe their slogan of hope to begin with.

Life goes on and we make our own hope.

I always thought she was a he/she!

HellSquirrel · 17-12-2016 06:08PM

Steve012 wrote: »

I always thought she was a he/she!

Oh grow the fcuk up.

Skommando · 17-12-2016 06:37PM

Professor Moriarty wrote: »

You have a cohort of people who come from the extremes. Transparent or not, the problem is that they are very bad. They are led by a celebrity, rich kid, business failure who has zero political experience. His gaffes, bizarre behaviour and political appointments simply reflect who and what he is. What would you expect from a pig but a grunt.

yeah but with me, the other side don't fool me any more than trump does, but at least trump's gang is more obvious to others.

HellSquirrel · 17-12-2016 06:54PM

Skommando wrote: »

yeah but with me, the other side don't fool me any more than trump does, but at least trump's gang is more obvious to others.

Unfortunately, no-one seems to be able to do anything about his gang. And they are a pretty revolting troupe of scumbags for the most part (I'm still clinging onto hope that there's a couple of non-lunatics in the barrel). They're going to try **** that no-one else would have, partly because they don't have the experience to know what they're doing and partly because there's a lot of long-term repercussions. Some of them might do well in the short-term; sure, strip-mine Montana. Lots of lovely coal. A lot of land ruined and consequent effects on the air and water, but with the destruction of the regulations, that won't have much effect - until people start getting sick. Love Canal anyone? Beijing smogs? And that's without going near climate change and that dip**** wanting to pull out of any accords that puts the good of the earth over temporary economic advantage. Sure, you can raid your house for copper and iron and rip it all out, but your house'll be a bit **** once it's all gone. And unlike that analogy, you can't just build another one.

Same goes for medical insurance, civil rights and all the rest of the issues covered by this charming set of toads.

Tbh, Clinton may not be a saint (although again, there's a hell of a lot more smoke than fire so far), at least she's got enough common sense and policy nous that she could have made a better hash of it than this idiot, who is already causing tensions to rise with China, who doesn't understand Russia, bar that Putin pats him and calls him a good boy and who doesn't understand or want to understand NATO.

Water's long under the bridge there, and she wasn't the best pick for nominee - her reputation was far too badly damaged for that run - but Trump is so devoid of either common sense or knowledge (or a want for knowledge) that I do honestly think she (and pretty much anyone else) would have been a better one.

Sigh. And then there's Pence. Of course there is. Every sultan needs a bloody Jafar.

DEFTLEFTHAND · 17-12-2016 06:55PM

PopePalpatine wrote: »

Poor Drumpf, there's no lése majesté laws for him or his cultists to use. :rolleyes:

No, not Drumpf.

President Donald John Trump.:)

HellSquirrel · 17-12-2016 07:00PM

DEFTLEFTHAND wrote: »

No, not Drumpf.

President Donald John Trump.:)

President-Elect Donald John Trump (I wonder if you realise that he apparently deeply dislikes the John and he's not overly keen on the Donald either. You'd make him happier calling him President Trump, although that's not actually yet accurate, but who cares about accuracy anymore..).

Skommando · 17-12-2016 07:13PM

HellSquirrel wrote: »

Unfortunately, no-one seems to be able to do anything about his gang. And they are a pretty revolting troupe of scumbags for the most part (I'm still clinging onto hope that there's a couple of non-lunatics in the barrel). They're going to try **** that no-one else would have, partly because they don't have the experience to know what they're doing and partly because there's a lot of long-term repercussions. Some of them might do well in the short-term; sure, strip-mine Montana. Lots of lovely coal. A lot of land ruined and consequent effects on the air and water, but with the destruction of the regulations, that won't have much effect - until people start getting sick. Love Canal anyone? Beijing smogs? And that's without going near climate change and that dip**** wanting to pull out of any accords that puts the good of the earth over temporary economic advantage. Sure, you can raid your house for copper and iron and rip it all out, but your house'll be a bit **** once it's all gone. And unlike that analogy, you can't just build another one.

Same goes for medical insurance, civil rights and all the rest of the issues covered by this charming set of toads.

Tbh, Clinton may not be a saint (although again, there's a hell of a lot more smoke than fire so far), at least she's got enough common sense and policy nous that she could have made a better hash of it than this idiot, who is already causing tensions to rise with China, who doesn't understand Russia, bar that Putin pats him and calls him a good boy and who doesn't understand or want to understand NATO.

Water's long under the bridge there, and she wasn't the best pick for nominee - her reputation was far too badly damaged for that run - but Trump is so devoid of either common sense or knowledge (or a want for knowledge) that I do honestly think she (and pretty much anyone else) would have been a better one.

Sigh. And then there's Pence. Of course there is. Every sultan needs a bloody Jafar.

sure the other side are smoother spin doctors and better at hiding their real agendas and fooling people than trump's crowd, and the media love to push and promote them, but I don't think this is a good thing.

DEFTLEFTHAND · 17-12-2016 07:17PM

HellSquirrel wrote: »

President-Elect Donald John Trump (I wonder if you realise that he apparently deeply dislikes the John and he's not overly keen on the Donald either. You'd make him happier calling him President Trump, although that's not actually yet accurate, but who cares about accuracy anymore..).

I don't like my name either. I thought about going the Deed Poll route but way too much hassle.

Would be kind of weird with family and friends also.

PopePalpatine · 17-12-2016 07:18PM

DEFTLEFTHAND wrote: »

No, not Drumpf.

President Donald John Trump.:)

Poor President-Elect Dorito Jesus Trump, who needs lése-majesté laws to protect his ego.

Renegade Mechanic · 17-12-2016 07:21PM

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AxRg6hg8Cfk

And I suppose Lyndon Johnson stayed still while the Democrats approved of you, lol....

A Little Pony · 17-12-2016 07:45PM

The obsession with Putin, why do so many people care? Putin gets blamed for everything, Hillary blamed him for why she lost the other day!

DEFTLEFTHAND · 17-12-2016 07:54PM

PopePalpatine wrote: »

Poor President-Elect Dorito Jesus Trump, who needs lése-majesté laws to protect his ego.

:mad:

Don't be so mean.

Pherekydes · 17-12-2016 07:58PM

The Trump presidency will be grotesque, unbelievable, bizarre, and unpresidented.

:pac:

Or more likely non-existent.

Zubeneschamali · 17-12-2016 08:06PM

DEFTLEFTHAND wrote: »

Cop yourself on and show a bit of respect to the future leader of the free world.

Leader of the free world my hole.

Jimmy Garlic · 17-12-2016 08:10PM

A Little Pony wrote: »

The obsession with Putin, why do so many people care? Putin gets blamed for everything, Hillary blamed him for why she lost the other day!

Seth Rich was most likely the source for the DNC leaks. He was shot in the back in a ''botched robbery'' where nothing was taken. Assassinated. Assange has more or less confirmed that he was the source of the DNC leaks..

Recently there have been a lot of fake news reports emanating from the US alleging that Russia hacked the elections, these reports back up their assertions with absolutely no evidence whatsoever.

A Little Pony · 17-12-2016 08:24PM

Jimmy Garlic wrote: »

A Little Pony wrote: »

The obsession with Putin, why do so many people care? Putin gets blamed for everything, Hillary blamed him for why she lost the other day!

Seth Rich was most likely the source for the DNC leaks. He was shot in the back in a ''botched robbery'' where nothing was taken. Assassinated. Assange has more or less confirmed that he was the source of the DNC leaks..

Recently there have been a lot of fake news reports emanating from the US alleging that Russia hacked the elections, these reports back up their assertions with absolutely no evidence whatsoever.

Absolutely. Murdered on the orders of the DNC. More to this story than people think.

HellSquirrel · 17-12-2016 08:52PM

Wait, so first you have to assume that Seth Rich is the mostly likely source, then you have to assume that the CIA, the FBI (who have been somewhat pro-Trump so far if anything) are lying, then you have to assume that the UK intelligence services are lying because Reasons, I suppose, then you have to assume that he was assassinated, presumably by Clinton disguised as a ninja, because it's always Clinton.

It's a possibility, I won't deny that. I'd hesitate to call it "probably" though. That's being a bit too certain for the circumstances.

I would lean more towards the evidence of the use of cyrillic in the code and the use of the same IPs, code system and malware type as in a German hacking last year which also pointed to Russia though. And the complexity of the operation doesn't suggest some random bloke either.

ebbsy · 17-12-2016 09:38PM

DEFTLEFTHAND wrote: »

Professor Moriarty wrote: »

I prefer Donald Chump. It's more descriptive. I look forward to his presidency and, in particular, where his ego continues to swell and his head finally explodes scattering sh1t everywhere. That will be fun to watch.

How dare you disrespect the 45th President of the United States like that!!

You call him by his name, President Donald John Trump.

God bless you and God bless the usa.

El Presidente Trump

Comments