Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Galway to get a nuclear bunker for 55 people

2»

Comments

  • #32
    PucaMama
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,129 ✭✭✭PucaMama


    ScumLord wrote: »
    I think being one of only 55 people left in the world would be worse than the few seconds of suffering you'd have to endure outside the bunker.

    55 people left in the country.

    No bomb would incinerate the entire world population people would be left to die slowly from radiation poisoning and disease


  • #33
    ScumLord
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,787 ✭✭✭✭ScumLord


    PucaMama wrote: »
    55 people left in the country.

    No bomb would incinerate the entire world population people would be left to die slowly from radiation poisoning and disease
    No, but the collapse of the global economy would mean you'll be living on whatevers around you. It would be chaos for those left over and possibly a futile attempt.


  • #34
    The Wolverine
    Closed Accounts Posts: 370 ✭✭The Wolverine


    PucaMama wrote: »
    I'm not a man tho so I'm ok. I'd have my own bunker anyway.

    The end goal is repopulation. Not sexual satisfaction.This should be made clear to whoever is chosen. However bad that sounds, they are better off than the ones left outside.

    Jaysus your beating hard on the it shouldn't be for good looking women drum, worried are you? :pac:


  • #35
    kowloon
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 14,189 ✭✭✭✭kowloon


    Grayson wrote: »
    I've seen the civil defence booklets from back then. After a nuclear attack you were supposed to go outside and sweep the fallout away from your driveway every morning.

    I need to see a copy of that :D.


  • #36
    PucaMama
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,129 ✭✭✭PucaMama


    The Wolverine wrote: »
    Jaysus your beating hard on the it shouldn't be for good looking women drum, worried are you? :pac:

    No, I won't be going into a bunker belonging to someone else


  • Advertisement
  • #37
    pure.conya
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 904 ✭✭✭pure.conya


    Grayson wrote: »
    I've seen the civil defence booklets from back then. After a nuclear attack you were supposed to go outside and sweep the fallout away from your driveway every morning.

    the americans weren't much better back then either

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BFT8hLjHtuE


  • #38
    RobertKK
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,782 ✭✭✭✭RobertKK


    Butters1979 wrote: »
    Well then it's about bloody time we had a discussion about it.

    Serious question, did you know that was an RTE archive before posting it?

    I am leaving the country for a week due to embarrassment if that answers your question :p


  • #39
    Butters1979
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,164 ✭✭✭Butters1979


    PucaMama wrote: »
    No, I won't be going into a bunker belonging to someone else

    No you sure won't.


  • #40
    PucaMama
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,129 ✭✭✭PucaMama


    Butters1979 wrote: »
    No you sure won't.

    And? Hardly wrong that I don't want someone else in charge


  • #41
    osarusan
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,059 ✭✭✭✭osarusan


    It would not be difficult Mein Fuhrer. Nuclear reactors could...I'm sorry, Mr. President.


  • Advertisement
  • #42
    topper75
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,942 ✭✭✭topper75


    Limerick had one under the Customs House, or as the youngsters like to call it - the Hunt museum.

    I presume there were bunkers in Dublin and Cork too?


Advertisement
Advertisement