Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Seismic Activity at San Andreas Fault.

2»

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,887 ✭✭✭Atoms for Peace


    Its like the plot to escape from LA...



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 9,434 ✭✭✭cml387


    Coincidentally there is action at the dangerous Icelandic volcano known as Katla

    And a big hurricane headed for Jamaica.

    Never turn your back on mother earth.

    Name the pop group?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,692 ✭✭✭Stigura


    cml387 wrote: »
    Never turn your back on mother earth.

    Name the pop group?

    Sparks. Saw them live.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 24,461 ✭✭✭✭darkpagandeath


    Build a wall around the fault job done.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,239 ✭✭✭Jimbob1977


    That Charlton Heston film from the 1970s is a decent thriller. Earthquake.

    The 1989 Baseball World Series between San Francisco Giants and Oakland Athletics (The Bay Series) was interrupted live on TV by the Loma Pieta earthquake.

    Building on a fault line is a huge gamble.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,163 ✭✭✭✭Del2005


    Samaris wrote: »
    -Would- be a game-changer. Yosemite popping would be extremely messy and likely destroy most of the northern United States. The San Andreas Big One wouldn't be fun to live through, but at its absolute worst, it wouldn't affect more than a state (roughly). Yosemite is orders of magnitude bigger in terms of potential disaster.

    I think if San Andreas goes it'll affect a bit more than one State as the tsunami would do a bit of damage around the Pacific. And even if it just affected one State it is one of the biggest economies in the world if it wasn't part of the USA so there would be serious financial difficulties afterwards, without even getting into the potential loss of life and major infrastructure destruction.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,114 ✭✭✭OU812


    Jimbob1977 wrote: »
    That Charlton Heston film from the 1970s is a decent thriller. Earthquake.

    Very dated by today's standards.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,114 ✭✭✭OU812


    Samaris wrote: »
    The San Andreas Big One wouldn't be fun to live through, but at its absolute worst, it wouldn't affect more than a state (roughly). Yosemite is orders of magnitude bigger in terms of potential disaster.

    California economy is the largest in the US (by 49% over the next closest state - Texas), there's also the neighbouring states - Washington, Oregon, Nevada, New Mexico which would be affected. Depending on where & when it strikes, the San Andreas has the potential to cause devastation in several of them.

    Candie wrote: »
    There's a State-wide alert in force in California, something they don't issue lightly.

    Have you a source for this please?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,692 ✭✭✭Stigura




    F**king brilliant number!


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 9,668 CMod ✭✭✭✭Fathom


    Overheal wrote: »
    The only third swarm of earthquakes of this kind (140+ since Monday) since seismology started in the 30s, and nothing of this magnitude. The USGS is pinning the chance of the San Andreas Fault shifting - causing The Big One - is as high as 1/100 or as low as 1/3000 for the next month given the current status.
    California shakes. Always. Rarely notice. This morning I did. Looked behind. No one. Slight floor tremor. BIG ONE? Tomorrow? Or 1000 years? No one knows. Geologic time vast. Human species history? Geologic eye blink.

    Cmod Science, Health, and Environment



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,900 ✭✭✭InTheTrees




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,900 ✭✭✭InTheTrees


    Its scary. In a kind of abstract way. It could happen tomorrow or in a thousand years.

    I've been in a 7.1, and a 6.8 and many many 5+

    We're in Seattle now. With the added risk of an active volcano just south of the city.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,114 ✭✭✭OU812


    InTheTrees wrote: »

    We're in Seattle now. With the added risk of an active volcano just south of the city.

    Love to see Seattle. Hope to get there one day to see a game at Century Link. I listen to KZOK online & it sounds like a really great city.


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 9,668 CMod ✭✭✭✭Fathom


    InTheTrees wrote: »
    We're in Seattle now. With the added risk of an active volcano just south of the city.
    California = earthquakes. Washington = volcanos. Oklahoma = tornados. Lousiana = hurricanes. Colorado = avalanches. Living Earth.

    Cmod Science, Health, and Environment



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,900 ✭✭✭InTheTrees


    Fathom wrote: »
    California = earthquakes. Washington = volcanos. Oklahoma = tornados. Lousiana = hurricanes. Colorado = avalanches. Living Earth.

    Washington gets earthquakes too. I think Alaska is the most seismically active US state.
    The "Ring Of Fire" surrounds the pacific ocean and is responsible for quakes in Japan, Cille, NZ, and the USA.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ring_of_Fire


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,548 ✭✭✭BrokenArrows


    Fathom wrote: »
    California = earthquakes. Washington = volcanos. Oklahoma = tornados. Lousiana = hurricanes. Colorado = avalanches. Living Earth.

    Ireland = Rain

    So boring.


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 9,668 CMod ✭✭✭✭Fathom


    InTheTrees wrote: »
    Washington gets earthquakes too.
    Rockies = earthquakes.
    Ireland = Rain So boring.
    Rain. Lucky you. Green. So Cal = drought.

    Cmod Science, Health, and Environment



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,163 ✭✭✭✭Del2005


    Ireland = Rain

    So boring.

    Boring gets a lot of FDI though.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9 Brave_Horatius


    I mean, how am I going to cook all the human we'll be eating if I can't even get onto the beebs food website?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,129 ✭✭✭PucaMama


    Samaris wrote: »
    PucaMama wrote: »
    Would Yellowstone not affect us too? I would have thought people would be far more worried about Yellowstone than San Andreas

    Yellowstone "wins" hands-down; if the cauldara erupted violently, it would basically destroy the United States and Canada. Physically, it would take out everything from Washington to Kansas, and it would effectually ruin from the midlands to states on the eastern seaboard. After that, the ash cloud would cover the northern hemisphere and t could be a decade without summers, with consequent catastrophes to food production. But it's not that likely to happen. Nothing you can do to prepare for it anyway bar move to New Zealand.

    The faultline shifting is something that people absolutely know is going to happen and keep getting warnings about from it cracking every so often. At some point it won't just grind a bit, it will snap to release the building pressure and cause a catastrophe in San Fransisco amongst other cities. But while it would cause a lot of harm, it wouldn't destroy the world.

    The big one -is- going to happen, and very likely in the next hundred years, Yellowstone is an extinction event, but may never happen.
    I do believe Yellowstone will go off. Saw great documentaries on it can't remember the names though. Hopefully i will be gone before Yellowstone goes.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 9,434 ✭✭✭cml387


    PucaMama wrote: »
    I do believe Yellowstone will go off. Saw great documentaries on it can't remember the names though. Hopefully i will be gone before Yellowstone goes.

    The BBC made a disaster movie about it. It's on youtube I think.
    Plucky Brits save the day.

    It was quite well made as I remember.


  • Posts: 26,219 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    OU812 wrote: »
    Have you a source for this please?

    It was reported in a local paper yesterday, seems to be only So-Cal though. Surprising it's limited since there was a 3.6 in south Napa during the week.

    http://www.sfgate.com/news/article/Earthquake-warning-advisory-Southern-California-9514009.php


    With nearly 200 small tremors giving Southern California a jiggle earlier in the week, the California Office of Emergency Services has issued an earthquake advisory for the region.

    If the 70+ tremors detected in the Bay area in the past week are anything to go by, it'll be extended statewide soon.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 18,299 ✭✭✭✭The Backwards Man




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,448 ✭✭✭✭Grayson


    InTheTrees wrote: »
    Its scary. In a kind of abstract way. It could happen tomorrow or in a thousand years.

    I've been in a 7.1, and a 6.8 and many many 5+

    We're in Seattle now. With the added risk of an active volcano just south of the city.

    http://www.geekwire.com/2015/earthquake-experts-on-the-really-big-one-heres-what-will-actually-happen-in-seattle/

    It's a follow up to the New Yorker story that terrified people a few weeks ago.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 18,252 ✭✭✭✭uck51js9zml2yt


    cml387 wrote: »
    The BBC made a disaster movie about it. It's on youtube I think.
    Plucky Brits save the day.

    It was quite well made as I remember.

    That was the day of the triffids....man eating flowers not earthquakes;)


Advertisement
Advertisement