Breaking dependence - enforcing sexual morals, restoring corporal punishment and hard

brickmauser · 30-09-2016 08:53AM #1

The relaxation of sexual morals in particular the acceptance of single motherhood has led to the creation of fatherless welfare dependent asocial young offenders who have not learned the value of work or the masculine virtues of discipline and gruelling physical labour due to an absence of responsible fathers.

In school they play truant or are defiantly disruptive - perhaps a subconscious demand to be loved rather than managed by teachers playing the surrogate parent role due to the fecklessness of their parents. The absence of punishment - violent painful punishment at the hands of a stick wielding male teacher - means they are scornful of female teachers who give them mere verbal reprimands - all that their mothers can do too incidentally since there is no father to administer a physical chastisement.

As they emerge from school with no education since no discipline was enforced they lack the ability to knuckle down and obey orders from authority figures at work or law enforcement. They are unemployable and resort to anti social behavior or full blown careers in crime.

Cops cannot administer beatings to juvenile scum without human rights crusaders breathing down their necks. The relaxation of height requirements and the introduction of females into the police force has resulted in its castration.

If laws are not enforced - with physical violence - the law has no teeth. Fatherless juvenile feral scum who received no chastisement in the home or school will have no fear of cops or courts which send them for treatment and counselling and give them suspended sentences. Sending them to prison is no punishment if they have gyms and games consoles and TV and three square meals and loaf about all day.

In the past prison were brutal wretched places with harsh regimes enforced by physical violence such as flogging combined with hard labour and a very basic diet.

Is it any surprise scumbags who are the product of dingle mothers and inept teachers and a soft justice system go on to offend and offend and offend?

How about restoring the taboo on single motherhood? A woman who was a single mother in the past was considered the same as a whore and her children were labelled as bastards. Sexual taboos were ruthlessly enforced.

In the past if you defied a teacher you got the crap beaten out of you and when you came home you got a beating from your father who was feared. Fathers didn't give hugs or tell you they loved you. They chastised you and put manners on you.

In the past apprentices who gave lip got a dig from their peers or their employers. You got out of line you got squashed. Simple as.

Gangs of feral kids were sorted out by locals who send them home with a kick up the backside and clip over the ear. Cops like Lugs Brannigan never bothered the juvenile courts and administered savage beatings to jumped up thugs.

Nip it in the bud at the very start and society will become safer and quieter. We can go back to the days of leaving our doors unlocked.

dashoonage · 30-09-2016 08:55AM

What?

Speedwell · 30-09-2016 08:55AM

Troll.

dashoonage · 30-09-2016 08:56AM

Ok read it.

**** off.

Wibbs · 30-09-2016 08:56AM

Am I a bad man for sitting awaiting some of the outrage…

:D

purpleisafruit · 30-09-2016 08:57AM

Who could possibly disagree with any of those points? :rolleyes:

dudara · 30-09-2016 08:57AM

Ah the good old days.

If you miss them that much, I suggest closing your computer, throwing it in the bin and start using pen & paper to write letters to the editor of the Times.

_Brian · 30-09-2016 08:57AM

Get down of that soap box your embarrassing yourself 😕

VinLieger · 30-09-2016 08:57AM

Wibbs wrote: »

Am I a bad man for sitting awaiting some of the outrage… :D

Surely everyone knows by now not to respond to them?

Speedwell · 30-09-2016 08:58AM

Wibbs wrote: »

Am I a bad man for sitting awaiting some of the outrage… :D

No, you're just a spectator at the gladiatorial combat which the OP would likely also be in favor of, since they think violence solves everything.

Kindly kick him out from under his bridge, wouldja?

Wibbs · 30-09-2016 08:58AM

Speedwell wrote: »

Troll.

Maybe, but there are quite the silent minority out there who might agree with some of his/her? post. Calling them trolls is easy. After all the back slapping over the gay marriage vote, it's easy to forget it was a too narrow a margin to be that smug and self satisfied about it.

dwayneshintzy · 30-09-2016 08:58AM

1950s Ireland truly was a paradise!

sharkfox · 30-09-2016 08:59AM

Sounds like you had a terrible childhood

gramar · 30-09-2016 08:59AM

Breaking dependence - enforcing sexual morals, restoring corporal punishment and hard......

...and hard what? Doing it all while maintaining an erection?

VinLieger · 30-09-2016 08:59AM

So what does everyone wanna talk about? Personally i'm looking forward to the ryder cup later but i get its not everyone's cup of tea

benjamin d · 30-09-2016 09:00AM

dudara wrote: »

Ah the good old days.

If you miss them that much, I suggest closing your computer, throwing it in the bin and start using pen & paper to write letters to the editor of the Times.

I feel that this lad is probably more of a Sunday World officianado

Speedwell · 30-09-2016 09:00AM

Wibbs wrote: »

Maybe, but there are quite the silent minority out there who might agree with some of his/her? post. Calling them trolls is easy. After all the back slapping over the gay marriage vote, it's easy to forget it was a too narrow a margin to be that smug and self satisfied about it.

Great, all we need is a Tea Party movement in Ireland, except instead of being "honest" about the government, they can be "honest" about keeping order with their fists (always theirs, never someone else's) and about throwing their pregnant daughters out of the house.

Where I came from, people of this sort are campaigning for Trump.

Wibbs · 30-09-2016 09:01AM

dwayneshintzy wrote: »

1950s Ireland truly was a paradise!

As with all time periods it depends who you ask. For people in urban areas with half decent jobs it was a "paradise". Quiet, traditional, stable and safe. The gulags it was not.

VinLieger · 30-09-2016 09:02AM

Wibbs wrote: »

As with all time periods it depends who you ask. For people in urban areas with half decent jobs it was a "paradise". Quiet, traditional, stable and safe. The gulags it was not.

So not different like nowadays and thus "scary", gotcha

Wibbs · 30-09-2016 09:03AM

Speedwell wrote: »

Great, all we need is a Tea Party movement in Ireland, except instead of being "honest" about the government, they can be "honest" about keeping order with their fists (always theirs, never someone else's) and about throwing their pregnant daughters out of the house.

And how do you stop these muppets? It is not by closing them down and creating "safe spaces". Too often that's what happens these days. It is by exposing them to the full light of reason and debate.

Pherekydes · 30-09-2016 09:03AM

Whose sexual morals are we enforcing?

The leaders of some childless, celebate sect?

Speedwell · 30-09-2016 09:04AM

Wibbs wrote: »

And how do you stop these muppets? It is not by closing them down and creating "safe spaces". Too often that's what happens these days. It is by exposing them to the full light of reason and debate.

I don't stoop to debating people on the Internet who think you can keep order by thuggery and abuse, and morality by promoting suffering. You can if you want. Such nastiness needs to be called out as something we don't do in a decent society.

Wibbs · 30-09-2016 09:06AM

Missed your edit.

Speedwell wrote: »

Where I came from, people of this sort are campaigning for Trump.

Yep and look at the huge support he's gathered around him. He is a bumbling oaf, sure, liked by bumbling oafs and people just simply pissed off with the current system that foists a crooked harridan like Hillary on them.

padd b1975 · 30-09-2016 09:06AM

Well said OP.
You're definitely not alone in your outlook despite the predictable boards.ie stampede of self-righteous indignation when someone dares to go off message.

There's still a few of us left who haven't been sucked into the "right-on" cult.

Wibbs · 30-09-2016 09:08AM

Speedwell wrote: »

I don't stoop to debating people on the Internet who think you can keep order by thuggery and abuse, and morality by promoting suffering. You can if you want. Such nastiness needs to be called out as something we don't do in a decent society.

The two underlined positions don't quite gel TBH. So what do you want? Censorship after a missive from on high, or debate. The former will only encourage the muppets. It continues to stagger me that the weight of history has time and time again proven this, yet people still think it's going to work. This time.

Speedwell · 30-09-2016 09:08AM

padd b1975 wrote: »

Well said OP.
You're definitely not alone in your outlook despite the predictable boards.ie stampede of self-righteous indignation when someone dares to go off message.

There's still a few of us left who haven't been sucked into the "right-on" cult.

It's the job of decent people to keep thugs and abusers like you from giving free rein to your sociopathy.

I'm out of this toxic sludge. I have enough to deal with IRL when people like you attempt to slime and fight their way over my rights. You go on being a free spirit, and I'll keep on trying to do my part to clean up the mess you leave behind.

brickmauser · 30-09-2016 09:11AM

gramar wrote: »

Breaking dependence - enforcing sexual morals, restoring corporal punishment and hard......

...and hard what? Doing it all while maintaining an erection?

Hard labour

Cervantes2 · 30-09-2016 09:13AM

Bishops love sci-fi!

VinLieger · 30-09-2016 09:18AM

brickmauser wrote: »

Hard labour

Is that what the priests called it?

Eponymous · 30-09-2016 09:21AM

Calm the fuck down Grandad.

dinorebel · 30-09-2016 09:21AM

brickmauser wrote: »

The relaxation of sexual morals in particular the acceptance of single motherhood has led to the creation of fatherless welfare dependent asocial young offenders who have not learned the value of work or the masculine virtues of discipline and gruelling physical labour due to an absence of responsible fathers.

In school they play truant or are defiantly disruptive - perhaps a subconscious demand to be loved rather than managed by teachers playing the surrogate parent role due to the fecklessness of their parents. The absence of punishment - violent painful punishment at the hands of a stick wielding male teacher - means they are scornful of female teachers who give them mere verbal reprimands - all that their mothers can do too incidentally since there is no father to administer a physical chastisement.

As they emerge from school with no education since no discipline was enforced they lack the ability to knuckle down and obey orders from authority figures at work or law enforcement. They are unemployable and resort to anti social behavior or full blown careers in crime.

Cops cannot administer beatings to juvenile scum without human rights crusaders breathing down their necks. The relaxation of height requirements and the introduction of females into the police force has resulted in its castration.

If laws are not enforced - with physical violence - the law has no teeth. Fatherless juvenile feral scum who received no chastisement in the home or school will have no fear of cops or courts which send them for treatment and counselling and give them suspended sentences. Sending them to prison is no punishment if they have gyms and games consoles and TV and three square meals and loaf about all day.

In the past prison were brutal wretched places with harsh regimes enforced by physical violence such as flogging combined with hard labour and a very basic diet.

Is it any surprise scumbags who are the product of dingle mothers and inept teachers and a soft justice system go on to offend and offend and offend?

How about restoring the taboo on single motherhood? A woman who was a single mother in the past was considered the same as a whore and her children were labelled as bastards. Sexual taboos were ruthlessly enforced.

In the past if you defied a teacher you got the crap beaten out of you and when you came home you got a beating from your father who was feared. Fathers didn't give hugs or tell you they loved you. They chastised you and put manners on you.

In the past apprentices who gave lip got a dig from their peers or their employers. You got out of line you got squashed. Simple as.

Gangs of feral kids were sorted out by locals who send them home with a kick up the backside and clip over the ear. Cops like Lugs Brannigan never bothered the juvenile courts and administered savage beatings to jumped up thugs.

Nip it in the bud at the very start and society will become safer and quieter. We can go back to the days of leaving our doors unlocked.

Need a hug hun?

Breaking dependence - enforcing sexual morals, restoring corporal punishment and hard

Comments