Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Guy Ritchie's King Arthur

  • 12-03-2015 1:06am
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 87,504 ✭✭✭✭


    http://www.rte.ie/ten/news/2015/0311/686159-aidan-gillen/

    Aidan Gillen has been cast opposite Charlie Hunnam, Jude Law, Eric Bana, Astrid Bergès-Frisbey and Djimon Hounsou in director Guy Ritchie's King Arthur.
    Hunnam is in the title role, with Gillen as Goosefat Bill, Bergès-Frisbey as Guinevere, Hounsou as Bedivere, Law as Vortigern and Bana as King Uther Pendragon.
    Filming has begun at Warner Bros Studios in Leavesden in the UK, with location shooting to take place in Wales and Scotland.
    The film is due for release on July 22, 2016


    No Merlin or Morgana cast yet (Gary Oldman has been rumoured for Merlin)


    I am looking forward to seeing what Ritchie's take on this tale will be


«1

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,556 ✭✭✭✭Skerries


    Oy! Lancelot, get yer mitts off my missus you MUPPET!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 38,247 ✭✭✭✭Guy:Incognito


    Is this not already filming? Kurt Sutter retweeted Richies pic of Charlie Hunnam as Arthur in a forest the other day.

    EDIT. So it has, from the article.

    Would they not want to hurry up and get the parts cast so?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,995 ✭✭✭Ipso


    The blurb about Arthur being streetwise makes me cringe.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,458 ✭✭✭✭gandalf


    Vinny Jones as Merlin I reckon ;)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 87,504 ✭✭✭✭JP Liz V1


    David Beckham has joined now too


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,107 ✭✭✭EoinMcLovin



    Film is called King Arthur: Legend of the Sword. Didn't create new thread as this one already existed even though last post was over a year ago


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,501 ✭✭✭✭Slydice


    That's some cast!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 55,534 ✭✭✭✭Mr E


    Looks like typical Guy Ritchie - style over substance.

    Out next March.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,501 ✭✭✭✭Slydice


    Mr E wrote: »
    Looks like typical Guy Ritchie - style over substance.

    Out next March.

    Yeah my first reaction was that the effects looked a bit odd, cheap in some places, not in others. Then so many in the cast was what caught my attention.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 60,886 ✭✭✭✭Agent Coulson


    To be released March 2017



  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 11,348 ✭✭✭✭ricero


    Looks like scutter


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,503 ✭✭✭✭Also Starring LeVar Burton




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,638 ✭✭✭✭Arghus


    That trailer Does.Not.Look.Good. Highly reminiscent of Game of Thrones, but without the wit, ultraviolence and bewbs: sure, what good is that?

    You know nothing Guy Ritchie.

    Of course the actual finished film could be better than what is promised there - a long way and much post production is yet to come - but something about King Arthur sporting an oh so current undercut fills me with foreboding for the whole project.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,014 ✭✭✭✭Corholio


    I think it looks kind of interesting actually. Looks like there is a bit of quirkiness there that I like in Ritchie's films even the ones that didnt fare so well over their complete running time. I don't really get the Game of Thrones feel about it either to be honest, I think every medieval or medieval-fantasy film is forever doomed to be compared to GOT, even in just look, regardless of content.

    The dialogue at the start is like 'Lock Stock and the Round Table' :pac:


  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 21,569 Mod ✭✭✭✭Brian?


    ricero wrote: »
    Looks like scutter

    Guy Ritchie is directing. That's pretty much a guarantee its muck.

    they/them/theirs


    And so on, and so on …. - Slavoj Žižek




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 60,886 ✭✭✭✭Agent Coulson




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,031 ✭✭✭✭bnt


    Death has this much to be said for it:
    You don’t have to get out of bed for it.
    Wherever you happen to be
    They bring it to you—free.

    — Kingsley Amis



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,031 ✭✭✭✭bnt


    Death has this much to be said for it:
    You don’t have to get out of bed for it.
    Wherever you happen to be
    They bring it to you—free.

    — Kingsley Amis



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 22,680 CMod ✭✭✭✭Sad Professor


    For some reason I could have swore Guy Ritchie already made a King Arthur movie.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 686 ✭✭✭DVD-Lots


    Love the Zep song in it but jeezus it looks like Michael Bay and James Wan had an over 9,000 level child that wants all of the monies. Oh and that's a BIG Oliphant? Meh but will watch to see if it is as bad as that Last Airbender thingy......coz Arthur is now an Airbender yeah? Ammirite?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 87,504 ✭✭✭✭JP Liz V1


    For some reason I could have swore Guy Ritchie already made a King Arthur movie.

    The Clive Owen one was done by Antoine Fuqua and I think that was the one last one done


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,300 ✭✭✭✭razorblunt


    JP Liz V1 wrote: »
    The Clive Owen one was done by Antoine Fuqua and I think that was the one last one done

    I really enjoy the Fuqua / Owen version, I'll always watch it when it's on (doesn't seem to be often nowadays). Great cast too, Owen, Skarsgaard, Edgerton, Mikkelson, Stevenson, Winsome.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,031 ✭✭✭✭bnt


    The first reviews are out. Ow.

    Death has this much to be said for it:
    You don’t have to get out of bed for it.
    Wherever you happen to be
    They bring it to you—free.

    — Kingsley Amis



  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,995 ✭✭✭Ipso


    How many sequels were they planning for this again?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,501 ✭✭✭✭Slydice


    The impression I've gotten from reviews is that it's a bog standard King Arthur film. Nothing majorly new except Guy Ritchie adding his way of doing special effects and all that.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Jesus what an absolutely horrible looking film. An American cast as Englands most famous King, still talking in an American accent, with gelled back hair. Loads of explosions before gunpowder was even invented, and teleporting sword fights.

    What a great thing for film the Chinese market is. We'll have Jesus driving muscle cars soon.

    As for Guy Ritchie he was on Rogans podcast the other day. Interesting guy, but he's phoning it in for cash now. Making films for his kids to enjoy. He said as much himself. Madonna must have sucked the life out of him


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,641 ✭✭✭Teyla Emmagan


    Charlie Humman is English.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Charlie Humman is English.

    Ha! He sounded like Jax Teller in the bit of dialogue in the trailer!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 38,887 ✭✭✭✭PTH2009




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,075 ✭✭✭xper


    What a great thing for film the Chinese market is. We'll have Jesus driving muscle cars soon.


    Edit: Of course, that skit was made before Gibson actually announced a sequel to Passion of the Christ


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 87,504 ✭✭✭✭JP Liz V1


    Charlie Humman is English.

    He has lost his Geordie accent :p a reunion for him and Aidan Gillen in this after Queer as Folk


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,641 ✭✭✭Teyla Emmagan


    JP Liz V1 wrote:
    He has lost his Geordie accent a reunion for him and Aidan Gillen in this after Queer as Folk

    Queer as Folk was great! He was good in that. He seems to have lost the ability to do more than about 3 facial expressions since though (mad Jax, sad Jax, nothing going on behind the eyes Jax).


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,673 ✭✭✭✭silverharp


    how much was filmed in Ireland?

    A belief in gender identity involves a level of faith as there is nothing tangible to prove its existence which, as something divorced from the physical body, is similar to the idea of a soul. - Colette Colfer



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 60,886 ✭✭✭✭Agent Coulson


    It's bombed in the States with an $14m opening day.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,960 ✭✭✭Dr Crayfish


    Everything about this film looks so bad. 90s freeze frames ffs. How does this clown keep getting work? Saw him on Graham Norton last night, charmless and gormless. Hopefully this is the final nail in his coffin now that he doesn't have Chris Evans telling us all how amazing his films are constantly.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 7,988 ✭✭✭constitutionus


    its getting trashed big time but ya know what ?

    the only thing the world needs LESS of than another robin hood film is another bleeding king arthur flim so if all richie did was dress up a mental fantasy flim with the bare bones of the king arthur mythos then im down for it.

    apparently according to the youtube reviewers its the closest we'll get to a he man film anytime soon.

    :D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,423 ✭✭✭✭Outlaw Pete


    Seen this today, my fellow patrons appeared to love it... I hated it.

    Massive try hard factor with soooo many scenes.. but they pretty much all just fall flat on their face as there's no quality of script to back any of it up.

    I cringed through so much of it tbh.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,191 ✭✭✭✭RobbingBandit


    I thought it was good much better than I expected, Jude Law is a slimy git villain, Conor McGregor as King Arthur was a bold move by Guy Ritchie, what'd you mean that wasn't Conor McGregor but he had the coat and everything, David Beckham was surprisingly good in his few scenes, the movie was what it was a cringe fest with quite a few laughs and a few sobs thrown in, I'll pick it up when it's out to download in a few months. Worth a watch but very long at 126 minutes bring a cushion.


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 60,170 Mod ✭✭✭✭Wibbs


    King Arthur is a poison chalice as a film subject since Monty Python tackled it. And I'm only sorta joking. It should be a tale that lights up the screen, big or small, but its day is gone IMH. I'm surprised the studios are still willing to throw money at it TBH.

    Rejoice in the awareness of feeling stupid, for that’s how you end up learning new things. If you’re not aware you’re stupid, you probably are.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,300 ✭✭✭✭razorblunt


    The Clive Owen, Antoine Fuqua was always a guilty pleasure of mine. I've seen Movie Sins on the film and I can't unsee that now!

    I'll catch this one but I'll wait for download I think.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 185 ✭✭RockSalto


    I don't get the hype with Guy Ritchie. He's a complete bluffer. His films are just awful.

    I was disappointed to find out he was directing Sherlock Holmes at the time and wasn't surprised by what was served up. Had so much potential.

    King Arthur looks quite laughable.


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    Wibbs wrote: »
    King Arthur is a poison chalice as a film subject since Monty Python tackled it. And I'm only sorta joking. It should be a tale that lights up the screen, big or small, but its day is gone IMH. I'm surprised the studios are still willing to throw money at it TBH.

    I think Arthur/Camelot and that whole mythos is a tale still worth telling, but a summer rollercoaster-blockbuster just ain't the right fight; TV in many ways has become the home of the more 'thoughtful' epic, so to speak, no doubt largely due to the success of the ubiquitous Game of Thrones.

    Plus, maybe King Arthur being a flop (so far anyway) might finally be the sign for Hollywood to stop taking these public domain tales and amping them up into brainless action films.


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,988 ✭✭✭constitutionus


    dont hold your breath.

    youve yet to see micheal bays take on the material next month !

    :D


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,178 ✭✭✭pajo1981


    Designed to appeal to chavs/skangs so?


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    dont hold your breath.

    youve yet to see micheal bays take on the material next month !

    :D

    Hmmm that's true, but sure only China watches those bloody things at this stage so shouldn't matter too much ;)


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,004 ✭✭✭conorhal


    Wibbs wrote: »
    King Arthur is a poison chalice as a film subject since Monty Python tackled it. And I'm only sorta joking. It should be a tale that lights up the screen, big or small, but its day is gone IMH. I'm surprised the studios are still willing to throw money at it TBH.

    The main problem with Arthurian legend is the fact that nobody's tried to make a film of it with the exception of John Boorman back in the 80's.
    I really don't understand why film makers insist on 'reimaginings' that have nothing to do with King Arthur, could anybody call this or Antoine Fuqua's effort even passingly related to King Arthur? Even First Knight ditched everything but the character names.
    So the real problem as I see it is not, that it's day is gone, but rather that it's never actually been translated to screen, sure Monty Python's Holy Grail contains more actual Arthurian legend then any of those films.
    I suspect the producers of all the previous fare are afraid the' supernatural element' won't connect to the audience or they can't figure out how to sell it, so they try to minimize it down to nothing.
    I'm unsure why though, there's a generation that grew up on Harry Potter and Game of Thrones that would have no problem with the fanasy element of myth and ledgend.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,995 ✭✭✭Ipso


    conorhal wrote: »
    The main problem with Arthurian legend is the fact that nobody's tried to make a film of it with the exception of John Boorman back in the 80's.
    I really don't understand why film makers insist on 'reimaginings' that have nothing to do with King Arthur, could anybody call this or Antoine Fuqua's effort even passingly related to King Arthur? Even First Knight ditched everything but the character names.
    So the real problem as I see it is not, that it's day is gone, but rather that it's never actually been translated to screen, sure Monty Python's Holy Grail contains more actual Arthurian legend then any of those films.
    I suspect the producers of all the previous fare are afraid the' supernatural element' won't connect to the audience or they can't figure out how to sell it, so they try to minimize it down to nothing.
    I'm unsure why though, there's a generation that grew up on Harry Potter and Game of Thrones that would have no problem with the fanasy element of myth and ledgend.

    Regarding the Clive Owen movie, there is an idea that Arthur was based on a Roman general. So it's more of basing it on a different origin story than re-imagining.


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 22,680 CMod ✭✭✭✭Sad Professor


    To a certain extent it's the John Carter problem as well. The mythos has been excessively mined already, which makes a new film difficult to market unless it has a unique spin on the legend.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,990 ✭✭✭longshanks


    Can people stop saying mythos?


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 39,561 CMod ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    I've got a real itch to go to the cinema but this looks dreadful.

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Advertisement
Advertisement