Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

!! DCG 2016

2»

Comments

  • #32
    saif.khalid14
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23 ✭saif.khalid14


    UN wrote:
    Not much I'd say 3, but I've never seen them specify where your plan had to be, luckily I noticed it before I drew too much and rubbed it out


    Thanks. But I noticed too late and this messed up the last bit of question.i drew it on the side and transferred the measurements to getting the inclined cutting plane.
    I got a 3/4elliptical for the true shape totally by fluke in the last minute of exam,what did others get?


  • #33
    Giotar
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 48 ✭Giotar


    adam240610 wrote: »
    We focused on perspective axonometric interpenetration for B and none came up haha

    That was quite risky, seeing as they've been quite common the last few years


  • #34
    adam240610
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 951 ✭✭✭adam240610


    Giotar wrote: »
    That was quite risky, seeing as they've been quite common the last few years

    We didnt know, least I knew my planes otherwise I'd be fooked


  • #35
    iFergal
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 52 ✭✭iFergal


    I would say it's surprising interpenetration didn't come up (which wasn't common, other 2 were though) but guess SEC haven't been very standard this year...


  • #36
    TomDelahunt
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 99 ✭✭TomDelahunt


    I'm actually impressed by the paper, good mix up of questions and each had its "easy" & more "difficult" parts! i messed up my assembly as i rushed it but apart from that i liked that strange paper! no perspective, axonometric or full intersection was strange though!


  • Advertisement
  • #37
    Jdoe
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 39 ✭Jdoe


    Just as a matter of interest how did people do Q C-4 ? (The tipper truck) I did it 3 times and I think on third attempt it was right, how many parts did ye divide up the 60 degree angle for the body ?


  • #38
    adam240610
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 951 ✭✭✭adam240610


    Jdoe wrote: »
    Just as a matter of interest how did people do Q C-4 ? (The tipper truck) I did it 3 times and I think on third attempt it was right, how many parts did ye divide up the 60 degree angle for the body ?

    Well it did half a revolution so I did 10 degree steps, 60/6 is 10 :P lovely quirky question on mechanisms though, especially the first part


Advertisement