Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Deposit return scheme (recycling) - Part 2

1404143454650

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,331 ✭✭✭✭Potential-Monke


    And there we have it folks. Finally an admittance that you don't care about anyone else except yourself so screw everyone else and their legitimate issues with a scheme you're happy with. At least we know we xan ignore everything you say from now on, because you're only in it for yourself. Not that I was really paying attention to an obvious shill anyway, but good to have final confirmation. You'd be great in government.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,449 ✭✭✭✭dxhound2005


    They are paying me big money to be here, and they really want me to be serious. But I have to obey the AH rules:

    "Keep it lighthearted; serious discussion is catered for elsewhere on the site."



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,803 ✭✭✭✭kippy


    The producer fee needs to be increased if anything and that cost needs to be passed on to the consumer. Why? Well the costs of the items have increased dramaticilly (in general) over the past few months - particularily PET. At this point people need to be paying through the nose for using PET at all, ensuring the producers actually need to come up with alternative, more environmentally friendly packaging or methods to distribute their product. As well all know in countries where this sheme is said to be a "success" - the amount of PET in circulation has actually increased instead of reducing. This isn't good for the environment - the opposite in fact.

    I'm at the point where I don't really care any more - this scam has holes all over it and isn't going to do what it is supposed to do in its current guise. If you want to be serious about the environment - be serious about it - the amount of admin/pr/bluster/hassle/nonsense that is tied to this scheme is without equal in my experience.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,461 ✭✭✭Bobson Dugnutt


    I actually don’t mind the scheme overall, but it’s very frustrating when you are stuck behind someone at the return machines.
    Headed down this evening to the local SuperValu for a few bits and pieces and decided to bring the cans and plastic bottles.

    Two complete Jackeens with their kids were ahead of me. Mason and Brady were being lifted up each time to put the cans in the machine. All cheap lager and those premixed gin in a can. The sort of Dubs that paid more for their latest pair of runners than they have in their entire life on books. Not a bother on them to hurry up.

    Don’t even know what they were doing there as I live in a pretty salubrious and leafy part of Dublin.

    Being young is a great advantage, since we see the world from a new perspective and we are not afraid to make radical changes - Greta Thunburg



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,449 ✭✭✭✭dxhound2005


    In general the cost of the items has not changed much. Measured in the July 2024 Consumer Prices Index, Mineral or Spring Water up 5.1% in the 12 months. Soft drinks up 1.6%. Much lower increases than in some previous years. The August index should be out soon, to see the latest information. There is no evidence that any of the anecdotal increases reported here, have anything to do with DRS.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,803 ✭✭✭✭kippy


    I don't think it matters WHY prices have increased but if you look in many shops and you had a "habit" of buying a certain drink you'd know that that drink has (in my experience increased anywhere between 5 and 10 percent in cost since the turn of the year.
    I already used Lucozade zero as it had its prices outlined on the bottle before and after the price rises came in - there have been more - a standard bottle of coke can be 2.75 in some locations when it wasn't near that before - someone has made the decision to increase those prices - doesn't really matter if it was DRS or not, but DRS was definely used as an opportunity to increase those prices during consumer confusion. I am just saying, prices have increased for whatever reason, continue to increase them until something changes and forget about the smoke and mirrors of the DRS.

    My point is, these items should be five euro each - with the producer passing on any fees to the consumer or absorbing it - the need to come up with other methods of distibution and will never do so if the alternative isnt hurting their business.

    So again, skip the BS with this scheme and go straight to the point where it's gonna cost a person or company to use PET products in their supply line.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,449 ✭✭✭✭dxhound2005


    I agree. I am not interested in WHY some prices went up. Or down as in the case of some one litre Soda Waters. It happened every year when there was no DRS as well. But some people want to link the price changes to DRS, without showing where they got the information.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,604 ✭✭✭✭Tony EH




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,803 ✭✭✭✭kippy


    No producer or retailer is going to say that they used the consumer confusion around the DRS scheme to increase the base price of their products.

    There isn't a person on here apart from the guys who seem to have blinkers on in relation to this scheme who doesn't believe that the unit cost of items that are in cans or PET has in general, increased significantly in the past 8 months or so.

    Why the cost actually increases doesn't matter because all you'll every get is overheads have shot up without a break down of overheads.

    Following on from these price rises my point is that producers should be asked to pay more an as such pass this on the the consumer until it is not feasible for the producer to continue to use PET or cans or to at least use them in a more sustainable way. There's zero onus on them to do this with this scheme..... It's a farce.

    You just need to look at other countries to see that the use of PET continues to rise with this scheme.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,625 ✭✭✭✭elperello


    It's an interesting proposition to do away with cans and PET.

    Have you considered the alternatives ?

    The only viable ones at the moment are higher density reusable plastic or reusable glass containers.

    Both of these involve deposit and return.

    Empty containers would have to be stored in homes and brought to shops to reclaim deposits.

    People who have a problem with RVMs would still have to queue up to return empties to a shop assistant.

    The empties would have to be sorted and transported to the bottling plants to be washed and refilled.

    I'm not sure that there would be widespread acceptance among producers, retailers or consumers for such a change.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,449 ✭✭✭✭dxhound2005


    The confusion must be that some people think the deposit is a price increase. But it isn't, and the Index does not count it as an increase. Unless you think the CPI figure of a 1.6% increase over the 12 months up to July is a fraud, then your contention that there has been a big increase does not make sense. And you are repeating the conspiracy theory about the supply line using DRS as a cover for increases. That is an old one here. And it falls down, because there were bigger increases before DRS.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,452 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    Another logic fail.

    Previous price increases can have different explanations.

    It does not preclude companies increasing prices either to cover DRS costs OR to take use DRS as cover to increase prices. There has been a big increase in the price of certain branded products in scope of DRS.

    DRS has also lead to items disappearing entierely from stores, cheaper imported items such as non alcoholic beers in Dunnes and items also gone from Holland and Barrett.

    That would not necessarily show up in CPI as they have a specific limited list of DRS related items they price check.

    There is no confusion except insofar as your post isdeliberate muddying of the waters.

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,803 ✭✭✭✭kippy


    Necessity often enhances the development of other options. If there's no necessity, as there is at the moment, nothing will change, in fact things will get worse. So while the options on the table at the moment seem limited ironically enough we are used to this process with glass bottles and generally seem to have accepted it. It's a fairly straightforward system ironically.

    Not saying it's the solution, like any it could be tweaked but again without the stick to go there it never will happen. Again, how serious are we about these issues?

    The DRS as it stands is a farce.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,803 ✭✭✭✭kippy


    General confusion around where the drs is applied, what premises charge it, whether it is included in the price of the item, where/when it can be reclaimed etc.....

    Does the CPI track, price of a 24 pack of Coca-Cola, price of a bottle of lucozade Zero, price of large bottle of coke? Because these are where I am seeing major change.....

    It's not a conspiracy theory. It's a theory backed up by my own research and that of many around me. Again, you will never have a company admit they used consumer confusion as a good cover for hiking prices. They'll tell you the usual costs have gone up without specifics. These companies are making significant profits.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,037 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    Indeed. If the price of the product has increased by the value of the DRS, then there is a price increase.

    Example. 4 pack of beer costs 10 euro before DRS.

    4 pack of beer now costs 10.60, with 15c DRS on each can.

    This is an increase to the product price.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,449 ✭✭✭✭dxhound2005


    It's a conspiracy theory. Any proper research would have got to the bottom of those charges you make against the companies. And shown the proof. They are certainly not borne out by the level of price increases, compared to the past. I don't know if the CPI tracks 24 packs of anything. You might find the information here:

    https://www.cso.ie/en/methods/prices/consumerpriceindex/methodologydocuments/csoconsumerpriceindexmethodology/



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,037 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    CPI is dealing with macro data, not DRS specfic products. There is no doubt that some DRS products have increased in price.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,449 ✭✭✭✭dxhound2005


    For the purposes of the CPI, they don't count it as part of the base price. So their monthly figures are a like for like comparison. That does away with any confusion on that score. And as we found out before, neither do accountants or the Revenue call it a price increase.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,037 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    Its still a price increase to the consumer, however we may like to dress it up or deflect.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,449 ✭✭✭✭dxhound2005


    Dress it up as a refundable deposit. That way it cannot be a price increase. My opinion.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,291 ✭✭✭jj880


    Im starting to agree with this being a price increase.

    I dont really care how many times the word deposit is used. Its not a "deposit" as Ive ever known it. Deposit to me means a small partial payment of total price with the rest to follow or a damage deposit in case of breakage when renting a property. Anything requiring free labour should not be called a deposit.

    Its not a deposit or a tax. Its a surcharge you will only get back if you do extra work for free.

    FLSRS. Free Labour Surcharge Return Scheme.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,037 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    Agreed, but the mistake made was to add the price of the deposit on top of the price of the product.

    If they had built the DRS into the original product price, there would be no price increase and folks would genuinely have got their deposit back, in exchange for the containers they returned.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,449 ✭✭✭✭dxhound2005




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,449 ✭✭✭✭dxhound2005


    You really do care. I'm the one who doesn't care.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,037 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    And even if you do the work and return your 4 cans, you have still paid 10 euro for the beer, when previously, 10 euro bought the beer plus the cans.

    Returning your cans gets the overpayment on the cans back; but you cannot redeem 100% of the "deposit", since the beer itself must have cost 9.40 prior to DRS, but now it costs you 10 euro.

    Post edited by BlueSkyDreams on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,449 ✭✭✭✭dxhound2005


    You have introduced "overpayment" as a new concept into the discussion. Is it the same as a price increase?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,037 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,449 ✭✭✭✭dxhound2005


    You could be making a mistake by claiming that they made a mistake.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,291 ✭✭✭jj880


    I care that you had a soda water relapse this evening. I thought we'd moved on from that.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,803 ✭✭✭✭kippy


    Again, how is it a conspiracy theory - business often take advantage of events to promote themselves/increase prices. That's a factual statement.

    I've seen at least two items that I would regularily have bought (and one of which I would argue is a very popular item) increase in price by at least ten percent and another to increase by a similiar amount. That's factual - January the price was 2:00 as on the outside of the bottle, March it changed to 2:20 - that was on the outside of the bottle - again a fact.

    The CPI doesn't track 24 packs of anything - but you'll see posts in here form people who were familiar with them state that retaillers/producers dropped them to 18 packs, amended the price, but ended up being more expensive per unit.

    These are all things that have been brought up again and again. You like to soda water one - but it's not a reflection of the market in general - not even close to it.

    And again - my point - there's talk of the DRS fee going up to "force" people to use the scheme - completely pointless. Place a significant tax on the producers, have them pass that onto the consumer (as they do anyway) - make it punitive to deal in PET or ALU until such as time as retailers and producers find a way to start reducing their useage. Everything else is just lip service.



  • Registered Users Posts: 272 ✭✭pauly58


    For the second week running, the machine in our local Aldi jammed the receipt & wouldn't print it out, I felt sorry calling one of the girls over, she said she was s**t sick of it, been waiting weeks for the engineer. They have to open it up & free the roll.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,209 ✭✭✭✭sligeach


    Ya, I've had that happen to me as well. The receipt had printed but it stuck inside the machine. I absolutely despise this scam.

    I'd love for people to march on the streets to get rid of it like they did for the water charges. But it's slightly different, as we're not being technically charged for this, as it's a deposit and we can get it back. It's an absolute pain in the H0L€ though, between all the inconvenience and the machines being inconsistent and broken much of the time.

    Anyway, here's one of several notices I seen up yesterday at an Aldi, with 2 outside DRS machines. First Aldi I've been to with 2 machines.

    🐝 🐝 🐝 🐝 🐝 🐝 🐝 🐝 🐝 🐝 🐝 🐝 🐝 🐝 🐝

    🐝 🐝 🐝 🐝 🐝 🐝 🐝 🐝 🐝 🐝 🐝 🐝 🐝 🐝 🐝

    At least they're trying I guess, I've used other outside DRS machines where they're clearly not.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 164 ✭✭Not made with hands




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,209 ✭✭✭✭sligeach


    Semantics? I'd almost argue it is a tax, between all the inconvenience and hassle. But there's plenty of situations where it ceases to be a deposit for the buyer, and becomes a tax.

    Buy minerals when visiting someone in hospital

    Buy cans/bottles at an airport

    Your kids don't bring back their empties

    Buy someone a 6/8 pack of beer as a gift. Go to a house party

    The DRS machine accepts the empty but doesn't give you credit for it. It's happened to me numerous times.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,452 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    I seem to remember earlier in the thread the notion that the machines would attract wasps was met with disbelief if not derision… and yet here we are.

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,803 ✭✭✭✭kippy


    A lot of stuff was said on this site at the back end of last year, early this year about this sheme that was laughed at. These things have happened and worse still NOTHING has been done to resolve the issues that were spotted well before the scheme came into play.

    I remember a news piece where one of the czars of ReTurn we asked how they were going to manage returns from those that shop from home or were house bound and had to shop from home - think he pushed it back on the retailers to resolve in the coming months - still nothing. Just one example.

    On the wasps/insects issue - which was always going to be an issue - how do they manage this in the warmer countries where this scheme is a "success" - Germany, Spain, France, Italy, Greece, Holland etc?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,449 ✭✭✭✭dxhound2005


    It was in response to this:

    "Immediately when the project goes live, and for the six months since, your customer base points out flaws that WILL prevent you from reaching your target."



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 164 ✭✭Not made with hands


    You called them customers. Not sure why you are trying to deflect.

    Are we customers or not?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,952 ✭✭✭✭Wanderer78


    …this is a form of taxation, and this approach to our environmental issues simply wont work, we have to start implementing policies that actually bring people along, not just p1ss people off, its very disturbing to see the lack of understanding that is occurring within our political institutions in regards our environmental problems, they simply dont have a clue what to do…

    …taxing, indebting and simply p1ssing people off, wont solve these issues, they ll just escalate them!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4 RT Grey


    I do agree, I think the scheme is nuts. They charge extra so you claim it back, extra work, machines, total waste of money all round. Packaging should be recyclable and bio-degradable. It annoys me when packaging is bumping the volume of the product to try sell more. Cereals are great at it. Change the manufacturing process, not the waste process.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4 RT Grey




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,952 ✭✭✭✭Wanderer78


    yup, but that would mean drawing attention to the creators of our goods and services, and thats a no no, as they are simply untouchable, and environmental issues are simply the problem of the purchasers of our goods and services!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,449 ✭✭✭✭dxhound2005


    Some good advice here from a Professional Organiser.

    https://re-turn.ie/re-turn-teams-up-with-professional-organiser-sarah-reynolds-to-create-clever-storage-hacks-for-bottles-and-cans/

    "Household involvement and responsibility

    Think about ways to incentivise household members and use the Scheme collectively for a sustainable future. Sarah suggests creating a chart to track collections and receive rewards or put Deposit Return vouchers or the deposit cash towards a special occasion or treat."



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,952 ✭✭✭✭Wanderer78


    …or maybe we should be creating policies to try actual reduce our overall creation of certain materials, to actually try prevent escalation of our environmental damage, such damage done is not an 'externality'!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,302 ✭✭✭✭Jim_Hodge


    To be honest, that's a crock of $#&@. Clever storage hack? Nothing beyond what everybody's doing. As for incentives to comply by using charts and rewards: Absolute rubbish.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,625 ✭✭✭✭elperello


    I can imagine that's a problem with smallies.

    Maybe it'll work better in a few years time



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,417 ✭✭✭CH3OH


    +1

    Good to know where Return are spending the money.

    How much does a partner get for this very basic common sense advice?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,625 ✭✭✭✭elperello


    In the meantime a few ideas to make the current scheme work is no harm.

    There is already a move to more sustainable packaging but progress is slow.

    There are reduction strategies that anyone can build into their routine.

    Stuff like buying loose veg rather than plastic wrapped and carrying a reusable water bottle are small easy steps.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,449 ✭✭✭✭dxhound2005




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,803 ✭✭✭✭kippy


    ReTurn have a significant marketing and PR/Spin budget - we know this from the actions of the past number of months.

    A "professional organiser" - f88k off.

    Now, I would be interested to see the research that ReTurn have done (referenced at the top of that article) - just to see what they are asking and who is answering.



  • Advertisement
Advertisement