Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

If cycle lane bollards don't belong in Architectural Conservation Areas, why do cars?

1235»

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 102 ✭✭TokenJogger


    It's the entire premise of the bollards from the op and you disagreed with it's relevance not understanding that they are different things

    I said nothing of architecture you're now making shıt up because you have lost the point and are seeking to deflect but go on spend ages straw manning and gas lighting

    I suggest you seek reference in a dictionary for the definitions are not my belief but the entire world's and it is your understanding either through deficiency or willful ignorance that is restricting any conversation



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 28,257 ✭✭✭✭Peregrinus


    TJ, none of this make any sense.

    I literally don't know what you mean by "the entire premise of the bollards from the op". How can bollards have a premise?

    How can you acccuse me of not understanding that permanent and temporary are different things when I have already said, in as many words, "of course permanent and temporary are different"?

    You say you said nothing of architecture, but the whole thread is about architecture - it's right there in the thread title - and you entered the thread to answer the question "why is there such a blindspot for some people to cars in Architectural Conservation Areas but plastic bollards aimed at making streets safer are a no-no?" by saying "Because cars aren't permanent fixtures like bollards". Are you now saying that in fact permanence has nothing to do with it, that your reply to the OP was not in fact answer to the question raised but more of a meaningless burble that we should all politely ignore? Because it looks a lot that that's what you're saying now.

    If you want to continue this conversation, stop with the sneering and start explaining what you mean in coherent sentences. Otherwise be quiet; the grownups are talking.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 26,304 Mod ✭✭✭✭CramCycle


    Parking spaces are permanent features if that makes it easier for the discussion.



Advertisement