Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Long term plan for smoking ban

  • 13-12-2022 8:02pm
    #1
    Posts: 0


    "New Zealand has passed into law a plan to stamp out tobacco smoking over time by imposing a lifetime ban on young people buying cigarettes. 

    Tobacco will not be able to be sold to anyone born on or after 1 January 2009, so the minimum age for buying cigarettes will keep rising."

    I think it's a good idea, and I'm a person who smokes.



«1

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,273 ✭✭✭xxxxxxl


    Cant see an issue I used to smoke now I vape. It's not like drinking were there are some positives.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,841 ✭✭✭jackboy


    A bit slow. I think it would be better to just announce a year to ban them, maybe in three or four years time.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,636 ✭✭✭dotsman


    And are you happy to pay the massive tax increase to cover the cost?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,841 ✭✭✭jackboy


    Vast savings to be made to the health system so the cost may not be much. Also, will save thousands of lives so I think worth a fair bit of cost.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,858 ✭✭✭Real Donald Trump


    More nanny state nonsense by Saint Jacinda, the woman is a pure sickner



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    More of a fan of adult education rather than Government taken away more freedoms.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,904 ✭✭✭✭Galwayguy35


    You would wonder why a law is even needed, its not something I gave a lot of thought to but with all the information out there about the dangers of smoking why on earth would any teenager even think about starting the habit.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 57,358 ✭✭✭✭walshb


    Very very few young people smoke these days, and I always look at the very few who are, and think to myself “wtf went wrong here?”



  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 11,902 Mod ✭✭✭✭igCorcaigh


    I thought they did this years ago?

    But, anyway, as a smoker, I think this is a good idea. I don't agree with prohibition of any drug, but ultimately removing tobacco products from Centra, and the like, can only be good. But it needs to be done in a way which reduces the possibility of black markets.

    Maybe if someone wants to buy expensive cigars from online stores and stuff, ok.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 803 ✭✭✭machaseh


    I doubt it will really lead to 0 percent of people born afer 2009 becoming smokers. Even though New Zealand is remote, illegal cigarette trafficking does exist there and will become a growing issue. Just like in Australia where smoking tobacco is super expensive so they just get illegal tobacco from nearby Indonesia.


    It might increase stigma of smoking tobacco as a bad thing but for some it could be seen as a status symbol, just like the usage of cocaine.



    Had they legalized cannabis, then maybe, but they didn't do that. The people voted against that in referendum.



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    What will they do to fill that tax void? They must have made a killing



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,826 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump



    It's surely dwarfed by the spend on resulting health issues



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 84,733 ✭✭✭✭Atlantic Dawn
    M


    They should make it that you need to buy a minimum of a carton at a time, €155 a go at current prices, would be biggest deterrent for newbies and a wake up call for addicts. Only sell them in licenced shops that only sell tobacco, 1 outlet per large town making them a pain in the hole to buy.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Na doubt it, I think those people will go black market or find something else to destroy their body’s with.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,111 ✭✭✭Doc07


    Fantastic. Stamp it out, no reason to cave and just accept another generation of smokers.

    Something similar for bariatric surgery worth considering also.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,111 ✭✭✭Doc07


    Unfortunately many never smokers vape instead and get addicted to that.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,636 ✭✭✭dotsman


    Very little savings to be made on health. And any that can be made wouldn't be made for many years/decades. And easily dwarved by the massive tax and pension holes.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,865 ✭✭✭PommieBast


    Wonder what will happen once those born that year get to vote. In any case doesn't NZ have one of the world's highest per-capita weed consumption?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,841 ✭✭✭jackboy


    Hard to believe. Smoking is one of the biggest killers and destroyers of health.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,635 ✭✭✭FishOnABike




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,921 ✭✭✭buried


    Well done 'cinda. Governments banning the taxable legal sale of products is a great idea. Look how well that system is turning out with illegal narcotics.

    Make America Get Out of Here



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,826 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump


    I'd say the average cancer treatment costs the equivalent of a good few years of pensions.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,793 ✭✭✭FunLover18


    Ireland set a goal of becoming tobacco free by 2025, I wonder how that's going. It hasn't been updated since 2019, the pandemic may have had an impact.




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,132 ✭✭✭joseywhales


    I smoked my first cigarette when I was 28 and for about 5 years then but I think that is the reason I found it easier to stop. Even knowing how harmful it is, I am not sure I agree with telling adults what they can and can't do to themselves.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    It's not about adults. It's about taking a whole generation out of being able to legally purchase cigarettes.

    So they might not do it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,179 ✭✭✭standardg60


    Pie in the sky nonsense. Resultant health costs are always given as an excuse to increase taxes on cigarettes.

    People will still die of something regardless, extending their lifespan by encouraging healthier living is only going to increase the cost of their healthcare. Do you think people who've never smoked require shorter or longer healthcare towards the end of their life?

    It's a complete red herring.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,059 ✭✭✭✭Spanish Eyes


    Young people these days don't smoke, they vape. It's far cheaper and no harm done except to those who object to the smell of fruit flavoured vapour.

    Weed maybe the smoke of choice also instead of tobacco. That's probably cheaper too.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,636 ✭✭✭dotsman


    And those who don't die from smoking always live perfectly healthy lives until they die suddenly and cheaply?

    There is no evidence to suggest that smoking causes significant additional health costs. Any study that has claimed it does has always been sponsored by vested interests (and often debunked when an analysis of the study is done*) while any attempt at an independent study has always been supressed.


    *The reality is that it is very difficult to determine what impact, if any smoking has on healthcare. Studies from vested interests typically attribute the cause to smoking if the victim was a smoker, regardless of whether or not it was - e.g. if a person has a heart attack and they were a smoker - that is counted as a smoking-related issue regardless of the fact that plenty of non-smokers have heart attacks. Nobody can actually say if smoking was the cause. Likewise, many, many, many non-smokers suffer from Cancer, but if a "smoker" suffers from Cancer - it is "because of the fags". This type of false statistical study was made infamous in recent years when "every patient diagnosed with Covid" was considered "in hospital due to Covid" when the reality was most of those patients were in hospital for a different reason and picked up Covid while in there (similarly, when a patient died, if they were found to have Covid, they were included in the Covid deaths regardless of the actual cause of death). Also, you have to ask, what is a smoker? Someone who smoked heavily in their twenties but hasn't smoked a single cigarette in the last 50 years? What if they only gave up 10 years ago? What if they only had the occasional smoke on the rare night out as opposed to 2 packs a day every day for 60 years?

    What about the non-smokers? We know that, statistically, they live a few years longer? But isn't a huge part of our healthcare bill spent on looking after the elderly and infirmed? The older someone becomes, the more likely they are to require treatment/surgeries for this, that and the other. Likewise, they will typically require far more expensive palliative and geriatric care in their final years, having outlived their spouse and other close relatives. Is the "hospital bed crisis" not down to the fact that there are so many elderly people using the beds because they are too old to be discharged and have nobody to look after them?

    Ultimately, the anti-smoking brigade can't have it both ways. You can't say smokers die younger and smokers cost more. By dying a few years younger, the average smokers saves this (and every) country a fortune.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,551 ✭✭✭AllForIt


    Exactly. So now the dealers have one more product to push.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,273 ✭✭✭xxxxxxl


    It's gas tbh the amount of pills and stuff old people end up on is staggering. Then you have dementia stuff like that. Current med tech is so advanced it's actually keeping us alive longer than the body currently functions properly. Obviously that may change in time.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Good to see a bit of debate, tbh.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,340 ✭✭✭sprucemoose


    id be interested to see some of this 'evidence' as it sounds like absolute bolloxology of the highest order to be honest

    its debatable as to whether it does no harm, id imagine any type of vapour going into your lungs is a bad idea. i would presume vaping is still less harmful overall though



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,858 ✭✭✭Real Donald Trump


    Going after smokers is an easy target, but why not target obese people, out and about I see way more overweight people than smokers, surely they are huge strain on the health system? But I guess that wouldn't go down so well, fat shaming or some BS like that.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,998 ✭✭✭c.p.w.g.w


    easy to fix obesity, but would require pi$$ing off too many massive companies...also would have to re-educate the entire health service...



  • Site Banned Posts: 12,341 ✭✭✭✭Faugheen


    Fine, let’s make gastric surgeries free to everyone.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,858 ✭✭✭Real Donald Trump


    Higher tax on crappy foods would be a start, if they can do it on cigs, why not rubbish food?



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    The thing is, it's not about going after smokers. It's about making the next generation not become smokers. No mention of taxes or otherwise.



  • Site Banned Posts: 12,341 ✭✭✭✭Faugheen


    Or why not bring in a policy that actually helps people living with obesity?



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    The idea is that each year, the age at which one can legally purchase cigarettes will increase. So, kids who are now 14 would have to wait 4 years to be able to purchase cigarettes legally. By which time they would need to be 22 to be able to purchase them legally. And so on. It's a clever way to deal with smoking as a long term plan.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,858 ✭✭✭Real Donald Trump




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 458 ✭✭BagofWeed


    Its far from clever, its actually stupid as it'll create a large black market opportunity plus it'll become glamorised in a different way due to its illegality but sure Ireland never learns. The Catholic misery stills casts a long shadow on Irish society as we still see the strong default reactionary position to a problem being a call to ban stuff. I've noticed the increasing moaning and finger pointing at vaping in the last year too. Cigarettes are rank anyway but banning them is just not going to work.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,204 ✭✭✭✭Strumms




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,204 ✭✭✭✭Strumms


    Because crappy food in moderation won’t kill you.

    Cigarettes due to their addictive properties… one becomes 5 a day becomes 10…15…20…25… according to the HSE about 20 is the average…a day. Smoking in moderation isn’t really a thing.


    it would take years and millions of taxpayers money to examine every current and new food product to the market.

    plus…714,000 people smoke in Ireland, roughly according to the HSE…

    there are not 714,000 unhealthy eaters I’d imagine….



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,268 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 478 ✭✭Run Forest Run


    What are the positives to drinking?

    The myth that you can drink in moderation as part of a healthy lifestyle has been peddled by many people. But the facts don't support it. Alcohol is every bit as damaging as smoking, and in some cases even far worse. (but this is obviously an inconvenient reality in a nation with our sort of drinking culture)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,609 ✭✭✭Tonesjones


    Vaping has taken over from smoking. Big tobacco owns most of the Vaping market anyway. Young people are still becoming addicted to nicotine and governments are still collecting taxes generated from nicotine addiction.



  • Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators Posts: 10,605 Mod ✭✭✭✭Jim2007


    Cutting the healthcare costs, reducing lost work days, improving citizens health is nonsense is it…. You just made the case for the nanny state since you are not able to act in your own and the community’s interests.



  • Site Banned Posts: 12,341 ✭✭✭✭Faugheen


    No?

    Just your solution of ‘tax crap food’ is like telling someone with skin cancer to just ‘stay out of the sun’.

    I was putting that policy to you to see if you actually cared about helping people living with obesity but you don’t.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,408 ✭✭✭✭Kermit.de.frog


    The black market in New Zealand must be lacking their lips



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 36,499 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    Pfft.

    I posted before about my mother's aunt, who died in her early 80s despite being a heavy smoker (John Player Special) to the end. Not bad going, eh?

    But for years before that she could hardly breathe. 3-4 spells in hospital every year - usually in the winter. Had to have oxygen installed in her home - she'd turn it off when lighting up. Still couldn't quit.

    So would she have lived any longer if she'd never smoked - maybe not.

    But she had absolutely shít quality of life for her last 15 years at least, gasping and spluttering and couldn't walk ten metres without stopping. All while costing the health system an absolute fortune.

    If she'd been spending €100 a pack it still wouldn't have paid for the medical bills never mind the misery it caused to her.

    Fúck tobacco.

    In Cavan there was a great fire / Judge McCarthy was sent to inquire / It would be a shame / If the nuns were to blame / So it had to be caused by a wire.



  • Advertisement
Advertisement