Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Why is there hostility towards centrists on social media?

  • 13-10-2022 11:26pm
    #1
    Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Is it because they appear to be devils' advocates? Fence sitters? Bothsides-ers?

    Post edited by [Deleted User] on


«1345

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,454 ✭✭✭NSAman


    Could it be they know their own minds and stay quiet?

    instead of being loud mouth shouters from either side of the fence?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,719 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    I think of myself as a centrist, in the Blair, Macron, Clinton, Lapid mould.

    I don't think its about fence sitting at all, its more about building concensus, pragmatism, bringing people with you.

    I would also approve of different ideological elements from both left and right; conservative fiscal policy, pro-enterprise and minimal regulation, making work pay.

    But also a significant welfare safety net for when its needed, free healthcare, free education right up to third level, State built and owned housing etc. Also social liberalism around womens healthcare, personal rights and secularism.

    The two aren't contradictory. A successful tax policy to benefit from the former pays for the latter, in my opinion.

    Its about keeping everyone moving forward and ensuring opportunity for everyone who will take it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,292 ✭✭✭Ubbquittious


    They're out of fashion in today's polarised world



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,719 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    I wonder then why more are returning to power in the democratic World just now, than leaving it.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Yeah, some people can't stand it if you're not strictly aligned with one "side" and have no tolerance for extremists on the right or left. Whereas it's surely healthier to stand back and take a broader view (obviously within reason - there are times when of course you'll only take one view).



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,859 ✭✭✭Real Donald Trump


    Centrist's are dying out, it's all one side of the extreme now



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Yeah people are saying centrists are dying out, but I think most people are in the centre - it's just the extremists who are the most vocal on social media.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,921 ✭✭✭John Doe1


    Centrists are usually former leftists in their youth who after getting some life experience re-evaluate their political opinions. Unfortunately the modern leftists regard anyone not in their mould as racist transphobes but they are very foolish people.



  • Posts: 13,688 ✭✭✭✭ Davian Teeny Tequila


    Centrists are usually former leftists in their youth who after getting some life experience re-evaluate their political opinions.

    Totally untrue.

    Studies have shown that political beliefs remain remarkably constant across time.

    The notion that people get more conservative as they age is just that, a notion.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 86,729 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    the modern leftists regard anyone not in their mould as racist transphobes

    These are incredibly lazy generalizations.



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 17,378 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Being in the centre is a difficult spot because you naturally anger both extremes. And there's a lack of maturity and a lack of ability to control emotions that has resulted from people expressing most of these types of opinions online. It's often easier to just not bother getting involved when it comes up in real life.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    I think you all have a rather narrow view of what being a centralist might entail.

    You don't have to stick to the centre all the time. Most centralists that I know, myself included, tend to swing left or right on certain issues. I'd be rather strongly on the right side of things in terms of criminal punishment, and swing to the left regarding disability benefits under a welfare system. Being a centralist simply means that you don't consider yourself fixed into a left/right mentality on issues.

    You're applying the same Black/White fixed position mentality that the extreme left/right social groups employ.

    It's often easier to just not bother getting involved when it comes up in real life.

    I'd second this, because people have become remarkably intolerant of others having opposing views on issues, and take offense that others won't agree with them. Considering how much "effort" has been expended in promoting a more fair and equal society, the various groups have ensured a less tolerant, patient, or openminded society. It really isn't worth the bother of engaging with people in real life on most issues. Which is why, thankfully, we have boards. 😁



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,273 ✭✭✭xxxxxxl


    I think that's what annoys the hard left and moderate left so much. There are slim picking in finding actual raving Far right they had to cast the net to Issues that could be far right like immigration. Ofc Far right will not want Johnny foreigner but most centrists I know would be for a point system or actually skills needed to come via visas.

    I supported gay marriage equality but not the alphabet stuff. Again far right would be against both. I think social housing is the sign of a functioning wester society. Far right again would not. I supported genuine refuges from Ukraine but at this stage were getting swamped the only viable solution is a cap. Far right against all immigration. Not to be mistake with cheap labour that right leaning business men like.

    I blame the likes of Twitter. It polarized option on the fact you could only use so many characters. That's bread people into just being black and white.



  • Posts: 17,378 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    I like to think my left and right views balance out in the middle. Rehabilitation for first-time offenders but repeat violent offenders must fight to the death and their organs be harvested. That sort of thing.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 40,546 CMod ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    And by the same logic, modern rightists are slackjawed, mouthbreathing Nazis.

    The thing with centrism is that left and right see things as a false dichotomy where you're either friend or foe. The UK Labour party is a great example. The Corbynistas and the Blairites loathe each other though the latter at least has the justification of knowing that the far left just got the worst electoral result since the 1930s.

    Post edited by ancapailldorcha on

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    I think the main problem people have with centrists is that they insist on dealing with reality



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,354 ✭✭✭Hodors Appletart


    Ideological Purity is the scourge of the left really, people in the centre aren't "left enough" and are therefore castigated and labelled as right wing.

    I don't think this phenomenon exists as much on the right, indeed it is mostly left, moderate left and far left wingers who have the real issue with Centrists, resorting to name-calling



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    I don't think this phenomenon exists as much on the right

    Really, they don't go labelling everyone who doesn't ascribe to their own particularly c*ntish brand of politics as "libtard", "Woke", "leftist", "Cuck" or whichever other puerile adjective they are using on that particular day?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,737 ✭✭✭Tombo2001


    What are we talking about?

    If its supposed to be a serious political discussion then a bit of a red flag when you put it in this forum.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,824 ✭✭✭donaghs


    In order to get your attention Social Media is designed to amplify controversial and more extreme sides of a debate.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,737 ✭✭✭Tombo2001


    What is the deal with someone who starts this thread and also this thread....

    The inevitable next question — boards.ie - Now Ye're Talkin'

    Is this on a commission basis?

    Come on boards.ie what is happening here.....



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,354 ✭✭✭Hodors Appletart


    Yeah, really. I think the right find it easier to coalesce and "put up with" differences to enable them to take power. Sure, they use those labels but I don't think they aim them (as much) at centrists. They prefer to embrace the centre than push it away, in my opinion.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,354 ✭✭✭Hodors Appletart


    I may as well fly my own colours here - 100% left on issues like LGBTQ, soft drug legalisation, pretty much social issues. Also on social welfare, I think it's a good thing but I think it should be more targetted to people who want to work instead of lifers.

    I'd be more centrist (or to the right, if you like) on things like crime, especially for repeat offenders and people who commit heinous crimes.

    I usually take time to digest any issue and make my mind up, rather than take ideological cues from others.



  • Posts: 17,378 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    I had this experience with my American friend recently, the same one I've mentioned plenty of times over the years. In the middle of a drunken rampage, he called me a Nazi who is sucking Putin's d*ck because I had the audacity to disagree with his repeated statement that all Russian people deserve to die. I was also called a sexist racist by two other Americans for preferring Bernie Sanders over Hillary.

    When people talk about the mental left who label everyone who doesn't agree with them, that's the type that's being talked about. They believe they have a monopoly on morality and anyone who falls outside of it is the spawn of the devil. It's a small minority, but they're very loud, and unlike the far right, they and their beliefs are socially acceptable.

    I never use the term woke but I've come to think it means the zeal of the convert. That guy used to be generally right-wing, but because of a relationship, swung so far left that anyone who hasn't gone as far as him is a sinner. Like how narrow does your world view have to be that you have to agree that all Russians deserve to die or you are a Russia-sympathiser.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,734 ✭✭✭✭osarusan


    Is there a problem with centrists on social media?

    What is it specifically?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,435 ✭✭✭Scoundrel


    They are the most condescending smug pr1cks you will ever come across. If I were in a room with a centrist a fascist and a loaded gun with 2 bullets I'd shoot the centrist twice. They provide a cloak to fascism they are the acceptable face of neo liberalism.

    They are the melts you see with Ukrainian flags and EU flags in their bios anything that is popular they will support. They support the Ukrainian proxy bomb attack on the bridge in Crimea yet pretend to be horrified by the IRA proxy bomb attack in Derry. They belt out Ireland's call but are horrified by Celtic Symphony and they are obsessed with respectability.

    They constantly advocate for NATO's wars but would never join up themselves oh no the actual fighting and dying is to be done by working class young men none of Jason O Mahony's or Brigid Laffan's or Keith Mills or Cllr McManus's etc family will die in the dirt of Eastern Ukraine.

    Post edited by Scoundrel on


  • Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators Posts: 10,611 Mod ✭✭✭✭Jim2007


    You are the one with the problem so explain yourself to us. Why do you feel the need to live in a world where people must either agree with you or not. What insecurity makes you unable to deal with people who are indifferent to your opinions? We can’t laugh at you if you don’t open up.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,165 ✭✭✭✭astrofool


    It's happening on the right too, see the GOP with their RINO's.

    Both sides (heh) have their complete hypocrites as well, for every Herschel Walker there's an Andrew Cuomo.

    The left tends to be quicker to get rid of the hypocrites while slower to drop electoral losers.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 755 ✭✭✭foxsake


    Blairs war in Iraq and all the dead kids isn't that centralist.

    I find they take each issue as it comes without any overarching direction.

    centralists are fence sitters for the most part as they hold little opinion other than consensus.

    people who go with the herd. Irish Times devotees.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 40,546 CMod ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    So you think being a herald of fascism is bad but actual fascism is fine? Odd way of thinking.

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,403 ✭✭✭Glaceon


    As a centrist myself, I tend to get it from both extremes so it's easier to just say nothing a lot of the time.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    This is pretty much it.

    It's effectively a new kind of puritanism. Both sides on the extremes shouting the odds, whilst the reasonable people in the middle - who speak the most sense and who are the most pragmatic - get drowned out and ignored.

    Centrists aren't the problem.

    It's the extremes at both ends, pulling society apart - tearing asunder any kind of meaningful dialogue and reasoned consensus.

    It's the kind of idiocy that sees anyone with any kind of leaning to the right grouped together under the banner of "fascist / far-right". You cannot engage with someone like that. They've made their mind up who the enemy are. They've lost all sense of proportion and balance.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    To the reactionary right traditional compassionate conservatives are adjacent to the radical left. So when their view of the centre has moved so far right, of course they embrace the centre, as long as its their centre



  • Posts: 17,378 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    It's reasonable to think one side, in America anyway, is driven by religion, and the other side's extreme end has had that religious void filled with this need to morally superior and virtuous.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 40,546 CMod ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    I don't think it's religion so much as a desire to be the cultural hegemon. Diversity of opinion is a direct threat to that and in a country with such established protections for free speech, the resentment leads to extremism as we saw on the 6th January terrorist attack.

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    That about sums up my view as well. The only thing missing is that I'd be more in favour of stricter control on the asylum seeker system. I feel like asylum seeker legislation is a bit obsolete, it was created in a different time, and rather than providing a lifeline for those in desperate need, I feel like it's being manipulated by some people who are plain old economic migrants. Nothing wrong with being an economic migrant. Just be honest, apply legally through the system and have your case heard.


    With everything else I kind of agree. Having got married, had a kid and bought a house, I now have something to lose from ripping up the system and starting anew. If you have nothing to lose, then you are more likely I think to want to choose radical solutions. But evolution rather than revolution might be the most sensible way forward.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    What we are talking about is explained in the title. Numerous posts in now - others know what I mean. I'm not sure I believe your question is genuine. What red flag?



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    What is your problem here? You're weirdly hostile for no reason. Explain to me what's suspect about this thread? It's not an issue for the numerous others responding.

    Yes, take that one stupid joke thread (without knowing the context - it was parodying other threads asking about people's hygiene habits) and ignore all my other contributions.

    Very strange, paranoid take. So many others doing far worse, yet you pick on me for a non reason. Bizarre.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    In fairness Irelands Call and Celtic Symphony are both pretty horrific.


    And a bridge built by an occupier to both enable the occupation and to transport military supplies to the front lines is a legitimate military target, bombing a pub because there might be soldiers drinking in it, less so



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,444 ✭✭✭✭One eyed Jack


    I’m in two minds about centrists really - on the one hand they lean towards the political right, and on the other hand they lean to the political left, I just never know where they stand on any given topic. Pick a siiiiiide dammit 🥵





  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 41,365 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    I firmly believe if you have to align your opinion through the prism of some archaic political spectrum you are a fúcking moron who badly needs to revaluate your life choices.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    What on earth...?

    What problem? Where did I indicate - even slightly - that I feel the need to live in a world where people must agree with me or not, or that I'm unable to deal with people who are indifferent to my opinions? Where are you getting the latter from? It's totally bizarre, and apropos nothing.

    What's this "we" and "us" about? Others understand perfectly, and are posting away fine. I have also posted followup posts. There's no logic to your post, other than just being spiteful and nasty for no reason. You're the one who is clearly unable to deal with different opinions.

    Why would you want to laugh at me? Do you enjoy bullying and ridiculing for no reason? (Seemingly yes).



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,719 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,719 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    Leaving Iraq aside, his politics were centrist. My sympathies with the policies that won him a landslide in 1997 still stand.

    And by the way, concensus is the political holy grail. If you can get concensus, nothing will ever beat it! I get the feeling thats never occurred to you.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Those are people whose opinions you disagree with, not centrists. And the bit about the bullet is unhinged.

    A centrist is someone who isn't constantly a slave to left or right. They have some views that are left leaning, some more conservative, some neither... they stand back and observe the full picture, they consider views across the board (when relevant - it's not always necessary).

    And while I wouldn't put a Ukrainian flag in my profile, I cannot see what the problem is with disagreeing with Putin's invasion.

    Post edited by [Deleted User] on


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Well no, I said "Whereas it's surely healthier to stand back and take a broader view (obviously within reason - there are times when of course you'll only take one view)". I don't think anyone is contradicting that being a centrist means taking positions that can be to the left or to the right. There often isn't a centrist position.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,108 ✭✭✭CGI_Livia_Soprano
    Holding tyrants to the fire


    Centrists are simply people who won't admit they're right-wing neoliberal types, whether it be cowardice or they're just too thick to realise it. They're too slow to realise that the Blair/Ahern/Clinton neoliberal "end of history" era is over, and it's never coming back.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 40,546 CMod ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    Utter drivel. Centrists are simply moderate people who just don't buy into the nonsense from either the right or the left. It's a harder term to define than Conservative, Liberal, Socialist, etc but it's no less legitimate.

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,841 ✭✭✭TomTomTim


    They provide a cloak to fascism they are the acceptable face of neo liberalism.

    I was going to write something similar sarcastically, but it seems that the clown show is already in town.

    “The man who lies to himself can be more easily offended than anyone else. You know it is sometimes very pleasant to take offense, isn't it? A man may know that nobody has insulted him, but that he has invented the insult for himself, has lied and exaggerated to make it picturesque, has caught at a word and made a mountain out of a molehill--he knows that himself, yet he will be the first to take offense, and will revel in his resentment till he feels great pleasure in it.”- ― Fyodor Dostoevsky, The Brothers Karamazov




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,435 ✭✭✭Scoundrel


    The IRA's proxy bomb targetted British soldiers at a checkpoint and killed only one civilian the poor fecker they strapped in the van. The Ukrainian proxy bombing didn't target any military and killed nothing but innocent civilians and it achieved absolutely nothing as the bridge was operational within 2 days.



  • Advertisement
Advertisement