Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Landlord evictions 1000 in 2nd Quarter due to selling up

Options
«134

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 11,830 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997


    "If this trend continues"

    We've had this for decades.

    What's more it's exactly what people asked for. Small Landlords to leave the market. Well they are. Job done.



  • Registered Users Posts: 6,003 ✭✭✭handlemaster


    2022 has seen a big increase probably due to covid.



  • Registered Users Posts: 287 ✭✭dennis72


    Sky news was showing a queue for viewing a house for rent in Dublin it went practically the length of the street

    700 places on daft aptly named site in a country of 5m

    It a world record AFAIK

    The mass exit is market driven but new RTB annual registration rules and more to come will continues to scare the hated small investor.



  • Registered Users Posts: 11,830 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997


    They charged the tenancies rules in 2016. Many will have come up for renewal over the last few years, and with the proposed future changes of never ending tenancies I'd say many are just getting out now while they can and while market prices are at peak.



  • Registered Users Posts: 19,233 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump


    It has far more to do with trying to cash out at the "top".


    It is ultimately better to flush those out that can't manage the regulations anyway rather than having the government keep pandering to them at the expense of society



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 287 ✭✭dennis72


    It's gone way beyond flushing ask anyone in that queue or looking for a place to rent

    The skynews clip was an anecdote on how not to destroy a private rental sector



  • Registered Users Posts: 19,233 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump



    It should have been done long ago rather than continued pandering and supports keeping them there.


    If they brought in an 80% CGT on investment residential property, we'd see how many of those amateur landlords currently selling up suddenly forget about these terrible regulations that are "forcing" them to sell



  • Registered Users Posts: 6,003 ✭✭✭handlemaster


    So everyone would be forced to buy or live in social housing .. is that what your after?



  • Registered Users Posts: 287 ✭✭dennis72


    So no sympathy for the queues and people trying to get a place you selfish twat



  • Registered Users Posts: 22,352 ✭✭✭✭Akrasia


    It's terrible that all the houses that landlords are selling are being demolished so that nobody can live in them again



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 19,233 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump


    Hmmm. Logic apparently isn't your strong point. That is a fairly absurd conclusion. (Even ignoring the irony that many amateur landlords are propped up by social welfare payments that cover most of their otherwise unsustainable rents)

    Can you explain to me the necessity to society of you, as a specific individual, owning and collecting rent on a specific house is, as opposed to say Flinty997 (by virtue of being the second poster) owning and renting out that same house in addition to any they might already own?

    In what world is 100 people each doing one unit as a sideline better than one person doing the 100 units full time? Do you think that doors would be cheaper if we had one carpenter making 100 doors a week, or if we had 100 amateurs making one door a week as a sideline?



  • Registered Users Posts: 19,233 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump


    Let's solve the crisis by having everyone who owns a house sell it to someone else who can rent it back to them!



  • Registered Users Posts: 19,233 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump


    There appears to be a marked lack of education across a section of "amateur landlords".


    Nobody owes you a living. Make your own choices and get up off your arse and work for it



  • Registered Users Posts: 6,003 ✭✭✭handlemaster




  • Registered Users Posts: 19,233 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump




  • Registered Users Posts: 6,003 ✭✭✭handlemaster


    I was asking what your looking for. Still not sure what your ideal market is for property



  • Registered Users Posts: 6,134 ✭✭✭screamer


    Between taxation of rental income and the absolutely ridiculous rules which totally put them on the back foot, the government have just hastened the point of diminishing returns for landlords, who are and will continue to exit in droves. There will always be a need for rental properties and so now tenants will just have to rent from the big investment fund companies, who’ll charge what they like. Well done to the government another wonderful intention which has had the direct opposite effect by poor execution. Idiots.



  • Registered Users Posts: 6,003 ✭✭✭handlemaster


    You can apply that logic to the shop owner who sits at home and has his workers running the shop or any other business. I dont think been a landlord is work free. If it is well why wouldn't everyone do if ?



  • Registered Users Posts: 19,233 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump



    Now you didn't. You attempted to put forward a strawman argument under the false dichotomy that the only alternatives were either owning+social welfare or loads of smalltime amateur landlords.


    There are also different forms of social housing btw. It can range from cost-price housing to people paying a peppercorn rent to be housed by the State



  • Registered Users Posts: 551 ✭✭✭GNWoodd


    Who are you suggesting should get up off their arse and work ? Is it the amateur landlord ? If they haven’t got up off their arse up to now how did they get to own a second ( or maybe third ) property ?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 19,233 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump



    It is so unfair and unexpected that they make landlords subject to income tax on their income. I think landlords should be exempt from income tax. And bus drivers too. Not train drivers though. That would be silly. Maybe also solicitors shouldn't have to pay income tax on their income. But barristers definitely should.



  • Registered Users Posts: 19,233 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump


    Step 1: Fill out form at bank for loan.

    Step 2: Outbid other buyer for already overpriced house

    Step 3: Benefit from massive direct and indirect state intervention when market turns sour

    Step 4: profit



  • Registered Users Posts: 11,830 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997


    The reason they outsourced it to the private market was to save the govt money.

    The private market never wanted the business. Which is why they changed the legislation to force the private market to take it on.

    You can see the arrears the local authorities have accumulated.

    The big investment landlords also mostly avoid the lower end of the market. No one wants that business. Which means the majority of it is with smaller landlords. Which are leaving the market. The big investment landlords are even more profit driven than the smaller ones.

    The market is exactly as people (like yourself) wanted it to be. The focus is still on driving supply out of the market. Then wondering why it's so dysfunctional.



  • Registered Users Posts: 6,134 ✭✭✭screamer


    who said they should not pay tax? I didn’t. What I said was that between everything the landlord has to pay/ comply with and have 0 rights when scumbag tenants wreck their property or refuse to pay, who’d want to be a landlord.



  • Registered Users Posts: 19,233 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump



    Hmmm. So how did they "force" the private sector to take it on, yet the "big investment landlords" were able to avoid it? I'd like to see that legislation you refer to if you can provide a link.

    The big investment landlords may indeed not want sh1tty one-off in in-homogeneous random properties that are inefficient to manage.

    As I've stated on here before, I'd call for the government to stop subsidizing private landlords and artificially inflating the market. Just turn off the taps and let the market find its level based on what people can afford. And also put in a properly enforced vacant property tax.

    You have a great imagination there - convincing yourself of how I wanted the market to be!



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,442 ✭✭✭KevRossi


    Not sure if this above is sarcasm or not, but I'll explain it from my experience living for years in north Dublin City in an area that was traditionally flatland and bedsit-land. This is all my opinion of course and could be totally wrong.

    Many people are cashing in now as they feel house prices are nearing the top. Many bought as buy to lets 15 years ago or thereabouts, spent over a decade in negative equity and can now sell, clear the mortgage and maybe have €50k or more into the bargain. Many bought in the 80's and 90's and missed out on selling in 2006-07 and won't be caught out again. They're looking for the nest egg for their pension or ironically to give their own kids a dig out with buying a house.

    So on average 4-6 people are in the houses in this area as they are quite big with various extensions tacked on over the decades. Who is buying them? Well not Buy-to-Let's as they are too expensive and you won't get the percentage return that you used to get. Houses are going for a minimum of €550k and with taxes etc. you won't get the return you want.

    So who is buying, (which answers your question)? They're being bought by couples trying to get a family home. So they'll have a couple of kids in the future and start a family. So what was once a home for 4-6 adults (i.e. renters) is now a home for 2 former renters. And so the stock of beds (literally) is dropping by about 60% each time a house is sold.

    This is reflected in the 3 and 4 bed semi-D's in newer areas all over Dublin. Doesn't matter if it's Beaumont, Terenure, Stillorgan or Swords. What was a home for 3-4 (or 5 in a Granny flat) renters is now home to 2. Look at the demographics of Rathmines, Ranelagh and Rathgar. Huge flatland up to the 90's, then people started to reconvert the bedsits back into the houses that they once where and suddenly the demographics change there considerably. This is now being done in other areas of the city.

    Rental prices are going up for a couple of reasons. There's a huge amount of well educated people coming in here from the EU and working in the service industry. For Google, Microsoft etc. etc. etc. Most of them are on at least €40k a year, many of them earn a lot more. They can afford more so they push the prices up. The rest is greed from landlords, a form of rack renting. But we could argue that's the capitalist system that we work under. Big demand means big price increases. Argue about the morality of it all you want, but it's where we are right now.

    Other issues are a lack of housing stock that's been well documented and the types of houses we build. We all want a semi-D or large terrace with a decent size back and front garden. But that's another story. The above though is my experience over the past 15 years in Dublin having watched areas and house prices change as well as having been a renter here since the late 80's.



  • Registered Users Posts: 11,830 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997


    Time to get popcorn and watch it play out.

    Many are leaving before SF get in and lock them into the market.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 8,469 CMod ✭✭✭✭Sierra Oscar


    You're fairly spot on with your analysis. You only need to look at areas such as the North Circular Road. Large three story houses that were divided into eight flats flats or more are being put up for sale and are being renovated into single family homes. Obviously those purchasing have deep pockets, but the point is you are going from having a building accomodating perhaps 16 - 20 people to accomodating 2 - 5 people. Just drive up or down the road and you will see how drastically it has changed over the last few years.

    The houses on the NCR are the extreme end of the sacle, but the same is being replicated all over the city on a smaller scale.



  • Registered Users Posts: 750 ✭✭✭dontmindme


    Where have SF suggested that's what they intend to do?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 6,198 ✭✭✭Ubbquittious


    Lol @ the notion of "amateur landlords". As if it's supposed to be the preserve of big megacorps run by people with a Masters in Landlording.



Advertisement