Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Do you believe climate change is the most urgent global emergency

Options
24

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 2,594 ✭✭✭newmember2


    Planetary climate systems are so vast and complex that if we really are seeing any changes due to human activity then it's already way past the point of doing anything about it. That ship has sailed.



  • Registered Users Posts: 17,438 ✭✭✭✭MEGA BRO WOLF 5000


    Nah. I'm just sick and tired of being taxed to death in the name of "climate change" while other developing countries do nothing and the people lecturing you are elite millionaires flying around the world in private jets. It's got nothing to do with the climate and everything to do with making money.



  • Registered Users Posts: 6,062 ✭✭✭Jequ0n




  • Registered Users Posts: 1,297 ✭✭✭Count Dracula


    I think it is a real issue and I think it is a problem. However, I also think it gets rammed down everyone's throat a bit too much. There is no harm in everyone doing their bit, but it does not stop the sale of big 4 wheel drives and new mobiles every year. I think it more often then not gets abused as a stick to hit everyone with. It kind of appears similar to the power which Religious Clerics and Zealots had in the middle ages. They had the almighty power of "God" and if you did not believe them you were condemned to hell, you could be burnt at the stake for not believing in the bible, it happened.

    It is all a bit hazy, the science.... and we will not really know the repercussions of the current human footprint for centuries to come?

    As a species humans have evolved dramatically in the last 100 years or 3-4 generations. I can walk out the door and drive to a local Mickey Dees and buy my dinner from out my side window whilst talking into a metal perforated box, I can then eat that "meal" and throw the rubbish into a plastic bin which gets collected and dumped into landfill somewhere out of sight. My grandparents would be shocked by it. They had to grow their own Veg or they didn't eat, that is not that long ago? The world is tiny now, I can be in a nightclub in Cape Town by midnight, that journey used to take over a month 100 years ago. I think a greater threat to the human race is how we might be dropping the ball on how resourceful we are.

    It also goes too far, chastising dairy farmers over methane from cow shight is too much of a stretch for me? Bovines have been shighting all over the planet for millions of years, all of a sudden some Danish professor announces that cow shight is killing the environment and every livestock farmer ends up in hardship, something is not adding up for me on that one? It is not unlike the clerics of the 15th century calling out heretics from the pulpit.

    But that being said I think that humans are robust and natural survivors. Yes there will be problems with Global warming, but we will adapt and persevere. Life is not a disaster movie, it is a great gift and privilege, go and enjoy it.



  • Registered Users Posts: 22,243 ✭✭✭✭Akrasia


    Your carbon tax adds up to a couple hundred euros a year. Your taxes have been used to subsidse the fossil fuel industry your entire life.

    You're being manipulated by those same interests to associate green policies with taxes while ignoring the billions spent on oil and gas subsidies



  • Advertisement
  • Administrators, Social & Fun Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 75,592 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭Beasty


    Iceberg? What iceberg? - that iceberg has blended into its surroundings.....

    The problem is everyone leaves it to someone else. And ultimately those of us who have benefitted from globalisation and the best standards of living are happy to leave it all for the next generation to sort out, by which time it will be too late (and probably already is too late to some extent, but equally starting to properly address it now will improve the chances for future generations)



  • Registered Users Posts: 12,962 ✭✭✭✭bnt


    I don’t think I would use the word “urgent”, since it places too much emphasis on the time factor. “Pressing” or “serious” would be better words for it. It demands sustained, meaningful, comprehensive changes to what we do and how we do it.

    Metaphor: everyone knows that crash diets don’t lead to lasting weight loss, but rather that becoming more healthy requires more permanent changes to one’s lifestyle. In the same way, climate change won’t be “solved” quickly by panicking and making drastic changes that aren’t sustainable over the long term.

    From out there on the moon, international politics look so petty. You want to grab a politician by the scruff of the neck and drag him a quarter of a million miles out and say, ‘Look at that, you son of a bitch’.

    — Edgar Mitchell, Apollo 14 Astronaut



  • Registered Users Posts: 13,885 ✭✭✭✭Thelonious Monk


    ah here developing countries are not the ones who caused this mess. The fact that there are hypocrites or green politicians in business class doesn't mean we're not f*cked. I don't think people are going to take it seriously until crop failures become more and more frequent, and it's already happening.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,244 ✭✭✭Brid Hegarty


    So you're not a climate change denier then... good!

    I don't see it as lecturing, and if it is then they're really lecturing each other, not you or me.

    How much truth is there to the millionaires flying around in jets theory? I get the point but I suspect it's really just an Alex Jones type red herring. I guess only poor David Attenborough isn't smart enough to suspect that it's all about money?

    And what are you saying so, that we should just do nothing about climate change? Wouldn't you be complaining about too?



  • Registered Users Posts: 28,876 ✭✭✭✭Wanderer78




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,244 ✭✭✭Brid Hegarty




  • Registered Users Posts: 2,986 ✭✭✭KilOit


    Not climate change as such but what affects it. hate seeing the rain forests being wiped out and plastic and oil spills into the oceans.

    Pending fear would be evolving super powers, I think a civil war in America will happen and a 3rd world war, scary things happening in China now, massive financial collapse is about to happen. 10 years time the world will be a very different place



  • Registered Users Posts: 965 ✭✭✭harmless


    Each one releasing more Co2 in 2 hours than I will be responsible for in 1 year.

    Is this proof that Co2 footprint was just invented by British Petroleum to shift blame away from powerful people and corporations?



  • Registered Users Posts: 28,876 ✭✭✭✭Wanderer78


    ...maybe, we cant keep doing what we re doing, wealth will always be protected, but its up to us to keep highlighting its obligations also, including our own....



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,274 ✭✭✭EOQRTL


    Voted no. It's blown out of all proportion by interest groups that stand to make money from keeping people fearful.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,297 ✭✭✭Count Dracula


    I still struggle to comprehend how 3rd millennium cow shight is producing more methane than the cow shight dropped by their ancestors over the centuries? Surely manure dropped 300 years ago was just as detrimental to the environment as manure produced by modern cattle? This is what the scientists have gotten over the line, did no one question this, or are we not allowed to?

    I also doubt very much that Ireland's carbon footprint is of any significance on the global scale of things? I can only imagine that measures taken by the 6 million people on the island are merely token efforts when compared to the industrial carnage being raged in developing Africa, India, China or say the Philippines? I respect that it is very noble of us to recycle and purchase 80k electric cars, but the reality is that we are literally a blip in the Atlantic ocean, they may as well ban sheep farming in New Zealand.

    What fuel is used to procure the lithium that is running those batteries? Lead acid, zinc air, nickel cadmium, lithium phosphate... be the hokey. The cringing reality is that you couldn't drive from one end of the country to the other without needing to recharge. What a shambles. I reckon they have as much future at the Betamax video, I said it first.



  • Registered Users Posts: 965 ✭✭✭harmless


    But most well know climate change activists are super emitters. Responsible for the equivalent pollution per year as thousands of people.

    Do they know something we don't? Why don't they believe in personal responsibility?



  • Registered Users Posts: 13,379 ✭✭✭✭Danzy


    No but they are going to be the ones that add most of the carbon this century.


    So they will tip it from problem to crisis to disaster.


    Largely fighting climate change is a Western Europe and North America passion, most of the world doesn't care.


    That's a problem.


    Western Europe and North America going net zero will be dwarfed by Asian carbon output alone.


    We are all in it together, only sometimes it seems.



  • Registered Users Posts: 28,876 ✭✭✭✭Wanderer78


    are they really, care to share those resources that confirms this?



  • Registered Users Posts: 965 ✭✭✭harmless


    There was no industrilised farming. Eating meat was consider a luxury not so long ago.

    Ireland has it's part to play as part of the EU which contains 450 million people.

    If we can reduce our polution per capita to that of the developing countries you listed we will be on the right track.

    A transition from cars to EV cars would be a mistake, there are much more efficient modes of transport.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 24,863 ✭✭✭✭Strumms


    Agriculture and Industry are two of the biggest catalysts of climate change yet, there are precious few restrictions or limitations placed on their operations, especially agriculture that can influence climate change….positively.

    much easier to target and tax the fûck out of Johnny and Mary with 3 kids, driving a 1.6 litre.



  • Registered Users Posts: 28,876 ✭✭✭✭Wanderer78


    how will we run our economies will ageing populations?

    what modes of transport are they?



  • Registered Users Posts: 965 ✭✭✭harmless


    We have outsoutrced most of our manufacturing to asia and they still cause less of an impanct to climate change per capitia. How have they managed to do this?



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 38,976 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    I still struggle to comprehend how 3rd millennium cow shight is producing more methane than the cow shight dropped by their ancestors over the centuries? Surely manure dropped 300 years ago was just as detrimental to the environment as manure produced by modern cattle? This is what the scientists have gotten over the line, did no one question this, or are we not allowed to?

    I think this is the second time this question has been raised on this thread.

    Ireland has a cattle population of about 6,500,000 head, a sheep population of nearly 4,000,000 and 1,700,000 pigs.

    These numbers are astronomical compared to those in our history.



  • Registered Users Posts: 13,379 ✭✭✭✭Danzy


    Johnny and Mary will be complaining about agriculture over supper and they will still decide to eat tomorrow again.


    There is a hypocrisy in that.


    They will also push for agricultural output to be reduced in Europe, where most of the best land in the world is, in favour of other locations where growth is achieved by abusing fertilizer to drive growth on poor soils, which is most of Asia, South America and most of Africa where environmental regulations are non existent.



    You want low carbon and environmental protection then farm where the least damage is done on the best land and climate.



  • Registered Users Posts: 24,863 ✭✭✭✭Strumms


    Not hypocritical, humans have to eat, that’s just a fact.

    loads of agricultural machinery and vehicles are hybrids and have been for some time, but farmers engagement with such tech is slow.



  • Registered Users Posts: 13,379 ✭✭✭✭Danzy


    They produce massive amounts of carbon but have large populations.


    Its why so many talk about Carbon per capita, otherwise the focus is going to have to radically shift to Asia, where the carbon problem is now and where it is growing exponentially.


    If you want to reduce global carbon focus on Asia. Everything else is way down the list and often just Western narcissism.


    Western Europe and North America are going in the right direction at a speed of knots, Asia is rocketing in the wrong direction.


    What we do now is verging on also ran, passed out.


    The hope is for European and American tech to meet the challenges and provide the Asian giants with the tech to mitigate their carbon footprint.


    We all have to do something but a carbon neutral Europe is not going to have a global impact on carbon.



  • Registered Users Posts: 13,379 ✭✭✭✭Danzy




  • Registered Users Posts: 13,379 ✭✭✭✭Danzy


    They are very expensive, hard to find, produced in small numbers, near impossible to fix yourself, so additional expense and they have a very poor torque.


    They are all big issues.


    People are also obsessed with ever cheaper food so the economic sustainability of production is an issue as well, big reason to stick with current machines.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 48,510 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    this link would suggest otherwise. seems to show head of cattle going from about 300m in 1900 to about a billion in 2000.

    https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Global-animal-stocks-for-1900-1950-2000-and-2050-for-cattle-A-pigs-B-and-sheep_fig2_51130812



Advertisement