Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Mica redress levy - Nope, Nope and Nope

Options
2

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 9,500 ✭✭✭runawaybishop


    Its not a 'developers' buildings, its anyone who used blocks made in certain quarries, and there are a number of them. It has nothing to do with buying cheap blocks. The blocks contain too much mica/pyrite which then break down over time and exposure. Poor regulation meant blocks were not tested for mica/pyrite content, this has since been remedied.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    It should be done, anyway, to send a message. No way should that company be left standing, after all this.



  • Registered Users Posts: 9,500 ✭✭✭runawaybishop


    afaik they have folded, and reopened under another name.



  • Registered Users Posts: 975 ✭✭✭Parachutes


    I don’t live in Dublin but even still, when I go to Dublin I still benefit from the trams in our capital city. Stupid analogy.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,832 ✭✭✭enricoh


    The current minister who's brief covers asylum seekers proposes that all asylum seekers get keys to their own pad within 4 months of arriving here. There is 8000 asylum seekers in the system at the minute, they can apply to bring their family over once they get the green light to stay here.

    Yet they haven't the money to replace the houses of people who work n pay their own way in life and get caught innocently on block defects. An absolute scam of the highest order.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 729 ✭✭✭SupplyandDemandZone


    Sorry it hasn't worked out for the home owners but that's life im afraid. It's not my fault so why should i pay?



  • Registered Users Posts: 73 ✭✭DullSpark


    A cap of €400,000 seems a bit saucy. Apart from the actual structure you would think a lot of things could be re used e.g. kitchens, bathrooms, doors, sockets, switches, and the land that the house is on.

    To be fair there are some cowboys up in that North West, you can be sure they'll feel entitled to better higher spec houses due to all the pain and suffering they've endured too



  • Posts: 3,801 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    The state didn’t, the developers did.


    the entire industry needs an insurance agency.



  • Posts: 3,801 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    I have a feeling there’s a lot of criminality close to that sector.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,302 ✭✭✭landofthetree


    Its amazing how much the scumbag builders and the construction industry have cost the taxpayers.

    Cowboys the lot of them.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 6,805 ✭✭✭timmyntc


    Entire houses need knocked - if you must reuse windows/doors/kitchens etc, then you need to carefully remove and pay for storage

    Foundations may need lifted & relaid depending on state of them - family needs put up somewhere for the duration (caravan most likely)

    Keep in mind most of these people are still paying mortgages for houses that are unsellable and worthless



  • Registered Users Posts: 6,805 ✭✭✭timmyntc


    There really is. CRH in particular had a very dodgy rise to power both here and abroad.



  • Registered Users Posts: 33,019 ✭✭✭✭Princess Consuela Bananahammock


    Oh, you'll pay. You'll all pay.* One way the other.

    There should be some ceveat attached to this, like liquidation and prosecution of firms who are found to have knowlingly caused this and stricter laws for the future - THAT'S where the scandal is: TDs not holding people accountable and even helping them evade responsibilities (but you'll only go and vote them back in, so you kind of pay for that, too. Only this time by choice.)


    *I don't live in Ireialnd, so won't pay :)

    Everything I don't like is either woke or fascist - possibly both - pick one.



  • Registered Users Posts: 9,500 ✭✭✭runawaybishop


    You arent that far off the mark, building regs have changed since those houses were built so they will have to be built to current code.



  • Registered Users Posts: 263 ✭✭SnazzyPig


    This seems to be about appeasing the TDs that had constituents affected by this regulatory failure.

    So, 3.2 billion to prop up the current coalition.


    Makes perfect sense.



  • Registered Users Posts: 12,971 ✭✭✭✭Losty Dublin


    If the materials were shoddy and not up to spec then the supplier should be at fault.

    If the materials were not the right spec for the job required then those architects or engineers who said to use them should be at fault.

    If the materials were not used right on the building site then the builder should be at fault.

    The above should be culpable between themselves, not the taxpayer.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,832 ✭✭✭enricoh


    Possibly apart from 2007 I couldn't think of a worse time than now for building a house. A neighbour moved into his new build last year in March. He had the builder out this summer for something small and the builder said it'd be e100k extra for the same house now. The house cost around the 300k mark.



  • Registered Users Posts: 28,805 ✭✭✭✭Wanderer78




  • Registered Users Posts: 2,876 ✭✭✭Borzoi


    Mrs B has a friend, who's father lives in an affected house. The house in 19 years old. So now they want it rebuilt as new. Get the f#@k out. There needs to be a discount based on the house age as well



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,135 ✭✭✭323


    Aye, but the construction and insurance sectors are untouchable in Ireland.

    Sure lots of Councilors & TD's were involved with the construction industry, brown envelopes everywhere to smooth things over around the time most of these problem buildings were built in Dublin as well as the NW & elsewhere.

    Buck stops with government for lack of proper standards plus the lack of enforcement of those standards that were in place.

    We'll end up paying, bitch a bit and accept it as always. But look in the bright side, its small change compared to what was given to the banks to pay off unsecured bondholders and the money stays in the country.

    “Follow the trend lines, not the headlines,”



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 18,475 ✭✭✭✭_Brian




  • Registered Users Posts: 10,527 ✭✭✭✭EmmetSpiceland


    Sure didn’t we pay Sisk to fix up the shoddy schools that Western Building Systems built and then gave the contract for building new schools to, the very same, Western Building Systems.

    The tide is turning…



  • Registered Users Posts: 37 Mousie32



    Post edited by Mousie32 on


  • Registered Users Posts: 821 ✭✭✭lapua20grain


    The funny thing is that even if they get the funding they will probably vote for SF and not government parties, Eoin O'Brion is hanging out of the main protestors and getting plaudits from them even though SF haven't come out with any solid plan on how to fund it.



  • Registered Users Posts: 18,064 ✭✭✭✭namloc1980


    Dip into the taxpayers pockets again. We're just the magic money tree for the government to use to solve all their problems. Insurance companies and the people responsible can walk away while the taxpayer has to dig deep again. It's exasperating.

    Why are we paying for people to build 2,000+ sq.ft. houses? This should be limited to a reasonable house size of say 1,300 sq.ft. and if the owner wants a bigger house then they pay the extra themselves.



  • Registered Users Posts: 24,150 ✭✭✭✭Sleepy


    It should be a levy on the profits of any business engaged in property development.



  • Registered Users Posts: 16,457 ✭✭✭✭astrofool


    I completely agree on the pre-2014, which is why I specified that exactly. The idea of the system is also to inspect the blocks, it was brought in after the pyrite scandal which would necessitate block testing.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,034 ✭✭✭Swaine


    Most of them driving around in UK reg cars for the cheapness but want the Irish taxpayer to build them a brand spanking new house.

    Civil matter so let them go be fcuked.



  • Registered Users Posts: 10,249 ✭✭✭✭Furze99


    There ARE alternative ways to deal with this. One would be to offer zero interest loans to householders that would be repayable going forward or realised by sale eventually as in Fair Deal scheme. People would then only borrow the minimum needed to make their houses safe. That would be fair and entirely manageable. Second would be to build estates of ‘grant sized’ houses and offer these to people where they say their houses must be demolished. Again that would control costs. But a Fair Deal type loan would be the best overall in terms of meeting needs and limiting costs to rest of us.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 578 ✭✭✭VillageIdiot71


    Why? Its likely many, many of these homes would be self-builds. No developer involved.



Advertisement