Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Mica redress levy - Nope, Nope and Nope

  • 11-11-2021 7:55pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,026 ✭✭✭


    I'm not paying anymore levy's they can go stick it up their hole.

    TD's earn millions , have cash falling out their ass but now I maybe paying?

    Fuck off, No discussion no "what do I think" it's just no.

    https://www.thejournal.ie/mica-redress-levy-5598282-Nov2021/



«1

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,412 ✭✭✭Jequ0n


    Who else did you think was going to fund it? Realistically I mean.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 513 ✭✭✭The DayDream


    Doesn't Apple still owe us a few squid?



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 24,381 CMod ✭✭✭✭Ten of Swords


    Title updated to indicate what the thread is actually about!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,656 ✭✭✭lawrencesummers


    What are you going to do about it?


    they cant levy the construction industry because that would make unaffordable homes more unaffordable.

    They wont tax vulture funds.


    Its going to fall on the majority to pay for this.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,381 ✭✭✭✭Potential-Monke


    This is why I was against it in the first place. If I'm not mistaken, the company who did this are still trading, yet they want me, a person who lives on the literal other end of the country, to pay for it. Oversight me hole, never a problem until someone is affected by it.

    But as they're saying above, can't do anything about it. We don't have a say in this.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,838 ✭✭✭Markcheese


    Ah but the AVERAGE house size affected in Donegal is 2400 square feet ( apparently ) , that's a lot of sq feet to rebuild -

    Slava ukraini 🇺🇦



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,997 ✭✭✭Dr Turk Turkelton


    Now bear with me here because this may seem like a radical idea but how about the homeowners?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 975 ✭✭✭Parachutes


    Why should I have to pay for people who built their homes with defective blocks? It's sad and all but caveat emptor and all that. This has nothing to do with the state, or my family for that matter.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,412 ✭✭✭Jequ0n


    Everyone is a victim these days, and so are the the poor homeowners. It’s just the fashionable badge.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,216 ✭✭✭✭listermint


    I'm wholly against a levy on any of this. No chance nope I've enough bloody bills and Levy's.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,412 ✭✭✭Jequ0n


    I never said you should have to pay for it. I just asked if anyone expected a different outcome. I don’t want to pay for it either, but complaining on boards won’t make a difference either.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,638 ✭✭✭Homelander


    I mean realistically where did people think the money would come from ultimately?

    I feel for the homeowners but I think the Government response should be measured - a suggested cap of €400K seems fairly high considering most of those homes would be in fairly rural areas.

    I understand they might have lost more than that in many cases, but if its all at the taxpayers expense, the response should be focused on providing what's essential to each affected family rather than replacing what was lost.

    EG if you lost a spacious 4-bedroom home with large square footage, the cost to cover a bog-standard 4-bedroom home would be sufficient.

    The projected cost is not exactly pocket change.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,745 ✭✭✭StupidLikeAFox


    What do people want instead? 5000 homeowners on the housing list, where we will have to pay to house them anyway?

    Not very enthused about having to pay for it, but it has to be done.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,433 ✭✭✭✭EmmetSpiceland


    People, on boards, don’t want these people getting anything they aren’t getting themselves.

    And if they must get something they aren’t to get an inch more than they had at the start. The “footprint” of the rebuild will have to be measured, and checked, to ensure it’s exactly the same. If that’s not good enough for them let them rot in the fields.

    Another example of the crab mentality on here.

    “It is not blood that makes you Irish but a willingness to be part of the Irish nation” - Thomas Davis



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,381 ✭✭✭✭Potential-Monke


    No, I just don't think the government should be responsible for a private companies shoddy tactics on saving money which resulted in this. If it was such a big problem, why is it only this developers buildings that are affected? Because they went with the cheapest option for them. So it should be on them and them alone. You can quote regulations and lack of oversight, but they seem to be the only company (that I'm aware of) who used these blocks. They even quote that it used standard mix design, but are still the only ones who had this problem.... If it was widespread around the country with multiple manufacturers and developers involved, I'd be a bit more understanding. But one company? Maybe I'm thick, but everything is pointing back to that one company.

    Open to correction on this. I don't like reading about it because it only angers me that I'm going to have to pay for it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,102 ✭✭✭✭Del2005


    If they are going to give the mica home owners redress because of bad regulation why are they ignoring the thousands of other home owners who have had to rectify their property because of lack of enforcement of regulations, Priory Hall was the tip of the iceberg and people who have had to spend thousands fixing their property won't be happy that a select group will be getting theirs fixed for free.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,216 ✭✭✭✭listermint


    5000 folks on the housing list for bog standard social housing would have a significantly different cost than covering all sorts of sizes of houses from anything to small for 5000 folks.


    100 redress was a cod from start to finish. It's la la land stuff altogether.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,381 ✭✭✭✭Potential-Monke


    Exactly. Even the crowd who looked into this said it was unreasonable for the government/bodies to have been able to predict/test for this. So they're saying it's not the governments fault, even if better procedures and testing were in place, but yet the government is expected to cover the cost of this craic. If I've read right, there was a 1% limit on the inclusion of whatever is causing this, but tests have shown the blocks contained far more. Yet Cassidy Brothers are claiming innocence... Even going so far as to decide to not produce bricks for housing anymore...

    Cassidy Bros is still in operation from its quarry at Buncrana. Its website still offers a range of prices for concrete blocks, although it is no longer, a source said last week, producing blocks for housing construction.16 Oct 2021

    Do we now have to worry that office or public buildings these lads are involved in are going to start crumbling one day? Why aren't they footing the expected up to €3.2 billion bill?



  • Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators Posts: 10,611 Mod ✭✭✭✭Jim2007


    Ah but you don’t understand how the building industry works……. A lot of legal work goes into isolating the various projects and risks into separate legal entities so that when a problem occurs the drawbridge goes up and you are left dealing with an empty shell. You need deep pockets and lots of time to get anywhere and these are two things most people don’t have.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 824 ✭✭✭lapua20grain


    100% agree, we are still paying for the failure of PMPA and Quinn gambling with Anglo, why the fk should I pay for houses in Donegal? Not a hope am I paying another levy.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,013 ✭✭✭Allinall


    I'll begrudgingly pay a levy. Mainly because I won't have a choice.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,503 ✭✭✭thefinalstage


    This really sticks in my side. A generation who can't even afford a home are expected to pay for a private company's mess?



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Its fairly stunning that insurance/construction havent simply been told to solve this or else

    That said the caps discussed are just too high and talk of 100% redress is fantasy stuff that should never have been enabled- in the media, from politicians or on various fora



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,838 ✭✭✭Markcheese


    Many of the affected houses can be repaired - but they'll probably always be devalued as mica houses - doesn't seem that's good enough,

    Many of the houses that do need replacing are pretty big - and the owners want like for like replacement ...

    then there is the issue of fixtures and fittings ,do they get paid for by the state - ? , And where are people going to live while demolition and rebuilding Is done and who's going to pay ? Landscaping ? Driveways ?

    100% redress would end up a bottomless pit ,

    If the state offered modest 3 or 4 bed homes as replacement ,that'd still be a couple of hundred thousand a pop , and demolition costs on top of that ... would a bank accept a 3 bed house as collateral in exchange for a mansion - also making it unsellable ...

    But many houses are either uninhabitable or becoming so ..

    Slava ukraini 🇺🇦



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,517 ✭✭✭Sunny Dayz


    I have to say it is disappointing reading comments like this. If it's nothing to do with me or if I'm not benefitting then I don't want to pay is what you are saying.... But yet you don't have a problem with my taxes paying for your trams or whatever in Dublin that I don't get to use....

    People's houses are literally crumbling. Do you think they chose to build with defective blocks?

    We are already paying levies for the insurance industry and (I stand corrected) the bank bailouts so this is nothing new.

    But I do think that the construction and insurance sectors should be contributing significantly to this.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,410 ✭✭✭Mr. teddywinkles


    Wheres all the insurance companies on this. Did the building company not have a liability insurance for this kind of structural defect. Or the quarry supplying these shoddy materials.

    The government in this country are a soft roll over. Absolutely useless. Any problem just throw money at it and pass it in to the taxpayer



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,380 ✭✭✭timmyntc


    Soft touch regulation from the government allowed this to happen - and its not the first time.

    Dublin pyrite, Donegal mica, Mayo pyrite, limerick pyrite, clare pyrite, tipp pyrite - the list keeps growing. And it will continue to grow until the sector is regulated properly. Quarrying and building materials production are a law unto themselves. Once you get the cert to say your product is NSAI certified, it will never be checked again. You can make them as shoddy as you like and nobody will know until their homes start to crumble.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,165 ✭✭✭✭astrofool


    Since May 2014 (in response to pyrite) there has been building inspector system in place to catch these type of issues (doesn't help with the pre-2014), however homeowners can pay a fee and opt out of the inspection and take on the risk themselves (which it seems a lot of people have done).



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,380 ✭✭✭timmyntc


    Nearly all Mica and Pyrite issues to date have occurred in pre-2014 builds. So you can try and victim blame all you want, its just lies from yourself.

    And building inspectors do not test blockwork - if you order 10N blocks you have no idea if they are 10N or 5N unless you test them yourself. Building inspector inspects the building, not the blocks.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,745 ✭✭✭StupidLikeAFox


    I agree the insurance and block supplier should be cleaned out on this, punish them for sure, however how much are you realistically going to get out of them? If you got 200m out of them you are still about 3bn short



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,512 ✭✭✭runawaybishop


    Its not a 'developers' buildings, its anyone who used blocks made in certain quarries, and there are a number of them. It has nothing to do with buying cheap blocks. The blocks contain too much mica/pyrite which then break down over time and exposure. Poor regulation meant blocks were not tested for mica/pyrite content, this has since been remedied.



  • Posts: 8,385 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    It should be done, anyway, to send a message. No way should that company be left standing, after all this.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,512 ✭✭✭runawaybishop


    afaik they have folded, and reopened under another name.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 975 ✭✭✭Parachutes


    I don’t live in Dublin but even still, when I go to Dublin I still benefit from the trams in our capital city. Stupid analogy.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,082 ✭✭✭enricoh


    The current minister who's brief covers asylum seekers proposes that all asylum seekers get keys to their own pad within 4 months of arriving here. There is 8000 asylum seekers in the system at the minute, they can apply to bring their family over once they get the green light to stay here.

    Yet they haven't the money to replace the houses of people who work n pay their own way in life and get caught innocently on block defects. An absolute scam of the highest order.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 729 ✭✭✭SupplyandDemandZone


    Sorry it hasn't worked out for the home owners but that's life im afraid. It's not my fault so why should i pay?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 73 ✭✭DullSpark


    A cap of €400,000 seems a bit saucy. Apart from the actual structure you would think a lot of things could be re used e.g. kitchens, bathrooms, doors, sockets, switches, and the land that the house is on.

    To be fair there are some cowboys up in that North West, you can be sure they'll feel entitled to better higher spec houses due to all the pain and suffering they've endured too



  • Posts: 3,801 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    The state didn’t, the developers did.


    the entire industry needs an insurance agency.



  • Posts: 3,801 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    I have a feeling there’s a lot of criminality close to that sector.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,439 ✭✭✭landofthetree


    Its amazing how much the scumbag builders and the construction industry have cost the taxpayers.

    Cowboys the lot of them.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,380 ✭✭✭timmyntc


    Entire houses need knocked - if you must reuse windows/doors/kitchens etc, then you need to carefully remove and pay for storage

    Foundations may need lifted & relaid depending on state of them - family needs put up somewhere for the duration (caravan most likely)

    Keep in mind most of these people are still paying mortgages for houses that are unsellable and worthless



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,380 ✭✭✭timmyntc


    There really is. CRH in particular had a very dodgy rise to power both here and abroad.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,762 ✭✭✭✭Princess Consuela Bananahammock


    Oh, you'll pay. You'll all pay.* One way the other.

    There should be some ceveat attached to this, like liquidation and prosecution of firms who are found to have knowlingly caused this and stricter laws for the future - THAT'S where the scandal is: TDs not holding people accountable and even helping them evade responsibilities (but you'll only go and vote them back in, so you kind of pay for that, too. Only this time by choice.)


    *I don't live in Ireialnd, so won't pay :)

    Everything I don't like is either woke or fascist - possibly both - pick one.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,512 ✭✭✭runawaybishop


    You arent that far off the mark, building regs have changed since those houses were built so they will have to be built to current code.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 268 ✭✭SnazzyPig


    This seems to be about appeasing the TDs that had constituents affected by this regulatory failure.

    So, 3.2 billion to prop up the current coalition.


    Makes perfect sense.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,258 ✭✭✭✭Losty Dublin


    If the materials were shoddy and not up to spec then the supplier should be at fault.

    If the materials were not the right spec for the job required then those architects or engineers who said to use them should be at fault.

    If the materials were not used right on the building site then the builder should be at fault.

    The above should be culpable between themselves, not the taxpayer.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,082 ✭✭✭enricoh


    Possibly apart from 2007 I couldn't think of a worse time than now for building a house. A neighbour moved into his new build last year in March. He had the builder out this summer for something small and the builder said it'd be e100k extra for the same house now. The house cost around the 300k mark.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,439 ✭✭✭✭Wanderer78




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,876 ✭✭✭Borzoi


    Mrs B has a friend, who's father lives in an affected house. The house in 19 years old. So now they want it rebuilt as new. Get the f#@k out. There needs to be a discount based on the house age as well



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,140 ✭✭✭323


    Aye, but the construction and insurance sectors are untouchable in Ireland.

    Sure lots of Councilors & TD's were involved with the construction industry, brown envelopes everywhere to smooth things over around the time most of these problem buildings were built in Dublin as well as the NW & elsewhere.

    Buck stops with government for lack of proper standards plus the lack of enforcement of those standards that were in place.

    We'll end up paying, bitch a bit and accept it as always. But look in the bright side, its small change compared to what was given to the banks to pay off unsecured bondholders and the money stays in the country.

    “Follow the trend lines, not the headlines,”



  • Advertisement
Advertisement