Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all,
Vanilla are planning an update to the site on April 24th (next Wednesday). It is a major PHP8 update which is expected to boost performance across the site. The site will be down from 7pm and it is expected to take about an hour to complete. We appreciate your patience during the update.
Thanks all.

Why don't some cyclists use cycle lanes?

Options
245

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 8,212 ✭✭✭07Lapierre


    This discussion reminds me of a certain poster who gave the cycle “path” along North strand as an example of a “perfectly good” bike lane. He couldn’t understand why anyone on a bike wouldn’t use it!

    https://goo.gl/maps/Y1aGhc9quSypUQZ88



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 25,276 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    Oh god, and they also wanted a fatwa against any cyclists on the pavement and couldn't see the logical dissonance there.


    There are pluses and minuses to different types of segregated cycle lanes. Two way segregated lanes tend to give you options to overtake into the oncoming lane (when safe) but they can make turning right quite difficult and time-consuming. Single segregated lanes sometimes have issues with yielding (obviously they should retain the same rights as the road) but I want to be clear that paint on a footpath is not a segregated cycle lane in my book. The likes of what they are installing on Griffith Ave would be a proper segregated single carriage cycle lane - but it is going to be next to impossible to overtake on that - frustrating but not the end of the world as long as they have regular "gaps" to let you out onto the main road to do so.

    I am reasonably fond of what we have here in Geneva, which is a slightly raised cycle lane and then a slightly raised footpath beside it. Not perfect, but you can easily transfer to the main road to overtake and then return to the cycle lane but there remains enough delineation that traffic doesn't generally impeach onto it. Unfortunately I'm not sure it would work in Ireland as it would simply be parked on with great gusto.

    https://www.google.com/maps/@46.2507084,6.1511006,3a,75y,5.79h,86.95t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sG1Pmj6VGthP6fEA2tKTbNg!2e0!7i16384!8i8192




  • Registered Users Posts: 1,694 ✭✭✭thesimpsons


    new cycle lane installed outside my house in recent years - there is no way to get out of it at the end of the 750m unless you go on to the footpath or get off the bike and walk through a tiny gap. It has deeply recessed rainwater shore covers (the grids type ones) every 100m and is currently badly in need of hedge trimming, but hey, it all counts in the council's xkm of countywide cycle lanes so they get their kudos for that. I sent the council photos of the debris on the cycle lane - they are still scheduling cleaning despite 5 reminders.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 19,826 Mod ✭✭✭✭Weepsie


    The lanes on Griffith avenue (and I'm still bewildered by the parking they've retained) are starting to fill with debris, and I don't imagine they'll be kept free on long stretches.


    At the Mobhi Road end, the residents are very proactive in sweeping leaves and mulching them, though one had a habit of making a big pile and leaving it in what is now the cycle lane.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,017 ✭✭✭TaurenDruid



    Yes, that's me, and I still can't understand why it's preferable to cycle slowly up a steep enough hill with a bus chugging along behind you, trying to overtake, when you could just nip in to the cycle lane, completely separated from the traffic, and merge back in when safe to do so when you get to the top of the hill.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 4,017 ✭✭✭TaurenDruid


    You might think that, but you'd be wrong... /waves at @07Lapierre



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 48,305 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder




  • Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 38,842 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    This might help explain why they might not be used

    People in Galway may be familiar with Doughiska and it's completely stupid cycle lanes...




  • Registered Users Posts: 733 ✭✭✭Heraclius


    That Galway photo is hard to look at! The council must be very proud of their work.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,017 ✭✭✭TaurenDruid


    hill?

    Heh. :-)

    In fairness, I think I've seen you post average cycle speeds of 50kmh? Speeds that made me raise an eyebrow, anyway. So no bother to you, I'm sure, or anyone who is properly fit but yes, that's a hill, certainly to someone as unfit as I currently am, and certainly to some of the cyclists I see regularly there going reeeallly slowly up the hill.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 4,017 ✭✭✭TaurenDruid


    That is just bizarre! Why would the normal rules of the road not apply there - traffic coming on to the main road has to yield to traffic on the road (including cyclists)? Presumably cars coming onto the road do have to yield to cars anyway?



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 48,305 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    definitely not me doing 50km/h average, that'd be superhuman.



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 38,842 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    The cycle lane is not on the road so cyclists are expected to yield at every junction.



  • Registered Users Posts: 11,741 ✭✭✭✭tomasrojo


    It's a classic really. Got international attention as well.

    Part of the rationale was to make cyclists give way to the drivers, I assume. They definitely have to yield in any interpretation of the rules, I think, based on all the yield triangles.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 48,305 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    that's an insanely common feature of irish cycle paths though. cyclists who are proceeding straight on being instructed to yield to traffic coming from lesser side roads.

    often it's simply achieved by making the cycle lane 'disappear'; as in 'we're not even going to try to make an effort to manage how cyclists cross':

    https://www.google.com/maps/@53.2764484,-6.1879376,3a,46.2y,176.97h,87.8t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sn4X27L9eSpI5jsBsYkEwmQ!2e0!7i16384!8i8192



  • Registered Users Posts: 9,268 ✭✭✭Macy0161


    When commuting I generally use them (even the N11!) except for one spot that throws you out in an awful position having ceded priority.

    I carry on why a cyclist might use the road - generally full of crap (my experience is far more likely to puncture in a cycle lane than on the road), shared use or de facto shared use which isn't appropriate at any kind of speed, the ceding of priority, parked cars, awful exit points, other road users taking the space before looking to see if anyone is coming...

    The tl:dr is they're designed by people who don't cycle, who just want people who do out of the way of cars (and to tick boxes).



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 48,305 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    and they're a piece of piss to install; you don't need to do any engineering or redesign of the road, just retrofit a cycle lane with some paint and maybe replace the grass verge with tarmac. they're often putting cyclists in a space which was never designed to accomodate them.



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,212 ✭✭✭07Lapierre


    Well I can’t be arsed explaining it to you again… but if you didn’t understand the first time, I guess there’s no point.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Here's a new one near me up a slight hill, solid white and a dead end. What's not to love? The only reason those ones get built is to satisfy planning for new developments. There are many more in the area.




  • Registered Users Posts: 7,867 ✭✭✭cletus


    Having seen some new bike lanes go in locally, I'm pretty sure the fellas putting in the footpaths are told anywhere a path goes, put in a section of bike lane too. Unfortunately, that seems to be as far as the planning



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 4,017 ✭✭✭TaurenDruid


    There needs to be some basic national standards, surely. Specifying things like minimum widths, and basic logic/cop-on around safety standards, such as "You've got a cycle lane that needs to exit onto a road? Right, it needs to do so cyclists can do so safely!" Isn't this the sort of thing the RSA should be all over? Maybe if a cycling lobby group were to approach them?



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,017 ✭✭✭TaurenDruid


    You're right, there's absolutely no point explaining to me why it's big or clever to huff and puff your bike slowly up a bus lane on a hill, with a 20-tonne double decker a metre behind your rear wheel the whole time, when there's an alternative a metre away, separated by a stone wall; nor why it's fine for adult cyclists to cycle on narrow city centre footpaths.



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,212 ✭✭✭07Lapierre


    North strand is city centre. That lane is on a narrow footpath…in fact that’s all it is a narrow footpath. As for huffing and puffing up a hill while holding up a bus? So what? Do it often enough and you’ll get fitter.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,895 ✭✭✭Padre_Pio


    That's not a cycle lane. It's a footpath someone painted a bicycle on.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,017 ✭✭✭TaurenDruid



    A footpath that's between 1.5 and 1.9 metres wide, not even counting the cycle lane, is not "narrow." And I can huff and puff up that cycle lane (and get fitter!) without a 20-tonne bus up my arse. But I thought you weren't going to bother continuing this conversation?



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,212 ✭✭✭07Lapierre


    I lied! Any bus driver that can’t overtake you is a crap driver and shouldn’t be driving a bus. See your not the problem on the road, it’s crap bus drivers that drive up the arse of slow cyclists that need the kick up the arse.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 19,826 Mod ✭✭✭✭Weepsie


    In normal traffic, in normal times, you're going to be passing that bus several times I'd wager, even with moderate fitness, especially with the cars that'll cut into the lane to skip the traffic.


    The design of that lane is more likely to cause accidents. Even the wall there will potentially prevent a driver spotting you as they cut out to skip the queue and the angle it drops you out on the road is quite remarkable



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,017 ✭✭✭TaurenDruid


    Strangely enough, the lanes on the M50 only exist as lanes because someone painted those lanes on. Most motor traffic still seems to manage to understand that they're separate lanes, most of the time. I've seen this "paint isn't infrastructure" thing on a lot of social media, but actually, it usually is.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 48,305 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    You can't create a motorway just with paint though.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 150 ✭✭Gary Scrod


    They are too busy using footpaths if the AH thread is anything to go by.



Advertisement