Granny jailed for refusing to wear a face mask

drunkmonkey

poisonated wrote: »

That’s not going to happen. From my understanding, she disobeyed a direct order from the judge. She was being disrespectful to the court of law.

He can't order to cover her face, this isn't Iran.

[Deleted User]

drunkmonkey wrote: »

He can't order to cover her face, this isn't Iran.

Your showing that you don't know what you're talking about again

guy2231

DubInMeath wrote: »

Your showing that you don't know what you're talking about again

Showed himself to be a complete fool.

Princess Consuela Bananahammock

Big Gerry wrote: »

It sounds like the Judge was trying to make a name for himself for locking up a Granny.

You a granny yourswlf there, Gerry? Solidarity and all that?

Big Gerry

I just noticed in the article that they printed that Grannies address that's something they don't even do for convicted peadophiles.

runawaybishop

Big Gerry wrote: »

I just noticed in the article that they printed that Grannies address that's something they don't even do for convicted peadophiles.

Yes they do.

dockysher

She's worse than the black and tans, disgrace

NaFirinne

The times we are living in - Granny Jailed for refusing too wear a Mask....people jeering that she gets what she deserves - how could she be so irresponsible.


Wow - people just love using fear to indimidate others and to force them to comply with pure evil tryanny.

I pray for God to give this women strenght and courage and help through any mental health issues that she may have.

[Deleted User]

NaFirinne wrote: »

The times we are living in - Granny Jailed for refusing too wear a Mask....people jeering that she gets what she deserves - how could she be so irresponsible.


Wow - people just love using fear to indimidate others and to force them to comply with pure evil tryanny.

I pray for God to give this women strenght and courage and help through any mental health issues that she may have.

You mean any issues she has as a result of her own refusal to follow a very simple legal requirement for the safety of the staff?

Her age and having grandkids is completely irrelevant.

Princess Consuela Bananahammock

Big Gerry wrote: »

I just noticed in the article that they printed that Grannies address that's something they don't even do for convicted peadophiles.

Oh, she's a granny? You never mentioned that before...

[Deleted User]

Big Gerry wrote: »

I just noticed in the article that they printed that Grannies address that's something they don't even do for convicted peadophiles.

Have you considered that other people might also have search engines and access to the internet before posting absolutely 100% ****e?

[Deleted User]

drunkmonkey wrote: »

He can't order to cover her face, this isn't Iran.

The jail cell disagrees

Guy:Incognito

NaFirinne wrote: »

The times we are living in - Granny Jailed for refusing too wear a Mask....people jeering that she gets what she deserves - how could she be so irresponsible.


Wow - people just love using fear to indimidate others and to force them to comply with pure evil tryanny.

I pray for God to give this women strenght and courage and help through any mental health issues that she may have.

Asking her to wear a mask in court is not tyranny.

And , if god existed, why the **** is he sitting up there giving or letting the woman (or anyone else) suffer mental health issues and refusing to do anything until NaFirinne begs him too? Seems like a psychotic way to use your omnipotence.

[Deleted User]

NaFirinne wrote: »

The times we are living in - Granny Jailed for refusing too wear a Mask....people jeering that she gets what she deserves - how could she be so irresponsible.


Wow - people just love using fear to indimidate others and to force them to comply with pure evil tryanny.

I pray for God to give this women strenght and courage and help through any mental health issues that she may have.

If god could cure her like that why does he wait til hes asked nicely?

Aside from the rest of your post, like

By the way, there was a pandemic. Id look it up if i were you.

NaFirinne

Niner leprauchan wrote: »

You mean any issues she has as a result of her own refusal to follow a very simple legal requirement for the safety of the staff?

Her age and having grandkids is completely irrelevant.

And many people disagree with being legally forced into wearing a Mask and as such will use civil disobiedience as a protest.


However we don't know this womens personal life, we don't know if she has some sort of medical condition such as being bi-polar which may prevent her having rational decisions at times.


Lockdowns can have detrimental effects on a lot of peoples mental health at any age.



People are so quick to judge others, like a mob with pitchforks.



Oh look someone isn't following the new facist laws - quickly burn them at the stake.


Listen to yourselves, what kind of people are you becoming, cold hearted, incompassionate zombies.

MidlanderMan

Play stupid games, win stupid prizes.

drunkmonkey

Niner leprauchan wrote: »

The jail cell disagrees

I don't think a judge can just make up a law and jail you on the back of it for not complying. He could have jailed her for the dunnes incident but he didn't. Also starting she has to stay in jail until she puts on a mask is redicilolous.

dockysher

drunkmonkey wrote: »

I don't think a judge can just make up a law and jail you on the back of it for not complying. He could have jailed her for the dunnes incident but he didn't. Also starting she has to stay in jail until she puts on a mask is redicilolous.

Fake

drunkmonkey

Guy:Incognito wrote: »

Asking her to wear a mask in court is not tyranny.

Demanding she does and sending her to jail indefinitely is.

Tyranny
noun
"cruel and oppressive government or rule"

drunkmonkey

dockysher wrote: »

Fake

?

dockysher

drunkmonkey wrote: »

?

Real

NaFirinne

drunkmonkey wrote: »

Demanding she does and sending her to jail indefinitely is.

Tyranny
noun
"cruel and oppressive government or rule"

Of course it is - your preventing a person from getting a fair hearing or defending themselves, how can people not see this as tyranny?

Guy:Incognito

drunkmonkey wrote: »

Demanding she does and sending her to jail indefinitely is.

Tyranny
noun
"cruel and oppressive government or rule"

So all laws are tyranny then?

Topgear on Dave

Has this old dear any previous convictions? Is she a danger to the public?

She deserved to get thrown out of Dunnes but I doubt shes too well and what does the nation gain from throwing her in the clink.

drunkmonkey

Guy:Incognito wrote: »

So all laws are tyranny then?

There is no law that's the point, he could have asked her for a foot massage and jailed her for not complying going by the same logic.

Guy:Incognito

NaFirinne wrote: »

Of course it is - your preventing a person from getting a fair hearing or defending themselves, how can people not see this as tyranny?

If she also refused to wear clothes, is that more tyranny to make her?

She chose not 5o obey the court. The fair hearing is there for her when she wants to follow their rules. She doesn't get to pick the ones that apply.

Guy:Incognito

Topgear on Dave wrote: »

Has this old dear any previous convictions? Is she a danger to the public?

She deserved to get thrown out of Dunnes but I doubt shes too well and what does the nation gain from throwing her in the clink.

What do they do with her when she continually refuses to follow the rules, just send her on her way and say they don't apply to her? Is there a separate set for people in their 20's and those in their 60's?

Strumms

FuzzyThinking wrote: »

Do we have to add these terms like “grandmother” as if that somehow changes everything.

Grandmother who refused to stop at red lights...

Grandmother who refused to pay for groceries...

Grandmother who refused to provide a breath sample...

Grandmothers are not exempt from the law, every single expectation of a man / woman of 40 is expected of a grandmother of 80 plus...

questionmark?

NaFirinne wrote: »

The times we are living in - Granny Jailed for refusing too wear a Mask....people jeering that she gets what she deserves - how could she be so irresponsible.


Wow - people just love using fear to indimidate others and to force them to comply with pure evil tryanny.

I pray for God to give this women strenght and courage and help through any mental health issues that she may have.

Unsure if this a serious post or your on the windup but sure I'll humour you.

People don't have sympathy because she is a gowl looking to cause trouble for the sake of it. Wouldn't surprise me if she was drooling over Gemma and Dee and any other Karen on Facebook She looked for a fight, bit off more than she can chew and is now sleeping in a cell.

Also why say Granny. Age is irrelevant once an adult in eyes of the law and well common sense expectations in general.

P.s. wearing a mask isn't evil. Wearing a mask isn't tryanny. It's a short term minor inconvenience so get over it and stop moaning.

P.s.s. Stop comparing mental health issues with just been a Gowl!!

[Deleted User]

drunkmonkey wrote: »

I don't think a judge can just make up a law and jail you on the back of it for not complying. He could have jailed her for the dunnes incident but he didn't. Also starting she has to stay in jail until she puts on a mask is redicilolous.

She is in jail. The physical reality of the situation renders your opinion incorrect. Contempt of court is not new.