Porn Industry

YFlyer

Anyone wonder how come porn companies don't sue or demand why other websites for taken their material? It is legal material? The morality situation from Hustler was taken care of.

You mean like a copyright claim?

Leg End Reject

YFlyer wrote: »

Anyone wonder how come porn companies don't sue or demand why other websites for taken their material? It is legal material? The morality situation from Hustler was taken care of.

Were you **** when you typed that?

munster87

Whoever used reverse cowgirl first has to be annoyed by the amount of copying.

woejus

YFlyer wrote: »

Anyone wonder how come porn companies don't sue or demand why other websites for taken their material? It is legal material? The morality situation from Hustler was taken care of.

The leading porn tube site owner does just this, over 4.5m times last year. Conditions ripe for a monopoly grot vendor.

https://torrentfreak.com/pornhub-owner-sends-millions-of-takedown-notices-a-year-210430/

YFlyer

Leg End Reject wrote: »

Were you **** when you typed that?

No.

YFlyer

[Deleted User] wrote: »

You mean like a copyright claim?

Guess so.

YFlyer

YFlyer wrote: »

Anyone wonder how come porn companies don't sue or demand why other websites for taken their material? It is legal material? The morality situation from Hustler was taken care of.

When you say companies are you talking about websites like Pornhub, xHamster, etc.

or

Production companies like Brazzers, Dog Fart, etc...

YFlyer

woejus wrote: »

The leading porn tube site owner does just this, over 4.5m times last year. Conditions ripe for a monopoly grot vendor.

https://torrentfreak.com/pornhub-owner-sends-millions-of-takedown-notices-a-year-210430/

Interesting read.

How come, as far as I'm aware, not happening in other motion picture industry, music or sports?

YFlyer

[Deleted User] wrote: »

When you say companies are you talking about websites like Pornhub, xHamster, etc.

or

Production companies like Brazzers, Dog Fart, etc...

Pornhub etc.

theballz

YFlyer wrote: »

Anyone wonder how come porn companies don't sue or demand why other websites for taken their material? It is legal material? The morality situation from Hustler was taken care of.

Onlyfans is destroying that industry. They have bigger problems

YFlyer

munster87 wrote: »

Whoever used reverse cowgirl first has to be annoyed by the amount of copying.

Lol

Rocco 1st to utilize anal.

maxwell smart

MindGeek? Are they based in Ireland?

YFlyer

theballz wrote: »

Onlyfans is destroying that industry. They have bigger problems

How so?

Sky King

theballz wrote: »

Onlyfans is destroying that industry. They have bigger problems

Never got the attraction to OnlyFans... like what do these people have against proper air conditioning?

theballz

theballz wrote: »

Onlyfans is destroying that industry. They have bigger problems

An industry well worth destroying. Few things more cringey than inadequate men boasting about watching porn and pulling themselves off.

An industry built upon exploiting vulnerable young women using false promises, threats, coercion, and drugs. The viewers are also victims in a way as they then have difficulties forming healthy relationships, unrealistic expectations of what bodies look like, and what partners are expected to do as part of a sex life. It’s why there are so many angry single men complaining about feminists.

YFlyer

sugarman wrote: »

It reads like they were having a stroke alright.

Stick to the sh.it taken thread, and shave the hairs off your hand.

archer22

Deleted User wrote: »

An industry well worth destroying. Few things more cringey than inadequate men boasting about watching porn and pulling themselves off.

An industry built upon exploiting vulnerable young women using false promises, threats, coercion, and drugs. The viewers are also victims in a way as they then have difficulties forming healthy relationships, unrealistic expectations of what bodies look like, and what partners are expected to do as part of a sex life. It’s why there are so many angry single men complaining about feminists.

Well if you're bothered about "vulnerable young women" and "unrealistic expectations of what bodies look like" you can always watch "Granny Porn" :pac:

YFlyer

[Deleted User] wrote: »

An industry well worth destroying. Few things more cringey than inadequate men boasting about watching porn and pulling themselves off.

An industry built upon exploiting vulnerable young women using false promises, threats, coercion, and drugs. The viewers are also victims in a way as they then have difficulties forming healthy relationships, unrealistic expectations of what bodies look like, and what partners are expected to do as part of a sex life. It’s why there are so many angry single men complaining about feminists.

Going to save this and Emmetts one.

Potential-Monke

Deleted User wrote: »

An industry well worth destroying. Few things more cringey than inadequate men boasting about watching porn and pulling themselves off.

An industry built upon exploiting vulnerable young women using false promises, threats, coercion, and drugs. The viewers are also victims in a way as they then have difficulties forming healthy relationships, unrealistic expectations of what bodies look like, and what partners are expected to do as part of a sex life. It’s why there are so many angry single men complaining about feminists.

Would you like a bigger brush for that sweeping statement?

YFlyer

Potential-Monke wrote: »

Would you like a bigger brush for that sweeping statement?

Possibly same person is against woman right to have an abortion.

Leg End Reject

[Deleted User] wrote: »

An industry well worth destroying. Few things more cringey than inadequate men boasting about watching porn and pulling themselves off.

An industry built upon exploiting vulnerable young women using false promises, threats, coercion, and drugs. The viewers are also victims in a way as they then have difficulties forming healthy relationships, unrealistic expectations of what bodies look like, and what partners are expected to do as part of a sex life. It’s why there are so many angry single men complaining about feminists.

It's uncanny how similar your opinions are to Emmet's.

Very strange.

YFlyer

YFlyer wrote: »

Possibly same person is against woman right to have an abortion.

No, I’m not that soldier.

A lot of lads like to boast about their addiction to hardcore porn and trying to pull the skeleton out of themselves via their groin. Porn that is becoming increasingly misogynistic, extreme, and violent.

Then you see the same pilgrims complaining about feminism, gender quotas, social media influencers etc.

The two are inextricably linked. It’s an unpleasant reality to have to deal with, but addicts are always in denial until they accept they have a problem.

YFlyer

Leg End Reject wrote: »

It's uncanny how similar your opinions are to Emmet's.

Very strange.

Throw in Paddy and Johnny. They don't want a conversation.

Leg End Reject

YFlyer wrote: »

Throw in Paddy and Johnny. They don't want a conversation.

I believe poor Johnny has shuffled off his mortal coil.

BingCrosbee

YFlyer wrote: »

Anyone wonder how come porn companies don't sue or demand why other websites for taken their material? It is legal material? The morality situation from Hustler was taken care of.

It’s the only thing on my mind for the past few weeks, I can’t sleep thinking about it.

Mad_maxx

Deleted User wrote: »

No, I’m not that soldier.

A lot of lads like to boast about their addiction to hardcore porn and trying to pull the skeleton out of themselves via their groin. Porn that is becoming increasingly misogynistic, extreme, and violent.

Then you see the same pilgrims complaining about feminism, gender quotas, social media influencers etc.

The two are inextricably linked. It’s an unpleasant reality to have to deal with, but addicts are always in denial until they accept they have a problem.

does anyone boast about an addiction to anything , let alone porn ?

YFlyer

YFlyer wrote: »

Pornhub etc.

Pornhub only host other people's videos so what goes on on other sites is of no consequence to them as Pornhub doesn't own any of that material.

If the copyright holder makes a copyright claim against a video being hosted on Pornhub, Pornhub just remove it.

YFlyer

Work with music and other platforms

Church on Tuesday

Leg End Reject wrote: »

I believe poor Johnny has shuffled off his mortal coil.

Ditto Woke Hogan.

What a not coincidence.

YFlyer

BingCrosbee wrote: »

It’s the only thing on my mind for the past few weeks, I can’t sleep thinking about it.

Extreme.

biko

I have never thought about this.

Places like pornhub are infested with minor abuse videos, revenge porn and trafficking videos, and people depicted in them spend years trying to get their rape videos removed. Pornhub et al will hopefully be so screwed eventually by damages payouts that copyright issues will seems like small beans to them. If there was anything remotely ethical, moderated or straight up about that site or its competitors, it could be defended, but there is not.

Look at this crap - this is what happens to some people. This teenager found her father's search history. How completely messed up would you be as a teenager after seeing this?

https://twitter.com/LailaMickelwait/status/1389217984753946627?s=20

Wanderer78

YFlyer wrote: »

Anyone wonder how come porn companies don't sue or demand why other websites for taken their material? It is legal material? The morality situation from Hustler was taken care of.

its a very sticky situation alright!

AdrianBalboa

It's hilarious that posters who don't join in on rampant sl*t and k*nk shaming are scorned for "not wanting to start a conversation," and accused of being the same person. I see it in every thread, sometimes I'm lumped in with them. It's getting old, guys, find another windmill.

I think it's a damning indictment of our society that so many womxn have resorted to such desperate measures as selling nude photos and videos of themselves when it is still considered to be such a taboo to do so, which they themselves would be well aware of.

Similar to people who work for Uber Eats, or are employed under zero hour contracts, I don't personally judge womxn who start Onlyfans profiles. But I do question that this idea of being in a state of employment limbo without any of the protections guaranteed under proper full time contracts and their associated benefits.

Onlyfans in particular masks this by claiming the franchising of people's eroticism is "empowering" and "liberating" when in reality the opposite is true: they are signing away their bodies to the Onlyfans Pimpcorp and getting a pittance in return.

Sex work is the oldest profession and yet sex workers are mocked and shamed for it by corpulent commentators who gorge themselves on the feed the sex workers dish out. Hypocrites to a man (and it's always men).

Xdrixn Bxlbox, I presume womxn is a mistaken spelling?

Leg End Reject

[Deleted User] wrote: »

Xdrixn Bxlbox, I presume womxn is a mistaken spelling?

No, it's the new term used by feminists, male feminists in particular.

Apparently, the "man" at the end is an insult to women.

Feisar

Leg End Reject wrote: »

No, it's the new term used by feminists, male feminists in particular.

Apparently, the "man" at the end is an insult to women.

And didn't some clown not us "amen" recently in the US as it's again insulting to women.

CarProblem

Deleted User wrote: »

An industry well worth destroying. Few things more cringey than inadequate men boasting about watching porn and pulling themselves off.

An industry built upon exploiting vulnerable young women using false promises, threats, coercion, and drugs. The viewers are also victims in a way as they then have difficulties forming healthy relationships, unrealistic expectations of what bodies look like, and what partners are expected to do as part of a sex life. It’s why there are so many angry single men complaining about feminists.

as you're so fond of saying to others, lots of anger there Jonny Dr

Grayson

YFlyer wrote: »

Anyone wonder how come porn companies don't sue or demand why other websites for taken their material? It is legal material? The morality situation from Hustler was taken care of.

They tried. But because users were uploading it as fast as it could be taken down they went into deals with the site. They also hired people who used to work for RIAAA, the guys that sued napster. But it was too late.

Within a couple of years of pornhub and other porn streaming sites appearing they were getting something like 80% of the traffic and revenue. So porn companies were faced with either going out of business or changing their business model to pivot and use them.

Leg End Reject

Feisar wrote: »

And didn't some clown not us "amen" recently in the US as it's again insulting to women.

:pac:

It's beyond ridiculous now in fairness.

Leg End Reject

Leg End Reject wrote: »

:pac:

It's beyond ridiculous now in fairness.

But could it not be intoned in a very severe manner....

Awwhhhhhhhhh mennnnnn

...to express a kind of holy rage?

CarProblem

AdrianBalboa wrote: »

It's hilarious

AdrianBalboa wrote: »

womxn

You're right, it is

Relikk

Leg End Reject wrote: »

I believe poor Johnny has shuffled off his mortal coil.

His metamorphosis into the Abominable Dr. Phibes was completed in January, it seems.

Junkyard Tom

Not sure why having 'man' at the end of 'woman' should be problematic. After all, God took a rib from a man and made woman, it's the least women could do to acknowledge everything men have done for them.

Kaybaykwah

Junkyard Tom wrote: »

Not sure why having 'man' at the end of 'woman' should be problematic. After all, God took a rib from a man and made woman, it's the least women could do to acknowledge everything men have done for them.

Yeah. That God had a word for everything.

ShatterAlan

Feisar wrote: »

And didn't some clown not us "amen" recently in the US as it's again insulting to women.

That's mxntal!

B.A._Baracus

[Deleted User] wrote: »

When you say companies are you talking about websites like Pornhub, xHamster, etc.

or

Production companies like Brazzers, Dog Fart, etc...

Why anyone would call a porn company dog fart I'll never know.

TheMilkyPirate

AdrianBalboa wrote: »

It's hilarious that posters who don't join in on rampant sl*t and k*nk shaming are scorned for "not wanting to start a conversation," and accused of being the same person. I see it in every thread, sometimes I'm lumped in with them. It's getting old, guys, find another windmill.

I think it's a damning indictment of our society that so many womxn have resorted to such desperate measures as selling nude photos and videos of themselves when it is still considered to be such a taboo to do so, which they themselves would be well aware of.

Similar to people who work for Uber Eats, or are employed under zero hour contracts, I don't personally judge womxn who start Onlyfans profiles. But I do question that this idea of being in a state of employment limbo without any of the protections guaranteed under proper full time contracts and their associated benefits.

Onlyfans in particular masks this by claiming the franchising of people's eroticism is "empowering" and "liberating" when in reality the opposite is true: they are signing away their bodies to the Onlyfans Pimpcorp and getting a pittance in return.

Sex work is the oldest profession and yet sex workers are mocked and shamed for it by corpulent commentators who gorge themselves on the feed the sex workers dish out. Hypocrites to a man (and it's always men).

Lol it is far from a pittance they are making.

Rothko

Leg End Reject wrote: »

No, it's the new term used by feminists, male feminists in particular.

Apparently, the "man" at the end is an insult to women.

There's something very odd about someone who would censor the word woman like it's a swearword.

mohawk

B.A._Baracus wrote: »

Why anyone would call a porn company dog fart I'll never know.

Be careful now you could be accused kink shaming.