Pro 16 Discussion

Red Silurian

How do you see it playing out and how would you like to see it play out?

What we know
16 Teams
4 Irish
4 Welsh
2 Scottish
2 Italian
4 South African

Obviously the most fair situation would be 1 table of 16 teams and each team playing 15 Home and Away games but I don't think that's logical

The best option I think is an East/West or North/South conferences
That is to say

North Conference
Ulster and Connacht (The 2 northern most Irish provinces)
Edinburgh (slightly more north than Glasgow)
Scarlets + Ospreys (The 2 northern most Welsh teams)
Benetton (more north than Zebre)
Lions and Bulls (The 2 northern most South African teams)

South conference
All the rest

Dividing it equally among the countries so 8 teams per conference, home+away in each conference home or away for the rest + 2 further inter-country games

That's 24 games, 25 if you have a final

Cookiemunster

That's way too many games. Especially when there's definitely going to be plays offs that are larger than just a final. Most likely each team will play each other once and then there'll be return derbys for the Irish, Welsh and South Africans with the Italian/Scots doing the same amongst themselves. Gives you 18 regular season games plus play offs.

Red Silurian

Cookiemunster wrote: »

That's way too many games. Especially when there's definitely going to be plays offs that are larger than just a final. Most likely each team will play each other once and then there'll be return derbys for the Irish, Welsh and South Africans with the Italian/Scots doing the same amongst themselves. Gives you 18 regular season games plus play offs.

Before we brought the Cheetahs and Kings in we had 22 games (11 home + 11 away) Semis and a final so up to 24 Pro12 games per season. While I agree that 30 is probably too much I don't think 24-25 (or 26 if you want an extra round of playoffs) is much of a stretch

Cookiemunster

Red Silurian wrote: »

Before we brought the Cheetahs and Kings in we had 22 games (11 home + 11 away) Semis and a final so up to 24 Pro12 games per season. While I agree that 30 is probably too much I don't think 24-25 (or 26 if you want an extra round of playoffs) is much of a stretch

We won't be going back to 22 regular season games. The Pro14 CEO has already stated that they want to avoid playing games during the internationals windows with B teams. That means fewer regular season games.

thomond2006

24/25 games would be a disaster. The internationals would barely make a mark on the regular season and broadcasters/casuals would hate it.

Us on boards might enjoy young players getting so many league appearances but you can't sell it.

By all accounts, 18 regular season games is the suggestion and I'm all for it.

Red Silurian

thomond2006 wrote: »

24/25 games would be a disaster. The internationals would barely make a mark on the regular season and broadcasters/casuals would hate it.

Us on boards might enjoy young players getting so many league appearances but you can't sell it.

By all accounts, 18 regular season games is the suggestion and I'm all for it.

The internationals haven't been making a mark on the regular season for quite some time now and that's down to the IRFU player welfare program along with the Scottish and Welsh internationals not playing in the tournament

The idea that the Irish provinces play each other on a home and away basis while the Scottish face the Italians home and away also suggests an easier ride is being had by some teams

Cookiemunster

Red Silurian wrote: »

The internationals haven't been making a mark on the regular season for quite some time now and that's down to the IRFU player welfare program along with the Scottish and Welsh internationals not playing in the tournament

The idea that the Irish provinces play each other on a home and away basis while the Scottish face the Italians home and away also suggests an easier ride is being had by some teams

That was already happening. Over the years generally the Irish beat the crap out of each other, while Glasgow trashed Edinburgh 3 times, Benetton trashed Zebre 3 times and the Cheetahs would trash the Kings 3 times.

The internationals not being available is the problem with the league and why it has little relevance outside the diehards. It's something that's been recognised by the powers that be and it's why they are changing it. Fewer games avoiding the international breaks meaning more appearances from the internationals and more interest in the league.

Kevski

One idea:

4 pools of 4 teams:

- each team playing the teams in their own pool both home and away (6 games)

- each team plays the teams outside of their pool once, either home or away (12 games)

- additional 3 rounds of derby games (3 games)

That would leave 21 regular season games which would be the same as the PRO14.

The additional round of derby games could be scrapped to make it an 18 game regular season but probably unlikely to happen as derby games traditionally have the highest attendances (in Ireland anyway).

Jump_In_Jack

Kevski wrote: »

One idea:

4 pools of 4 teams:

- each team playing the teams in their own pool both home and away (6 games)

- each team plays the teams outside of their pool once, either home or away (12 games)

- additional 3 rounds of derby games (3 games)

That would leave 21 regular season games which would be the same as the PRO14.

The additional round of derby games could be scrapped to make it an 18 game regular season but probably unlikely to happen as derby games traditionally have the highest attendances (in Ireland anyway).

The way you've phrased it, I assume you mean the pools of 4 are to be made up of teams from different countries, 1 each from Ireland, South Africa, Wales and 1 from either Italy or Scotland?
Then your proposal would look good at least in theory.

Or could phrase it in other words,
Group 4 pools together, IRL, SA, WAL, SCO&ITA,
Play your own teams twice, play everyone else once, and then play three more matches so one more match against one team from each of the other pools.
How would you propose to split up the pool to seed them evenly?
And what is your proposal for playoffs if using that format for the regular season?

Kevski

Jump_In_Jack wrote: »

Assume you mean the pools of 4 are to be made up of teams from different countries, 1 each from Ireland, South Africa, Wales and 1 from either Italy or Scotland?
Then your proposal would look good at least in theory.
How would you propose to split up the pool to seed them evenly?
And what is your proposal for playoffs if using that format for the regular season?

I had thought of splitting teams as you have mentioned above but to be honest, I just scribbled down an idea on a piece of paper so haven’t put too much more thought into it.

Playoffs could be based on the desired number of games. Top two from each pool going into QF would add 3 more games whereas top team from each group going into SF would add 2.

Jump_In_Jack

Kevski wrote: »

I had thought of splitting teams as you have mentioned above but to be honest, I just scribbled down an idea on a piece of paper so haven’t put too much more thought into it.

Playoffs could be based on the desired number of games. Top two from each pool going into QF would add 3 more games whereas top team from each group going into SF would add 2.

For example:

Pool 1: South Africa 1, Ireland 4, Wales 2, Scotland/Italy 3
Pool 2: South Africa 2, Ireland 3, Wales 1, Scotland/Italy 4
Pool 3: South Africa 3, Ireland 2, Wales 4, Scotland/Italy 1
Pool 4: South Africa 4, Ireland 1, Wales 3, Scotland/Italy 2

E.g. from latest rankings in Pro14 and Super Rugby,
Pool 1: Sharks, Connacht, Ospreys, Zebre
Pool 2: Stormers, Ulster, Scarlets, Benetton
Pool 3: Bulls, Munster, Dragons, Glasgow
Pool 4: Lions, Leinster, Cardiff, Edinburgh

Dubinusa

The problem with shutting the league down during the international window is how do up and coming young players get minutes?
The format will be interesting but I think the easiest would be each team plays each other once, followed by derby games. This format obviously gives the Scottish teams a leg up as they have the weakest schedule.
Another way would be 2 groups of 8, home and away and then play once v the other group. That is 21 matches.

Cookiemunster

Dubinusa wrote: »

The problem with shutting the league down during the international window is how do up and coming young players get minutes?

You don't shut it down, you reduce the amount of games played during those windows. You still won't see the internationals playing every game, but the idea is to have them available for more games than they currently are. There'll still be plenty of game time for up ad coming players.

Jump_In_Jack

Dubinusa wrote: »

The problem with shutting the league down during the international window is how do up and coming young players get minutes?
The format will be interesting but I think the easiest would be each team plays each other once, followed by derby games. This format obviously gives the Scottish teams a leg up as they have the weakest schedule.
Another way would be 2 groups of 8, home and away and then play once v the other group. That is 21 matches.

22 matches (7+7+8)

Dubinusa

Oops! Can't believe I can't count!

bilston

I'd just have a 16 team league, play each other once...15 regular season matches, and then play offs between the top 4, or maybe even top 5 or 6.

15-17 games a season and teams are more likely to be close to full strength

I'd than run a separate Inter Pro home and away championship which would give 6 games, throw in a max of 8 or 9 European games and that is about 32 games max over the course of the season

Less is more IMO, but then again the provinces need the money more than ever so they will probably take the opposite view.

Lost Ormond

bilston wrote: »

I'd just have a 16 team league, play each other once...15 regular season matches, and then play offs between the top 4, or maybe even top 5 or 6.

15-17 games a season and teams are more likely to be close to full strength

I'd than run a separate Inter Pro home and away championship which would give 6 games, throw in a max of 8 or 9 European games and that is about 32 games max over the course of the season

Less is more IMO, but then again the provinces need the money more than ever so they will probably take the opposite view.

Less isnt better. Less games means less income. What would you do about squads as much fewer games means smaller number of contracts.
Interpros are great but i dont see how playing them as a stand alone tournament will be better for games.
A stand alone interpro series only works if you have full strength sides for all of them and will that happen? I dont see Nucifora etc agreeing to that for all games

bilston

Lost Ormond wrote: »

Less isnt better. Less games means less income. What would you do about squads as much fewer games means smaller number of contracts.
Interpros are great but i dont see how playing them as a stand alone tournament will be better for games.
A stand alone interpro series only works if you have full strength sides for all of them and will that happen? I dont see Nucifora etc agreeing to that for all games

Why does there have to be full strength sides for Inter Pros? There hardly are as it is. Why would this be any different?

Less makes the league better as teams will be stronger. The slack is picked up by the Inter Pros, so there would be fewer Pro 16 games but over the season the lrovinces would play just as many games as they do now.

Jump_In_Jack

Sometimes simplicity is best.
A round robin playing every team once with playoffs would be a very straightforward format.
Spectators would easily grasp that format which might make it a better product to sell, conferences seem to annoy certain people, and the extra round of interpros are not fair as each country has different levels of opponent.
I'd say top 6 would be about the right number of teams for playoffs, for three rounds, two quarters, two semis and a final.
I would assume there'd be a few Irish and South African teams vying for the playoffs every year and always a chance of a Welsh or Scottish team having a good run in any given season.
That should keep the league stage competitive to the end.
Hopefully they stick with the Heineken cup format of 24 teams, 8 from each league, so there'd be competition even for the 2 spots outside the top 6 each year.

I would like a round robin interpro separate to the league each year if it could be fitted in.
The challenge with that would be to make it financially attractive by getting full teams out.
I'd like to see that on free-to-air TV.

Lost Ormond

bilston wrote: »

Why does there have to be full strength sides for Inter Pros? There hardly are as it is. Why would this be any different?

Less makes the league better as teams will be stronger. The slack is picked up by the Inter Pros, so there would be fewer Pro 16 games but over the season the lrovinces would play just as many games as they do now.

Because they are the games with highest profile within the league in Ireland. Same with Welsh games. Theyre derbies etc and we should have our best players playing each other in these games as much as possible.

Less games wont see other games have stronger players.

Jump_In_Jack wrote: »

Sometimes simplicity is best.
A round robin playing every team once with playoffs would be a very straightforward format.
Spectators would easily grasp that format which might make it a better product to sell, conferences seem to annoy certain people, and the extra round of interpros are not fair as each country has different levels of opponent.
I'd say top 6 would be about the right number of teams for playoffs, for three rounds, two quarters, two semis and a final.
I would assume there'd be a few Irish and South African teams vying for the playoffs every year and always a chance of a Welsh or Scottish team having a good run in any given season.
That should keep the league stage competitive to the end.
Hopefully they stick with the Heineken cup format of 24 teams, 8 from each league, so there'd be competition even for the 2 spots outside the top 6 each year.

I would like a round robin interpro separate to the league each year if it could be fitted in.
The challenge with that would be to make it financially attractive by getting full teams out.
I'd like to see that on free-to-air TV.

A separate round robin for interpros just wont happen and would essentially be an A competition. You already have A interpros. Getting full teams to make it financially viable isnt going to happen. If you are not getting full teams for provinces in League games then there is zero chance of getting full teams for this separate competition that wont have money incentive in terms of prize money etc.
A full round robin just reduces for so many teams their biggest crowds by reducing derby games

molloyjh

The one thing people talk about when talking about less games is the impact on development. Unlike England and France, the rest of us don't have close to the same scope for talent development for the national team. If every season up until now had been as short, where would players like Gavin Coombes or Harry Byrne be in their development? What about Keenan or Connors or Craig Casey? People often talk about the weakened teams as a bad thing, but in terms of the bigger picture it enables us to maximise development potential given the reduced capacity for that compared to the big 2 6Ns countries.

thomond2006

molloyjh wrote: »

The one thing people talk about when talking about less games is the impact on development. Unlike England and France, the rest of us don't have close to the same scope for talent development for the national team. If every season up until now had been as short, where would players like Gavin Coombes or Harry Byrne be in their development? What about Keenan or Connors or Craig Casey? People often talk about the weakened teams as a bad thing, but in terms of the bigger picture it enables us to maximise development potential given the reduced capacity for that compared to the big 2 6Ns countries.

I don't think reducing to 18 from 21 games will have a marked impact on development.

Blackheath

Jack Regan is signing for the Ospreys

Red Silurian

One thing I would like to see changed is either a draft style system for new player signings being introduced. Or instead of paying our winners the most money we should actually pay the teams at the bottom of the table the most money (and the winners should be paid the least, if anything)

Then sit back and watch the Italians win the league :D:D

bilston

Red Silurian wrote: »

One thing I would like to see changed is either a draft style system for new player signings being introduced. Or instead of paying our winners the most money we should actually pay the teams at the bottom of the table the most money (and the winners should be paid the least, if anything)

Then sit back and watch the Italians win the league :D:D

You could maybe do a draft for Academy players each year. Let the provinces promote from within their academies first and then come 1st June all the remaining Academy players are pooled together to allow the other provinces to cherry pick certain players for full professional contracts. So for example say all 4 provinces have 15 full Academy players, they could promote who they like to senior contracts from their own Academy. Say everyone promotes 5 players, that leaves 10 players per province or 40 across Ireland. Connacht get first pick, they could offer a Leinster academy player a two year senior contract and then it is up to that player to decide. Do they stick or twist? GIve the Leinster academy another go for a year or secure professional rugby for the next two years, or maybe they wait and see if Munster or Ulster pick them up, a big risk obviously.

It would allow provinces to fill areas of weakness with young IQ players and might stop some players stalling in their respective Academy for 3 years before moving to the Championship or Pro D2 or packing it in altogether.

This way the best young players get to stay with their "indigenous" province, but guys who are borderline can decide to stick at it knowing their home province aren't sure about them, or there isn't a space, or they can go somewhere else.

It's not perfect, it might hinder player development in some cases, it would mean more movement of players between provinces and it would mean provinces potentially losing players they have invested a lot in.

It will never happen, and we're probably only talking about it because the NFL draft was last weekend! But it would be interesting as well.

Red Silurian

bilston wrote: »

I'd just have a 16 team league, play each other once...15 regular season matches, and then play offs between the top 4, or maybe even top 5 or 6.

15-17 games a season and teams are more likely to be close to full strength

I'd than run a separate Inter Pro home and away championship which would give 6 games, throw in a max of 8 or 9 European games and that is about 32 games max over the course of the season

Less is more IMO, but then again the provinces need the money more than ever so they will probably take the opposite view.

I like this idea and with 16 teams the top 6 would give a very fair playoff series but I think the separate inter-pro championship should be just 3 games and tied into the regular Pro16 League ie you would play the other 3 provinces once in the regular season and once more in this post-season championship where the points earned against the other provinces carry over. Have a separate trophy and a catchy name and even a final potentially

Most importantly, you could do the same for the Welsh and SA teams and adapt it for the Scots or Italians

bilston wrote: »

You could maybe do a draft for Academy players each year. Let the provinces promote from within their academies first and then come 1st June all the remaining Academy players are pooled together to allow the other provinces to cherry pick certain players for full professional contracts. So for example say all 4 provinces have 15 full Academy players, they could promote who they like to senior contracts from their own Academy. Say everyone promotes 5 players, that leaves 10 players per province or 40 across Ireland. Connacht get first pick, they could offer a Leinster academy player a two year senior contract and then it is up to that player to decide. Do they stick or twist? GIve the Leinster academy another go for a year or secure professional rugby for the next two years, or maybe they wait and see if Munster or Ulster pick them up, a big risk obviously.

It would allow provinces to fill areas of weakness with young IQ players and might stop some players stalling in their respective Academy for 3 years before moving to the Championship or Pro D2 or packing it in altogether.

This way the best young players get to stay with their "indigenous" province, but guys who are borderline can decide to stick at it knowing their home province aren't sure about them, or there isn't a space, or they can go somewhere else.

It's not perfect, it might hinder player development in some cases, it would mean more movement of players between provinces and it would mean provinces potentially losing players they have invested a lot in.

It will never happen, and we're probably only talking about it because the NFL draft was last weekend! But it would be interesting as well.

Personally I've been thinking about it since the ESL was being discussed. The prospect of no promotion/relegation is a good one but only if the teams in the league are at a similar level

I don't like the idea of the clubs getting the first few picks from their own academies... If it's to be done it should be done right, yes that means that this years wooden spoon winners Benetton and Zebre would potentially get the first pick of Leinster and Munster academy player contracts but that's the whole point in a way

bilston

Red Silurian wrote: »

I like this idea and with 16 teams the top 6 would give a very fair playoff series but I think the separate inter-pro championship should be just 3 games and tied into the regular Pro16 League ie you would play the other 3 provinces once in the regular season and once more in this post-season championship where the points earned against the other provinces carry over. Have a separate trophy and a catchy name and even a final potentially

Most importantly, you could do the same for the Welsh and SA teams and adapt it for the Scots or Italians



Personally I've been thinking about it since the ESL was being discussed. The prospect of no promotion/relegation is a good one but only if the teams in the league are at a similar level

I don't like the idea of the clubs getting the first few picks from their own academies... If it's to be done it should be done right, yes that means that this years wooden spoon winners Benetton and Zebre would potentially get the first pick of Leinster and Munster academy player contracts but that's the whole point in a way

If it were ever to happen it would be within countries. There is no way in a million years that the IRFU would let the best young Irish players going to Zebre to play rugby.

Lost Ormond

Red Silurian wrote: »

I like this idea and with 16 teams the top 6 would give a very fair playoff series but I think the separate inter-pro championship should be just 3 games and tied into the regular Pro16 League ie you would play the other 3 provinces once in the regular season and once more in this post-season championship where the points earned against the other provinces carry over. Have a separate trophy and a catchy name and even a final potentially

Most importantly, you could do the same for the Welsh and SA teams and adapt it for the Scots or Italians

Dont see that happening. While not completely even or fair. keeping all the derbies within the league isnt going anywhere

Personally I've been thinking about it since the ESL was being discussed. The prospect of no promotion/relegation is a good one but only if the teams in the league are at a similar level

I don't like the idea of the clubs getting the first few picks from their own academies... If it's to be done it should be done right, yes that means that this years wooden spoon winners Benetton and Zebre would potentially get the first pick of Leinster and Munster academy player contracts but that's the whole point in a way

No union or province/team would ever agree to that system and with a cross country league it would never work with players and colleges as well. Its double within your own country but across 5. Impossible.

Red Silurian

bilston wrote: »

If it were ever to happen it would be within countries. There is no way in a million years that the IRFU would let the best young Irish players going to Zebre to play rugby.

Only for the length of the contract they are signed for though, after 2 or 3 years they can be bought back by any interested club, including the Irish provinces

Lost Ormond wrote: »

Dont see that happening. While not completely even or fair. keeping all the derbies within the league isnt going anywhere



No union or province/team would ever agree to that system and with a cross country league it would never work with players and colleges as well. Its double within your own country but across 5. Impossible.

If you gave the unions more control over the league, a new way to make money they might get on board... Stranger things have happened

Lost Ormond

Red Silurian wrote: »

Only for the length of the contract they are signed for though, after 2 or 3 years they can be bought back by any interested club, including the Irish provinces

Why would provinces develop own players then if theyre going to lose so many of them especially players they really need.

If you gave the unions more control over the league, a new way to make money they might get on board... Stranger things have happened

IRFU already have the control over the proxx with welsh, scottish, italian and now south african unions.
Its not going to happen and how would it be a new way to make money?

Jump_In_Jack

According to Thornley,

"Plans for the inaugural cross-hemisphere competition are at an advanced stage and the likelihood is that next season’s Pro16 will feature two pools of eight, wherein each team plays the other seven teams at home and away, with additional return derbies worked into the schedule."

So I guess that means 14 pool matches, plus 4 return derby matches against the provinces in the other pool, so 18 matches before playoffs, and I'd assume the playoffs will be top 6, 2 quarters, semis, and the final.

Red Silurian

Jump_In_Jack wrote: »

According to Thornely,

"Plans for the inaugural cross-hemisphere competition are at an advanced stage and the likelihood is that next season’s Pro16 will feature two pools of eight, wherein each team plays the other seven teams at home and away, with additional return derbies worked into the schedule."

So I guess that means 14 pool matches, plus 4 return derby matches against the provinces in the other pool, so 18 matches before playoffs, and I'd assume the playoffs will be top 6, 2 quarters, semis, and the final.

So we wouldn't play 6 teams at all in a season? Feels very diluted to me, beginning to think a return to the Celtic League and let the italians and Saffers off on their own would be a more viable solution? Munster were in the process of creating a great rivalry with Glasgow before the Saffers came in and ruined it all

Cookiemunster

Red Silurian wrote: »

So we wouldn't play 6 teams at all in a season? Feels very diluted to me, beginning to think a return to the Celtic League and let the italians and Saffers off on their own would be a more viable solution? Munster were in the process of creating a great rivalry with Glasgow before the Saffers came in and ruined it all

A return to a Celtic league would be the road to ruin. There's simply isn't enough money in that. The Italians were paying to be involved and the Saffers are bringing a lot of TV money to the table.

The simple fact is that money is needed to survive and the expanded tournament provides that money.

sydthebeat

Red Silurian wrote: »

So we wouldn't play 6 teams at all in a season? Feels very diluted to me, beginning to think a return to the Celtic League and let the italians and Saffers off on their own would be a more viable solution? Munster were in the process of creating a great rivalry with Glasgow before the Saffers came in and ruined it all

assume you havent watched the scottish or welsh teams in the proXX for the last 10 years then if you think a return to a celtic league would be a viable league.

at this stage id prefer 4 bokke, 4 irish, 2 welsh, 1 scot and 1 italian in a Pro12 where everyone plays each other twice.

but that wont happen of course.

Red Silurian

sydthebeat wrote: »

assume you havent watched the scottish or welsh teams in the proXX for the last 10 years then if you think a return to a celtic league would be a viable league.

at this stage id prefer 4 bokke, 4 irish, 2 welsh, 1 scot and 1 italian in a Pro12 where everyone plays each other twice.

but that wont happen of course.

I've watched the South Africans and Italians who are the only 2 nations to not have had a Champion in the last 10 years... A part of me wonders if the extra travel associated with the Saffers and Italians is weakening the Scottish and Welsh sides

sydthebeat

Red Silurian wrote: »

I've watched the South Africans and Italians who are the only 2 nations to not have had a Champion in the last 10 years... A part of me wonders if the extra travel associated with the Saffers and Italians is weakening the Scottish and Welsh sides

Its not the same South Africans

Red Silurian

sydthebeat wrote: »

assume you havent watched the scottish or welsh teams in the proXX for the last 10 years then if you think a return to a celtic league would be a viable league.

at this stage id prefer 4 bokke, 4 irish, 2 welsh, 1 scot and 1 italian in a Pro12 where everyone plays each other twice.

but that wont happen of course.

There was talk of the welsh teams merging and the Italians don't really seem interested in fairness so you could easily have a Pro12 with 4/4/2/2 between the original Celts and the Saffers

sydthebeat wrote: »

Its not the same South Africans

True, it's the super rugby South Africans who between the 4 of them (6 at one stage) have won the competition 3 times since 1996... I can't see them being much of a threat

stephen_n

Red Silurian wrote: »

There was talk of the welsh teams merging and the Italians don't really seem interested in fairness so you could easily have a Pro12 with 4/4/2/2 between the original Celts and the Saffers



True, it's the super rugby South Africans who between the 4 of them (6 at one stage) have won the competition 3 times since 1996... I can't see them being much of a threat

Apart from possibly Leinster, there isn’t a team in the ProXX that would have a snowballs chance of winning Super Rugby. I wouldn’t even be sure that Leinster could.

awec

Bulls and Sharks will definitely be among the best sides in the Pro16.

Lions and Stormers I'd say are comfortably better than most teams.

stephen_n

stephen_n wrote: »

Apart from possibly Leinster, there isn’t a team in the ProXX that would have a snowballs chance of winning Super Rugby. I wouldn’t even be sure that Leinster could.

Ya Leinster of a few years ago may have but not right now I'd say

Clegg

The Lions sub tighthead is the most out of shape pro I've seen in a while.

Also, this Lions Vs Stormers game is great. It's 37-36 to the Lions in the 82nd minute. Lions tried to kill the game off and on the 80th minute exactly they sealed off, gave away a penalty, Stormers kicked to the Lions 10m won another pen and Morne Steyn just kicked the winning penalty.

Larbre34

I think the Irish teams, above any of the Pro XX, would adapt well to Super Rugby. So much of the Irish provincial philosophies is anchored in SH thinking.

Maybe not in the first season, but by a second Season I'd expect Leinster to challenge a Crusaders or a Stormers.

Squidgy Black

Clegg wrote: »

The Lions sub tighthead is the most out of shape pro I've seen in a while.

Also, this Lions Vs Stormers game is great. It's 37-36 to the Lions in the 82nd minute. Lions tried to kill the game off and on the 80th minute exactly they sealed off, gave away a penalty, Stormers kicked to the Lions 10m won another pen and Morne Steyn just kicked the winning penalty.

Worse than Rhys Henry from the Ospreys?

stephen_n

awec wrote: »

Bulls and Sharks will definitely be among the best sides in the Pro16.

Lions and Stormers I'd say are comfortably better than most teams.

After watching the game today, my verdict on the Sharks is wait and see. Very poor performance in terms of discipline and their pack got absolutely destroyed by the bulls. It’s hard to make any judgement off one game but they were poor today.

Downlinz

Red Silurian wrote: »

So we wouldn't play 6 teams at all in a season? Feels very diluted to me, beginning to think a return to the Celtic League and let the italians and Saffers off on their own would be a more viable solution? Munster were in the process of creating a great rivalry with Glasgow before the Saffers came in and ruined it all

Glasgow are dead as a competitive force at this stage, they've let all their best players leave and their backroom staff from when they were last successful have moved elsewhere as well. Like the Welsh they seem to be treating the Pro more like a development league now and that doesn't offer very much to the Irish teams.

The big South African sides are the last hope for a functioning league IMO. Otherwise I think we'll continue to see the 4 provinces dominate, interest will fade in Wales, Scotland, Italy and our international setup will suffer as our players will be playing AIL caliber teams most weekends.

awec

The silence around the TV rights for this cannot be a good sign.

PMC83

awec wrote: »

The silence around the TV rights for this cannot be a good sign.

I see BBC Wales are getting a share of the regions games


https://www.walesonline.co.uk/sport/rugby/rugby-news/new-pro16-live-coverage-set-20620493


From the mummers we are looking at a shared option Between RTE, TG4 and BBC NI. Hopefully this is the case and they are thrashing things out.

Utah_Saint

PMC83 wrote: »

I see BBC Wales are getting a share of the regions games


https://www.walesonline.co.uk/sport/rugby/rugby-news/new-pro16-live-coverage-set-20620493


From the mummers we are looking at a shared option Between RTE, TG4 and BBC NI. Hopefully this is the case and they are thrashing things out.

I'm surprised Sky didn't go for it to bring rugby back to Sky Sports.

Also surprised BT didn't bid so they could complete their Rugby offering.

PMC83

Utah_Saint wrote: »

I'm surprised Sky didn't go for it to bring rugby back to Sky Sports.

Also surprised BT didn't bid so they could complete their Rugby offering.

I read somewhere that Sky had pulled out?


Crappy as Eir was, it was great that they covered 95% of the games. Could often find a few good neutral games. These wont be on the likes of RTE unfortunately

icdg

It looks like it’s going to be a very similar situation to the 2014-18 era. Premier Sports perhaps taking a “pick of the week” game or two with the other games spread around the PSBs, with RTE, TG4, BBC Wales, and S4C involved, though it seems unclear what’s going to happen in Scotland.

At the time Sky previously had the rights they still had a good Rugby portfolio (England games, Heineken Cup, Southern Hemisphere, Top14) but needed a replacement for PRL which they had lost not too long previous. Now they are in a completely different scenario where once this Lions tour is over they are completely done with rugby union. They may want back in, it is the UK’s second most popular team sport and a big hole in their portfolio but the way back in is probably through the AI rights (which may go to Amazon) rather than the ProXX.

BT - they already have a lot of resources invested in the PRL contract where they are sole host broadcaster and they don’t really need the ProXX tbh, they have set out their stall as the home of English club rugby and taking on host broadcaster duties for another tournament just doesn’t fit for them.

The biggest problem for both Sky and BT is though that the ProXX just has no interest in England.

PMC83

icdg wrote: »

The biggest problem for both Sky and BT is though that the ProXX just has no interest in England.

Yeah nail on the head there. The English (and many other rugby fans) would have a passing interest in Super Rugby or Top 14 outside their own league, but Pro16 just isn't that attractive unless you have a team in it.


TBH I'm happy as long as it isn't Amazon. I'm still not convinced that streamers are the way to go for sport. No pause, no record. Nightmare if you kids in the gaff!