Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

What does the future hold for Donald Trump? - threadbans in OP

1196197199201202714

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,718 ✭✭✭✭duploelabs


    Please stop derailing this thread with your pearl clutching over an accusation that never happened



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    I will, just stop making accusations or quoting me. I’m not stopping you, only responding to your ludicrous accusations.



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,391 ✭✭✭Cody montana




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,718 ✭✭✭✭duploelabs


    Point to me to the post where I made a 'ludicrous' accusation at you



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,391 ✭✭✭Cody montana




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,126 ✭✭✭✭everlast75


    ironic consider the GOP's talking points of "the squad" being radical and pulling the party to the right. Here we have two out and out lunatics and very little pushback from the rest of the GOP



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,755 ✭✭✭✭Leroy42


    You are right, I mixed that up with another poster. I apologise.


    However, the point still stands. If you continually come on here and defend Trump, or as is more recently the case for Trump supporters, refuse to condemn him, then it is not unreasonable for posters to take the view that you are in agreement with Trump. Not in everything but given the balance of which was to go, Trump or Dem, you will opt for Trump in the knowledge of all the issues and his shortcomings that brings.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Christ almighty, in one breath you apologise for mixing me up with someone else in another you make another false accusation that I’m a Trump supporter. Worst apology ever.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,755 ✭✭✭✭Leroy42


    I apologised.


    Then I backed up the original retort of your claim that you are being unfairly treated.

    Stop feeling so bloody sorry for yourself. You fail to provide anything to support your positions, but want everyone to just accept you statements and not challenge you?

    If you are not a Trump supporter then is seems you are doing an awful job of getting your position across. It isn't just me, there are many posters that seem to think that your support Trump. You may claim not to support him directly, but it seems you have little issue with anything he does and consistently ignore any calling out of him.

    So maybe, you need to look at your own posting history and try to work out how you ended up painting yourself as a Trump supporter when clearly you are not. Instead of complaining that everybody is treating you unfairly, maybe start posting the issues you have with Trump.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 24,063 CMod ✭✭✭✭Ten of Swords


    @matchbox2021 can we move on please?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,365 ✭✭✭✭rossie1977


    Hmm going by Cpac last week its only Trump running



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,718 ✭✭✭✭duploelabs


    Also becausee they're abadoning candidate debates too



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,940 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    I've no doubt he wants to, I don't think everyone in the party is ok with that and are hedging their bets. If it was guaranteed that they were fine with him running, I think we'd see less commentary from former insiders.

    Unless, as I sad, US parties just aren't cohesive enough to be able to manipulate that type of control on all members.



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 16,112 Mod ✭✭✭✭Quin_Dub


    Trump wants to run again but ONLY so he won't be labelled a Loser and so he can "get" all those that wronged him.

    He isn't going to run again because of some kind of "unfinished policy agenda items" approach or anything remotely like that.

    It's all about soothing his punctured ego and venting his poisonous rage at all those that he feels did him dirty.

    Few in the GOP can stand him, to be honest few anywhere actually like the man.

    But they are terrified of the damage he could do to them in the primaries so they mostly put up with him.

    Those that are actively doing him down are retired/retiring or not up for Election anytime soon so they feel a certain degree of comfort in speaking their minds to a degree.

    Other than Cheney, no one that is up for election next November has said a word against him nor anyone planning on running in 2024.

    The current GOP fall into three categories really - Genuine Lunatic Idiots (Bohbert , Gosar , MTG et al) , Obsequious invertebrate sycophants (Kevin McCarthy , Lindsey Graham etc.) and then the rest are simply cowards , they hate the guy but won't stand up to him for fear of being Primaried and losing their cushy number.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,654 ✭✭✭✭extra gravy


    Meanwhile "oath keeper Stewart Rhodes says Trump needs to ‘step up’ and raise money for group’s legal defense" 😂

    They'll be waiting, Donnie the conman doesn't even pay his own bills, never mind anyone else's.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,940 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,718 ✭✭✭✭duploelabs




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,235 ✭✭✭✭Penn


    Be careful what you wish for. I'd say if Trump did raise money for them, most of the money would never actually make its way to their defence fund.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,126 ✭✭✭✭everlast75


    Where on earth are the folks that said trump had nothing to do with Jan 6th, bore no responsibility, did nothing wrong, folks there were just tourists, they didn't try to overturn an election etc etc.??



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,755 ✭✭✭✭Leroy42


    Whatever about the 6th itself, and they will never be able to prove Trump was involved directly, this paragraph in the above linked article should be enough for any person that claims to be a patriot and a fan of democracy.

    The select committee said in the court submission that it believed Trump defrauded the United States by interfering in the certification process, disseminating false information about election fraud, and pressuring state officials to alter state election results.

    The proof is there, he admits it and yet there are still many who claim that Trump is the saviour of the US. Whether Biden ends up being a good or bad POTUS, the US certainly dodged a serious bullet when Pence refused to be corrupted to sell out his country for Trump.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 16,112 Mod ✭✭✭✭Quin_Dub


    This is the thing - Biden is a politician and like all politicians he'll do some good things and some bad things and will make mistakes and missteps along the way.

    However, he is largely driven by a political agenda to deliver policies that he and his party believe in. Just like Obama , Clinton , Bush Snr and Jr and all those before them.

    Of course you can disagree with those agendas as vehemently as you wish and seek to undo them etc. , that is the very function of a democracy.

    However , Trump is plain and simple a narcissistic sociopath - He is ONLY interested in himself and has repeatedly shown that there is quite literally nothing he would not say or do in his efforts to look after himself and his ego.

    He has no agenda other than self-agrandisement , he has no moral compass , he has no "line" and there is no person or institution he would not burn to the ground without a second thought to save himself.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,653 ✭✭✭✭amdublin


    Jan 6 committee alleging Trump engaged in criminal conspiracy



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,244 ✭✭✭✭MisterAnarchy


    What would you expect, its essentially a kangaroo court, everyone on the committee hates Trump.

    They could at least have tried to pick some objective people.

    The House has no ability to bring criminal charges.

    Eastman and Trump have not been accused of any crime by federal or state prosecutors, and no top advisers around Trump have been charged for January 6 related crimes, its just more posturing and mud slinging by the Democrats.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,887 ✭✭✭✭astrofool


    To be fair, they tried, but the GOP had a conniption about it and just want their misdeeds forgotten about (which is f'n hilarious given the amount of time they waste on things like the Dems stealing the letter W).



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,755 ✭✭✭✭Leroy42


    Whether you think it is a kangaroo court or not, and tbf every right thinking patriot and true American should hate Trump for what he tried to do, these are court documents which will be adjudged by the courts, not any politicians.

    So unless you believe that the entire judicial system had been corrupted, you have nothing to worry about.

    But quite apart for that, what are your thoughts on the charges? Have you read Peril? Do you think Trump didn't claim the vote was rigged? That he didn't try to get Pence to overturn the democratic will of the people?

    Despite all the very clear evidence, even from Trump himself?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,824 ✭✭✭✭Igotadose


    Gotta love this 'kangaroo court' nonsense that some nim on Fox came up with and the clapping seals all parrot (mixed metaphor, apologies.)

    It's not a court, it's an investigative panel with power to refer to the DoJ. There aren't any trials, there isn't a jury or a judge. And the GOP could have been more cooperative, but heck it was the same granstanders from the first impeachment that they offered up, like Gym Jordan.



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 16,112 Mod ✭✭✭✭Quin_Dub


    Objective people?

    You mean like some of the people nominated by Kevin McCarthy , like Jim Jordan??

    Do you think he'd objectively review the evidence (include the evidence of his own involvement) and come to a balanced decision based on the facts?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,549 ✭✭✭✭Tony EH


    Have to laugh (again) at the Trump worshippers. Their guy is getting dragged over the coals, so it's a "kangaroo court".

    FFS. 🤣



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,244 ✭✭✭✭MisterAnarchy


    A Trump worshipper, lol.

    I have a statue of him out the back instead of a grotto, you are welcome to call around to worship any time you like.

    I made the valid point that the committee is completely made up of Democrats and a couple of turncoat Republicans, its completely unobjective.

    Another poster starts arguing pedantics about it not being a court, and accuses me of lifting the phrase off some cabbage on Fox News, I know exactly what it is.

    Imagine I set up a commitee with a few other people who dont think Trump is the devil incarnate and you and a few of the people who dont like Trump set up yere commitee, do you think the outcomes would be similar ?

    You mean like some of the people nominated by Kevin McCarthy , like Jim Jordan??

    Do you think he'd objectively review the evidence (include the evidence of his own involvement) and come to a balanced decision based on the facts?

    No I dont think he would as he is one of Trumps biggest fans, but then again neither will the people on it.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,824 ✭✭✭✭Igotadose


    Turncoat? From what?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,654 ✭✭✭✭extra gravy


    Turncoat/RINO because they're more interested in justice than fawning over Trump like the rest of the Republican morons. That's the Trumpist "logic" for you.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,940 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    Amazing how the party of Law and Order didn't want to investigate what happened on Jan 6th.

    And just because some do, you're suggesting they are biased and their findings are subjective. Do you think the 11 investigations in to Benghazi were motivated by bias?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,755 ✭✭✭✭Leroy42


    Its a committee made up of democratically elected members of Congress. Working within the rules as voted by that Congress.

    Your opinion is that its biased, as usual you have no actual evidence.

    Have you reviewed the evidence to date? Have you read Peril? Have you listened to Trump saying the vote was rigged and that it should be overturned? Have you listened to Pence say he couldn't go along with Trumps plan?

    Did you listen to the GOP senators that tried to overturn the vote?

    Or are you simply ignoring everything in pursuit of dogged support for Trump?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,940 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    It's amazing how people claim Trump is so popular and yet hardly anyone on here is willing to admit being a fan of him.

    Why is that?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,654 ✭✭✭✭extra gravy




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,654 ✭✭✭✭extra gravy


    They'll defend him to the hilt but don't have the balls to admit their support. It's pathetic but hardly surprising when you see the calibre of people he attracts.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 493 ✭✭Stanley 1


    Guilfoyle is lucky she is not a blonde or maybe she dyes her hair as a repellant.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,145 ✭✭✭TheIrishGrover


    Oh, if she's involved with trump she's repellent enough...



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,940 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how





  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,493 ✭✭✭francois




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,145 ✭✭✭TheIrishGrover


    Man, this thread has more reporters than a newspaper



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,126 ✭✭✭✭everlast75


    And yet *still* not as much pearl clutching as is going on in this thread....



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,513 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,410 ✭✭✭✭salmocab


    Always the victims, poster gets banned it’s everyone’s fault but the guy who didn’t obey the rules, don’t like a post I’d report it but the mods are against me.

    no responsibility and someone to blame that’s all they want.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,654 ✭✭✭✭extra gravy


    Do you support Trump? If so, it's a perfect opportunity now for you to admit it and outline your reasons. Fire away.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,824 ✭✭✭✭Igotadose


    Almost as if some of them show up, stir the sh1t through lies, insults and refuse to engage in anything, practically daring the Mods to ban them. Get a few complaints against them and eventually they are banned....


    Regarding the #2xIMPOTUS, apparently he called what is happening in the Ukraine a 'Holocaust,' again demonstrating his profound lack of knowledge about, well, anything, certainly the Holocaust.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,654 ✭✭✭✭extra gravy


    Last week, it was "genius", this week it's a holocaust. A cabbage would have more intelligent responses.



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 16,112 Mod ✭✭✭✭Quin_Dub


    So , Truth Social - So crap even Donald Trumps isn't using it

    I mean he's had lots to say in recent days but not a word of it has appeared on his shiny new Social Media platform.

    He's still posting he "press releases" to Twitter via his proxy.

    But maybe this is just one of those necessary business failures that real entrepreneurs go though on their journey to greatness.

    Poor old Devin Nunes will have to go back to being a Dairy Farmer in Iowa California if things don't pick up soon.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,442 ✭✭✭Hoop66


    I mentioned before that I had signed up to the Truth Social waiting list (using a dummy email, I'm not daft - trumpisascamartist@gmail.com 😀) and had heard nothing. Now I'm getting a ton of spam emails from Fox , and it's very hard to unsubscribe from them.

    You click on the "unsubscribe" link that they are legally required to have and that takes you to a page that tells you "click anywhere outside the box to close this message" almost everywhere "outside the box" is a link to subscribe to another Fox email. Unbelievable grifting.


    The App seems to have disappeared for the App store too.



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 16,112 Mod ✭✭✭✭Quin_Dub


    I did read an article where lots of people were saying that they were still "wait listed" for access and that their position in this notional queue hadn't changed since they first signed up - They were still being told that 158,462 people or whatever were ahead of them in the queue.

    It really is an absolute disaster of an implementation.

    There is only an app for Apple and not Android but even more significantly there is no web access - That's the one that I simply cannot get my brain around from a development point of view. The FIRST thing that should be live is the web access.

    It just makes it stink to high heaven of a scam - Go live with the "app" to hit some notional launch target (perhaps tied to funding or loan agreements??) but then throttle access to the platform claiming to be "overwhelmed" by the response so that no one gets to see how utterly unready it is.

    Has anyone anywhere actually seen evidence that the platform is live and hosting user discussion??



  • Advertisement
This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement