Irish Archbishops call for Catholics to be allowed to attend Mass

John Hutton

As reported in the Irish Times:

The four Catholic archbishops of Ireland have requested a meeting with Taoiseach Micheál Martin to address concerns about the loss of mass services during Covid-19 restrictions.

Under Level 3 all religious services must move online, although places of worship can remain open for private prayer.

However, a letter from the Archbishops points out that communal celebration of Mass and the Sacraments, even with restricted numbers, “is at the very heart of what it means for us to be a Christian community”.

“We wish to engage constructively with the civil authorities to ensure that our people have continued access to the support of Mass and the Sacraments and essential spiritual nourishment for these challenging times,” it says.

https://www.irishtimes.com/news/social-affairs/catholic-archbishops-request-meeting-with-taoiseach-about-loss-of-mass-services-1.4376119

The Bishops have been slow to raise this call but I am glad they have. The Church has put a massive effort into making sure that Mass is safe, and I am sure more efforts can be made if required.

Many Catholic churches are massive buildings with multiple entrances and exits, than can, normally, hold many hundreds of people. I think Mass is perfectly safe to go ahead in buildings like these with a limited number of people attending, with assigned seating etc. in place to ensure physical distancing, and masks. Churches are already set up like this and have been operating safely. Certainly far safer than schools!

For many people communal religious worship is an "essential". This is especially the case for Catholics as due to the nature of the Mass, "virtual" or online attendance is no substitute. This is recognized in essentially every other country where attending Mass is not effectively banned. Ireland is certainly an outlier in this regard.

Hopefully the Archbishops will be successful in persuading the government, I think we should all support their efforts. I would encourage people to lobby their local TDs about it.

It strikes me that there is more likely a fear that many who habitually attend mass will stop doing so once they realise that it’s a habit and not something they do with deliberation each week.

The cynical may also wonder if there are concerns regarding reduced collections amongst those who count the beans.

In any case, this is another of those occasions when we have an opportunity to see how the views of the catholic church leadership are very much at odds with the wisdom and guidance of those appointed to represent and protect the wellbeing of all citizens.

“We know best” no longer stands up, especially when prayer does nothing to prevent viral infection of congregants and when ultimately it’s a terrible idea to assemble in a closed space with many others for 40ish minutes.

John Hutton

JayZeus wrote: »

It strikes me that there is more likely a fear that many who habitually attend mass will stop doing so once they realise that it’s a habit and not something they do with deliberation each week.

This doesn't seem to add up, because the Sunday Obligation has been lifted for like over 6 months now. The Church are literally saying that people don't have to go every Sunday as they normally would.

The cynical may also wonder if there are concerns regarding reduced collections amongst those who count the beans.

If small numbers, as envisioned, are going it would probably be cheaper, especially over winter, to keep the Churches shut and not need heating and to continue collecting through envelopes and dues as has been happening anyway.

In any case, this is another of those occasions when we have an opportunity to see how the views of the catholic church leadership are very much at odds with the wisdom and guidance of those appointed to represent and protect the wellbeing of all citizens.

Ireland are the only country which saw fit to ban Mass attendance. Surely it is the government who are at odds?

“We know best” no longer stands up, especially when prayer does nothing to prevent viral infection of congregants and when ultimately it’s a terrible idea to assemble in a closed space with many others for 40ish minutes.

Who claimed prayer would stop infections at Mass? Schools can open but not large churches?

John Hutton

Further to the above, it is important to make the point that many Catholics like going to Mass and get a lot out of it. (as incomprehensible as that may be to some). In fact, it is incredibly important to many, "like" is an inadequate word.

It is my opinion, that if anything, the Archbishops have felt a lot of pressure from the laity to make this move.

antiskeptic

John Hutton wrote: »

Further to the above, it is important to make the point that many Catholics like going to Mass and get a lot out of it. (as incomprehensible as that may be to some). In fact, it is incredibly important to many, "like" is an inadequate word.

It is my opinion, that if anything, the Archbishops have felt a lot of pressure from the laity to make this move.

Although i understand your view and think mass could be handled, given the space available, you are dealing with an age profile who were being advised to cocoon. Mass appears to lie somewhere well away from the cocoon idea

GarIT

I don't see why some people should be allowed go to mass why others aren't allowed meet their family, play sport or go to the cinema.

The cinema or a play is probably the best comparison to a church, if they can't open a church shouldn't.

John Hutton

antiskeptic wrote: »

Although i understand your view and think mass could be handled, given the space available, you are dealing with an age profile who were being advised to cocoon. Mass appears to lie somewhere well away from the cocoon idea

Given that the Sunday Obligation has been lifted, it is very much in the hands of an individual to decide if they feel safe enough to go. Lots of people outside of the cocooning category go to Mass.

Like supermarkets, there could be designated special times for cocooners.

John Hutton

GarIT wrote: »

I don't see why some people should be allowed go to mass why others aren't allowed meet their family, play sport or go to the cinema.

The cinema or a play is probably the best comparison to a church, if they can't open a church shouldn't.

No, cinema or the theater is not a close comparison for any form of religious worship, especially the Mass. Why is Ireland pretty much the only country in the world that has saw fit to ban mass? What is the logic in banning mass yet cramming schoolchildren into classrooms?

GarIT

John Hutton wrote: »

No, cinema or the theater is not a close comparison for any form of religious worship, especially the Mass. Why is Ireland pretty much the only country in the world that has saw fit to ban mass? What is the logic in banning mass yet cramming schoolchildren into classrooms?

How isn't it? They both have rows of fixed seating in a large room or building. In what way are they different?

It has been accepted that schools aren't completely safe but that they are necessary. And the ages attending school are in the range that aren't terribly affected by the virus. And classes have fixed attendance, you can send a class home if someone gets it. If you closed every church where a parishioner had it most churches would be closed anyway.

At least cinemas pay taxes and have staff to pay who have families to feed.

Cinemas are of far greater importance.

John Hutton

GarIT wrote: »

How isn't it? They both have rows of fixed seating in a large room or building. In what way are they different?

The fundamental nature of what is taking place, and why people are there. Your comment is a bit like me saying what is the difference between going to a church and the supermarket or a shopping center, sure they are in a large building aren't they? It's disingenuous.

Ireland are pretty much the only country that have effectively banned religious worship and the celebration of Mass.

Under level 3 I can get my hair cut in a barbers but am banned from Mass. where is the logic?

smacl

John Hutton wrote: »

No, cinema or the theater is not a close comparison for any form of religious worship, especially the Mass. Why is Ireland pretty much the only country in the world that has saw fit to ban mass? What is the logic in banning mass yet cramming schoolchildren into classrooms?

Cynically perhaps, I'd say it is that schools are also the de facto childcare which enables parents to keep working and the economy to function, albeit at a reduced capacity. Somewhat less cynically, I would imagine very many parents place great value on their children's education. On the basis of declining mass numbers in recent years, this would seem to be less the case for mass attendance.

I tend to agree that there are many more important things to our society than cinemas, and for some that includes attending mass.

GarIT

John Hutton wrote: »

The fundamental nature of what is taking place, and why people are there. Your comment is a bit like me saying what is the difference between going to a church and the supermarket or a shopping center, sure they are in a large building aren't they? It's disingenuous.

Ireland are pretty much the only country that have effectively banned religious worship and the celebration of Mass.

Under level 3 I can get my hair cut in a barbers but am banned from Mass. where is the logic?

The virus doesn't care about what is taking place it only cares about the distances between people and the circulation of air. The difference between a supermarket and a church is a supermarket doesn't have everyone sitting in rows of seats and a church doesn't provide something essential to life.

Ireland it taking a stronger approach than most countries on everything.

Hair cuts are needed for hygiene and we would damage the economy if we closed them.

John Hutton

John Hutton wrote: »

The fundamental nature of what is taking place, and why people are there. Your comment is a bit like me saying what is the difference between going to a church and the supermarket or a shopping center, sure they are in a large building aren't they? It's disingenuous.

Ireland are pretty much the only country that have effectively banned religious worship and the celebration of Mass.

Under level 3 I can get my hair cut in a barbers but am banned from Mass. where is the logic?

The barber pays taxes, has rent to pay, bills to pay, helps keeping the economy chugging along.

John Hutton

GarIT wrote: »

The virus doesn't care about what is taking place it only cares about the distances between people and the circulation of air. The difference between a supermarket and a church is a supermarket doesn't have everyone sitting in rows of seats and a church doesn't provide something essential to life.

Ireland it taking a stronger approach than most countries on everything.

Hair cuts are needed for hygiene and we would damage the economy if we closed them.

Everyone is spaced out in pews and more than 2 meters away from each other. Some churches have removed pews in favour of chairs to facilitate physical distancing.

For many people their faith is essential, and this has been recognised in most of the world which have not banned worship. I am sure the Archbishops will be making this argument, and I hope they will be successful.

I'm not in favour of closing barbers because I agree with you, but if its safe to get my hair cut its safe to go to Mass. (Incidentally I cut my own hair!)

John Hutton

Deleted User wrote: »

The barber pays taxes, has rent to pay, bills to pay, helps keeping the economy chugging along.

The Church also has many employees and bills and contributes to the economy. But I don't agree with your line of argument, why should any business be closed, following your logic, as they contribute to the economy?

smacl

Deleted User wrote: »

At least cinemas pay taxes and have staff to pay who have families to feed.

Cinemas are of far greater importance.

Deleted User wrote: »

The barber pays taxes, has rent to pay, bills to pay, helps keeping the economy chugging along.

John Hutton wrote: »

The Church also has many employees and bills and contributes to the economy. But I don't agree with your line of argument, why should any business be closed, following your logic, as they contribute to the economy?

Mod: Consider the point that in your opinion other industries which contribute to the economy are more important than the church, or not, well made and leave it at that please. Repetitions will be deemed as soap boxing and dealt with accordingly. Thanks for your attention.

GarIT

John Hutton wrote: »

Everyone is spaced out in pews and more than 2 meters away from each other. Some churches have removed pews in favour of chairs to facilitate physical distancing.

For many people their faith is essential, and this has been recognised in most of the world which have not banned worship. I am sure the Archbishops will be making this argument, and I hope they will be successful.

I'm not in favour of closing barbers because I agree with you, but if its safe to get my hair cut its safe to go to Mass. (Incidentally I cut my own hair!)

So in your first paragraph you agree the spacing is similar to a cinema?

Visiting family is essential to me, the pub is essential to my father and sport is essential to many of my friends. We're all not getting what we want in this situation.

You won't get dirty if you don't go to mass and it won't cause issues in work. That's why haircuts are allowed at level 3 and mass isn't.

Del2005

John Hutton wrote: »

Everyone is spaced out in pews and more than 2 meters away from each other. Some churches have removed pews in favour of chairs to facilitate physical distancing.

For many people their faith is essential, and this has been recognised in most of the world which have not banned worship. I am sure the Archbishops will be making this argument, and I hope they will be successful.

I'm not in favour of closing barbers because I agree with you, but if its safe to get my hair cut its safe to go to Mass. (Incidentally I cut my own hair!)

What about before and after the mass?

The Irish government is taking the most conservative approach to reopening the country. With the damage that is doing to hospitality, tourism and several other sectors you decide the big issue is that a few people can't go to mass!

GarIT

John Hutton wrote: »

The Church also has many employees and bills and contributes to the economy. But I don't agree with your line of argument, why should any business be closed, following your logic, as they contribute to the economy?

No. The church actually has a net negative effect on the economy. We have to close some things to keep us alive and keep the essential things open to also keep us alive. The situation now is about survival not entertainment.

John Hutton

GarIT wrote: »

So in your first paragraph you agree the spacing is similar to a cinema?

Visiting family is essential to me, the pub is essential to my father and sport is essential to many of my friends. We're all not getting what we want in this situation.

You won't get dirty if you don't go to mass and it won't cause issues in work. That's why haircuts are allowed at level 3 and mass isn't.

The vast majority of the world have distinguished between religious worship and the things you mention. Under the constitution and law people have a fundamental right to practice their religion. You are very much in the minority if you do not deal with and view the expression and practice of religion in a separate category.

As the Archbishops point out in their letter: "for parishes and individual Catholics the loss of these spiritual supports can be a source of great anxiety and fear, and can have a detrimental impact on their overall health and well-being".

My local parish have an extensive system in place, physical distancing in the church (pews closed etc.), sanitised after every mass (they even bought a fogging machine!), comprehensive PPE available, one way systems in place, parking stewards to ensure physically distanced parking, stewards in the church to ensure physical distancing, multiple entrances and exits.

You can safely have 50 or so people in a massive building like this for 30 minutes:

John Hutton

GarIT wrote: »

No. The church actually has a net negative effect on the economy. We have to close some things to keep us alive and keep the essential things open to also keep us alive. The situation now is about survival not entertainment.

I agree with you regarding entertainment, but Mass and religious worship is not entertainment.

crossman47

GarIT wrote: »

No. The church actually has a net negative effect on the economy.

What evidence for that statement?

GarIT

John Hutton wrote: »

The vast majority of the world have distinguished between religious worship and the things you mention. Under the constitution and law people have a fundamental right to practice their religion. You are very much in the minority if you do not deal with and view the expression and practice of religion in a separate category.

As the Archbishops point out in their letter: "for parishes and individual Catholics the loss of these spiritual supports can be a source of great anxiety and fear, and can have a detrimental impact on their overall health and well-being".

My local parish have an extensive system in place, physical distancing in the church (pews closed etc.), sanitised after every mass (they even bought a fogging machine!), comprehensive PPE available, one way systems in place, parking stewards to ensure physically distanced parking, stewards in the church to ensure physical distancing, multiple entrances and exits.

You can safely have 50 or so people in a massive building like this for 30 minutes:

[removed the image to reduce size of quote]

Do you have statistical evidence for your claim that I am in the minority or are you making it up?


The constitution also provides a right to gather in a group. Everyone is having to make sacrafices.


Lots of things are causing stress and anxiety right now, like the cancelling of GAA matches. Or the fact that I haven't been able to visit my termal grandfather for the last 6 + months.



You could say all the same things about the measures at my local cinema.



The root of the problem is you want a special status that you no longer have.

smacl

GarIT wrote: »

You won't get dirty if you don't go to mass and it won't cause issues in work. That's why haircuts are allowed at level 3 and mass isn't.

Bit of a stretch, you won't suffer hygiene problems if you wash your hair. There are no shortage of people with long hair and beards out there who are perfectly hygienic. I would suggest the issue for most has more to do with appearance, or more bluntly, vanity. Having been to many online meetings over the past couple of months, many of my clients do indeed look like they're auditioning for Robinson Crusoe. I've no reason to believe they've stopped washing their hair

John Hutton

Del2005 wrote: »

What about before and after the mass?

The Irish government is taking the most conservative approach to reopening the country. With the damage that is doing to hospitality, tourism and several other sectors you decide the big issue is that a few people can't go to mass!

Churches have stewards in place to prevent people lingering.

I think your second comment is unfair, I posted this in the Christianity forum, in this context religious worship certainly is the big issue.

Rest assured I have lots of other things to complain about :pac:

GarIT

John Hutton wrote: »

I agree with you regarding entertainment, but Mass and religious worship is not entertainment.

We disagree on that one. The virus doesn't care if you want top believe in Jesus Christ, Harry Potter or the flying spaghetti monster.

crossman47 wrote: »

What evidence for that statement?

They send more monry out of the country than they bring in. They provide free entertainment which takes away from other econmy stimulating things people could be doing on a Sunday. They don't pay taxes on their profits or income.

GarIT

John Hutton wrote: »

Churches have stewards in place to prevent people lingering.

I think your second comment is unfair, I posted this in the Christianity forum, in this context religious worship certainly is the big issue.

Rest assured I have lots of other things to complain about :pac:

We could start a discussion in every specific fourm saying that that forums thing is more important than other things. The point is the virus doesn't care, it will infect all the same. Realistivcally this discussion shouldn't be in the christanity forum as it's not just a religious issue it will affect other people. And all coronavirus discussions are supposed to be kept together, discussions about covid aren't allowed on the websitre at all outside of the covid-19 forum and that's a site wide rule.

John Hutton

smacl wrote: »

Bit of a stretch, you won't suffer hygiene problems if you wash your hair. There are no shortage of people with long hair and beards out there who are perfectly hygienic. I would suggest the issue for most has more to do with appearance, or more bluntly, vanity. Having been to many online meetings over the past couple of months, many of my clients do indeed look like they're auditioning for Robinson Crusoe. I've no reason to believe they've stopped washing their hair

I like to pretend that the 15 pounds I have gained since March consists entirely of the beard I have grown :pac:

smacl

GarIT wrote: »

We disagree on that one. The virus doesn't care if you want top believe in Jesus Christ, Harry Potter or the flying spaghetti monster.

They send more monry out of the country than they bring in. They provide free entertainment which takes away from other econmy stimulating things people could be doing on a Sunday. They don't pay taxes on their profits or income.

Mod warning: Comparisons between Jesus Christ and Harry Potter and the Spaghetti monster, and suggesting that Sunday Mass is free entertainment, are in breach of the forum charter, i.e. they are intended to inflame or insult. Please be considerate of the beliefs and faith of others on here. Any response to the feedback thread please, not in-thread here. Thanks for your attention.

AlanG

GarIT wrote: »

No. The church actually has a net negative effect on the economy. We have to close some things to keep us alive and keep the essential things open to also keep us alive. The situation now is about survival not entertainment.

There is a remarkable level of intolerance in some of your views. The arguments made by the church leaders are very strong. Clearly mass provide a great source of mental well being to many people and most churches can clearly be safe places in a time of COVID. They are well ventilated and have loads of space.

I don't feel the need to go to mass but I do believe in science and there is no scientific reason to stop small numbers of people going into a massive building. I also believe in the proven mental health benefits for participants who choose to go to mass.

GarIT

There are no sensible discussions to be had if it has to be on the basis that Christanity is special above all else the virus doesn't work like that so I'm out.

Happy that the Bishops are free to call for and lobby about this on behalf of their parishioners

But also happy that the decision isn't theirs to make.

It is quite akin to businesses- yes, it's difficult, yes your users are clamouring to be back and you want to be open

But there's no case for it at all in the circumstances

John Hutton

GarIT wrote: »

Do you have statistical evidence for your claim that I am in the minority or are you making it up?

The majority of the worlds governments treat religious worship and expression as a separate category. As do their laws, including those in Ireland. In France a court case was taken to vindicate people's rights, I don't see why that should be necessary for us.

The constitution also provides a right to gather in a group. Everyone is having to make sacrafices.

Yes, but if precautions are taken to allow stuff to go ahead safely I don't see why is shouldn't. I we go to a full lockdown I don't have an issue with Churches being temporarily closed, but we are talking about level 3 currently were loads of places are still open.

Lots of things are causing stress and anxiety right now, like the cancelling of GAA matches. Or the fact that I haven't been able to visit my termal grandfather for the last 6 + months.

That is very sad and I am sorry to hear about your grandad, I will say a prayer for him and your family.


For lots of people religious worship can be very helpful for them mentally in situations like this.

You could say all the same things about the measures at my local cinema.

Have to say I am surprised if they are that comprehensive ! But again we come back to the fundamental difference in the nature of activity. We don't have laws forbidding discrimination on the basis of what films you like!

The root of the problem is you want a special status that you no longer have.

I think the root of your issue and objection might be your dislike for the Church. It's not a "special" status, but rather being treated fairly. If shopping centres and barbers are open, Mass should be allowed too.

AlanG

AlanG wrote: »

There is a remarkable level of intolerance in some of your views. The arguments made by the church leaders are very strong. Clearly mass provide a great source of mental well being to many people and most churches can clearly be safe places in a time of COVID. They are well ventilated and have loads of space.

I don't feel the need to go to mass but I do believe in science and there is no scientific reason to stop small numbers of people going into a massive building. I also believe in the proven mental health benefits for participants who choose to go to mass.

There is certainly scientific reasons to stop small numbers of people being indoors.

A public health expert has told young people “if you are going to do mad stuff do it outside”.

Anthony Staines, professor of public health systems at Dublin City University, said it was “much safer to have 200 of your friends in a field than 20 of your friends back in your house”.

A study published in the British Medical Journal in July found the chances of people getting Covid-19 in an indoor environment were more than 18 times higher than in an outdoor setting.


https://www.irishtimes.com/news/ireland/irish-news/safer-to-meet-200-friends-in-a-field-than-20-indoors-says-expert-1.4360939

It won't be youngsters attending mass.

logically

I am a regular church goer. I'm not a holy joe, an eldery or frail person or anything else the media would like us to believe are the only people that frequent churches these days.

I desperately miss being able to celebrate mass on Sunday with my wife and children.

I miss singing, I miss the nods and waves, the sense of community.

I worry that the 10 million euro (for those who like to talk about the economy) going to the St. Vincent de Paul from the various collections won't be there this year, and what that means for those less fortunate than myself in the run up to Christmas.

Needless to say, I full endorse the view that the ability to worship is an essential service, but I can't see any exemption being made in Ireland given a generally hostile and influential media.

smacl

Moved from Christianity forum to Coronavirus forum. Please read and adhere to the local charter before posting.

Beasty

All this shows is that the Catholic Church believe they are above all of this. Sod the rest of us, but the church must do what it wants to how it wants to. They seriously still believe they are entitled to avoid applying the rules the rest of us are expected to (and we can all shout we are "special" in some way, so the restrictions re not for us)?

John Hutton

Beasty wrote: »

All this shows is that the Catholic Church believe they are above all of this. Sod the rest of us, but the church must do what it wants to how it wants to. They seriously still believe they are entitled to avoid applying the rules the rest of us are expected to (and we can all shout we are "special" in some way, so the restrictions re not for us)?

They have said that they want to discuss the rules and that restrictions on worship should be more consistent, both with the rest of the world and restrictions applied here under level 3 to other places, businesses etc.

There is a discussion to have here, and while you mightn't agree they certainly have a valid point in saying that Ireland are treating religious worship different than the rest of the world.

I found the tone of the letter very respectful, they want a meeting to discuss it. I think your animosity toward the Church is coloring your view.

breezy1985

Do it outside like I have to with my essentials like coffee or a pint. It's not like most churches have more than 15 customers these days anyway

eviltwin

I know for a religious person mass attendance is important but its not essential and if you can access daily mass online, on tv and radio does not being there is person really matter? I appreciate the loss of community and there is no comparison to being there in person but we are all missing something we love and we just have to get on with it.

Beasty

John Hutton wrote: »

They have said that they want to discuss the rules and that restrictions on worship should be more consistent, both with the rest of the world and restrictions applied here under level 3 to other places, businesses etc.

There is a discussion to have here, and while you mightn't agree they certainly have a valid point in saying that Ireland are treating religious worship different than the rest of the world.

I found the tone of the letter very respectful, they want a meeting to discuss it. I think your animosity toward the Church is coloring your view.

They should simply accept they are not a special case. If not we can all plead how special we are and the whole system collapses. They are no more special than many other organisations that rely on interaction with the public

breezy1985

GarIT wrote: »

There are no sensible discussions to be had if it has to be on the basis that Christanity is special above all else the virus doesn't work like that so I'm out.

The forum rules for the Christianity section seem like a joke to anyone who believes in open dialogue but in fairness questioning Jehovah is one of the big sins in Christianity.

But this topic has been moved to the covid forum now though so all bets are off baby.

eviltwin

John Hutton wrote: »

They have said that they want to discuss the rules and that restrictions on worship should be more consistent, both with the rest of the world and restrictions applied here under level 3 to other places, businesses etc.

There is a discussion to have here, and while you mightn't agree they certainly have a valid point in saying that Ireland are treating religious worship different than the rest of the world.

I found the tone of the letter very respectful, they want a meeting to discuss it. I think your animosity toward the Church is coloring your view.

I think its the fact they see themselves as special that they should be considered in a way other business or recreational services are not. I'd love a meeting with the minister to discuss the impact on our clients at work who are missing out on vital services due to lockdown but I wouldn't waste my time because I know we are a small fish in a big pond.

hynesie08

Beasty wrote: »

They should simply accept they are not a special case. If not we can all plead how special we are and the whole system collapses. They are no more special than many other organisations that rely on interaction with the public

Well why can't you? There's absolutely nothing stopping you from contacting your local councillors or tds and getting an answer as to why restrictions apply to you.

The church are a group, just like ryanair or press up group or the lva, who want answers as to why they are under the restrictions they are under.

Nothing wrong with that.

John Hutton

eviltwin wrote: »

I know for a religious person mass attendance is important but its not essential and if you can access daily mass online, on tv and radio does not being there is person really matter? I appreciate the loss of community and there is no comparison to being there in person but we are all missing something we love and we just have to get on with it.

Yes, given the nature of the Mass, and the theology etc. behind it, virtual attendance is no substitute and not the same.


Is it not odd that under level three the church can remain open for private prayer (i.e. the building is open and a decent number of people can go in and pray or light a candle) but a priest can't say Mass when people are there anyway?

breezy1985

Is there a radius on blessings. In church a priest blesses the bread at a distance of about 10 to 20cm but is that due to convenience or do priests powers diminish with distance ?

Basically is bread blessed if a priest does it over a webcam or from the back of a room ?

Tzardine

Would the Archbishops not be better off just asking Jesus to come back and cure the Covid-19 epidemic?

2000 years is a decent break in fairness - he needs to get off his hole at some point.

eviltwin

John Hutton wrote: »

Yes, given the nature of the Mass, and the theology etc. behind it, virtual attendance is no substitute and not the same.


Is it not odd that under level three the church can remain open for private prayer (i.e. the building is open and a decent number of people can go in and pray or light a candle) but a priest can't say Mass when people are there anyway?

But that would be an impromptu thing, have a set mass and you have less control over who arrives and its unfair to expect a priest to do crowd control or ensure people are masked etc

John Hutton

breezy1985 wrote: »

Is there a radius on blessings. In church a priest blesses the bread at a distance of about 10 to 20cm but is that due to convenience or do priests powers diminish with distance ?

Basically is bread blessed if a priest does it over a webcam or from the back of a room ?

Consecration, sacraments, cannot be preformed virtually.

John Hutton

eviltwin wrote: »

But that would be an impromptu thing, have a set mass and you have less control over who arrives and its unfair to expect a priest to do crowd control or ensure people are masked etc

There are stewards to do that, and turn people away if necessary.