Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
The Great Reset
Options
Comments
-
-
-
-
Gianni Scrawny Steroid wrote: »
The Great Big Reset 2021 WEF/DAVOS, provides the perfect conditions for this, if that is what is 'desired'.
Keyword: If
Always the fantasy of something is "going to happen in the future" with none of the commitment to it. Rapturists and conspiracy theorists indulge in exactly the same hobby of prophesizing.0 -
Likely you'd consider all professional Weather Forecasters, FX sellers, Hedge Funders, and Tracksiders on L31's all as 'Prophet Rapturists'Keyword: If
Always the fantasy of something is "going to happen in the future" with none of the commitment to it. Rapturistsand conspiracy theorists indulge in exactly the same hobby of prophesizing.
The unfortunate situation, is that thanks to new very present unique chain, model or sequence of events, the only easy way out could well be a population cull of sorts.
Of course someone could discover zero point energy instructions tomorrow afternoon in a crisp packet, or Musk might start bulk shipping folks to a previously undiscovered leafy green zone on Mars to grow potatoes and alleviate a multitude of growing global crisie. ...Requiring a Great Reset.0 -
Advertisement
-
Gianni Scrawny Steroid wrote: »Likely you'd consider all professional Weather Forecasters, FX sellers, Hedge Funders, and Tracksiders on L31's all as 'Prophet Rapturists'
No I don't because they are using actual projections, math's and logic.
Someone who is predicting the "end of the world" or rapture or silly conspiracies isn't.0 -
Who dat 'someone so and so, somwhere else, at some time', and when is this all due?Someone who is predicting the "end of the world"
Is 'The Great Reset', what it says it is, by it's own logic?
A Global Socio-Economic Reset of Greatness.
https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2020/06/now-is-the-time-for-a-great-reset/...the world must act jointly and swiftly to revamp all aspects of our societies and economies, from education to social contracts and working conditions. Every country, from the United States to China, must participate, and every industry, from oil and gas to tech, must be transformed.0 -
-
Very informative examination of The Great Reset, based on information available so far. Highly recommend everyone gives this a watch/listen, regardless of where you sit on the 'open conspiracy
it'll be nothing' spectrum. Some very interesting stuff re: future technologies and their potential as well.
Apologies if it's already been shared.0 -
-
Advertisement
-
-
"Penchant for spreading fake news"... I thought this was Wikipedia at first glance... who writes these 'rationalwiki' articles? Just any randomer who feels like it?
0 -
As opposed to randomers on YouTube who spread conspiracy nonsense for profit?[Deleted User] wrote: »"Penchant for spreading fake news"... I thought this was Wikipedia at first glance... who writes these 'rationalwiki' articles? Just any randomer who feels like it?
Are you saying that you YouTube expert doesn't believe all of those ridiculous things and the link dohnjoe provide just made it all up?0 -
Deleted User wrote: »"Penchant for spreading fake news"... I thought this was Wikipedia at first glance... who writes these 'rationalwiki' articles? Just any randomer who feels like it?
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/the-corbett-report/
Corbett is a full-on tinfoil merchant. He (and other crank magnets) regularly pop up as "sources of information" on this forum.0 -
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/the-corbett-report/
Corbett is a full-on tinfoil merchant. He (and other crank magnets) regularly pop up as "sources of information" on this forum.
Again, who's writing these articles... Could be you and King Bob, for all we know. You get the point.
Seems these days one is either a conspiracy theorist, or a coincidence theorist. I personally don't believe in extreme coincidences, especially when a lot of money is connected to the outcome of such coincidences.
I honestly hope you're right anyway, and nothing much comes of this Schwab guy's lunacy (based on his sh*tty book). Wish he'd move towards his true calling of playing a Bond villian, rather than trying to dictate global policy in real life 0 -
-
-
-
-
Don't you find it strange that without question you accept and post a video from a well known conspiracy theorist, yet you immediately question (cast doubt on) anything pointing that out
This is something that's fairly easy to verify yourself, e.g. chemtrails
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=STEtkZR0iao
911
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fTHT7MXLef8
Anti-vax, moon landing hoax, climate denial, Soros, false flags, Alex Jones, geo-engineering, etc, etc - every red flag possible is there.
I never said I "accept without question" the video. I simply said I found it informative and worth checking out for people to make up their own minds. The point I was making is that you linking to some random article that says "____ has a penchant for spreading fake news" obviously doesn't mean or prove anything. It's just some anonymous person trying to discredit another person's opinions. You're suggesting that his skepticism re: The Great Reset should be dismissed because he also questions mainstream narrative on other events like 9/11. Again, I'm going to point out that with many of these events, you're either a 'conspiracy theorist', or in your case, a 'coincidence theorist'. Personally, I do not believe in massive coincidences when the outcome is conveniently connected to billions of dollars.
Let me put it to you this way: Your odds of winning the Irish lottery (47 balls) works as follows:
47/6 x 46/5 x 44/4 x 43/3 x 42/2 x 41/1
To get the first ball, you have a 6 in 47 chance. To get the second you have a 5 in 46 chance. And so on. To calculate probability of winning (ie the six balls drawn to be the six numbers you have on your ticket), multiply these six figures by each other. The calculation comes to roughly 10 million. So 1 in 10 million; that's the chance all of these events (each ball drawn) come together in a way that ultimately produces a highly unlikely outcome (ie you winning the lottery).
You can roughly apply the same kind of probability/mathematics to any event that features an unlikely series of coincidences. As you mentioned 9/11 in your post, let's do a really quick, crude take on it here. I could make an endless list of the unlikely scenarios/coincidences that took place, but for the sake of brevity, I'll choose a quick few:
- Group of guys from Middle East, armed with boxcutters, manage to highjack a few planes. With no flight experience (outside of a couple of simulator lessons) and no radio support, they manage to successfully navigate Boeing Jets towards New York City, then skilfully/precisely crash those jets into the World Trade Centers. This is like needles in a haystack. Many experienced pilots said they would have found this very difficult to do themselves... let alone a group of individuals who'd never flown a real plane before.
PROBABILITY: HIGHLY UNLIKELY
- Two 'highjacked' planes are allowed to fly unchallenged across one of the most protected airspaces in the world for an hour or so.
PROBABILITY: HIGHLY UNLIKELY
- Stock market experts say trading patterns prior to 9/11 indicated almost definite prior knowledge of the attacks. When asked what were the odds of this being coincidental, one analyst replied "it would have to be the most extraordinary coincidence of all time".
PROBABILITY: HIGHLY UNLIKELY
- Building 7 falls down in the exact same fashion as the other two. Problem being, no plane ever hit Building 7. 'Fire' (the official explanation) doesn't cause every support beam to fail at exactly the same time, to facilitate a perfect collapse (identical to a controlled demolition). Again, nothing ever even hit Building 7, but it collapsed like a house of cards anyway. Typing this out makes me laugh at the absurdity.
PROBABILITY: HIGHLY UNLIKELY
- The 9/11 commission was given extremely limited funds to investigate ($15m). In contrast, $60 million was spent investigating Clinton’s affairs with Monica. Yes, the Lewinsky affair received four times the amount of funding for investigation than one of the biggest attacks on the United States of America in history. Sure, makes sense.
PROBABILITY: HIGHLY UNLIKELY.
I'm going to stop there. Now, for your probability of the official story being true, you multiply the probability of each scenario/coincidence by each other. Your odds will end up something similar to winning the lottery. Nearly impossible. Regardless, 9/11 allowed the Americans to enter the Middle East, and take control of the oil. Billions and billions of dollars.
To repeat, I do not believe in massive coincidences/unlikely scenarios when the outcome is conveniently connected to billions of dollars. You can if you want; it's entirely your prerogative. But that, as I've just illustrated, would make you a coincidence theorist.
I've seen multiple polls now on 9/11 re: whether Americans believe the official story. Numbers of people who think it was an inside job range from 20-50%. I'd love to research this in more detail, but I suspect anybody who believes the official story merely accepted whatever mainstream media/government told them at the time, without doing any proper research of their own.
I suppose you believe Jeffrey Epstein committed suicide as well, as that's what the mainstream media said :pac: Anyone with any sort of common sense, knew he would never make it to trial. Too many powerful people connected to him, and whom he had intel on. "Epstein will be suicided" was all over social media in the weeks prior to his 'suicide'. And then, of course, one of the most high profile prisoners in the world, on 24/7 suicide watch, with CCTV in his cell.... commits suicide. And oops, the guards happened not to be watching at the time. Then double oops, every CCTV camera in the cell had unfortunately malfunctioned, too. This is absolutely laughable, and anyone who accepts this deserves to be lied to for the rest of their life. Again: money/power/control over everything else. Always and forever.
Stop believing everything you see in the mainstream media. Likewise, just because something is not in the mainstream media, doesn't automatically make it untrue, either. Mainstream media comes through the filter of the governments and corporations that pay for it. I had to explain this to a guy in another thread last week. He sincerely believed the likes of RTE and the BBC were completely unbiased and objective. RTE is funded by the Irish government (via the taxpayer), whereas the BBC is funded in a similar way with additional money from the likes of the Gates Foundation and European Commission. Everything in mainstream media comes through the filter and agenda of it's funders. It's not hard to understand.
Btw, a common retort to "9/11 was an inside job" is "but how on earth would they get away with it?!". The answer is "because they don't answer to anybody". They're above the law. Human lives are but mere statistics in the face of money, power and control. It's the way it's always been, and always will. That's completely fine, and understandable, in the grand scheme of things. But to actually accept and believe these 'official' stories / 'explanations' fed down to you... that's on you. So, in the words of the great Joe Biden: "come on, man!"
0 -
Advertisement
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
You don't address any of the points and are resorting to ad hominem
It's a public forum. I sincerely hope you aren't suggesting I can't post here..
I'm suggesting, as have others, that you actively try to stifle discussion on conspiracy theories... On a forum for conspiracy theories :rolleyes: I'm also suggesting you either don't read properly, or misinterpret posts, and reply with the same lazy "but who and why?" quite regularly. Case in point when I wrote about Bill Gates, the very coincidental/convenient timeline between his pandemic simulation, to Coronavirus appearing a few months later, and his immediate pushing of the vaccines he's developing (with "20-1 financial return", in his own words)...
You reply to that post with "You seem to be suggesting it was released intentionally, if so, then by who and why?". The answers to your questions were clearly implied in the post. So again, to me it indicates you're either:
a) not reading posts properly
b) you just completely misinterpret what posters are saying, or
c) you're just trying to stall/derail threads
On your last point, again you seem to be misreading what was actually said. I said "I don't see what you get out of it" (posting here the way you do). I never suggested you "can't post here". So, one last time: read posts properly, my man. Will make everyone's life a lot easier -- most of all your own 0 -
-
-
Advertisement
-
![[Deleted User]](/applications/dashboard/design/images/defaulticon.png)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HeMsaN6xjAQ
Advertisement