Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Told I have to send faulty laptop to manufacturer myself?

  • 27-05-2020 3:52pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 393 ✭✭


    Hey lads,

    I have a Razor laptop. I bought it May 2019 and it started acting up in March and then broke down completely last week. I know it a hard drive issue.

    So I went into Curry's last weekend. The shop was closed but they let me in cause I had my laptop with me and I had hospital staff ID.

    So yesterday they ring me and inform me I need to collect my laptop from the store ( that was in a big package ready to be sent off ) and that I need to send it to Razor myself ????????? :confused:

    They said its due to GDPR issues ? I told them I'm hospital staff and I'm trying to avoid the city centre for obvious reasons.

    Are they able to do this ??? It makes no sense to me at all.
    Tagged:


«1

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 71,113 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    They're responsible for your consumer rights and can't send you off to the manufacturer; however it can be easier to deal with them in some circumstances. What date in May did you buy it on?

    As goes GDPR, that's basically an excuse based on the idea they may see data on the machine.

    I'm fairly certain no recent Razer machines would have hard drives - if its a failed SSD don't expect to get any data back. Actually, never expect to get any data back if sending a machine for repair as a reimage is basically default behaviour.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 393 ✭✭DisneyLover


    L1011 wrote: »
    They're responsible for your consumer rights and can't send you off to the manufacturer; however it can be easier to deal with them in some circumstances. What date in May did you buy it on?

    As goes GDPR, that's basically an excuse based on the idea they may see data on the machine.

    I'm fairly certain no recent Razer machines would have hard drives - if its a failed SSD don't expect to get any data back. Actually, never expect to get any data back if sending a machine for repair as a reimage is basically default behaviour.

    Auto correct and half asleep sorry Razer ** lol

    Em Ill have to check my receipt later but early May and I have a 2 year warranty !

    They rang me and said they can't deal with Razer I have to do it myself. GDPR was mentioned, I told them I literally used my laptop for 1 game and Netflix, I dont care who sees it or what gets deleted. That it isn't up to them to send my laptop off to Razer Germany for repair, its up to me !


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 71,113 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    The path of least resistance is probably dealing with Razer, although its not right. I'd get in contact with Razer and if they're looking for you to send it at your own expense, go back to Currys; point out that GDPR has nothing to do with what they think it does and that they are responsible for your consumer rights under the Sale of Goods and Supply of Services Act; not the manufacturer


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,967 ✭✭✭Sultan of Bling


    L1011 wrote:
    The path of least resistance is probably dealing with Razer, although its not right. I'd get in contact with Razer and if they're looking for you to send it at your own expense, go back to Currys; point out that GDPR has nothing to do with what they think it does and that they are responsible for your consumer rights under the Sale of Goods and Supply of Services Act; not the manufacturer


    Deal with them in writing also. If they don't budge i would go the small claims court route


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 393 ✭✭DisneyLover


    L1011 wrote: »
    The path of least resistance is probably dealing with Razer, although its not right. I'd get in contact with Razer and if they're looking for you to send it at your own expense, go back to Currys; point out that GDPR has nothing to do with what they think it does and that they are responsible for your consumer rights under the Sale of Goods and Supply of Services Act; not the manufacturer

    I just dont get why they're asking me to do it ! I would do it normally but I can't go to town with a parent at home ill and I work in a hospital.. I might try ring the shop later and ask for the manager ? I am waiting on a twitter reply from Currys and Razer atm


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 71,113 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    Because they don't want the hassle and its an easy excuse.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 393 ✭✭DisneyLover


    L1011 wrote: »
    Because they don't want the hassle and its an easy excuse.

    Grand so ring them and mention Sale of Goods act best option


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26 noa2020


    Grand so ring them and mention Sale of Goods act best option

    Not sure that would be the best option to be honest. I’ve no idea why they’re asking you to deal with the manufacturer especially after taking it in (maybe if the service centre is currently closed, not sure though) but it’s guaranteed that the info isn’t coming directly from the customer service employee or even the store itself.

    When I worked in retail, the minute someone started quoting various sales acts to me (usually incorrectly, ironically), I’d become a lot less flexible on the situation and start conversing defensively. To me, it just felt like when the customer came in and explained the situation/problem to me, we’d work together to find the best/most reasonable solution but when the sales of goods act came out, it turned into a them vs me situation.

    My best advice would be try and re-explain your situation in a calm and friendly manner and hopefully they’ll send it off for you.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 71,113 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    noa2020 wrote: »
    Not sure that would be the best option to be honest. I’ve no idea why they’re asking you to deal with the manufacturer especially after taking it in (maybe if the service centre is currently closed, not sure though) but it’s guaranteed that the info isn’t coming directly from the customer service employee or even the store itself.

    When I worked in retail, the minute someone started quoting various sales acts to me (usually incorrectly, ironically), I’d become a lot less flexible on the situation and start conversing defensively. To me, it just felt like when the customer came in and explained the situation/problem to me, we’d work together to find the best/most reasonable solution but when the sales of goods act came out, it turned into a them vs me situation.

    My best advice would be try and re-explain your situation in a calm and friendly manner and hopefully they’ll send it off for you.

    When dealing with staff trained to be "computer says no" and also trained in UK consumer laws as Currys/PCWorld mostly have, you need to go hard with actual Irish law pretty quickly to get anywhere.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 393 ✭✭DisneyLover


    L1011 wrote: »
    When dealing with staff trained to be "computer says no" and also trained in UK consumer laws as Currys/PCWorld mostly have, you need to go hard with actual Irish law pretty quickly to get anywhere.

    I'm talking to their support on Twitter in private messages and they told me they don't deliver small items that I need to collect it ???? What in the name of god like


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 393 ✭✭DisneyLover


    Hi There, if you took the laptop into store then it would be upto you to collect.

    I appreciate that this is inconvenient however Unfortunately we cannot offer a delivery service for small items from stores

    Regards


    .... I Don't want my laptop I want them to send it to Germany for me. I've a 2 year warranty on it too !


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 71,113 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    Semi automated replies from someone who doesn't speak English well in a call centre


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 393 ✭✭DisneyLover


    L1011 wrote: »
    Semi automated replies from someone who doesn't speak English well in a call centre

    He had a British name but clearly didn't understand what I was talking about!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 71,113 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    Fake Anglophone names are quite common in those setups.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,817 ✭✭✭Darc19


    Yet another thread about the lack of service by Currys / PCWorld

    I learnt long ago never to purchase an item from them as their customer service vies with Eir to be the worst in Ireland


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 71,113 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    They had a Talk To forum here with actually good and useful staff.

    The person responsible for it moved on, and everything went back to how it had been before.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 992 ✭✭✭Bikerman2019


    L1011 wrote: »
    They had a Talk To forum here with actually good and useful staff.

    The person responsible for it moved on, and everything went back to how it had been before.

    I don't think that is correct. The guy didn't move on, I believe it was Declan, who was quite high up in the organisation, and his position was abolished in favour of command from the UK.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 393 ✭✭DisneyLover


    L1011 wrote: »
    They're responsible for your consumer rights and can't send you off to the manufacturer; however it can be easier to deal with them in some circumstances. What date in May did you buy it on?

    As goes GDPR, that's basically an excuse based on the idea they may see data on the machine.

    I'm fairly certain no recent Razer machines would have hard drives - if its a failed SSD don't expect to get any data back. Actually, never expect to get any data back if sending a machine for repair as a reimage is basically default behaviour.

    Currys tech team replied to me today.. finally
    They ,said I need to collect the laptop because if something happens to it they can't accept responsibility... ?????


  • Posts: 3,689 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Covering all their bases covering their..


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 393 ✭✭DisneyLover


    Covering all their bases covering their..

    Is this true then ? Do I have to go in to town and collect it and send it myself??


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,718 ✭✭✭whippet


    There are two issues here

    1- they won’t deliver it back to you - that is normal as you dropped it in to them you need to arrange collection.

    2- they want you to deal with Razer yourself .. not within the letter or spirit of the law.


    So my advise is .. collect the laptop and contact Razer support yourself .. they may actually collect from you and resolve the issue. If not then back to curry’s first resolution via SCC if necessary.

    Don’t alway last assume that dealing with the manufacturer is the worst option .. in many cases it’s better than dealing with the retailer


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,195 ✭✭✭GrumpyMe


    https://thecai.ie/your-rights/your-rights/know-your-rights/
    Under the Sale of Goods and Supply of Services Act 1980, anything you buy from a retailer must be:
    • of merchantable quality
    • fit for its normal purpose, and reasonably durable
    • as described, whether the description is part of the advertising or wrapping, on a label, or something said by the salesperson.
    • When you buy goods from a retailer, you make a contract with him. He agrees to provide certain goods to you for a certain price. If your purchase turns out to be faulty, the retailer, not the manufacturer, is responsible to you and must sort out your complaint. You are entitled to a refund, a replacement or a repair.
    You do not have to take a credit note if your complaint is covered by the Sale of Goods Act. You can insist on a refund, a replacement or a repair.

    I think it is quite clear from the quote above that Curry's (the retailer) are failing to fulfil their obligations "Under the Sale of Goods and Supply of Services Act 1980".

    You need to tell Curry's (the retailer) that you would like a refund, replacement or a repair. End of!!!
    Inform them that if they fail to provide a refund, replacement or a repair you will go to Small Claims Court. Give them 14 days to comply.
    Be polite, keep it focussed and don't enter into discussions - you would like a refund, replacement or a repair.

    Insisting on your rights is a reasonable stance for you to take. Not complying with Sale of Goods and Supply of Services Act 1980 is an unreasonable stance for Curry's(the retailer) to take.
    https://thecai.ie/your-rights/how-to-complain-effectively/


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,718 ✭✭✭whippet


    GrumpyMe wrote: »
    https://thecai.ie/your-rights/your-rights/know-your-rights/
    Under the Sale of Goods and Supply of Services Act 1980, anything you buy from a retailer must be:
    • of merchantable quality
    • fit for its normal purpose, and reasonably durable
    • as described, whether the description is part of the advertising or wrapping, on a label, or something said by the salesperson.
    • When you buy goods from a retailer, you make a contract with him. He agrees to provide certain goods to you for a certain price. If your purchase turns out to be faulty, the retailer, not the manufacturer, is responsible to you and must sort out your complaint. You are entitled to a refund, a replacement or a repair.
    You do not have to take a credit note if your complaint is covered by the Sale of Goods Act. You can insist on a refund, a replacement or a repair.

    I think it is quite clear from the quote above that Curry's (the retailer) are failing to fulfil their obligations "Under the Sale of Goods and Supply of Services Act 1980".

    You need to tell Curry's (the retailer) that you would like a refund, replacement or a repair. End of!!!
    Inform them that if they fail to provide a refund, replacement or a repair you will go to Small Claims Court. Give them 14 days to comply.
    Be polite, keep it focussed and don't enter into discussions - you would like a refund, replacement or a repair.

    Insisting on your rights is a reasonable stance for you to take. Not complying with Sale of Goods and Supply of Services Act 1980 is an unreasonable stance for Curry's(the retailer) to take.
    https://thecai.ie/your-rights/how-to-complain-effectively/


    No arguments against the rights above

    However in the real world sometimes is easier / quicker to get the warranty issue resolved by the manufacture than the retailer. In many cases the retailer will just log a service call with the manufacture and go through the same process and the consumer will have to wait on the retailer to do this for them


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 965 ✭✭✭shaveAbullock


    How many years can you expect to get out of a laptop for it to be considered reasonably durable?
    10 years or more?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,782 ✭✭✭Xterminator


    How many years can you expect to get out of a laptop for it to be considered reasonably durable?
    10 years or more?


    what does that have to do with a 1 year old laptop?

    OP - you might get it fixed quicker and with less hassle using the manufacturers warranty, and dealing with them.

    you have a choice of pursuing currys or manufacturer. I would personally deal with the one what offers the fastest resolution and best outcome with least effort.

    If you wish to pursue currys via small claims court you will have to put in great effort. if you want to enforce the principal, do so by all means.

    If you want to get a working laptop faster - contact manufacturer and see what they can offer. make an informed choice when its clear what your choices are.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 965 ✭✭✭shaveAbullock


    what does that have to do with a 1 year old laptop?


    It's over 1 year old. It's covered under law for 12 months, after that it has to be decided how long it must last to be considered fit for its normal purpose, and reasonably durable.
    I think for a laptop 10 years would be fair. But I'm not sure how well that would hold up in law.
    My current laptop is 6 years old so I don't see why it wouldn't last at least 10 years.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,382 ✭✭✭petes


    It's over 1 year old. It's covered under law for 12 months, after that it has to be decided how long it must last to be considered fit for its normal purpose, and reasonably durable.
    I think for a laptop 10 years would be fair. But I'm not sure how well that would hold up in law.
    My current laptop is 6 years old so I don't see why it wouldn't last at least 10 years.

    But this has nothing got to do with this thread. They have a two year warranty.

    Six to ten years? No chance.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 965 ✭✭✭shaveAbullock


    Was it razor or curry's that gave the extended warranty?
    It might be easier to use the extended warranty than argue over the length for it to be considered fit for its normal purpose, and reasonably durable.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 385 ✭✭selephonic


    It's over 1 year old. It's covered under law for 12 months, after that it has to be decided how long it must last to be considered fit for its normal purpose, and reasonably durable.
    I think for a laptop 10 years would be fair. But I'm not sure how well that would hold up in law.
    My current laptop is 6 years old so I don't see why it wouldn't last at least 10 years.

    Aren't all warranties now 2 years, under EU law?

    https://europa.eu/youreurope/citizens/consumers/shopping/guarantees-returns/index_en.htm


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,512 ✭✭✭runawaybishop




  • Closed Accounts Posts: 965 ✭✭✭shaveAbullock


    It's a bit of a misconception.
    That law merely states that someone can attempt to take action against a seller up to 2 years from sale date.
    It does not mean all goods have a 2 year warranty.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 385 ✭✭selephonic


    It's a bit of a misconception.
    That law merely states that someone can attempt to take action against a seller up to 2 years from sale date.
    It does not mean all goods have a 2 year warranty.

    Ah, fair enough, I stand corrected. I see its detailed a bit further here:

    https://europa.eu/youreurope/citizens/consumers/shopping/guarantees-returns/ireland/index_en.htm

    I've referred to the 2 year thing with manufacturers before and received a repair/replacement on electronics. I would usually contact the manufacturer directly as I find they're more concerned about their customers/reputation.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,792 ✭✭✭Mark Hamill


    It's a bit of a misconception.
    That law merely states that someone can attempt to take action against a seller up to 2 years from sale date.
    It does not mean all goods have a 2 year warranty.

    That's not what selephonics link says:
    Free of charge, 2-year guarantee for all goods

    You always have the right to a minimum 2-year guarantee at no cost, regardless of whether you bought your goods online, in a shop or by mail order.

    This 2-year guarantee is your minimum right, however national rules in your country may give you extra protection.

    If goods you bought anywhere in the EU turn out to be faulty or do not look or work as advertised, the seller must repair or replace them free of charge or give you a price reduction or a full refund.

    Do you have something that says otherwise?


  • Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 15,109 Mod ✭✭✭✭whiterebel


    First line: "Ireland has not introduced any particular provision regarding the duration of the legal guarantee. Instead, a 6 year limitation period applies, during which consumers can exercise their rights, both for new and second-hand goods"


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,792 ✭✭✭Mark Hamill


    whiterebel wrote: »
    First line: "Ireland has not introduced any particular provision regarding the duration of the legal guarantee. Instead, a 6 year limitation period applies, during which consumers can exercise their rights, both for new and second-hand goods"

    That is on top of the 2 year European guarantee, not instead of it.
    To repeat what I quote:
    "You always have the right to a minimum 2-year guarantee at no cost, regardless of whether you bought your goods online, in a shop or by mail order.

    This 2-year guarantee is your minimum right, however national rules in your country may give you extra protection.
    "

    In Ireland you have a minimum of 2 years guarantee, but Irish law extends that up to 6 years to at least argue a claim if something fails.


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 15,109 Mod ✭✭✭✭whiterebel


    That is on top of the 2 year European guarantee, not instead of it.
    To repeat what I quote:
    "You always have the right to a minimum 2-year guarantee at no cost, regardless of whether you bought your goods online, in a shop or by mail order.

    This 2-year guarantee is your minimum right, however national rules in your country may give you extra protection.
    "

    In Ireland you have a minimum of 2 years guarantee, but Irish law extends that up to 6 years to at least argue a claim if something fails.

    No, because we deemed our consumer protection stronger than that offered by the EU Directive. Its not an either/or that's why they have a specific part for Ireland, as do the likes of Apple on their website.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,512 ✭✭✭runawaybishop


    That is on top of the 2 year European guarantee, not instead of it.
    To repeat what I quote:
    "You always have the right to a minimum 2-year guarantee at no cost, regardless of whether you bought your goods online, in a shop or by mail order.

    This 2-year guarantee is your minimum right, however national rules in your country may give you extra protection.
    "

    In Ireland you have a minimum of 2 years guarantee, but Irish law extends that up to 6 years to at least argue a claim if something fails.

    No. We did not enact that law.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,792 ✭✭✭Mark Hamill


    whiterebel wrote: »
    No, because we deemed our consumer protection stronger than that offered by the EU Directive. Its not an either/or that's why they have a specific part for Ireland, as do the likes of Apple on their website.

    I never said it's an either/or.
    They have a specific part for every country, bar Liechtenstein, so you can see what extra guarantees you have in those countries. In Ireland, that extra guarantee goes up to 6 years.

    And Apple can say what they like on their website about their warranty, in Ireland EU law overrides it.
    No. We did not enact that law.

    We did not have to enact it, it's an EU wide law already enacted by the EU, which automatically applies to us as we are part of the EU. Our specific laws extend your opportunity to make a claim to 6 years.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,512 ✭✭✭runawaybishop


    I never said it's an either/or.
    They have a specific part for every country, bar Liechtenstein, so you can see what extra guarantees you have in those countries. In Ireland, that extra guarantee goes up to 6 years.

    And Apple can say what they like on their website about their warranty, in Ireland EU law overrides it.


    We did not have to enact it, it's an EU wide law already enacted by the EU, which automatically applies to us as we are part of the EU. Our specific laws extend your opportunity to make a claim to 6 years.

    No, this is wrong. There is no 2 year guarantee on goods in Ireland as our existing laws are stronger than that so we did not enact it.

    This pops up every few months, it's tedious. Go show in our statue books exactly were the 2 year guarantee is.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,899 ✭✭✭✭28064212


    We did not have to enact it, it's an EU wide law already enacted by the EU, which automatically applies to us as we are part of the EU. Our specific laws extend your opportunity to make a claim to 6 years.
    An EU directive is not a law. It requires members to achieve a particular result via their own laws. The law that applies in court is the members' laws.

    An EU regulation is a directly applicable law.

    Boardsie Enhancement Suite - a browser extension to make using Boards on desktop a better experience (includes full-width display, keyboard shortcuts, dark mode, and more). Now available through your browser's extension store.

    Firefox: https://addons.mozilla.org/addon/boardsie-enhancement-suite/

    Chrome/Edge/Opera: https://chromewebstore.google.com/detail/boardsie-enhancement-suit/bbgnmnfagihoohjkofdnofcfmkpdmmce



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 15,109 Mod ✭✭✭✭whiterebel


    28064212 wrote: »
    An EU directive is not a law. It requires members to achieve a particular result via their own laws. The law that applies in court is the members' laws.

    An EU regulation is a directly applicable law.

    This is correct.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,792 ✭✭✭Mark Hamill


    No, this is wrong. There is no 2 year guarantee on goods in Ireland as our existing laws are stronger than that so we did not enact it.

    This pops up every few months, it's tedious. Go show in our statue books exactly were the 2 year guarantee is.

    The 2 years is included in our existing laws which mention 6 years. We already had laws that said up to 6 years, so we did not need to do anything when the EU brought in the directive for a minimum of 2.
    28064212 wrote: »
    An EU directive is not a law. It requires members to achieve a particular result via their own laws. The law that applies in court is the members' laws.

    An EU regulation is a directly applicable law.

    Yes, but in this case, what is the difference? The EU directive is that EU states give minimum of 2 years guarantee. Ireland already gives more than 2 years, so we did not need to amend or add anything to legislature.
    For the purposes of this discussion, and particularly shaveAbullock's post where they said:
    It's over 1 year old. It's covered under law for 12 months
    the law is that it (the OPs laptop) is covered for a minimum of 2 years (with up to 6 years possible in Ireland, if they can argue it).


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,899 ✭✭✭✭28064212


    Yes, but in this case, what is the difference? The EU directive is that EU states give minimum of 2 years guarantee. Ireland already gives more than 2 years, so we did not need to amend or add anything to legislature.
    Where does Ireland give more than 2 years guarantee? The 6 years is purely a limit on the timeline for claiming. There is no minimum guarantee in Irish legislation

    Boardsie Enhancement Suite - a browser extension to make using Boards on desktop a better experience (includes full-width display, keyboard shortcuts, dark mode, and more). Now available through your browser's extension store.

    Firefox: https://addons.mozilla.org/addon/boardsie-enhancement-suite/

    Chrome/Edge/Opera: https://chromewebstore.google.com/detail/boardsie-enhancement-suit/bbgnmnfagihoohjkofdnofcfmkpdmmce



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,512 ✭✭✭runawaybishop


    The 2 years is included in our existing laws which mention 6 years. We already had laws that said up to 6 years, so we did not need to do anything when the EU brought in the directive for a minimum of 2.


    Yes, but in this case, what is the difference? The EU directive is that EU states give minimum of 2 years guarantee. Ireland already gives more than 2 years, so we did not need to amend or add anything to legislature.
    For the purposes of this discussion, and particularly shaveAbullock's post where they said:

    the law is that it (the OPs laptop) is covered for a minimum of 2 years (with up to 6 years possible in Ireland, if they can argue it).

    This is all wrong, you have up to 6 years to claim. Goods must be of merchantable quality, that does not mean a 1 euro pair of headphones has a 2 year guarantee.

    The EU law you keep mentioning does not apply in Ireland.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 71,113 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    Legal Discussion forum for that debate please - no more arguments about 2 vs 6.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 461 ✭✭Drodan


    My previous job for 2.5 years was dealing with these exact type of complaints, few thoughts on what have been posted and unfortunately may not be too popular.

    There is a 2 year warranty with the manufacturer for goods purchased within the EU (for most products but there can be exceptions, mostly if the seller/manufacturer have a built in extended warranty which is adhoc per company and not standardized). What PC World are doing is indeed correct. You'd have a guarantee with them for particular period, usually 30 days, but as they are an authorised retailer once those 30 days are up they are correct to advise customer to contact the manufacturer directly. You would have to ship the product to the manufacturer yourself with shipping costs incurred by yourself which may only be refundable if a manufacturing flaw is present and a refund is offered (which does not have to be cash etc and can be "store credit".

    The shop are also correct in saying they cannot deal with the manufacturer directly for the customer as their responsibility within the sales contract is expired. Even if somehow they do agree to act as a 3rd party go between for the manufacturer and the customer, which they will not I cannot stress that enough, they would be assuming responsibility for the product during the shipping and handling of the product from there on out. No company would take on that responsibility.

    Basically OP, you'll have to go collect the product, contact the manufacturer and go through their 3rd party retailer flawed product procedure. They have to engage with you on it, but it is up to you to act on it. Being a frontline hospital worker myself now I understand not wanting to make trips to shops etc, but you have no choice to be honest, if you want your product assessed and repaired, you have to follow the rules in place. My main advise is that when shipping to the manufacturer to use a trackable/traceable courier/postal service on the off chance the parcel goes missing during shipping, that way you'll at the very least have some comeback with whatever shipping method you use, as unlikely as it can be.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 839 ✭✭✭mk7r


    Drodan wrote: »
    My previous job for 2.5 years was dealing with these exact type of complaints, few thoughts on what have been posted and unfortunately may not be too popular.

    There is a 2 year warranty with the manufacturer for goods purchased within the EU (for most products but there can be exceptions, mostly if the seller/manufacturer have a built in extended warranty which is adhoc per company and not standardized). What PC World are doing is indeed correct. You'd have a guarantee with them for particular period, usually 30 days, but as they are an authorised retailer once those 30 days are up they are correct to advise customer to contact the manufacturer directly. You would have to ship the product to the manufacturer yourself with shipping costs incurred by yourself which may only be refundable if a manufacturing flaw is present and a refund is offered (which does not have to be cash etc and can be "store credit".

    The shop are also correct in saying they cannot deal with the manufacturer directly for the customer as their responsibility within the sales contract is expired. Even if somehow they do agree to act as a 3rd party go between for the manufacturer and the customer, which they will not I cannot stress that enough, they would be assuming responsibility for the product during the shipping and handling of the product from there on out. No company would take on that responsibility.

    Basically OP, you'll have to go collect the product, contact the manufacturer and go through their 3rd party retailer flawed product procedure. They have to engage with you on it, but it is up to you to act on it. Being a frontline hospital worker myself now I understand not wanting to make trips to shops etc, but you have no choice to be honest, if you want your product assessed and repaired, you have to follow the rules in place. My main advise is that when shipping to the manufacturer to use a trackable/traceable courier/postal service on the off chance the parcel goes missing during shipping, that way you'll at the very least have some comeback with whatever shipping method you use, as unlikely as it can be.

    Almost none of that post is accurate. The EU thing is true but not in Ireland, we have not enacted it as our consumer protection is stronger. They DO have to deal with you and can't fob you off to the manufacturer, this nonsense about 30 days is just that..... Also you cannot be out of pocket for shipping etc, store credit wont cut it so they can use prepay labels or reimburse you directly.
    However you may find it easier and less stressful to go to the manufacturer yourself if they are not playing ball.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 71,113 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    Drodan wrote: »
    My previous job for 2.5 years was dealing with these exact type of complaints, few thoughts on what have been posted and unfortunately may not be too popular.

    There is a 2 year warranty with the manufacturer for goods purchased within the EU (for most products but there can be exceptions, mostly if the seller/manufacturer have a built in extended warranty which is adhoc per company and not standardized). What PC World are doing is indeed correct. You'd have a guarantee with them for particular period, usually 30 days, but as they are an authorised retailer once those 30 days are up they are correct to advise customer to contact the manufacturer directly. You would have to ship the product to the manufacturer yourself with shipping costs incurred by yourself which may only be refundable if a manufacturing flaw is present and a refund is offered (which does not have to be cash etc and can be "store credit".

    The shop are also correct in saying they cannot deal with the manufacturer directly for the customer as their responsibility within the sales contract is expired. Even if somehow they do agree to act as a 3rd party go between for the manufacturer and the customer, which they will not I cannot stress that enough, they would be assuming responsibility for the product during the shipping and handling of the product from there on out. No company would take on that responsibility.

    Basically OP, you'll have to go collect the product, contact the manufacturer and go through their 3rd party retailer flawed product procedure. They have to engage with you on it, but it is up to you to act on it. Being a frontline hospital worker myself now I understand not wanting to make trips to shops etc, but you have no choice to be honest, if you want your product assessed and repaired, you have to follow the rules in place. My main advise is that when shipping to the manufacturer to use a trackable/traceable courier/postal service on the off chance the parcel goes missing during shipping, that way you'll at the very least have some comeback with whatever shipping method you use, as unlikely as it can be.

    Your "thoughts" are wildly inaccurate and look like the contents of a customer service training manual from another country

    You were wildly breaching consumers rights if you actually enforced this


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,899 ✭✭✭✭28064212


    mk7r wrote: »
    Almost none of that post is accurate. The EU thing is true
    Even that part's not correct, because they said it's with the manufacturer. It's the retailer who has to provide the legal guarantee.

    Boardsie Enhancement Suite - a browser extension to make using Boards on desktop a better experience (includes full-width display, keyboard shortcuts, dark mode, and more). Now available through your browser's extension store.

    Firefox: https://addons.mozilla.org/addon/boardsie-enhancement-suite/

    Chrome/Edge/Opera: https://chromewebstore.google.com/detail/boardsie-enhancement-suit/bbgnmnfagihoohjkofdnofcfmkpdmmce



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,868 ✭✭✭Ten Pin


    What PC World are doing is indeed correct. You'd have a guarantee with them for particular period, usually 30 days, but as they are an authorised retailer once those 30 days are up they are correct to advise customer to contact the manufacturer directly. You would have to ship the product to the manufacturer yourself with shipping costs incurred by yourself which may only be refundable if a manufacturing flaw is present and a refund is offered (which does not have to be cash etc and can be "store credit".

    This reads more like a change of mind policy but it's unsurprising that some retailers may use it as a tactic to put people off exercising their statutory rights.

    The subject of this thread is goods that have developed a fault.


  • Advertisement
Advertisement