Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on [email protected] for help. Thanks :)
Hello All, This is just a friendly reminder to read the Forum Charter where you wish to post before posting in it. :)
Hi all, The AutoSave Draft feature is now disabled across the site. The decision to disable the feature was made via a poll last year. The delay in putting it in place was due to a bug/update issue. This should serve as a reminder to manually save your drafts if you wish to keep them. Thanks, The Boards Team.

9/11 conspiracy theories with evidence, 2020 edition

2»

Comments

  • #32
    weisses
    Registered Users Posts: 9,234 ✭✭✭ weisses


    King Mob wrote: »
    Yes, evidence for conspiracy theories.
    Of which you've none.

    Yes NIST lied when they produce their 3 stage collapse theory, because it conflicts with their other theory.I do not know as why they would do that other then to save face, or having to really look into CD.

    The evidence is their whole investigation vs their admittance to free fall.. Because as evidence is showing the first leaves no room for the latter.

    Or dont you understand the evidence ?


  • #33
    weisses
    Registered Users Posts: 9,234 ✭✭✭ weisses


    King Mob wrote: »
    There's no reason for the NIST to lie in their own report. It's been proven that there was no demolition, so there's nothing for them to hide.

    That is a cop out because it was never really investigated
    King Mob wrote: »
    If they did lie, they would be exposed easily when the NIST report was peer reviewed and/or cited in the dozens of following peer reviewed papers.
    It doesn't make sense for why they would rule out free fall or why they would then also confirm it after ruling it out.

    And yet their own investigation rules that out ...

    Can you explain any of those issues?

    I did by referencing directly to their own investigation


  • #34
    weisses
    Registered Users Posts: 9,234 ✭✭✭ weisses


    Just in case you missed this one

    first point: Does the NIST collapse computer model allow for free fall yes or no? simple question which has not been answered really


  • #35
    quickbeam
    Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 16,286 Mod ✭✭✭✭ quickbeam


    weisses wrote: »
    Just in case you missed this one

    first point: Does the NIST collapse computer model allow for free fall yes or no? simple question which has not been answered really

    Mod: Please stay on topic.


  • #36
    Dohnjoe
    Registered Users Posts: 16,216 ✭✭✭✭ Dohnjoe


    Alternative theories only please


  • Advertisement
  • #37
    mr_fegelien
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,483 ✭✭✭ mr_fegelien


    Here's an interesting image I saw on 4chan. True or not?

    file.php?40,file=252236,filename=1473566280229.jpg


  • #38
    King Mob
    Registered Users Posts: 24,326 ✭✭✭✭ King Mob


    mr_fegelien wrote: »
    Here's an interesting image I saw on 4chan. True or not?
    ]
    This image is very silly and contains mostly distortions and half truths.
    It presents debunked and ridiculous arguments like the "pull it" thing.
    It does not present a coherent theory and neither are you.

    I'm not sure what you find interesting about it or why you would believe something you found on 4chan.


Advertisement