Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Aer Lingus Fleet/ Routes Discussion Pt 2 (ALL possible routes included)

Options
18081838586220

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 22 Coffeelock2020


    Indeed - this summer EI are operating a 2 aircraft base out of Cork vs summer 2019 they had 4

    Very disappointing for staff and the loyal customer base they have in the south yet only offering 7 routes in peak summer



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Cork had a much reduced Winter schedule as well. Looks to be the same next year or maybe EI can add capacity yet.



  • Registered Users Posts: 22 Coffeelock2020


    Yes agreed

    3 aircraft would be understandable for this summer even during peak May to Sept

    2 for peak summer ops is shocking



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,228 ✭✭✭kevinandrew


    Cork was always going to be very tricky for Aer Lingus post-pandemic restrictions.

    The airline had stagnated at Cork long before the pandemic. It had been stuck at 3-4 based aircraft for a number of years with no prospect of considerable growth. New routes that weren’t typical sun destinations usually failed, competition on its existing network was increasing and new entrants were arriving.

    When the pandemic came along, Cork was essentially closed with just a skeleton network by Aer Lingus and Ryanair. Restarting from zero was always going to be a challenge but for Aer Lingus it was even more difficult because they had felt the full force of Irish government restrictions whereas Ryanair’s size and pan-European network enabled more flexibility.

    While Aer Lingus continues to rebuild and naturally focuses its attention on Dublin, Ryanair is able to sweep up at Cork and Shannon.

    It remains to be seen if Ryanair is committed to Cork and Shannon at this level long term, we’ve seen time and time again how they treat smaller airports but it’s even more doubtful that Aer Lingus, with its current short haul strategy, will ever be able to return to the relatively modest levels it had there before the pandemic.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Not sure about ORK, but SNN have a long term deal with FR until 2029. So hopefully they can keep comitted to it and continue adding new routes.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 4,166 Mod ✭✭✭✭Locker10a


    Indeed, although EI are back at Shannon with I think more capacity than 2019!? Hopefully they’ll show some of this ambition for Cork next year



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,160 ✭✭✭goingnowhere


    The 'new' routes ex SNN to CDG/BCN are still in the website as Shannon routes but no schedule, these would be A321NEO out and back trips while one of the A321's would have been sitting between flights. SNN is getting the routes by accident really, they might cover the fuel/crew costs probably not hugely profitable but the aircraft costs money just sitting at the gate, probably some TATL connecting business as CDG/BCN seemed to drive a lot of traffic through DUB



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,521 ✭✭✭Noxegon


    EI is offering evening-before check in again:

    https://www.aerlingus.com/travel-information/check-in-options/airport/

    While it's good to see something here, I think there'd be rather more value to it if it was open until 9pm/10pm so that those not living in Swords and Portmarnock could use it without having to deal with rush hour traffic.

    I develop Superior Solitaire when I'm not procrastinating on boards.ie.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    CDG/BCN haven’t / won’t get off the ground from Shannon. One of the NEO is operating the early LHR while the other stays in SNN. SNN has no increase in EI flights this year. They say increase on T/A flights but it’s just JFK going from 6 weekly to daily. The seasonal routes EI used to operate from SNN-ACE/AGP/FAO are gone. It’s only JFK, BOS & LHR operating from Shannon. The cabin crew base is gone as well. So it’s got very much reduced flights as well.

    CDG/BCN aren’t bookable from SNN on the website and probably need to be removed.



  • Registered Users Posts: 874 ✭✭✭HTCOne


    CDG/BCN were due to be operated by the based A320 in the morning, as the early LHR rotation was being taken over by a NEO. Is the 320 operating the 2 later LHR rotations on a W pattern from DUB now, ie no based 320 anymore?



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Yeah no 320 in Shannon anymore. It’s just 2 X 321 NEO operating JFK, BOS & LHR. The later two LHR rotations are operated on a W leg from DUB. The 320 operates DUB-LHR-SNN-LHR-SNN-LHR and then operates LHR DUB the next day after overnighting in LHR.



  • Registered Users Posts: 17,642 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    Correct - the aircraft does an early morning rotation out of Dublin, then flies to LHR, and does two return trips to SNN and back before overnighting in LHR, and then returning to DUB the next morning.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,542 ✭✭✭California Dreamer


    I hear that 2 or 3x320 neos coming over the summer originally destined for a Russian customer!



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,871 ✭✭✭Chris_5339762


    I think it stagnated due to lack of aircraft, or just plain not bothering. They didn't add any good new routes for ages, wheras Ryanair did. Then Zurich came along from Swiss (AL could have done that) or do Frankfurt with Lufthansa.


    Or Munich. Ski destination early in the year only. No service from Cork to Munich with AL during the summer or during the Christmas Market season, and that hasn't changed for years. I just don't think they're bothered with Cork - they didn't even bring back Paris for heavens sake.


    Ryanair just came in with "we are re-launching our entire pre-pandemic route network" and Aer Lingus just didn't bother.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    I think EI are going with the IAG model and focusing on DUB. Theres pressure on them I’d say to keep routes and presence in SNN and ORK



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,228 ✭✭✭kevinandrew


    In order to make the likes of FRA or ZRH work long term, you need a good schedule, daily is ideal. Unfortunately there’s no way Aer Lingus would fill a daily A320 to Zurich or Frankfurt on a point to point basis only, it’s too big an aircraft and they lack the onward feed. Note that AF, LH and LX have come in with their regional jets. There’s no way Aer Lingus could compete.

    I also don’t think Aer Lingus is in the business of being “not bothered” and really can’t afford to be. If they could make Cork work with their current model and product, they would, but they’ve been outmanoeuvred by Ryanair with its size, and the European flag carriers with their smaller aircraft, better product and extensive hub networks.

    This isn’t unique to Cork either, we’ve seen it at Dublin with Aer Lingus being squeezed from all sides on various routes, AMS being a good example. It really should be a wake up call that maybe the short haul fleet lacks flexibility for the changing market. The A320 is a fine machine on bread and butter routes or sunshine destinations but on everything else it becomes the struggle bus.

    I think in the long term Aer Lingus needs to reassess its European business in the same way they did their regional network. The deal with Aer Arann helped Aer Lingus claw back market share from Ryanair. A similar situation could be replicated in Europe to support the core mainline network while fully realising the transatlantic hub potential and maintaining a strong presence in Cork and Shannon.



  • Registered Users Posts: 344 ✭✭Shamrockj


    The reality is their goal is 90% of 2019 levels, so 10% cut has to come from somewhere and that is why there is a much smaller schedule from Cork. They don’t have the same amount of aircraft they did before many aircraft have left the business. The 3 A321CEO, -LAX, - EWR plus the remaining -200s still in storage and a number of 320s have left also



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 4,166 Mod ✭✭✭✭Locker10a


    That’s interesting!

    I wonder will the be used to add capacity or swapped to replace older 320s straight away



  • Registered Users Posts: 401 ✭✭NH2013


    Given the shortage of pilots and crew to operate even the current schedule I'm guessing we won't see much in the way of additional capacity this year, seems to be quite the bottle neck for Aer Lingus, always behind the curve when it comes to hiring enough people to run the schedule, even back before COVID and the current hiring issues. Guessing this means the best we could probably hope for is for them to replace older A320s and perhaps those A320s could act as spare aircraft for the summer for any tech issues.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,228 ✭✭✭kevinandrew


    I see Aer Lingus has stitched a small clear pocket into the back of their standard A320 seat, to hold the new tri-fold style safety card.

    It seems a little unnecessary, I’m guessing it was to stop the new safety card getting lost in the larger standard pocket or maybe to remove it completely to reduce weight/cleaning but it looks pretty tacky staring at a safety card and sick bag all flight.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 2,499 ✭✭✭Jack1985


    Don't know a part of the industry without a real staffing crisis at the moment... But to be fair EI have at least since Summer 2012 run an extremely tight staffing for Summer schedules.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,499 ✭✭✭Jack1985


    Don't like it either, but it will stop people dumping rubbish on the floor or in pockets which anyone would welcome. (well me anyway😶)



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 4,166 Mod ✭✭✭✭Locker10a


    I could never understand why but people absolutely can’t seem to get enough of storing their passports, wallets, phones, tablets, macs etc in seat pockets and subsequently leaving them behind when they disembark.

    Would honestly happy once or twice a day



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,521 ✭✭✭Noxegon


    For me the words "better product" are key here. Call a spade a spade – the short haul experience on Aer Lingus these days is more or less equivalent to Ryanair, but without the punctuality or low fares.

    I develop Superior Solitaire when I'm not procrastinating on boards.ie.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,499 ✭✭✭Jack1985


    RE punctuality, EI are the top OTP performer ex-DUB and will inevitability remain so judging by whoever block scheduled the majority of FR's DUB op's this Summer...



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,228 ✭✭✭kevinandrew


    Personally I still find Aer Lingus a notch above Ryanair but the basic product is essentially the same so it comes down to the finer details. The other so called legacy carriers are also quickly catching on too by introducing buy on board catering, changing baggage rules and having a heavier focus on ancillary revenue.

    The overall product of these carriers still remains above Aer Lingus however; better frequent flyer programmes, lounges, flight times, boarding procedures and ‘proper’ short haul business cabins. The service delivery from start to finish is also more polished than Aer Lingus all at very competitive fares, these things make a difference.

    What bothers me most is that it really wouldn’t take Aer Lingus much to bring it up another notch. It has all the ingredients but rarely implements new initiatives or products well.

    Meanwhile the jewel in the IAG crown, British Airways, is having yet another system failure at Heathrow. Ouch.



  • Registered Users Posts: 14,432 ✭✭✭✭cson


    Lets not start calling eurobiz 'proper' when it comes to short haul business! 😅



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,521 ✭✭✭Noxegon


    When I flew Icelandair from DUB-KEF a few months ago I paid about a 40% supplement on the base fare to sit in Saga Premium, which is a 2+2 arrangement compared to 3+3 in the back.

    If Aer Lingus (or indeed anyone else) offered something like that I'd take it in a heartbeat.

    I develop Superior Solitaire when I'm not procrastinating on boards.ie.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,228 ✭✭✭kevinandrew


    A well known YouTube flight reviewer/blogger is flying Aer Lingus to the US today but has been told immediately by crew there is absolutely no filming allowed.

    Obviously he has said he will comply with the rules but it has left a sour taste which is now shared with many of his followers on social media, some reporting their own similar experiences with Aer Lingus.

    I understand cabin crew have a right to privacy and nobody wants to be filmed while at work but the way in which crew inform passengers of this rule appears increasingly hostile. It seems there’s an assumption by crew and the airline that staff are going to be filmed when this is rarely the case. The airline may need to reconsider how strictly this rule is enforced and train staff accordingly because today they’ve missed out on some potentially great publicity and have actually attracted negative attention.

    Other airlines and their crews are happy to accommodate such videos and reviews, whether they’re impromptu or not.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 10,692 ✭✭✭✭Jamie2k9


    Not as if he films crew directly and not sure they are stop you filming either.

    Hopefully a better crew on BOS leg.



Advertisement