Gameweek 15 Match Day thread

Mosie Kean misses a great chance too.

End to end now.

km79

km79 wrote: »

wtf is mane at there

I do think Pickford got hands on his feet and it was enough.

Had he gone down it would have been a peno.

shmeee

Origi 3
Mane 2
Shaqiri 1

As it stands on the BPS

SlickRic

Wijnaldum (Firmino)

matthewmurdock

Didn't realise the deadline was last night and left the captaincy on Harry Kane. I'd get rid of him now but they have Burnley at home this weekend, and I want to be disappointed again.

km79

matthewmurdock wrote: »

Didn't realise the deadline was last night and left the captaincy on Harry Kane. I'd get rid of him now but they have Burnley at home this weekend, and I want to be disappointed again.

Well I am sure you won't be disappointed so
He was terrible again

castletownman

Since Tomori didn't play in my starting back three, with Abraham my first sub (appeared to be injured), and my next defender (Dan Burn) my last sub, does Tammy come in for Tomori, or is it the nearest available defender? Confused and fingers-crossed its the former

extra gravy

Everton into the relegation zone...new manager bounce incoming.

km79

62 assuming bonus stay same
Double blades defence to go

shmeee

castletownman wrote: »

Since Tomori didn't play in my starting back three, with Abraham my first sub (appeared to be injured), and my next defender (Dan Burn) my last sub, does Tammy come in for Tomori, or is it the nearest available defender? Confused and fingers-crossed its the former

Have to have 3 defender's in your team

munster87

castletownman wrote: »

Since Tomori didn't play in my starting back three, with Abraham my first sub (appeared to be injured), and my next defender (Dan Burn) my last sub, does Tammy come in for Tomori, or is it the nearest available defender? Confused and fingers-crossed its the former

Burn is your last sub? Who is your second sub?

castletownman

munster87 wrote: »

Burn is your last sub? Who is your second sub?

Subs: Pope, Abraham, Matip (inj), Burn.

Lundstram and Mousset to go

Cypher_sounds

55 with Lundstram to go.

2 free transfers will be put to use I’m thinking.

munster87

castletownman wrote: »

Subs: Pope, Abraham, Matip (inj), Burn

Yeah Burn comes in. Minimum 3 defenders needed.

castletownman

castletownman wrote: »

Subs: Pope, Abraham, Matip (inj), Burn.

Lundstram and Mousset to go

It'll be burn.

km79

castletownman wrote: »

Subs: Pope, Abraham, Matip (inj), Burn

What I am about to tell you is going to burn................


You have to have 3 defenders
So even if Burn doesn't play Abraham will not come in

castletownman

km79 wrote: »

What I am about to tell you is going to burn................


You have to have 3 defenders
So even if Burn doesn't play Abraham will not come in

It'll be grand. Sheffield Utd will win 2-0, with Lundstram and Mousset scoring and assisting one each, while Burn will CS at the Emirates

matthewmurdock

That rule actually helps me as I played 3 at the back with Tomori not playing, but Rico comes in with 9 points even though he isn't my first sub.

SlickRic

54 with Lord Lunny and Saka to come.

Treading water again.

Cartman78

45 with Lord Lundy to play and Rico to sub in....seems average enough

siblers

54 with Lundstrum and Ryan to go. Average and disappointing

CSF

Did Kane show anything to suggest I should be bringing him in with an eye to captaining him? The performance at the weekend put the doubts in and a blank today doesn’t help the cause.

matthewmurdock

Tumbled down the table the last few weeks in the paid league so needed a decent week.

Despite Kane as captain, 75 after the projected bonuses and Rico coming in, in place of Tomori. Lundstram to play.

Should see me make up some ground.

matthewmurdock

CSF wrote: »

Did Kane show anything to suggest I should be bringing him in with an eye to captaining him? The performance at the weekend put the doubts in and a blank today doesn’t help the cause.

I've had him as captain the last 2 games and am fighting the urge to rage remove him.

He is still a differential but the wrong kind of one at the moment. They have Wolves away and Chelsea after Burnley so if you didn't have him already I wouldn't personally be bringing him in.

He drops so deep under Mourinho, like McGoldrick does for Sheffield United. Rarely near the goal.

50 with 2 to play. Lundstram and captain Lacazette.

A predicted drop of 6k down to 13k.

And that’s from a high of 4K in GW 13.

This game is relentless.

I wavered on a couple of decisions (didn’t bring in Alli and Aurier for a hit) and gambled on Lacazette for my Abraham replacement.

I had Ings, Jesus and Kane on my shortlist to replace Abraham so captain Lacazette is carrying a lot of my hopes, and worries, tomorrow.

I’m off now to take that hit for Alli and Aurier.

CSF

matthewmurdock wrote: »

I've had him as captain the last 2 games and am fighting the urge to rage remove him.

He is still a differential but the wrong kind of one at the moment. They have Wolves away and Chelsea after Burnley so if you didn't have him already I wouldn't personally be bringing him in.

He drops so deep under Mourinho, like McGoldrick does for Sheffield United. Rarely near the goal.

So no further forward than Saturday tonight then?

CSF

CSF wrote: »

Did Kane show anything to suggest I should be bringing him in with an eye to captaining him? The performance at the weekend put the doubts in and a blank today doesn’t help the cause.

No he didn’t show anything.

It’s Son or Alli from what I’ve seen.

Don’t think I’d buy Kane now even if he was 9m.

Fitz*

My transfers for a -8 included Alli & Ings who both scored makes me happy. But they were were for Mount & Abraham who both scored so it's bad. 5 & 9 on the bench while 2 X 2 start.

Triple captain Vardy..... At least he got some returns.

Double Sheffield United defence let's go.

km79

CSF wrote: »

Did Kane show anything to suggest I should be bringing him in with an eye to captaining him? The performance at the weekend put the doubts in and a blank today doesn’t help the cause.

Absolutely not

km79

CSF wrote: »

So no further forward than Saturday tonight then?

No
That’s his game now it seems