10 Player Secret Role

tusk

quickbeam wrote: »

Jaysus Tusk. You gave me a fright there!!

So long GnR!

I have to entertain myself too like :P

MrKingsley

tusk wrote: »

Green&Red has been munched, murderised, obliterated, extinguished, annihilated, deadified, unalived.

GNR WAS A WOLFhunting nrv

You duped me anyway Tusk. Well played.

Right so. We have lost our most active villager and the one who caught the 1st wolf.

Baggly has yet to surface today yeah?

Spook have you just played a blinder in tunneling one way yet throwing your claws in another?

I firmly believe Fixxxer now as there would be no point using the cure on a goodie(wouldve known if GnR was a wolf). Although if they were a wolf this would be a great way to essentially clear themselves.........hmmmmm

quickbeam

So, if GnR is good, can Fixxxer be bad? Would mean the role went to a wolf. GnR said he was definitely poisoned and cured. So why would Fixxxer do that? He could just kill a villager and be done with it and say nothing, and possibly even lay the blame at me, who was claiming a role (and I'd voted for GnR first lynch too, so I had "motive"). Or, to gain villager cred, poison and cure him? Maybe, but jaysus ... I don't want to believe that, tbh.

So Fixxxer still good.

I'm good.

Clara was convinced neither Fixxxer or GnR would be munched and was wrong. Was she playing the "ignorant" wolf? Were the wolves actually intending to kill somebody else, but changed to GnR to make Clara look bad?

GnR, who is now Lock Clear, said Kingsley or Baggly.

But don't forget Spook either.

Clarabel

tusk wrote: »

Green&Red has been munched, murderised, obliterated, extinguished, annihilated, deadified, unalived.

GNR WAS A WOLFhunting nrv

Khal we have our answer, for a friend. Mad!

quickbeam

Clarabel wrote: »

Khal we have our answer, for a friend. Mad!

Wut?

Clarabel

I'm now between Baggly and QB

quickbeam

Clarabel wrote: »

I'm now between Baggly and QB

Why?

Clarabel

khalessi wrote: »

Dearest Tusk

In a scale if mad very mad and off your rocker

Where do you place your modding hat?

Asking for a friend

quickbeam wrote: »

Why?

...

MrKingsley

quickbeam wrote: »

So, if GnR is good, can Fixxxer be bad? Would mean the role went to a wolf. GnR said he was definitely poisoned and cured. So why would Fixxxer do that? He could just kill a villager and be done with it and say nothing, and possibly even lay the blame at me, who was claiming a role (and I'd voted for GnR first lynch too, so I had "motive"). Or, to gain villager cred, poison and cure him? Maybe, but jaysus ... I don't want to believe that, tbh.

This angle would be pure genius if true.

Is there anyway it could be refuted?

If Fixxxer is the second wolf and the poison was the role then they would know that any claim otherwise would be full of guff.

quickbeam

Clarabel wrote: »

...

Okay. Helluva memory. Though you didn't remember calling yourself the little boy down the well.

Clarabel

quickbeam wrote: »

Why?

You're playing differently. I don't really see you wolf hunting, few comments here and there. I think a wolf could claim a role and pretend she was covering for the village.

Baggly as GnR said is too cool for skool

Mr K as the alternative I think is wolf hunting

quickbeam

MrKingsley wrote: »

This angle would be pure genius if true.

Is there anyway it could be refuted?

If Fixxxer is the second wolf and the poison was the role then they would know that any claim otherwise would be full of guff.

Genius indeed and I'll happily bare him my throat to munch on if he did.

Role had to be good though and Fixx is good.

"had to be" as in, I strongly believe it is, rather than have any proof in the matter.

Clarabel

quickbeam wrote: »

Okay. Helluva memory. Though you didn't remember calling yourself the little boy down the well.

Ah here, I cannot help what I can and cannot remember.

quickbeam

Clarabel wrote: »

You're playing differently. I don't really see you wolf hunting, few comments here and there. I think a wolf could claim a role and pretend she was covering for the village.

Baggly as GnR said is too cool for skool

Mr K as the alternative I think is wolf hunting

People accuse me Every Single Game of playing differently :P

Baggly

Guys im sorry ive a sinus infection and my heart just isnt in the game. Im an NRV so my job at this stage is to beg you not to kill me, as i dont think we have lynches to spare. But tbh im too tired and ive too much work to do with this infection to put my usual effort into self pres and defence. I'm just knackered and dont want to drop out because Tusk has already had to sub someone in.

MrKingsley

Baggly wrote: »

Guys im sorry ive a sinus infection and my heart just isnt in the game. Im an NRV so my job at this stage is to beg you not to kill me, as i dont think we have lynches to spare. But tbh im too tired and ive too much work to do with this infection to put my usual effort into self pres and defence. I'm just knackered and dont want to drop out because Tusk has already had to sub someone in.

Fair enough Baggly. That sounds rotten. No need to apologise though

quickbeam

Barney is down as a sub in the sign-up thread. If you really can't play I wonder would he take over. I don't really wanna dismiss you as a suspect just because you're sick.

fixXxer

Tusk you absolute ****ing bastard of a ****e i had a heart attack reading that.

Work has ****ed me over today so I wont be on much.

I'd say have a look at Sppoky, then Clara & QB as my next suspects.

fixXxer

Also, RIP GnR

Clarabel

Can we talk about Spookie?




Actually QB, your post just repeats what others have said and doesn't say what you think.

Where's your head at now?

then can we talk about Spookie

MrKingsley

fixxxer wrote: »

Tusk you absolute ****ing bastard of a ****e i had a heart attack reading that.

Work has ****ed me over today so I wont be on much.

I'd say have a look at Sppoky, then Clara & QB as my next suspects.

Could I ask why not me?

I can’t rule out the idea that you have played an absolute wolfie blinder here

Clarabel

MrKingsley wrote: »

Could I ask why not me?

I can’t rule out the idea that you have played an absolute wolfie blinder here

Not fixxxer, we have no counter.

I would ask if there is a counter to come out so that we can leave Fixxxer alone for the day and actually find a wolf

MrKingsley

Clarabel wrote: »

Not fixxxer, we have no counter.

I would ask if there is a counter to come out so that we can leave Fixxxer alone for the day and actually find a wolf

Ok but what if the poison was the role and he did it to appear clear to the village?

quickbeam

fixxxer wrote: »

I'd say have a look at Sppoky, then Clara & QB as my next suspects.

Not Baggly or Kingsley? Why?

Clarabel

MrKingsley wrote: »

Ok but what if the poison was the role and he did it to appear clear to the village?

as in the role was bad?

MrKingsley

Clarabel wrote: »

as in the role was bad?

Exactly. If the role was bad then 2 wolves would make sense.

In this scenario QB makes the claim. Fixxxer doesn’t need to refute it as they know it’s bull. It would also make QB look bad going forward for making a false claim.

Then save GnR who they know to be good and essentially be cleared by GnR as village a result.

It’s very improbable but I don’t think it can be ruled out.

Also Fixxxer not suggesting to look at me could be the beginning of them getting ready for the lynch tonight. They would probably only need support from 1 other to be safe

Having said all that I will leave it there for the minute and see what they say in response.

Spook next as you say

fixXxer

quickbeam wrote: »

Not Baggly or Kingsley? Why?

Baggly I don't think would using being sick and announcing himself on thread as NVR to hide being a wolf.

Kingsley didn't say anything that's caught my eye, simple as that.

Your hard claim earlier makes me think of you QB. It was a very unsubtle claim, unlike what sKieth was doing around the same time. I know you can be subtle and smooth when you want to be so I'm wondering if we went along with the thought that you were trying to take one for the village a little too easily.

quickbeam

fixxxer wrote: »

Your hard claim earlier makes me think of you QB. It was a very unsubtle claim, unlike what sKieth was doing around the same time. I know you can be subtle and smooth when you want to be so I'm wondering if we went along with the thought that you were trying to take one for the village a little too easily.

I'm usually better at being subtle when I'm a wolf. I've often tried to draw the munch as an NRV (I've only succeeded once though IIRC, in a live game), but it didn't happen because I was subtle. When I've hinted at a role it's either not believed or missed. So yeah, I went for the balls out version. One day I'll actually have a role and do the same.

But ... your accusation is reasonable and thank-you for your consideration. I hate accusations that are "gut" or "not playing like you normally do" (Clara :P) as there's not a lot that one can even say to claims like that. If I sound sarcy here, I don't mean to be. I genuinely appreciate an honest accusation.

Clarabel

QB I've given you a direct accusation, you have no passed your own opinion. I've asked you for yours and you've cloak and mirrored answering and saying I am "feeling" my accusation.

I am not accusing you, I am suspicious if you because you are appearing to post and give detailed answers and they are helpful but they are rehash of other posts.

Who do you think is a wolf and why?

Clarabel

tusk will not confirm if the role is good or bad. So whoever said that tusk/mod had confirmed that is likely lying. I think it was fixxxer - I'll go try find the post