Seansouth03 wrote: » I don’t think i actually love this girl anymore. I’m afraid about what her family my family etc will say if we do break up..
Big Bag of Chips wrote: » Good point by Ursus. Is your gf working? I know she's on maternity leave at the moment but does she intend returning to work? This is the perfect time for her to move to your area. It will give you both time to see how things are working. Although having a baby before you've ever lived together possibly wasn't the wisest decision. Now you have to try get used to living together for the first time and settling with a new baby. But, if you are still working in your home area, and she isn't working it makes more sense for the moment for you all to live in your area. You can continue working and over the next few months see where is going to work best for you all as a family.
Big Bag of Chips wrote: » Yes, but for the next 6 months while they find their feet and decide what to do longterm, they don't HAVE to live in her area. She's off work at the moment. She can temporarily move to you, OP. You can continue to work, and find your feet as a coupe living together for the first time, and then when the time comes for her to return to work decide what to do next. Any decision taken at any time doesn't have to be permanent.
PARlance wrote: » Surprised at the advice so far. I wouldn't be so flippant about leaving a mother and daughter to fend for themselves.
Sardonicat wrote: » You are contemplating a wanker move. No point in sugar coating it. Love and affection don't cut the mustard at 3 weeks old. If you are pulling your weight with the baby you shouldn't have time for your mates right now. You've been hit by reality, don't like it and want to bail. It's not about you anymore. It's not even about you and your partner anymore. Grow up !
Sardonicat wrote: » He can't be an active parent to a 3 week old if he's living hours away. That's just a fact. It's not the same as a couple splitting up after the kids are a few years old. He waits for the child to be born before realising he doesn't want to be with his partner? Rubbish! He's a man child who doesn't want the responsibility of parenthood. He just wants the love and affection part. And he wants his mommy and his mates.
The_Honeybadger wrote: » He probably should give it a go and see if it can work with his partner but I don’t think the opening post sounds good for their long term prospects. The needs of the child are paramount of course. That said the country is full of couples who stayed together for the sake of their children and it’s debatable in most cases whether the children benefit. Op I don’t know if I missed this but is there any reason she cannot rent her house and move in with you? She will be off work for a while presumably and it would mean less travelling time for you to and from work?
Seansouth03 wrote: » We spoke about that and she said no way... This is her home and her family is around here.. That would obviously be an ideal sceranio on a temporary basis but it's not a runner
lainey_d_123 wrote: » I'm not. This 'me feiner' mentality has slowly seeped into society and it's now widely accepted for people to leave a woman to cope alone with a new born baby because the father has decided he can't really be arsed with being a parent and he'd rather just think about himself.