Micky Jackson in trouble again

turbbo

Edgware wrote: »

Has Bubbles being asked to make a statement or has he been bought off too?

Poor bubbles!!!

turbbo

How do you know it's bedtime at MJ's house?

- When the big hand touches the little hand.

Deebles McBeebles

turbbo wrote: »

What was he doing with kids in his bed? - he's a nonce! end of. Wither these guys are looking for money or not. The fact remains he was seriously shady - what is unbelievable is he got away with it.

turbbo wrote: »

How do you know they didn't try?

turbbo wrote: »

Why was mickey so obsessed with kids - why? simple question? Didn't he pay $20 mill back in the day - old saying really applies here - "there is no smoke without a fire"

Deebles McBeebles wrote: »

Its not black and white though is it? If it was we wouldn't still be debating it. He would have been convicted and imprisoned. You and I, we don't know.

turbbo wrote: »

I did say dummies were debating.

Aye, better to post a joke that's older than most Boards users while blindly sticking to your convictions.

turbbo wrote: »

How do you know it's bedtime at MJ's house?

- When the big hand touches the little hand.

Leroy42

Boggles wrote: »

Jaysus, I asked you a very simple question and you bring up religious fundamentalists.

Can you not just answer it.

I asked what you would do by the way, not anyone else.

I have never been in that position, so very hard to answer.

I imagine that I would look for what I thought would be the most credible person I could put on the stand to speak in my defence. I would then work with that witness to ensure they put out the story that best suited my needs.

If there was any issues that they could talk about that I would prefer them not to, I would ask them to lie for me, for us. Think of your family, imagine the shame on your mother if you admit to what you did. Imagine what will happen to your brothers and sisters. And forget about ever working in the US again, or getting access to famous people or parties. Remember, I only did any of that because you asked me to, it was your fault for it all, you let me do it.

If you tell the truth, nobody is going to believe you anyway. Who are you? A nobody that I took into my home. A nobody whose family needs you to stay with me to continue to enjoy nice things. But if you try to tell any stories, I will tear you apart. I will tear your family apart. I will say it was your fault, your parents fault. That I only wanted to be friends but now you make all these crazy stories up for money.

If I can make all that up in a few minutes, don't you reckon his lawyers could have done much more in the time they had?

ceadaoin.

Boggles wrote: »

Well there is, and Cory Feldman has stated it again last night. Text speak is tragic, but you get the jist.

Feldman was already 13 or something when he met Michael. Too old already.

Also, just because he didn't abuse that person, doesnt mean he didn't abuse anyone at all.

turbbo

Deebles McBeebles wrote: »

Aye, better to post a joke that's older than most Boards users while blindly sticking to your convictions.

Ahh a mickey fan - poor mickey fans!

ceadaoin.

Boggles wrote: »

Of course it has, in lieu of any actual evidence. What more can people on the internet who have a passing interest in the case go on? He died in 2009.

It echoes what an awful lot of people have said about Jackson, including Robson, so it is not just Corey or a one off factual experience.

What do you think of Robsons "memories" just coinciding with the Jackson estate booting him off the gravy train?

What did he say - he didn't realize anally raping a child was wrong until he held his child in his hands, he was 31. :rolleyes:

He was also financially fooked and the wife was about to boot him.

Does that pass the "smell test" to you?

That's not what he said at all. Have you actually watched it yet? If you have and you still don't believe them then I don't believe that you aren't a crazed, delusional fan tbh

The alternative is that you are just a run of the mill paedophile apologist. Neither are a great look

turbbo

ceadaoin. wrote: »

That's not what he said at all. Have you actually watched it yet? If you have and you still don't believe them then I don't believe that you aren't a crazed, delusional fan tbh

I'm obviously trolling - a deluded Mickey fan is worth trolling.:D

Deebles McBeebles

turbbo wrote: »

How do you know it's bedtime at MJ's house?

- When the big hand touches the little hand.

turbbo wrote: »

Ahh a mickey fan - poor mickey fans!

I think we've found your level, turbbo.

turbbo

Deebles McBeebles wrote: »

I think we've found your level, turbbo.

Well we all know you're a deluded fan too.

ceadaoin.

Boggles wrote: »

They gave glowing references until they were fooked off the gravy train.

Then they tried to get a book deal and couldn't and then went on to sue for 100s of millions of dollars.

The example doesn't even have to be that extreme.

Again, watch the documentary. Safechuck told Jackson to **** off when he came calling looking for him to testify in 2005. He was still a child when he defended him in the 90s. He hasn't been "on the gravy train" for years.

is_that_so

ceadaoin. wrote: »

Again, watch the documentary. Safechuck told Jackson to **** off when he came calling looking for him to testify in 2005. He was still a child when he defended him in the 90s. He hasn't been "on the gravy train" for years.

You seem to be placing a whole lot of trust in a "documentary", which by all accounts makes little attempt at any balance.

ceadaoin.

is_that_so wrote: »

You seem to be placing a whole lot of trust in a "documentary", which by all accounts makes little attempt at any balance.

have you watched it yourself?

turbbo

is_that_so wrote: »

You seem to be placing a whole lot of trust in a "documentary", which by all accounts makes little attempt at any balance.

I think most sensible people are. It's gone mainstream - which really means it's only hardcore fans that still believe he was innocent.

https://www.cnbc.com/2019/03/06/oprah-winfrey-leaving-neverland-is-much-bigger-than-michael-jackson.html

is_that_so

ceadaoin. wrote: »

have you watched it yourself?

No fan of such stuff at all. I have zero interest in wasting four hours on a piece of programming aiming to tell me what to think.

is_that_so

turbbo wrote: »

I think most sensible people are. It's gone mainstream - which really means it's only hardcore fans that still believe he was innocent.

https://www.cnbc.com/2019/03/06/oprah-winfrey-leaving-neverland-is-much-bigger-than-michael-jackson.html

The old juvenile with us or ag'in' us? I don't know what he was nor do you but believe you know.

ceadaoin.

is_that_so wrote: »

No fan of such stuff at all. I have zero interest in wasting four hours on a piece of programming aiming to tell me what to think.

Well then you can't really comment on it's content can you? Many of the standard put downs are addressed. It's not telling you what to think, it's allowing these men to tell their stories and let people decide.

Good for you though, don't make any attempt to challenge your views, just keep defending an obvious peadophile

turbbo

is_that_so wrote: »

The old juvenile with us or ag'in' us? I don't know what he was nor do you but believe you know.

Same way you don't know what Jimmy Saville was I suppose :rolleyes:

is_that_so

ceadaoin. wrote: »

Well then you can't really comment on it's content can you? Many of the standard put downs are addressed. It's not telling you what to think, it's allowing these men to tell their stories and let people decide.

Good for you though, don't make any attempt to challenge your views, just keep defending an obvious peadophile

And there we have it. The childish well if you don't agree with me defence. I think he was a very strange man in a very very strange situation. I have no problem changing my views provided there is actual truth and not a televised version of it. I don't think we'll ever know for certain but it doesn't stop people lining up to give opinions on it anyway.

is_that_so

turbbo wrote: »

Same way you don't know what Jimmy Saville was I suppose :rolleyes:

Nah I knew he was creepy and there was a whole lot of evidence.

sligeach

ceadaoin. wrote: »

Well then you can't really comment on it's content can you? Many of the standard put downs are addressed. It's not telling you what to think, it's allowing these men to tell their stories and let people decide.

Good for you though, don't make any attempt to challenge your views, just keep defending an obvious peadophile

Telling people to be open-minded and then finish off with calling Michael an "obvious paedophile". Well done you.

Doctors room ghost

The day I saw him buying the green giant statues I said to the wife there’s something up with that fcuker there.and a truck load of vases.wouldnt trust him as far as I’d throw him.a quare hawk among birds.

8-10

And in fairness to those saying "watch the documentary", it's actually only out tonight in this side of the pond. Channel 4 have the exclusive.

So a bit of patience on that part, many of us are intending on watching it once it's out over here and I'm sure it'll drive a lot more discussion on this thread from tomorrow

monkeybutter

is_that_so wrote: »

And there we have it. The childish well if you don't agree with me defence. I think he was a very strange man in a very very strange situation. I have no problem changing my views provided there is actual truth and not a televised version of it. I don't think we'll ever know for certain but it doesn't stop people lining up to give opinions on it anyway.

Would ya fell better if it was in the written word? Michael Jackson for dummies suit ya better?


Hilarious Ignorance

8-10

Doctors room ghost wrote: »

The day I saw him buying the green giant statues I said to the wife there’s something up with that fcuker there.and a truck load of vases.wouldnt trust him as far as I’d throw him.a quare hawk among birds.

What does a truckload of vases signify? I'm missing the link you're making here?

is_that_so

monkeybutter wrote: »

Would ya fell better if it was in the written word? Michael Jackson for dummies suit ya better?


Hilarious Ignorance

Oh I think there's a reason why countries have legal systems, so that this type of genius reasoning does not actually determine guilt.

is_that_so

8-10 wrote: »

What does a truckload of vases signify? I'm missing the link you're making here?

Being a weirdo?

ceadaoin.

8-10 wrote: »

And in fairness to those saying "watch the documentary", it's actually only out tonight in this side of the pond. Channel 4 have the exclusive.

So a bit of patience on that part, many of us are intending on watching it once it's out over here and I'm sure it'll drive a lot more discussion on this thread from tomorrow

Fair enough, I forgot it hadn't been on there yet. I'll be interested to see what you think after it. I mean, it's not like there is a smoking gun or anything but the men's stories are very believable and their demeanors etc. Jimmy in particular is clearly a very damaged person and it's the performance of the century if he is lying.

Doctors room ghost

8-10 wrote: »

What does a truckload of vases signify? I'm missing the link you're making here?

A truckload as in he bought about 50 huge expensive vases that would fill a truck.what the fcuk would you want with them. The interviewer doing the show asked him where he would put them and he hadn’t a clue.

ceadaoin.

Doctors room ghost wrote: »

A truckload as in he bought about 50 huge expensive vases that would fill a truck.what the fcuk would you want with them. The interviewer doing the show asked him where he would put them and he hadn’t a clue.

That's why he died pretty much broke.he wouldn't stop spending. It's taken a while for his estate to bounce back. That's why his family are so pissed off, it's them who stand to be thrown off the gravy train at this point, not the accusers