Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Cities around the world that are reducing car access

1129130131132133135»

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,696 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    Yes but a ZTL is overly restrictive.

    It bans cars from entering the city centre at all!

    Deprioritising cars in favour of PT is fine, but cars still need to access car parks and be able to visit and spend in the city centre.

    Car occupants are the highest spenders per capita amongst all modes of transport users.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,928 ✭✭✭✭MJohnston


    Meh! I think we could (and should) very easily transform everything inside the Inner Orbital Route into a ZTL. A lot of areas in this zone are already off-limits directly or indirectly to non-residents anyway.

    Throw a few huge park and ride multi-storey car parks in at strategic transport nodes outside the zone - like Heuston, The Point (already has a big multi-storey) and accommodate access to some of the existing peripheral ones like Werburgh Street

    image.png


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,216 ✭✭✭Ben D Bus


    I thought that high spending thing for car occupants was somewhat debunked in that they spend more per visit but make fewer visits, and as such are not in fact the biggest overall spenders. Open to correction on that. Either way, I believe bus users are biggest overall spenders.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 54,495 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    how is the spend tracked per mode of transport? more importantly, who does the research?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,696 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    Car users spend the most individually and visit the city centre in their thousands every day, so banning them from the city completely would have a big impact on spend levels.

    Bus passengers are higher in number but spend less individually.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,744 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997


    The traditional model of people driving into down to buy books paint or furniture is gone the way of the dodo. It's not coming back. It shouldn't be used as a blocker.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 74,481 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    That lobby group have since admitted they were wrong, too; and shouldn't have opposed it. Statement given to some trade magazine, someone will likely have the photo of it.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 54,495 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    this is the NTA shopper survey; i've just had the barest of scans of it so far, but one thing that jumped out at me was their choice of polling locations - grafton street and henry street. they picked the two main 'shopping' streets in the city, and i guess that's sensible; but they are streets people who specifically go into town to shop would likely pick.

    in short, there are a hell of a lot of other streets people go into town to, but for other reasons (e.g. drinking or dining) or whose trip had a different 'source' intention - e.g. workers who frequent the streets near their workplace and might only occasionally need to pop into either of the two main streets.

    unfortunately, the figures for how often people enter the city centre are broken down by frequency of visits, but unfortunately not by mode of transport. obviously workers would be much more likely to take PT, and much more likely to spend below the average per trip, but how much would that be compensated for with the frequency of the trips?

    also, wouldn't the range of shops on either street be skewed too? towards fashion and shoes, maybe jewellery too? compared to other streets anyway.

    https://www.nationaltransport.ie/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/Dublin-City-Shopper-Survey-2022.pdf



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 54,495 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    also, i wonder where they stood on each street; e.g. at either end? that could have an impact; with henry street opening onto a major thoroughfare for PT (luas and bus), that could skew results every bit as much as if they had stood outside brown thomas where the spend would be high, and where the shop has a car park right at the back.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,696 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    I dont think you can read too much into the survey but it does highlight the higher spend of car drivers.

    I think there is a judicial review against the traffic changes around the quays.

    More pedestrianisation and priority to public transport would be great to see but cars should still be able to access the city centre at the same time and access car parks.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,744 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997


    They don't spend more collectively. Which is the only relevance.

    Imo. Vested interests commissioned it. When the results didn't support their interests it was selectively quoted from out of context.

    That the media let this pass unchallenged raises it's own questions about the media.

    Whatever about all that. Congestion, a problem of too many cars is never going to be solved by "more cars".



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,744 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997


    "....More pedestrianisation and priority to public transport would be great to see.. "

    That's past tense. It's already in place.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 54,495 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    I dont think you can read too much into the survey but it does highlight the higher spend of car drivers.

    a question that survey can't answer - how many people were put off travelling into the city because their only option is a bus on roads choked by private traffic?

    e.g. it's theoretically possible (note theoretically; i'm not stating this is actually the case) that the traffic created for every one person driving in could be worsening PT to the point that two or more bus users don't make the shopping trip.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,696 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    We should have more pedestrian areas in the city centre. There have been improvements but some way to go yet.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,696 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    This is true and the same applies to a total ban on cars.

    Banning 10,000 drivers from the city centre does not mean those 10,000 people come in by bus instead.

    Many wont come to the city at all and may well spend online instead or drive to Liffey Valley etc.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,696 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    It isnt the only relevance.

    If car drivers are the highest spending group and you eliminate them from the city centre, total spend goes down.

    There are vested interests on both sides of the argument.

    Pro cycling journalists are hardly going to champion car driver behaviour, no matter what the facts of the matter are.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,744 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997


    It's the car park owners survey its their facts.

    The facts aren't in dispute. Just the ability to read them.

    Car drivers aren't the highest spending group. They only account for 24% of spending in that survey. Their numbers have fallen further since the survey.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,744 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,696 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    Car park owners and also retail experts who understand where the sales come from in great detail.

    Nobody said that drivers were the largest spending group, but they are the largest spenders individually.

    The smaller the market share they have the lower the overall spend.

    All modes of city centre visitors should be welcomed and PT users should be prioritised. We can probably agree on the 2nd point at least.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,744 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997


    So they are minority spending group and falling in numbers. Their priority of road space should reflect that. A minority.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,696 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    Deprioritised into the city centre, yes. But not banned from visiting.

    Nationally, car usage is at record levels and represents 71% of all journeys.

    M50 traffic is up 11% since the pandemic so cars arent going away any time soon.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 54,495 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,744 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997


    Not that one no.

    But consider that survey is going to be skewed like you said simply by the location of the survey. Let's exaggerate and do the survey in the Rolex store Vs Dunnes.

    Not that it's wrong. You just need to have the context.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 31,622 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    No one is seriously considering banning them. The council have bent over backwards to maintain access to the city centre car parks. But if gets more complicated to get to them then tough.

    Car park owners and also retail experts who understand where the sales come from in great detail.

    If by retail experts you mean business owners then they are notoriously terrible at knowing where their sales come from and consistently wildly overestimate the spend of drivers. And car park owners dont actually care



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,744 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997


    Experts who can't read or misrepresent their own data are not experts.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 146 ✭✭Juza1973


    Removing all the jobs that can be done with wfh. Leave it to tourism and institutional affairs only.



Advertisement