Margaret Cash steals €300 worth of clothes from Penneys and aftermath/etc!

Teddy Daniels

It wasnt me123 wrote: »

Then we need to make it less attractive to have large families when you are depending on the public purse.

Maybe a max of 4 children and then cut off the child benefit. And make it perfectly clear that the maximum house available is 4 bed and that's that. You want a big family, you finance it.

The public service / TDs just need to grow a pair, put rules in place and make sure they adhere to them. Now you will always have an exception - but those should be an exception (elderly/sick parent living with their child who has 3 kids already, etc) not the norm.

In relation to maintaining the house, they should ensure its maintained and inspect them. Basic hygiene, rubbish removal, dusted / hoovered etc. In fairness, if you are on the dole and home all day you have no excuse not to keep the property in good condition.

I have been in many housed Traveller houses and they are nearly always very very clean. They acually compare favourably with middle class homes that are often dirty. However ther reesons you state are probably relevant wrt time to clean.

retalivity

k99_64 wrote: »

Love this interview

"I WASN'T WEARING PAJAMAS IN THE HOTEL! only when going out to get clothes"

"So.....you were wearing pajamas in the hotel"

"Yes but only a few times"

normanoffside

It’s all kicking off on Margaret’s FB. Apparently she has just discovered a local Tallaght page which shared the article about her stealing in Pennies 6 months ago. She is sharing PMs threatening to sue the page.
It also looks to me like Bernard is writing her messages. Funny, he was in Wicklow today (he normally lives in Sligo). Coincidence?

Teddy Daniels

punisher5112 wrote: »

Full of ornaments and Waterford crystal...

tuxy wrote: »

And plastic wrapping still on the sofa

I have reported these posts as stereotyping.

Credit Checker Moose

She is playing the race card on Facebook.

tuxy

normanoffside wrote: »

It also looks to me like Bernard is writing her messages. Funny, he was in Wicklow today (he normally lives in Sligo). Coincidence?

He's actually in a completely different county several times every week. One of the few travellers still travelling I guess.

punisher5112

Planting his seeds.

normanoffside

tuxy wrote: »

He's actually in a completely different county several times every week. One of the few travellers still travelling I guess.

I guess he is doing Job interviews?

xi5yvm0owc1s2b

KrustyUCC wrote: »

All she wants is a home for her the husband and the kids

That's what a lot of people want! But it's all how you go about it.

Route 1: Finish school, go to college, study 3-4 years for a degree, get a job, save up a deposit, get a mortgage, and pay it off with interest by spending the next 30-odd years commuting and working 50+ hours a week. Faithfully pay tax, VAT, stamp duty, property tax, etc.

Route 2: Leave school at 12, never work, get married at 16, and pop out 6-7 kids by your mid-20s. Then go to the media demanding that the state house your ever-expanding family. Never pay a penny towards the house or any taxes.

Honestly, the people choosing Route 1 look like mugs.

KrustyUCC

Poor Margaret's solicitor will be busy between suing Just for Tallaght and the local pub

Laughing about them standing by the 'raciest' comments

marieholmfan

That's because they are mugs.
The people choosing route 1 are basically subhuman.

Rex Tasteless Gutter wrote: »

That's what a lot of people want! But it's all how you go about it.

Route 1: Finish school, go to college, study 3-4 years for a degree, get a job, save up a deposit, get a mortgage, and pay it off with interest by spending the next 30-odd years commuting and working 50+ hours a week. Faithfully pay tax, VAT, stamp duty, property tax, etc.

Route 2: Leave school at 12, never work, get married at 16, and pop out 6-7 kids by your mid-20s. Then go to the media demanding that the state house your ever-expanding family. Never pay a penny towards the house or any taxes.

Honestly, the people choosing Route 1 look like mugs.

TCM

marieholmfan wrote:

I think it needs to be increased as family size increases. Discourage women from working and encourage them to fulfil their natural function.

marieholmfan wrote:

Ironically Mrs Cash is a much better mother than the working mothers who after a couple of abortions squeeze out a child at 45 who is then dropped at the creche at 7 AM and collected at 7 PM.

Ooohhhh, you're going against the grain there. You won't be popular.

KrustyUCC

Well that's given me a good laugh early in the morning

First class trolling

xi5yvm0owc1s2b

marieholmfan wrote: »

I think it needs to be increased as family size increases. Discourage women from working and encourage them to fulfil their natural function.

Reduce the size of the workforce but increase social welfare benefits?

Where can we find this magic money tree of which you speak?

Effects

Rex Tasteless Gutter wrote: »

Where can we find this magic money tree of which you speak?

Just stick a tax on social welfare. The more people that are on it, and the higher the payment, the more tax that can be collected from it. Then just put that tax back into the system. Makes sense really.

Omackeral

KrustyUCC wrote: »

Well that's given me a good laugh early in the morning

First class trolling

Sweet.science has a new contender for the throne!

hynesie08

So, is she in tallaght or what? Is dis her 4eva home?

ohfa6muwtsvkc1

E300? She should have stolen a few billion while wearing a pant suit. Then we would she rewarded her with a top up on the amount.

Cina

marieholmfan wrote: »

I think it needs to be increased as family size increases. Discourage women from working and encourage them to fulfil their natural function.

What? That's a crazy train of thought, it'll just lead to more Margaret Cash's.

What we need is affordable childcare and cost of living so that women can pursue their career's whilst still being able to have kids, not one or the other.

marieholmfan

Rex Tasteless Gutter wrote: »

Reduce the size of the workforce but increase social welfare benefits?

Where can we find this magic money tree of which you speak?

It's in the Cayman islands. It's called the Ansbacher tree.

marieholmfan

Cina wrote: »

What? That's a crazy train of thought, it'll just lead to more Margaret Cash's.

What we need is affordable childcare and cost of living so that women can pursue their career's whilst still being able to have kids, not one or the other.

Women don't need careers. No one needs a career. People need families.


This career stuff is real subhuman consumerist bull****.

I agree with you about free childcare though.

normanoffside

hynesie08 wrote: »

So, is she in tallaght or what? Is dis her 4eva home?

She seems to be in Tallaght now again alright. She has just discovered that one of the local community pages was sharing an article about her stealing 6 months ago.
Her friends are telling her to report people to their employers for making negative comments about her on the ‘Just for Tallaght’ article.

xi5yvm0owc1s2b

marieholmfan wrote: »

No one needs a career.

So we can have a magic-money-tree economy where nobody works and we all live happily on the generous social welfare benefits provided by de gubbermint?

Cina

marieholmfan wrote: »

Women don't need careers. No one needs a career. People need families.


This career stuff is real subhuman consumerist bull****.

I agree with you about free childcare though.

Of course people need careers.

And more importantly, what if women want careers?

marieholmfan

Rex Tasteless Gutter wrote: »

So we can have a magic-money-tree economy where nobody works and we all live happily on the generous social welfare benefits provided by de gubbermint?

We can easily have that. There's more to life than work, sleep, consume, die(not that you ever do any work of course ).

Fr_Dougal

Rex Tasteless Gutter wrote: »

So we can have a magic-money-tree economy where nobody works and we all live happily on the generous social welfare benefits provided by de gubbermint?

Yes, try to keep up!

marieholmfan wrote: »

It's in the Cayman islands. It's called the Ansbacher tree.

HeidiHeidi

marieholmfan wrote: »

We can easily have that. There's more to life than work, sleep, consume, die(not that you ever do any work of course ).

Who'll fund it?


(Can't believe I bit....)

marieholmfan

Cina wrote: »

Of course people need careers.

And more importantly, what if women want careers?

You can't always get what you want, no no no no no , you can't always get what you want, oh no no no no no, but if you try sometime , yeah yeah , you get what you need ,




anyway unlike yourself and Vox Nihili I actually do work so this conversation is at an end.

marieholmfan

HeidiHeidi wrote: »

Who'll fund it?


(Can't believe I bit....)

Unfortunately unlike those who advocate work I do work so can't explain in detail but easily achieved by proper allocation of societies resources.

Ah Marie, you’re gonna have to be a bit more subtle in the winding up competition.