31 People Charged with Sexual Offences against children - UK

Assetbacked

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-leeds-45193514
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6062349/Thirty-men-woman-charged-sexual-exploitation-girls-young-12.html

The bad news stories just keep coming this week. Truly frightening story that 5 girls could have been abused over a 7 year period without anyone getting arrested.

Whilst perpetrated in the UK I find it astounding and terrifying that such large scale abuse could be carried out unchecked (the Catholic Church was a powerful and feared organisation). Of corse, this scale of child exploitation is not uncommon in the UK as there have been several revelations and prosecutions publicized over the past number of years.

But there must be lessons learned at an institutional level and the authorities must confront the failings head on to ensure it does not happen again. What I mean by this is that yet again there is a common theme among the perpetrators other than the fact they are predominantly men.

claiomh solais

Hussain, Hussain, Arif, Ali, Sajjad, Rafiq, Zaman, Hussain, Choli, Hussain, Hussain, Majid, Dogar, Ali, Anwar, Riaz, Akram, Akhtar, Fikru

jacksie66

This post has been deleted.

Edgware

claiomh solais wrote: »

Hussain, Hussain, Arif, Ali, Sajjad, Rafiq, Zaman, Hussain, Choli, Hussain, Hussain, Majid, Dogar, Ali, Anwar, Riaz, Akram, Akhtar, Fikru

Never heard of those saints

Wibbs

claiomh solais wrote: »

Hussain, Hussain, Arif, Ali, Sajjad, Rafiq, Zaman, Hussain, Choli, Hussain, Hussain, Majid, Dogar, Ali, Anwar, Riaz, Akram, Akhtar, Fikru

Good solid Welsh names all. Can't trust the Welsh. Lovely singing voices mind you.

The Backwards Man

50,000 charged with sexual offences against children in the UK every year, what's so special about these wankstains?

pjohnson

The Backwards Man wrote: »

50,000 charged with sexual offences against children in the UK every year, what's so special about these wankstains?

They are brown so for some that makes them guilty of two crimes.

This made me laugh. https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2018/aug/08/judges-uphold-decision-to-strip-rochdale-grooming-gang-members-of-citizenship

Appealing against deportation because it would deprive them of a right to family life.

Being a peado sex offender means they shouldn’t be anywhere near children or families.

Wibbs

The Backwards Man wrote: »

50,000 charged with sexual offences against children in the UK every year, what's so special about these wankstains?

Interesting question TB. I would say that the majority of such offences are carried out by individuals, maybe with a fellow enabler and usually a small number of victims(usually familial from what I recall of the stats breakdown). And of course you do get repellent deviants on the interwebs who form loose groups on the dark web.

What's different with these groups is they're much larger organised networks, with more participants and they exclusively prey on young teenage girls. Girls chosen specifically from a different cultural background to the perverts. There is most certainly a cultural angle to this. The attitudes of the scum towards girls and women, particularly "white" women stands out. Vanishingly few of these girls are from their own background and culture. Their own community would react far more viciously if they were. There is a strand that runs through some Islamic subcultures that White/Non Muslim women are little more than whores.

Another aspect as we have seen is the often blind eyes turned to this by authorities in the UK. Never mind blind eyes in certain sections of the media and that's different.

There are some parallels with the abuses of the Church here. The organisation, the blind eyes and so forth, but for generally different reasons.

Assetbacked

The Backwards Man wrote: »

50,000 charged with sexual offences against children in the UK every year, what's so special about these wankstains?

50,000 charged with sexual offences each year in the Uk, really?

Assetbacked

The Backwards Man wrote: »

50,000 charged with sexual offences against children in the UK every year, what's so special about these wankstains?

50,000 charged with sexual offences each year in the Uk, really?

TheValeyard

claiomh solais wrote: »

Hussain, Hussain, Arif, Ali, Sajjad, Rafiq, Zaman, Hussain, Choli, Hussain, Hussain, Majid, Dogar, Ali, Anwar, Riaz, Akram, Akhtar, Fikru

Were any of the Hussains called Sadam?


Ill be disappointed if not.


Although think his name was spelt Hussein

splashuum

84% of grooming gang members in the UK are “Asian”.
But shhh don’t say that because it’s racist.

PlaneSpeeking

Assetbacked wrote: »

The Backwards Man wrote: »

50,000 charged with sexual offences against children in the UK every year, what's so special about these wankstains?

50,000 charged with sexual offences each year in the Uk, really?

No of course not!!! It's another made up stat.

https://fournews-assets-prod-s3-ew1-nmprod.s3.amazonaws.com/media/2014/07/21_nspcc_ew.jpg

The Backwards Man

Assetbacked wrote: »

50,000 charged with sexual offences each year in the Uk, really?

Yep, including those against children aged 16-18, if that makes a difference.

Omackeral

I bet some on here still consider Tommy Robinson a bigger scumbag than these nonces.

Omackeral

claiomh solais wrote: »

Hussain, Hussain, Arif, Ali, Sajjad, Rafiq, Zaman, Hussain, Choli, Hussain, Hussain, Majid, Dogar, Ali, Anwar, Riaz, Akram, Akhtar, Fikru

The Backwards Man

Omackeral wrote: »

I bet some on here still consider Tommy Robinson a bigger scumbag than these nonces.

Na, but man who defends paedophiles and hampers court cases is still a scumbag.

pjohnson

Bootlegger wrote: »

Tommy Robinson defends the Prophet Muhammad?

News to me.

Yeah. No non muslim ever takes part in paedophilia. Larry Murphy was one of Irelands best muslims

Omackeral

pjohnson wrote: »

Yeah. No non muslim ever takes part in paedophilia. Larry Murphy was one of Irelands best muslims

Larry wasn't a pedo as far as I know. Silly comparison.

Edgware

Murray TheDemonic TalkingSkull wrote: »

Were any of the Hussains called Sadam?


Ill be disappointed if not.


Although think his name was spelt Hussein

No mention of Mustapha Bin Ridin

The Backwards Man

splashuum wrote: »

84% of grooming gang members in the UK are “Asian”.
But shhh don’t say that because it’s racist.

And 90% of child groomers in the UK are white.

But hey, don't twist stats to suit your own bigoted agenda eh?

pjohnson

Omackeral wrote: »

Larry wasn't a pedo as far as I know. Silly comparison.

Thought he was. Theres so much conspiracy about him haha.


Ah well. Guess that proves your idea. Only brown people are pedos.

Omackeral

The Backwards Man wrote: »

Na, but man who defends paedophiles

He doesn't. He claimed there was a stitch up by the police but ''Lennon (aka Robinson) later retracted the statement and said: “We completely condemn Richard Price.” You can stop beating that drum now.

The Backwards Man

Bootlegger wrote: »

Tommy Robinson defends the Prophet Muhammad?

News to me.

Na, just his fellow bigots.

https://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/latest-news/176587/Paedo-rap-for-EDL-leader

pjohnson

Bootlegger wrote: »

Imagine a thread on Catholic Church pedophiles and people coming in to derail with 'yeah but most gang rapists in Sweden are migrants' or 'yeah but hundreds of German women got attacked in Germany on NYE by immigrants so lay of the Church, yeah?'.

Can't you see how stupid your whatabutery is? The UK has a problem with 'Asian' rapists preying, mostly, on white girls.

You getting offended won't make the problem go away.

Am I fùck offended. I just find these threads hilarious really :pac:

Omackeral

pjohnson wrote: »

Thought he was. Theres so much conspiracy about him haha.


Ah well. Guess that proves your idea. Only brown people are pedos.

Yeah and where did I say that or infer that anywhere? Retarded comment.

The Backwards Man

Omackeral wrote: »

He doesn't. He claimed there was a stitch up by the police but ''Lennon (aka Robinson) later retracted the statement and said: “We completely condemn Richard Price.” You can stop beating that drum now.

Ah, so he doesn't support paedos anymore, but he used to?

Must be great to have a hero like that.

PlaneSpeeking

https://www.channel4.com/news/factcheck/what-do-we-know-about-the-ethnicity-of-sexual-abuse-gangs

Just in case anyone needs some actual facts.

Omackeral

The Backwards Man wrote: »

Na, just his fellow bigots.

https://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/latest-news/176587/Paedo-rap-for-EDL-leader

Your very own link contains this sentence; ''Lennon later retracted the statement and said: “We completely condemn Richard Price.”

Give over.

pjohnson

Bootlegger wrote: »

You find threads about girls being raped hilarious?

Let's try another thought experiment: lets say the UK had a problem with white sex gangs preying on young black girls. Would also being engaging in whataboutery?

No. But this thread is the latest thread about the....."hurrr durr muslim men bad men, very bad". Almost instantly it became about the surnames and "dont upset the left" and "thats racist" bantz.

You'd swear any of ye gave a hoot about the girls ye'reselves

Omackeral

The Backwards Man wrote: »

Ah, so he doesn't support paedos anymore, but he used to?

Must be great to have a hero like that.

Not my hero, I just tend to read what I link. You should try it too.

PlaneSpeeking

Bootlegger wrote: »

pjohnson wrote: »

Am I fùck offended. I just find these threads hilarious really :pac:

You find threads about girls being raped hilarious?

Let's try another thought experiment: lets say the UK had a problem with white sex gangs preying on young black girls. Would also being engaging in whataboutery?

I didn't think the bar was very high but even so finding hilarity in the systematic rape of girls as young as 12 is low.

I wonder if he finds amusing also the murder of one of the victims and the threatening of her family ???

Omackeral

pjohnson wrote: »

No. But this thread is the latest thread about the....."hurrr durr muslim men bad men, very bad". Almost instantly it became about the surnames and "dont upset the left" and "thats racist" bantz.

You were the first one to use the favoured ''brown people'' tag that your ilk love to throw around. YOU were the first to bring colour into it. Don't try to take the moral high ground.

pjohnson

PlaneSpeeking wrote: »

I didn't think the bar was very high but even so finding hilarity in the systematic rape of girls as young as 12 is low.

I wonder if he finds amusing also the murder of one of the victims and the threatening of her family ???

Already explained. Dont start picking on me now.

The Phantom Jipper

Out of curiosity, in this case and others like it that have involved so called Asian gangs, is there any common country of origin (of either them or their parents) or has it been quite varied?

pjohnson

Bootlegger wrote: »

Once again, imagine your level of whaboutery in a Catholic Church pedo thread.

It wouldn't have half as much attention.

PlaneSpeeking

The Phantom Jipper wrote: »

Out of curiosity, in this case and others like it that have involved so called Asian gangs, is there any common country of origin (of either them or their parents) or has it been quite varied?

British-Pakistani researchers believed most Pakistani or Bangladeshi.

Omackeral

The Phantom Jipper wrote: »

Out of curiosity, in this case and others like it that have involved so called Asian gangs, is there any common country of origin (of either them or their parents) or has it been quite varied?

I think I've read Pakistan but I stand to be corrected on that.

pjohnson

Omackeral wrote: »

You were the first one to use the favoured ''brown people'' tag that your ilk love to throw around. YOU were the first to bring colour into it. Don't try to take the moral high ground.

Check the 2nd and 3rd posts :pac: but I suppose you'll plead innocence eh?

The Backwards Man

Omackeral wrote: »

Your very own link contains this sentence; ''Lennon later retracted the statement and said: “We completely condemn Richard Price.”

Give over.

Yeah, fair enough. Takes a big man to retract their support for a nonce alright.

Omackeral

pjohnson wrote: »

Check the 2nd and 3rd posts :pac: but I suppose you'll plead innocence eh?

It's a list of names. So what?

YOU brought skin colour into it. You said Larry Murphy is a pedophile. You reckoned I think only brown people are sex offenders despite me never ever saying that or inferring it. You should quit while you're behind pal, you're having a bit of a nightmare.

Omackeral

The Backwards Man wrote: »

Yeah, fair enough. Takes a big man to retract their support for a nonce alright.

At least you can acknowledge it was retracted anyway. Good man.

pjohnson

Omackeral wrote: »

It's a list of names. So what?

YOU brought skin colour into it. You said Larry Murphy is a pedophile. You reckoned I think only brown people are sex offenders despite me never ever saying that or inferring it. You should quit while you're behind pal, you're having a bit of a nightmare.

And why do you think it was posted? No clue?

This is how these threads get funny :pac:

J. Marston

Aegir wrote: »

This made me laugh. https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2018/aug/08/judges-uphold-decision-to-strip-rochdale-grooming-gang-members-of-citizenship

Appealing against deportation because it would deprive them of a right to family life.

Being a peado sex offender means they shouldn’t be anywhere near children or families.

The related stories at the bottom of that article...

Oxford grooming ring. Newcastle grooming ring. Rochdale grooming ring. Rotherham grooming ring. Crazy how rife it is.

Malayalam

Aw Christ, the usual 'are you trying to say something racist about Muslims' shyte, because 'we have plenty of our own rapists and pedos here' shyte. It is blindingly OBVIOUS that there is a huge problem with grooming GANGS from Islamic backgrounds who consider white infidel girls as utter trash that they can pass around the circle and abuse like worthless pieces of meat. Can people not leave out all the smug whataboutery and just simply allow others to at least say it is fcuking disgusting. Full stop.

It is fcuking disgusting.

Beechwoodspark

claiomh solais wrote: »

Hussain, Hussain, Arif, Ali, Sajjad, Rafiq, Zaman, Hussain, Choli, Hussain, Hussain, Majid, Dogar, Ali, Anwar, Riaz, Akram, Akhtar, Fikru

Awful. At this stage there should be an Oxbridge study into the genetics involved. Do these men and their background-Pakistani mainly?-have some genetic predilection towards paedophilia? If so, what does society need to do to protect children.

PlaneSpeeking

J. Marston wrote: »

Aegir wrote: »

This made me laugh. https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2018/aug/08/judges-uphold-decision-to-strip-rochdale-grooming-gang-members-of-citizenship

Appealing against deportation because it would deprive them of a right to family life.

Being a peado sex offender means they shouldn’t be anywhere near children or families.

The related stories at the bottom of that article...

Oxford grooming ring. Newcastle grooming ring. Rochdale grooming ring. Rotherham grooming ring. Crazy how rife it is.

I dont think the surface has even been scratched yet sadly.

Why is money and resources being wasted on 40 year old alleged gropes when sick bastards like these are ruining the lives of wee girls right now.

Omackeral

pjohnson wrote: »

And why do you think it was posted? No clue?

This is how these threads get funny :pac:

Except it's not really funny subject matter at all, is it? I think you've embarrassed yourself on this thread enough for one evening.

pjohnson

Omackeral wrote: »

Except it's not really funny subject matter at all, is it? I think you've embarrassed yourself on this thread enough for one evening.

We've just entered into possible genetic studies of Pakistanis :pac:


Yeah things are getting good now! Why the fúck would I be embarrassed.

The Backwards Man

Malayalam wrote: »

Aw Christ, the usual 'are you trying to say something racist about Muslims' shyte, because 'we have plenty of our own rapists and pedos here' shyte. It is blindingly OBVIOUS that there is a huge problem with grooming GANGS from Islamic backgrounds who consider white infidel girls as utter trash that they can pass around the circle and abuse like worthless pieces of meat. Can people not leave out all the smug whataboutery and just simply allow others to at least say it is fcuking disgusting. Full stop.

It is fcuking disgusting.

There's a huge problem with child sexual abuse in general. But the baying mob is fixated on these paedo wankstains. Why are they so special? Why is it more disgusting? Are you more sympathetic to paedophiles from other backgrounds? Are the victims of other abusers deserving of lesser empathy?

Or do you just not give one single fcuk about the victims regardless?