Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Western Rail Corridor / Rail Trail

Options
1150151153155156182

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 6,727 ✭✭✭Pete_Cavan


    Hopefully whatever is recommended in the AI review is credible and can withstand scrutiny.

    From what I have seen and heard, the All Ireland Rail Review doesn't assess the feasibility of any projects, but is more a list of "wouldn't it be great if ..." projects. It seems to "recommend" doing every rail project that you can think of, plus some others too. We will have to see once it has been published but it sounds like it is more conceptual based rather than facts and figures.

    I'm sure there'll be a big disclaimer on all of it's "recommendations" saying subject to further assessment or something like that. The report will have no real standing and won't form even the vaguest intention to do anything, that's what the NDP is for. It's just another report to keep the plates spinning while nothing actually happens. This of course suits plenty of people down to the ground.



  • Registered Users Posts: 34 FrankLeeSpeaking


    Nothing of what you posted is relevant to reopening the rail line. The entire route needs (needed) to be rebuilt from the foundation up. Having 100 year old track and sleepers in situ is not at all relevant to reopening.



  • Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 67,817 Mod ✭✭✭✭L1011


    Track and sleepers haven't stopped huge encroachment on the Claremorris-Colooney section. Driveways, gardens, car dealers...



  • Registered Users Posts: 28,989 ✭✭✭✭end of the road



    it's very relevant, he was giving you the background to the good father and how he came to be involved in the railway campaign, something you asked for.

    any line that has been out of service for a time will require rebuilding, that is a non-issue really and to be expected and is part of everything.

    i get you were probably hoping for a specific answer and didn't get it so are now claiming his post isn't relevant when it is but you got the correct answer to what you asked for.

    ticking a box on a form does not make you of a religion.



  • Registered Users Posts: 15,802 ✭✭✭✭whisky_galore


    IR should send a machine through, even once every 3 or 4 years to tear through their creations and put manners on people.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 8,431 ✭✭✭Markcheese


    Is there much of a climate benefit to reopening a rail line for small quantities of freight,especially when it's probably going to be trucked to and from the rail head either side ,

    I mean if rail freight was going to be so great wouldn't you start with the bigger ports/ cargo generators Dublin cork Waterford ,limerick ,Galway , just linking those directly from quayside to railyards would really impact , and a lot of that infrastructure is still there,might need a teeny bit of work though..

    Slava ukraini 🇺🇦



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,431 ✭✭✭Markcheese


    That's gone and never coming back ..

    The midleton-youghal Greenway goes around a strip of the old line being used as a farmyard , and that line was used in the mid 80s , (I don't know when IE last traveled the line,or excerted ownership,or what the time limit is for squatters rights in this case )

    The work is being done for cork Cc, but the land is still owned by IE , and they didn't want to make a fuss

    Slava ukraini 🇺🇦



  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 14,350 Mod ✭✭✭✭marno21


    We now have a Minister for Transport who is basing transport policy on the thoughts that cross his mind while he's in the shower. It's little surprise we are seeing the Athenry-Claremorris freight line being mentioned in an official capacity. It'll be quite the mess for the next Minister to clear up and steer the country back towards a functional, realistic approach to transport policy.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Whatever happens, the days of the 10:1 ratio in favour of roads are over

    Sustainable modes will be getting the lions share of investment from here on out, the only question will be how it'll be broken out across rail, bus, AT etc



  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 14,350 Mod ✭✭✭✭marno21


    I didn’t mention roads. But freight rail from Claremorris-Athenry has no real world foundation.

    Anyway, what do buses travel on? Those Galway-Sligo buses have to use the N17, and will continue to use the N17



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]




  • Registered Users Posts: 2,680 ✭✭✭AngryLips


    At the current run rate, it will all be spent on 'walking and active travel' initiatives ...as if that will get you from Cork to Galway



  • Registered Users Posts: 910 ✭✭✭brianc89


    I don't understand this push back against freight.

    Comments here assume freight isn't needed based on current usage. A bit of a flawed argument?...

    Is it not reasonable to assume Ireland massively underutilises freight, but this is something that could change?



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Rail freight is best suited for bulk goods. We have bugger all of that.

    The distances involved make container freight non-viable as you would be trucking to the rail line, loading onto the train, then unloading onto a truck at the other end. You'd have damn near driven it by then.

    By all means show me the demand for it and where that demand is projected to outgrow the current capacity.

    I'll see if I can pull up some data I posted on this topic before but the data showed something like 10 years worth of rail freight volumes didn't even hit 10% of a single year of truck freight.

    The demand is not there and is unlikely to ever be there but please, show me otherwise. If there's a market for it cool, but I don't think there is.

    I'm still eager to see where the rail freight demand is going to come from for the WRC that is not already met by the existing service



  • Registered Users Posts: 910 ✭✭✭brianc89


    A few comments:

    • You mention only 10% of cargo is currently transported on freight. This means 90% isn't - that's a massive opportunity to take advantage of.

    • Loading and unloading shouldn't be an issue if infrastructure is put in place at the ports.

    • The ferry from France to Rosslare is about 17hours - saving a few hours doesn't particularly matter.

    • It's also not about the quickest transportation, it's about reducing emissions.

    • We have a driver shortage all across Europe, so reducing the need for drivers is good.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Read what I said again as regards the 10% (to be honest I think it was closer to 1% but I'll have to dig it out) as you seem to have misunderstood.

    Edit: found the data I posted previously, see link, clarifies the situation perfectly I think.

    The data shows the following

    The total for rail over that 12 year period, 8,359,000 tonnes, equates to 7% of the volume of road freight in its lowest year, 2012 when 108,078,000 tonnes were carried by road.

    Read that again, 12 years of total rail freight equaled just 7% of road freight in its worst year.

    Im all for reducing emissions, I regularly get lambasted on other forums here for the push for that.

    But again I'll ask, where is the demand for freight on the WRC? Where is the projected demand? Who are the customers who's needs are not being met?

    Spending a fortune on the WRC for freight is wreckless if its not possible to even show the demand.

    Especially seeing as some want it prioritised above the investment in the main line

    Post edited by [Deleted User] on


  • Registered Users Posts: 910 ✭✭✭brianc89


    Regardless of the exact figures, the vast majority of goods are transported by road. This doesn't mean it's cheaper, it just means freight isn't well set up in this country.

    You can't conclude that freight isn't needed based on current low usage, especially when we need to decarbonise the economy and there is a shortage of drivers.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    You can't conclude that freight isn't needed based on current low usage, especially when we need to decarbonise the economy and there is a shortage of drivers.

    Fair enough, show me how much freight has switched from road to rail so.

    Seriously I have nothing against rail freight, I am challenging it as a justification for the reopening of the WRC as nobody has been able to provide a shred of evidence to justify it.

    Show me anything, any data, that would justify the spend on the WRC over the main line.



  • Registered Users Posts: 910 ✭✭✭brianc89


    Sorry I am misunderstanding your data. Your 7% number confused me. So it's 0.5% to 1% at best. Very low indeed.

    Based on this, I still wouldn't conclude that freight can't be viable, if better infrastructure is put in place. I don't know anything about the supply chains required for wind in particular (maintenance as well as construction), but the Greens seem to think freight is necessary.



  • Posts: 5,121 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    You're underestimating the hassle and time in loading and unloading stuff, the more times it has to be done the more people involved and expensive it gets. Waiting for stuff to be loaded or unloaded is driver time wasted.

    If we made a lot of bulk stuff that isn't time sensitive like the Coca-Cola syrup in Ballina it can make sense, but I can't think of any equivalent here in Galway. In the other direction what we import again is lots of random stuff. It doesn't particularly make sense to unload at a port, load onto a train, train it to say Mullingar, unload onto a truck, truck it to a distribution center, unload there when the distance is so short the alternative is much simpler and quicker.

    The wind farm stuff is nonsense. Currently the equipment for one being developed outside Galway is shipped directly to Galway port and unloaded. At night they are loaded onto specialist, very long trailers and driven straight to the site. It's unlikely they would fit on the current rail network. If they did it would still face the problem of the final miles, they have to be unloaded and loaded onto trucks again regardless.



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    No sorry, either there is a case for freight or there isn't.

    Parts for some wind turbines is not a viable business case.

    As far as I can tell the argument for it goes something like this

    WRC: We must divert funds from the main line to reopen the WRC for freight

    Everyone else: What freight?

    WRC: Freight

    Everyone else: Err ok, who's freight?

    WRC: Freight

    Everyone else:???? What kind of freight?

    WRC: Freight

    Everyone else: Where is the freight coming from?

    WRC: Freight

    Everyone else: How much freight is there?

    WRC: Freight

    Everyone else:.......

    It can't be that difficult to get info, especially when you consider the sums involved



  • Registered Users Posts: 6,727 ✭✭✭Pete_Cavan


    The main argument for rail freight seems to be the assumption that reduces carbon which probably isn't correct. Basically all of our rail network outside of the Dublin and Cork commuter areas will remain non-electrified for a long time so any freight would be diesel hauled and all the associated emissions. Road vehicles are moving to electric and doing so at a faster rate than rail here.

    The great white hope of rail freight right now is the Foynes line and that isn't being electrified. Reopening it is costing €65m and that's non-electrified and with lots of Level Crossings. The cost of electrification would have killed the project and certainly would do so for WRC north of Athenry where assessments have found no value for money in a bog-standard reopening.

    Freight isn't like passenger services where you can say the train is running anyway so any journey using it instead of the car is a reduction in fuel emissions. For rail freight, you need a customer to justify the service. That generally means a very small number of customers for the full service due to all the coordination required, and the inflexibility makes it unattractive to 95% of potential customers. You can’t put on a freight rail and sell small volumes of space on it like you do with a passenger service.

    The fallacy of rail freight is highlighted by the suggestions by the MfT and others that the south Wexford line should be reopened for rail freight to/from Rosslare and Bellview ports. Both ports are already connected to the rail network and don't need to be connected to each other. There is no potential freight flows in between them that needs a rail connection to either port. Any other freight using that line to/from one of those ports would be passing the other port.

    If the Basically, the carbon thing sounds good but if you actually look at the reality of it, it isn't particularly good at all. That's why Ryan waffles on about these things, he wants them for ideological reasons and doesn't consider the actual reality of the situation.



  • Registered Users Posts: 28,989 ✭✭✭✭end of the road


    diesel rail will still be an emitions reduction as electric trucks ETC will require lots of generation to facilitate them being charged, which, until we are a fully renewable grid, will require foscel fuels.

    even then it's not just emitions from foscel fuels that are environmentally destructive.

    you absolutely can sell small spaces on rail freight trains but one will need sufficient users for it but it can be done, there isn't anything technical to prohibit it.

    ticking a box on a form does not make you of a religion.



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,431 ✭✭✭Markcheese


    So rail freight to claremorris , carrying fuel for wind turbines and Data for data centers

    The main bulk items being imported and exported in Ireland are timber, animal feed / grain and ore (hence foynes ) ,oh and fuel,

    Animal feed often goes to individual ports and is usually distributed from there ,obviously can't go to farms via train .

    A lot of oil products go by coastal tanker to ports and road distributed from there ,

    Timber does get some rail use . ( I think) ,

    Most ports/quay sides aren't rail connected anymore ..

    Slava ukraini 🇺🇦



  • Registered Users Posts: 628 ✭✭✭Westernview


    My point to you was in relation to your disparaging remarks about Fr McGreal. It was you that brought the discussion in that direction and so my points were relevant in addressing what you said. Id much prefer if the discussion sticks to debate on the rail itself.



  • Registered Users Posts: 628 ✭✭✭Westernview


    Sorry about the late reply. I dont have information on whether its one large freight yard or a number of them. Only that its the largest outside Dublin.

    Knock to Collooney is supposed to be going ahead but has been scaled back significantly from an initial idea to have a full north-south atlantic motorway.



  • Registered Users Posts: 15,802 ✭✭✭✭whisky_galore


    Any lorries, electric or not, that can be removed from the roads can only be a good thing. The less heavy vehicles that we have to share the roads with so much the better.



  • Registered Users Posts: 910 ✭✭✭brianc89


    The main argument for rail freight seems to be the assumption that reduces carbon which probably isn't correct.

    Even if freight uses diesel trains, they are far more efficient, given the larger capacity, versus individual lorries.

    Also, the emissions required to mine rare earth minerals from the ground (batteries) are going to become a bigger and bigger issue. We can't assume if we electrify everything that we're carbon neutral.

    Ireland's distribution network is not set up for freight right now - but that shouldn't conclude that it can't be adjusted to become a bigger player.



  • Registered Users Posts: 6,833 ✭✭✭timmyntc


    ironically a greenway along the line probably would stop encroachment until such a time as they line may be viable



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 8,431 ✭✭✭Markcheese


    A Diesel freight train is greener than a lorry IF it's carrying a lot of freight ..

    Empty trains don't really have a positive effect on the environment ,

    Think of your shopping coming back from the supermarket, it could be delivered by articulated lorry (they're far more efficient per ton than your car) , but it's not really a smart idea to send artics down every boreen and laneway to drop off a few bags of shopping ..

    Slava ukraini 🇺🇦



Advertisement