Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Dee Forbes banging the RTE TV licence drum again 60m uncollected fee *poll not working - pl ignore*

1234235237239240466

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,582 ✭✭✭skimpydoo


    Let’s not forget about all the reporters...... I made a list a few months ago, and admittedly have not updated it since then, so I’m sure a few new names could be added, as well as some removed.....

    Tony Connolly - Europe
    Michael Lihane - Politics
    Seán MAC an tSÍTHIGH
    Pascal Sheehy - Southern
    Ingrid Miley - Industry & Employment
    Theresa Manion - West
    Paul Cunningham - Politics
    Sean Whelan - London
    George Lee - Science
    Ciaran Mullooly -
    Samantha Librairi
    Vincent Kearney - Northern Ireland
    Emma O’Kelly - Education?
    Brian O’Donovan - Washington/U.S.
    Juliet Gash
    Albha Kineally
    Eleanor Mannion
    Fran McNulty - Agriculture
    Dimitri O’Donnell
    Eamonn Horan
    Conor Kane - Southeast
    Pat McGrath - Western
    Kathy O’Halloran
    Robert Short - Economics
    Sinead Crowley
    Helen Donohue
    Conor Hunt
    Fergal O’Brien
    Sinead Hussey
    Jackie Fox
    Laura Fletcher
    Gail Conway
    Justin Treacy - Sport?
    Philip Bromwell
    Fergal Bowers - Health
    Dyane Connor
    John Kilraine
    Coleman O'Sullivan
    Joe Stack - Sport (and Kerry lotto)
    Eileen Magnier
    Adam McGuire
    Aengus Cox
    Petula Martyn
    Brian Finn
    Kate Egan
    Claire McNamara
    Tommy Mescall
    Orla O Donnell
    Sharon Gaffney
    Dave Kelly
    Paul Reynolds - Crime
    Will Goodbody - Technology
    Sharon Lynch
    Mary Regan
    Laura Hogan
    Jenny O’Sullivan
    Aoife Heggarty
    Karen Creed
    Sandra Hurley
    Philip Bromwell


    If all of them are on an average salary of €50k a year...... that’s €3m - and I’d bet the average is much higher than €50k

    #Bloated

    Will Goodbody no longer does technology, 3 years ago he became RTE's business editor.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,828 ✭✭✭RabbleRouser2k


    When there’s little to no talent there. Anything will suffice as long as it’s well paid..... and your well connected.

    I remember when she first came on the scene, she was in one of the ‘biggest’ girl bands that nobody had ever heard of......

    Still though, at least she’s easier to look at than Nathan Carter.

    Aye, I remember The Saturdays were one of those bands that you just went 'I think I've heard of them... or was that the Sugababes?'

    I'd say she's getting some gigs out of 'pity' tbqh.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,531 ✭✭✭jmcc


    Elmo wrote: »
    tell us :pac:
    Eye-witness rings RTE having just witnessed John Lennon being shot. This was a global news story at the time. Some RTE jobsworth said that RTE's own reporter would cover it in the next few days.

    Regards...jmcc

    Regards…jmcc



  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,105 ✭✭✭Kivaro


    jmcc wrote: »
    Eye-witness rings RTE having just witnessed John Lennon being shot. This was a global news story at the time. Some RTE jobsworth said that RTE's own reporter would cover it in the next few days.

    Regards...jmcc

    And then Mark Chapman hung up, and RTE lost the scoop of the century.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,641 ✭✭✭✭Elmo


    Kivaro wrote: »
    And then Mark Chapman hung up, and RTE lost the scoop of the century.

    No Mark Chapman was RTÉ Washington correspondent back then. Only he was on one of those very long breaks that most RTÉ Washington Correspondents take and for some reason he couldn't report on the news of Lennon's murder.

    Chapman had be one of the more vocal RTÉ presenters at that time but for some reason following the murder he took some "annual leave" about two weeks after that RTÉ issued a memo to the press saying

    RTÉ confirms that Mark Chapman will not be returning to RTÉ News. His contract is due to expire shortly.

    RTÉ is developing a new direction for the RTÉ News and its correspondents which will be revealed in the coming weeks.

    RTÉ reveled the plans 10 years later saying it wasn't aware it had planned those changes.

    Indeed it was reported in most Irish tabloids at the time that Mehmet Ali Agca may take up the role, but he said that it was unlikely as he was happy in his as RTÉ middle eastern Correspondent, while John Hinckley Jr. was also a suggested name but he'd say he already had plans and was happy as RTÉ NY Correspondent, though he also mention that he had be unhappy with how Chapman was hanging around, he himself was at the time interview many of the stars of the time including a young Jodie Foster.

    It's all true! :pac:


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,956 ✭✭✭thomas 123


    Elmo wrote: »
    Biggest waste has always been their washington correspondent. They always seem to be missing. I haven't seen him report much on the floyd george case, instead it's reported from Dublin.

    However do we expect Newsreaders only? It's daft to think that you could run a news service without paying your staff or having no staff.

    We are a small island nation, no need for so many.

    Other news outlets invite other journalists on to cover the odd international event that would happen from time to time.

    It’s not like they are unbiased and therefore, in my opinion, absolutely not needed. Take the Washington guy for example - it was clear what his opinion was on Trump in every single report.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,641 ✭✭✭✭Elmo


    thomas 123 wrote: »
    We are a small island nation, no need for so many.

    Other news outlets invite other journalists on to cover the odd international event that would happen from time to time.

    It’s not like they are unbiased and therefore, in my opinion, absolutely not needed. Take the Washington guy for example - it was clear what his opinion was on Trump in every single report.

    Should RTÉ only have Dublin based reporters?

    I agree RTÉ could over the years could have found freelance Irish Journalists in most parts of the world to report on international issues. Even non-Irish journalists.

    I think its terrible that we never really heard from the diaspora. Even just a general elections or presidential elections in countries with a high number of Irish emigrants.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,933 ✭✭✭smurgen


    Rte might reconsider platforming the likes of John McGuick, editor of Gript again. They seem to have a particular problem with female politicians. https://twitter.com/elisaodonovan/status/1383870030186573828?s=19


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,585 ✭✭✭ligerdub


    Nice try. Next.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,956 ✭✭✭thomas 123


    Elmo wrote: »
    Should RTÉ only have Dublin based reporters?

    I agree RTÉ could over the years could have found freelance Irish Journalists in most parts of the world to report on international issues. Even non-Irish journalists.

    I think its terrible that we never really heard from the diaspora. Even just a general elections or presidential elections in countries with a high number of Irish emigrants.

    Of course not, journalism is important. Does one broadcaster need a rooster of that size though? I’m not saying get rid of them all but if money is tight I am sure they could cut 25-50% of them without us noticing.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,956 ✭✭✭thomas 123


    smurgen wrote: »
    Rte might reconsider platforming the likes of John McGuick, editor of Gript again. They seem to have a particular problem with female politicians. https://twitter.com/elisaodonovan/status/1383870030186573828?s=19

    I’d argue they don’t provide a fair platform for all view points to be honest - unless it’s in an effort to discredit - trump, sf etc


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,641 ✭✭✭✭Elmo


    thomas 123 wrote: »
    Of course not, journalism is important. Does one broadcaster need a rooster of that size though? I’m not saying get rid of them all but if money is tight I am sure they could cut 25-50% of them without us noticing.

    Why not utilize them better.

    Between Mid-July and September RTÉ news cut down in size for no apparent reason. They did the same for 3 weeks at Christmas. Why?

    Where is Brian O'Donovan? Is he on holidays and if so does he then also get from Mid-July to September?

    I am not picking on B. O'D but rather their Washington Correspondents, who all go missing.

    I know they are only one person but RTÉ fail to utilize them. For example Brian has gone missing for much of the George Floyd case, with report edited from Dublin.

    Perhaps he is working in the background, but I'd love to know what his job actually entails, I know I am being very basic about it but I do think, what does RTÉ's Washington correspondent do? Same goes for his predecessors.

    Why isn't he their North American Correspondent, surely with Brexit and CETA he should be reporting on occasion from Ottawa? or how about a report from Mexico?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,828 ✭✭✭RabbleRouser2k


    smurgen wrote: »
    Rte might reconsider platforming the likes of John McGuick, editor of Gript again. They seem to have a particular problem with female politicians.

    The important thing about putting someone with differing viewpoints is to bring them on tv, and completely demolish their POV.

    For example, if you bring the Ku Klux Kan on TV, you get to interview them and challenge and demolish every point of view they have, to show how feeble minded and weak they are. Banning those viewpoints only enables them. The great Edward R Murrow absolutely DESTROYED Joseph McCarthy when he turned the camera on him, allowed him to speak, and also challenged him. McCarthy had nothing in retaliation. He was slapped down like a repugnant child. (Keep in mind, McCarthy was a possible contender for president... until Murrow).

    When they had McGuirck on Prime Time... it highlighted how inept their presenter was (someone who literally said she was hired because of diversity-it showed that night). A better interviewer would have done their homework and challenged McGuirck.

    Instead, it led to 2 apologies and a quiet firing.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,641 ✭✭✭✭Elmo


    The important thing about putting someone with differing viewpoints is to bring them on tv, and completely demolish their POV.

    For example, if you bring the Ku Klux Kan on TV, you get to interview them and challenge and demolish every point of view they have, to show how feeble minded and weak they are. Banning those viewpoints only enables them. The great Edward R Murrow absolutely DESTROYED Joseph McCarthy when he turned the camera on him, allowed him to speak, and also challenged him. McCarthy had nothing in retaliation. He was slapped down like a repugnant child. (Keep in mind, McCarthy was a possible contender for president... until Murrow).

    When they had McGuirck on Prime Time... it highlighted how inept their presenter was (someone who literally said she was hired because of diversity-it showed that night). A better interviewer would have done their homework and challenged McGuirck.

    Instead, it led to 2 apologies and a quiet firing.

    Or you could always get the cra cras on and admonish them for being so stupid rather then looking for any out spoke people on the other side of the debate that you could debate and poor cold water on.

    Claire Byrne may as well have had

    simpsons-crazy-cat-lady-01-chung-in-lam.jpg
    Debate her

    :rolleyes:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,828 ✭✭✭RabbleRouser2k


    Claire Byrne is trash.

    Her show is dire.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,675 ✭✭✭✭namloc1980


    She's literally banging the drum in the Oireachtas Public Account Committee today:

    https://www.rte.ie/news/ireland/2021/0427/1212376-rte-public-accounts-committee/

    The Director General of RTÉ has warned that the organisation is facing a decline in financial sustainability, relevance, and a reduction in the number of services it can provide unless changes are made to the TV licence fee system.

    Appearing before the Oireachtas Public Accounts Committee this afternoon, Dee Forbes told TDs that failing revenues have already cost jobs both within RTÉ and the wider audio-visual sector.

    Ms Forbes told the Committee that it is estimated licence fee evasion rose to 15% in 2020.

    The number of ineligible homes, who do not own a television, also rose to an estimated 13% in the same year.

    RTÉ believes that both factors have led to a loss of €50 million per annum, more than it spends on News and Current Affairs programming on RTÉ One and RTÉ Radio 1.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,828 ✭✭✭RabbleRouser2k


    namloc1980 wrote: »
    She's literally banging the drum in the Oireachtas Public Account Committee today:

    https://www.rte.ie/news/ireland/2021/0427/1212376-rte-public-accounts-committee/

    The Director General of RTÉ has warned that the organisation is facing a decline in financial sustainability, relevance, and a reduction in the number of services it can provide unless changes are made to the TV licence fee system.

    Appearing before the Oireachtas Public Accounts Committee this afternoon, Dee Forbes told TDs that failing revenues have already cost jobs both within RTÉ and the wider audio-visual sector.

    Ms Forbes told the Committee that it is estimated licence fee evasion rose to 15% in 2020.

    The number of ineligible homes, who do not own a television, also rose to an estimated 13% in the same year.

    RTÉ believes that both factors have led to a loss of €50 million per annum, more than it spends on News and Current Affairs programming on RTÉ One and RTÉ Radio 1.

    'RTE believes'...

    Dear Jesus, this is the 'Americanism' of 'speaking your truth'.

    Except 'your truth' is often not 'The Truth'...

    Lets look at some obvious 'fudge ups' on Dee's part. 13 percent now do not own a television. 15 percent (she claims) aren't paying the license fee.
    Subtract 13 from 15, and you get 2 percent.

    So 2 percent aren't paying the license fee, but that equates to 50 million shorfall?

    She's a clown if she believes this to be true.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,641 ✭✭✭✭Elmo


    namloc1980 wrote: »
    RTÉ believes that both factors have led to a loss of €50 million per annum, more than it spends on News and Current Affairs programming on RTÉ One and RTÉ Radio 1.[/I]

    Wonder how much they spend PA on News and Current Affairs on RTÉ2 ... oh wait... they don't


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,675 ✭✭✭✭namloc1980


    'RTE believes'...

    Dear Jesus, this is the 'Americanism' of 'speaking your truth'.

    Except 'your truth' is often not 'The Truth'...

    Lets look at some obvious 'fudge ups' on Dee's part. 13 percent now do not own a television. 15 percent (she claims) aren't paying the license fee.
    Subtract 13 from 15, and you get 2 percent.

    So 2 percent aren't paying the license fee, but that equates to 50 million shorfall?

    She's a clown if she believes this to be true.

    What she's saying is that 15% who are liable (i.e. they own a TV) don't pay. The other 13% is a separate group who aren't liable as they don't have a TV in the first place. Now whether that adds up to €50m is another story.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,828 ✭✭✭RabbleRouser2k


    namloc1980 wrote: »
    What she's saying is that 15% who are liable (i.e. they own a TV) don't pay. The other 13% is a separate group who aren't liable as they don't have a TV in the first place. Now whether that adds up to €50m is another story.

    The estimates seem to be all guesswork at the moment. There's no definitive figures. It's like she's pulling it all out of her butt.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,483 ✭✭✭garrettod


    SSDD from Dee (I'm baging circa €300k pa from RTE) Forbes...

    http://www.rte.ie/news/ireland/2021/0427/1212376-rte-public-accounts-committee/

    I had to laugh when I saw mention of RTE telling the politicians that they may not be able to provide as much political coverage in the future. Hopefully the nitwits won't fall for it.

    Here's a bit of simple advice for you Dee:

    - get rid of the golden ten and that €3m that RTE are paying them every year.
    - confirm how many staff at RTE are getting paid over €100k per year, and specify, what function they serve. Best give them the heads up, that pay cuts are on the way.
    - Follow that by getting out of non - core broadcasting of repeat US, British and Australian programming, and sell off or close down non public service TV and /or Radio channels.
    -oh, and don't forget to cut your own remuneration package by 45%, then let's see what else needs doing at RTE.

    Thanks,

    G.



  • Site Banned Posts: 5,279 ✭✭✭political analyst


    garrettod wrote: »
    SSDD from Dee (I'm baging circa €300k pa from RTE) Forbes...

    http://www.rte.ie/news/ireland/2021/0427/1212376-rte-public-accounts-committee/

    I had to laugh when I saw mention of RTE telling the politicians that they may not be able to provide as much political coverage in the future. Hopefully the nitwits won't fall for it.

    Here's a bit of simple advice for you Dee:

    - get rid of the golden ten and that €3m that RTE are paying them every year.
    - confirm how many staff at RTE are getting paid over €100k per year, and specify, what function they serve. Best give them the heads up, that pay cuts are on the way.
    - Follow that by getting out of non - core broadcasting of repeat US, British and Australian programming, and sell off or close down non public service TV and /or Radio channels.
    -oh, and don't forget to cut your own remuneration package by 45%, then let's see what else needs doing at RTE.

    Selling RTÉ 2 is not an option because nobody would be willing to buy it. Besides, moving afternoon sporting events that may run into extra time onto RTÉ 1 would be untenable because there would be an outcry if Six-One was displaced.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,828 ✭✭✭RabbleRouser2k


    Selling RTÉ 2 is not an option because nobody would be willing to buy it. Besides, moving afternoon sporting events that may run into extra time onto RTÉ 1 would be untenable because there would be an outcry if Six-One was displaced.

    They tried selling the RTE guide.

    Nobody wanted it. I'd say they'd have a similar problem with RTE 2.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 880 ✭✭✭batman75


    Dee Forbes first step to restoring public confidence and affection for RTE would be to cap salaries at 300k. The salaries of Joe, Ryan, Ray and Miriam are ridiculous. If they leave because of it so be it. Give other young talent a chance. Then look to have access to license fees across all media. Not before then. The globalisation of television is a glorious opportunity for RTE given our international diaspora. If they produce quality Irish interest product then they have an audience of millions outside the island for their output.
    Hive off the celebrity nonsense off their RTE website if they want it to be taken seriously as a media outlet of quality.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,641 ✭✭✭✭Elmo


    Selling RTÉ 2 is not an option because nobody would be willing to buy it. Besides, moving afternoon sporting events that may run into extra time onto RTÉ 1 would be untenable because there would be an outcry if Six-One was displaced.

    Bauer just bought Communicorp.

    Sporting Events what you mean they can't use RTÉ 1 during the summer months when TODAY goes on a break or the news channel.

    What what come on.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,641 ✭✭✭✭Elmo


    garrettod wrote: »
    I had to laugh when I saw mention of RTE telling the politicians that they may not be able to provide as much political coverage in the future. Hopefully the nitwits won't fall for it.

    Oireachtas Report gone
    News ON TWO gone
    Morning TV news gone
    2FM late evening news gone

    Will these be restored.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,641 ✭✭✭✭Elmo


    If they cannot sell RTÉ2 it should be closed.

    I am absolute up to here with ****ing RTÉ they are a waste of space. And I won't take this **** any more.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 18,590 ✭✭✭✭fritzelly


    All I read in that news report is that it's everyone else's fault but RTE's that they are in the state they are and what are the government gonna do about it.

    They've already cut so much programming and yet still can't keep their heads above water and if they think 13% of people without tv's is bad it's only gonna get worse for them

    She wants everyone else to pay them more and more money while they whittle it away on cheap crap programs and crap presenters who most definitely would not stand a chance outside of Ireland

    As for the self employed how is Joe Duffy et al still contracted by RTE - they are doing full time (well permanent) jobs


  • Site Banned Posts: 5,279 ✭✭✭political analyst


    Elmo wrote: »
    Bauer just bought Communicorp.

    Sporting Events what you mean they can't use RTÉ 1 during the summer months when TODAY goes on a break or the news channel.

    What what come on.

    They can't - because Six-One must be on RTÉ 1 at a minute past 6. Period! Don't pretend otherwise.


  • Advertisement
  • Site Banned Posts: 5,279 ✭✭✭political analyst


    Elmo wrote: »
    If they cannot sell RTÉ2 it should be closed.

    I am absolute up to here with ****ing RTÉ they are a waste of space. And I won't take this **** any more.


    Why leave terrestrial-only viewers who don't have overspill of UK terrestrial TV with even less choice than they already have?

    Many of those viewers can't afford subscription TV (Sky, Netflix etc) or, even if they could, they either can't get access to good-quality broadband or they can't have satellite dishes because due to either landlords' objection or the blocking of the signal by trees that are protected by preservation orders (an issue that was mentioned in the Broadcasting forum of this website years ago).


Advertisement