Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.

Would you contribute €2 per week to solve homelessness?

12345679»

Comments

  • #242
    Galwayguy35
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,526 ✭✭✭✭Galwayguy35


    It would be interesting to know how many of these people living (for free) in hotels have been offered houses but have refused to take them.

    I'd suggest quite a few of them are trying to play the system like this Erica one did.


  • #243
    Permabear
    Closed Accounts Posts: 39,019 ✭✭✭✭Permabear


    This post has been deleted.


  • #244
    end of the road
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,599 ✭✭✭✭end of the road


    Permabear wrote: »
    This post had been deleted.


    can't be done like that as it would cause undue hardship to people, who may be refusing the house for actual genuine reasons. + it would probably cost us more in the long run.

    I'm very highly educated. I know words, i have the best words, nobody has better words then me.



  • #245
    Permabear
    Closed Accounts Posts: 39,019 ✭✭✭✭Permabear


    This post has been deleted.


  • #246
    gozunda
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,992 ✭✭✭✭gozunda


    Permabear wrote: »
    This post had been deleted.

    ^^^ this. Facilatating sham indigency helps no one imo ...


  • Advertisement
  • #247
    end of the road
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,599 ✭✭✭✭end of the road


    Permabear wrote: »
    This post had been deleted.


    the genuine reason for turning down a not free but subsidized house could be anti-social behaviour or other criminal behaviour being a huge problem in the area.

    I'm very highly educated. I know words, i have the best words, nobody has better words then me.



  • #248
    PeterParker957
    Closed Accounts Posts: 2,177 ✭✭✭PeterParker957


    end of the road wrote: »
    This post had been deleted.


    the genuine reason for turning down a not free but subsidized house could be anti-social behaviour or other criminal behaviour being a huge problem in the area.[/quote]

    So picking and choosing then. Thought so.


  • #249
    [Deleted User]
    Posts: 16,208 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    end of the road wrote: »
    the genuine reason for turning down a not free but subsidized house could be anti-social behaviour or other criminal behaviour being a huge problem in the area.

    I don't get that logic. If there's criminal behavior, then wouldn't the Gardai have marked the house as being unsafe (therefore not being on a list for them to move into), or dealt with the criminal behavior itself.

    Can you expand on anti-social behaviour as a reason?

    Lastly, how do these people know there is such terrible behavior happening before they move in?

    EDIT: Seems strange that the area is fine for everyone else living in that area... should they be offered a house in other areas in compensation?


  • #250
    corner of hells
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,439 ✭✭✭corner of hells


    Galwayguy35 wrote: »
    It would be interesting to know how many of these people living (for free) in hotels have been offered houses but have refused to take them.

    I'd suggest quite a few of them are trying to play the system like this Erica one did.

    One of conditions of moving from hotels\B&B into family hubs is that agree to look for private rented and not try to wait for local authority housing.Anyone in a family hub is getting support off social care workers and housing officers.

    At this stage those refusing family hubs and staying in hotels/b&b.s. are really just kidding themselves.


  • #251
    gozunda
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,992 ✭✭✭✭gozunda


    end of the road wrote: »
    the genuine reason for turning down a not free but subsidized house could be anti-social behaviour or other criminal behaviour being a huge problem in the area.

    But surely 'everyone' deserves the same opportunities as everyone else? I presume you do not exclude the criminally disadvantaged on the basis that they too are deprived? Surely mixed social housing was conceived so that we would have communities comprising all elements of society irrespective of such prejudice? Is not everyone deserving of a second chance? I am truely shocked at your attitude ...


  • Advertisement
  • #252
    [Deleted User]
    Posts: 12,694 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    https://www.tuathhousing.ie/

    Their CEO was interviewed on Newatalk today its was very interesting. The housing association operates mostly in the market between social housing and private ownership, because its an NGO supported by the state and private finance it can do a better job that the councils, better at maintaining the housing better and quicker dealing with anti social behaviour. The maximum rent they charge is 100 a week and its a tenancy for life. They keep the rent at that level to ensure a good social mix.

    There are solutions that are working but as he said the public often do not hear about them or they get drowned out in the shrill about the homeless.


Advertisement