Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

US may attack North Korea first

  • 17-03-2017 10:48am
    #1
    Posts: 31,118 ✭✭✭✭


    Looks like the US is turning up the heat on NK
    http://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-39297031
    The US has said its policy of "strategic patience" with North Korea is over, and suggested it may decide to take pre-emptive military action.

    Secretary of State Rex Tillerson said the option was "on the table" if the threat from the North's weapons programme reached a level requiring it.

    During a visit to South Korea, he also said the US was exploring a range of new diplomatic and economic measures.

    He also defended the deployment of a US missile system in South Korea.

    The move has angered China, but South Korea and the US say the system is needed to defend against North Korea.

    Mr Tillerson spoke shortly after visiting the demilitarised zone which divides the two Koreas.

    He arrived in South Korea from Japan, where he said that 20 years of efforts aimed at persuading North Korea to abandon its nuclear ambitions had failed.

    Looks like some of the worst fears of a Trump Administration may be about to come true.


«1345

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,240 ✭✭✭✭cnocbui


    I blame China.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,672 ✭✭✭elefant


    cnocbui wrote: »
    I blame China.

    China used to be cool.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 84,762 ✭✭✭✭Atlantic Dawn
    M


    Poor Kim Jong-un, only recently he lost his brother.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6 CormacOH


    I know there's a crazy dictator there with a growing army and nuclear programme and a population/culture we don't fully understand, but enough about The USA.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,956 ✭✭✭✭Omackeral


    Send in this one to defuse the tension


    bbcgirl1.gif


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,116 ✭✭✭archer22


    No way is America going in there...NK will fight back big time and like all bullies America will avoid such an opponent and sail on past looking for some weak victim.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,893 ✭✭✭Canis Lupus


    ^^ That glance down to his video feed.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,893 ✭✭✭Canis Lupus


    archer22 wrote: »
    No way is America going in there...NK will fight back big time and like all bullies America will avoid such an opponent and sail on past looking for some weak victim.

    What will they fight back with precisely?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,116 ✭✭✭archer22


    What will they fight back with precisely?

    Do an internet search on North Korean military power and you will find out ;)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,421 ✭✭✭✭Kermit.de.frog


    North Korea is best Korea.


  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 31,118 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    archer22 wrote: »
    Do an internet search on North Korean military power and you will find out ;)
    Any pre-emptive strike would have to be overwhelmingly massive to avoid any chance of a counter attack, plus it would have to be planned in total secrecy.
    A NK retaliation would have no specific target as the world except China is considered hostile by them.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,604 ✭✭✭irishgeo


    Any pre-emptive strike would have to be overwhelmingly massive to avoid any chance of a counter attack, plus it would have to be planned in total secrecy.
    A NK retaliation would have no specific target as the world except China is considered hostile by them.

    Seoul is within range of North Korea armies


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,240 ✭✭✭✭cnocbui


    I'll bet there are more than a few in China today who are ruing helping out N Korea in the Korean war.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 646 ✭✭✭hungry hypno toad


    North Korea is best Korea.

    Tell that to the starving masses, I'm sure it will make their miserable existence more tolerable.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,969 ✭✭✭✭alchemist33


    Nah, not with the peace-loving Trump we were told about in the election in power.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,116 ✭✭✭archer22


    cnocbui wrote: »
    I'll bet there are more than a few in China today who are ruing helping out N Korea in the Korean war.

    They would still do the same today...China's policy is simple, they will not tolerate America troops on their border.
    Also the reason America never invaded North Vietnam...they knew what China's reaction would be.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,893 ✭✭✭Canis Lupus


    archer22 wrote: »
    Do an internet search on North Korean military power and you will find out ;)

    They've found a way to launch famine at the US?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,885 ✭✭✭Tzardine


    I am planning on going to NK for Patricks day next year to do a pub crawl. (Seriously).

    A war would be very inconvenient for my travel plans.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,116 ✭✭✭archer22


    They've found a way to launch famine at the US?

    Yeah the same as US launched famine on them with sanctions :mad:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,240 ✭✭✭✭cnocbui


    archer22 wrote: »
    Yeah the same as US launched famine on them with sanctions :mad:

    Cut out the nonsense, please.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 38,247 ✭✭✭✭Guy:Incognito


    Love all the posters that wont have a bad word said about any despot that's unfriendly to the US. Bet most would take their holidays in DisneyWorld long before 2 week sun holiday in Pyongyang.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 43,028 ✭✭✭✭SEPT 23 1989


    Finally an invasion we can all agree on


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,988 ✭✭✭jacksie66


    This post has been deleted.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 38,247 ✭✭✭✭Guy:Incognito


    jacksie66 wrote: »
    America. Telling the world what they can and can't do for generations.

    If we were the likely targets for their nukes, would you be looking for Enda to do something or sit and wait till he sees one through the velux in Leinster House?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,116 ✭✭✭archer22


    Love all the posters that wont have a bad word said about any despot that's unfriendly to the US. Bet most would take their holidays in DisneyWorld long before 2 week sun holiday in Pyongyang.

    Yeah we are only supposed to have good words for the legions of despots that are friendly to the US.

    "DisneyWorld" :eek: Pyongyang would be a thousand times more interesting and educational than that plastic loud garbage.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 646 ✭✭✭hungry hypno toad


    archer22 wrote: »
    Yeah the same as US launched famine on them with sanctions :mad:

    I wonder would NK have the money for food if they didn't spend billions on a nuclear program...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,349 ✭✭✭✭super_furry


    I'd put money on Trump invading a country on a major scale before the next election. It's the only thing that could get him re-elected.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,750 ✭✭✭Avatar MIA


    Any pre-emptive strike would have to be overwhelmingly massive ...

    Taking out Kim would be a minimum. After that, and I think you'd seem some very relieved and grateful cronies.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,839 ✭✭✭Jelle1880


    Any pre-emptive strike would have to be overwhelmingly massive to avoid any chance of a counter attack, plus it would have to be planned in total secrecy.
    A NK retaliation would have no specific target as the world except China is considered hostile by them.

    Seoul. NK can't flatten it, but a few hundred thousand artillery rounds would be possible.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,452 ✭✭✭✭The_Valeyard


    looks like the US is playing North Korea at their own game. They have been taunting the west for years, videos of New York under nuclear attack, nuclear weapons testing, artillery strikes on a South Korean island, sinking of a sub, threatening destruction. What did they think would happen.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 646 ✭✭✭hungry hypno toad


    jacksie66 wrote: »
    America. Telling the world what they can and can't do for generations.

    Yet we have the 'liberals' complaining that the US will be more isolationist under Trump with foreign aid cut backs and less UN involvement. Really can't win with some people.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,905 ✭✭✭Hande hoche!


    I'd put money on Trump invading a country on a major scale before the next election. It's the only thing that could get him re-elected.
    He could take a leaf out of Clinton's book and blow up an aspirin factory.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,116 ✭✭✭archer22


    looks like the US is playing North Korea at their own game. They have been taunting the west for years, videos of New York under nuclear attack, nuclear weapons testing, artillery strikes on a South Korean island, sinking of a sub, threatening destruction. What did they think would happen.

    None of those areas are "west" they are east and south of NK


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 646 ✭✭✭hungry hypno toad


    Avatar MIA wrote: »
    Taking out Kim would be a minimum. After that, and I think you'd seem some very relieved and grateful cronies.

    Not sure about that, anyone currently in a position of power in NK would surely fear what the people would do to them if they lost power - expect thousands to be executed by the people, at a minimum. The same people who have lived in poverty, famine, fear for decades won't forget who enforced the dictators wishes.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,934 ✭✭✭daheff


    Awesome


    Now to get CNN/SKY News in HD


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,116 ✭✭✭archer22


    Not sure about that, anyone currently in a position of power in NK would surely fear what the people would do to them if they lost power - expect thousands to be executed by the people, at a minimum. The same people who have lived in poverty, famine, fear for decades won't forget who enforced the dictators wishes.

    Here we go again believing western propaganda...all the oppressed people waiting for whitey to bring his" freedom and democracy" :D
    Reality is rightly or wrongly they adore "beloved leader" and will fight like demons for him..if whitey is expecting flowers there he will get a rude reality check when bouquets turn out to be grenades.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,750 ✭✭✭Avatar MIA


    The same people who have lived in poverty, famine, fear for decades won't forget who enforced the dictators wishes.

    Nah, they are as likely to rise up post Kim as they are now. I'd fully expect totalitarian rule to continue, just less fear of the leaders being done away in a gruesome manner at the 'Whim of Kim'.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,452 ✭✭✭✭The_Valeyard


    archer22 wrote: »
    None of those areas are "west" they are east and south of NK

    It's the general term for US and it's allies and you know it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,384 ✭✭✭Eire Go Brach


    Sure NK have every right to be ready and armed. USA are bullies. Invading who they like. NK have every right to defend themselves.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 646 ✭✭✭hungry hypno toad


    archer22 wrote: »
    Here we go again believing western propaganda...all the oppressed people waiting for whitey to bring his" freedom and democracy" :D
    Reality is rightly or wrongly they adore "beloved leader" and will fight like demons for him..if whitey is expecting flowers there he will get a rude reality check when bouquets turn out to be grenades.

    Yeah, that explains the estimated 200,000 political prisoners. They probably loved the leader too much, right?


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 646 ✭✭✭hungry hypno toad


    Sure NK have every right to be ready and armed. USA are bullies. Invading who they like. NK have every right to defend themselves.

    While they starve. Seems a fair trade off.


  • Posts: 31,118 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Jelle1880 wrote: »
    Seoul. NK can't flatten it, but a few hundred thousand artillery rounds would be possible.
    I was referring to the probability that NK would attack ALL it's enemies in retaliation of a US strike.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    archer22 wrote: »
    Do an internet search on North Korean military power and you will find out ;)

    Sure didn't Kim single handedly win the last FIFA world cup ,

    I'm sure he could beat america with one hand behind his back ,


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,240 ✭✭✭✭cnocbui


    Sure NK have every right to be ready and armed. USA are bullies. Invading who they like. NK have every right to defend themselves.

    Ah, defending themselves, that must be why they launched those missiles aimed at Japan, because of the incessant Japanese aggression and threats these past few years.

    Pull the other one.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,681 ✭✭✭Fleawuss


    Of course it would be a short conflict. Of course it wouldn't escalate. Of course they would all be home for Christmas. Those masters of military strategy and geopolitics Trump and Pence and Bannon have it planned and measured to a millimeter.

    The first declaration of war via Twitter.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 7,611 ✭✭✭david75


    'He also defended the deployment of a US missile system in South Korea.'

    But the US would be fine if Mexico planted loads of missiles on their border..


    Riiiight


  • Posts: 31,118 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    archer22 wrote: »
    Here we go again believing western propaganda...all the oppressed people waiting for whitey to bring his" freedom and democracy" :D
    Reality is rightly or wrongly they adore "beloved leader" and will fight like demons for him..if whitey is expecting flowers there he will get a rude reality check when bouquets turn out to be grenades.
    The people of NK have only one source of information, their own government's version of the truth. Those people are educated to hate the rest of the world and yes, they'll fight.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 646 ✭✭✭hungry hypno toad


    david75 wrote: »
    'He also defended the deployment of a US missile system in South Korea.'

    But the US would be fine if Mexico planted loads of missiles on their border..


    Riiiight

    Yeah, because the US repeatedly threatens to nuke Mexico. Pull the other one.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,798 ✭✭✭Mr. Incognito




  • Closed Accounts Posts: 646 ✭✭✭hungry hypno toad


    Fleawuss wrote: »
    Of course it would be a short conflict. Of course it wouldn't escalate. Of course they would all be home for Christmas. Those masters of military strategy and geopolitics Trump and Pence and Bannon have it planned and measured to a millimeter.

    The first declaration of war via Twitter.

    Twitter is probably banned in NK, although I'm sure Kim and his cronies have access.


  • Advertisement
Advertisement