Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Bread - Least bad for you

2»

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,306 ✭✭✭daithi7


    Mellor wrote: »
    212cals pet 100g, same as the White bread above.
    The lower calories are mostly down to the fact that it's a much smaller slice as mentioned above. 28g vrs 40g.
    If it helps control portion size it's not necessarily a bad thing.
    But have 6 "low calorie" slices instead of 4 because they are less/smaller is a waste of time.

    Ha, those food companies' marketing departments are devious feckers aren't they!?.... :)

    Still in fairness, as you also point out, portion size is a major driver of your calorie intake, so it probably makes sense to reduce slice size to encourage people to eat less by just eating same number of smaller slices. Reducing plate size has been clearly shown to help people reduce how much they eat, so the slice size thing probably works also imho.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 483 ✭✭marialouise


    I for one am a fan of smaller slices! I am not a big bread eater, and I buy packets of the Slimbos or whatever they're called, pop them in the freezer, and for that one day a week when I want something to go with my eggs or whatever, there's a little low-calorie slice of something, without needing the whole slice. I wish I could buy mini-everythings, the small slices are ideal I think :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,377 ✭✭✭✭Mellor


    daithi7 wrote: »
    Ha, those good companies marketing departments are devious feckers.... :)
    You have to hand it to them, they've got people to pay the slightly more money for 3/4 of a loaf.

    It's not a new trick either, a few years ago Brennans did a weightwatchers branded bread. Which was basically their normal bread in smaller loafs.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,388 ✭✭✭✭rubadub


    Is it a low calorie bread though? :confused:

    Brennans Be Good White Bread has 212 kcal per 100g.

    Brennans Family Pan (i.e. the normal white sliced pan) has 219 kcal per 100g.
    Mellor wrote: »
    , a few years ago Brennans did a weightwatchers branded bread. Which was basically their normal bread in smaller loafs.
    They still do and its actually higher in kcal than the previous 2 listed.

    224kcal per 100g

    https://brennansbread.ie/products/brennans-weight-watchers-white-bread

    They can change the recipe to lower the WW points, but to still make it taste nice they can end up adding more sugar, which may be low in WW points.

    These were the WW points some years ago that I worked out

    600kcal portion of coconut is 21.5points
    600kcal portion of sugar is 8.5points

    rapeseed oil has 14.5WW points per 100ml
    coconut oil has 34.5WW points per 100ml

    The points calculations have changed since then.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 223 ✭✭OneMan37


    How did it go for you ? I’m a Catholic so fast on one meal a day, other than that I only eat dry bread with perhaps a cup of tea. This is fulfilling my daily fast while also helps me control my weight. You can offer your fast up for any intention.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,377 ✭✭✭✭Mellor


    If you’re eating bread, and having one meal a day it’s not really a fast.



Advertisement