Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

The End for Youghal?

«13456789

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,363 ✭✭✭✭Del.Monte


    Outrageous - CIE must be spending next to nothing on the line given the state that it's in. A lot of the track was removed years ago. CIE moved heaven and earth to prevent the line being preserved in 1983 and the local politicians have only themselves to blame. Maybe they can put a few photographs up in Clancy's Bar & Restaurant aka The Railway Bar. :rolleyes:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,085 ✭✭✭✭BonnieSituation


    It's just maddening. No lessons ever learned.

    Watch as they are allowed formally close it. Sell the land and in ten years buy it back to re-open the line...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,363 ✭✭✭✭Del.Monte


    Except that there will be no reopening this time.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,492 ✭✭✭KCAccidental


    Hopefully not, Youghal needs something in the future. The place is dying!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,831 ✭✭✭Markcheese


    Should preserve the line by making it a greenway

    Slava ukraini 🇺🇦



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,363 ✭✭✭✭Del.Monte


    Markcheese wrote: »
    Should preserve the line by making it a greenway

    Oh please don't.....


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,219 ✭✭✭bigroad


    Can they not put these lines out to tender to see if some group or company could make a go of it.
    It seems to me if Irish rail cant run then they dont want any one getting at it.
    A pure disgrace they are.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,363 ✭✭✭✭Del.Monte


    It would be difficult for a private operator as CIE have scrapped almost every locomotive and carriage that could have been used.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 71,184 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    bigroad wrote: »
    Can they not put these lines out to tender to see if some group or company could make a go of it.
    It seems to me if Irish rail cant run then they dont want any one getting at it.
    A pure disgrace they are.

    There is no line. There are a few bits of rotten track and not much else.

    Putting it out to tender would require money to pay the PSO to operate it, and someone who can get 1600mm rolling stock - as, thanks to the cutters torch and IE incompetence - we're already using pretty much all there is and the tiny bit remaining (the 2700 class) is needed for the next expansion.

    If the NTA starts tendering out lines, they're going to tender ones that are already operational first.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,126 ✭✭✭✭Idbatterim


    could these lines be simply turned into road and run buses and bikes on them etc?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 71,184 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    Idbatterim wrote: »
    could these lines be simply turned into road and run buses and bikes on them etc?

    Realistically no. In many cases there is already a superior road anyway.

    A double track railway line would barely provide the width of a single carriageway road.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,126 ✭✭✭✭Idbatterim


    yeah I thought width could be an issue, but couldnt you simply run the bus from youghal to middleton on a single carriageway.

    I just seems to me, that rail is so prohibitively expensive to serve these small places, but bus is far more flexible and dirt cheap to run by comparison...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 71,184 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    Idbatterim wrote: »
    yeah I thought width could be an issue, but couldnt you simply run the bus from youghal to middleton on a single carriageway.

    I just seems to me, that rail is so prohibitively expensive to serve these small places, but bus is far more flexible and dirt cheap to run by comparison...

    They run the bus on the existing single carriageway N25...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,295 ✭✭✭n97 mini


    I think the end came a long time ago. Is this line a level crossing fest like the Nenagh branch?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,363 ✭✭✭✭Del.Monte


    n97 mini wrote: »
    I think the end came a long time ago. Is this line a level crossing fest like the Nenagh branch?

    NO.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,126 ✭✭✭✭Idbatterim


    They run the bus on the existing single carriageway N25...
    right, but the rail route is totally segregated and would offer faster journey times I would assume?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,814 ✭✭✭✭whisky_galore


    Think this is just a tin rattling exercise for more funding...Make noises about abandonment... local people get angry, local politicians get stuck in...IE get monies for notional 'care and maintenace'...back to square one.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 71,184 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    Idbatterim wrote: »
    right, but the rail route is totally segregated and would offer faster journey times I would assume?

    Its not and probably not.

    There is zero financial justification in building a long distance busway to a small, broke provincial town anyway. Buses can use the N25. Indeed, they would have to from Midleton anyway due to the extant operating commuter rail service!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,363 ✭✭✭✭Del.Monte


    Cork is a county of hopeless dreamers and wafflers - my experience anyway.

    Image.jpg


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,258 ✭✭✭✭Losty Dublin


    Del Monte can correct me here but isn't it since the early 60's since this line had daily passenger services to and from Youghal? I know it had summer excursion trains besides but they were occasional if well patronised.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,363 ✭✭✭✭Del.Monte


    Del Monte can correct me here but isn't it since the early 60's since this line had daily passenger services to and from Youghal? I know it had summer excursion trains besides but they were occasional if well patronised.

    The daily passenger service ended in 1963 - if memory serves.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,381 ✭✭✭✭end of the road


    Del Monte can correct me here but isn't it since the early 60's since this line had daily passenger services to and from Youghal? I know it had summer excursion trains besides but they were occasional if well patronised.

    1963 i think. apparently the fares were cheeper then the bus that replaced it. only in ireland

    I'm very highly educated. I know words, i have the best words, nobody has better words then me.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,363 ✭✭✭✭Del.Monte


    Some details here of the last days of the Summer Sunday Excursion trains that ended in 1979. The small Ads are from the Evening Echo and were the only form of marketing.

    Image%2B%25282%2529.jpg

    Image%2B%25283%2529.jpg


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 71,184 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    Is the 19781979 correction yours, or did they actually do that in the printed ad?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,363 ✭✭✭✭Del.Monte


    L1011 wrote: »
    Is the 19781979 correction yours, or did they actually do that in the printed ad?

    Sunday 19th August was 1979 and not 1978 but they forgot to alter the date in the Ad. I crossed it out on my copy.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Some of the lines they want to abandon:

    http://www.irishexaminer.com/ireland/iarnrod-eireann-seeks-to-permanently-axe-10-closed-lines-430881.html

    Waterford-Rosslare Harbour
    Claremorris-Collooney
    Midleton-Youghal
    Navan-Kingscourt
    Abbey Junction-New Ross
    Mullingar-Athlone
    Limerick-Foynes
    Tralee-Fenit
    Ballingrane-Tralee

    Ballingrane-Tralee was already abandoned in 1987 surely?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 71,184 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    Few of those will be extremely controversial. The North Kerry was abandoned but not sold off I thought? I would assume its to avoid structure upkeep on the Greenway and make the councils do it, if anything.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 611 ✭✭✭MGWR


    Isambard wrote: »
    Disgraceful. More than enough money was spent on the Midleton extension to reopen the line all the way to Youghal. Time to rewrite the law for privatisation of railways.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,258 ✭✭✭✭Losty Dublin


    Karsini wrote: »

    Ballingrane-Tralee was already abandoned in 1987 surely?

    Yep, Ballingrane to Tralee was abandoned in 1988. However Tralee-Foynes was laid under a separate act to the North Kerry. As it is a line of its own accord, it needs an Order of it's own.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    L1011 wrote: »
    Few of those will be extremely controversial. The North Kerry was abandoned but not sold off I thought? I would assume its to avoid structure upkeep on the Greenway and make the councils do it, if anything.
    I think you're right actually. I just remembered that if you come off the N21 after Rathkeale and take the R523, you'll come across a bridge with a standard Irish Rail bridge code. Found it on Google Maps.

    https://www.google.ie/maps/@52.5114537,-9.0071485,3a,37.5y,180.93h,61t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1s8lCyK4l3ttL-wWZ6Vpl9Bg!2e0!7i13312!8i6656


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,363 ✭✭✭✭Del.Monte


    Karsini wrote: »
    Some of the lines they want to abandon:

    http://www.irishexaminer.com/ireland/iarnrod-eireann-seeks-to-permanently-axe-10-closed-lines-430881.html

    Waterford-Rosslare Harbour
    Claremorris-Collooney
    Midleton-Youghal
    Navan-Kingscourt
    Abbey Junction-New Ross
    Mullingar-Athlone
    Limerick-Foynes
    Tralee-Fenit
    Ballingrane-Tralee

    Ballingrane-Tralee was already abandoned in 1987 surely?

    There is no earthly way that red highlighted lines should be sanctioned for abandonment.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,573 ✭✭✭Infini


    MGWR wrote: »
    Disgraceful. More than enough money was spent on the Midleton extension to reopen the line all the way to Youghal. Time to rewrite the law for privatisation of railways.

    To be honest on the one hand its a joke some rail lines are abandoned when there could be a potential for visbility. The waterford rosslare section for example was closed down in 2010 but it was used a year or 2 later to move DMUs after the bridge at lansdowne station was damaged in floods.

    On the other hand the government deliberately underfunded IR to the point it risks insolvency in which case of course the company would seek to cut any costs it can expecially if its not making any money at all on those abandoned sections. Realistically money needs to be made available and some stuff restored.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,814 ✭✭✭✭whisky_galore


    L1011 wrote: »
    Few of those will be extremely controversial. The North Kerry was abandoned but not sold off I thought? I would assume its to avoid structure upkeep on the Greenway and make the councils do it, if anything.

    The North Kerry Greenway isn't getting any further west of the Kerry border beyond Abbeyfeale nor progressing beyond the site of 3rd(?) level crossing of Fenit branch with landowner issues, so that's at a stalemate.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,345 ✭✭✭Consonata


    Del.Monte wrote: »
    There is no earthly way that red highlighted lines should be sanctioned for abandonment.

    Honestly, neither should the Claremorris - Colooney line be. I mean I know WRC is a controversial subject here, but if we support the idea of rail in any form. A Sligo - Cork route has to be considered worth maintaining at the absolute least.


    It's shocking that they are closing all 400km of track for the sake of what.

    €3 million?

    An absolute drop in the ocean, where is that money even going that it is worth closing all those lines?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,795 ✭✭✭Isambard


    Sligo to Cork? No problem, change at Connolly.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,698 ✭✭✭✭Itssoeasy


    Well I'm biased towards youghal and traveled to Midleton last weekend on the train. And IR fair play made a great job of the reopened portioned and the town seems alive and the area around the station looked great and they made a beautiful job of the signal box which I was convinced they would demolish.

    I know that my memories of youghal railway station isn't a valid reason to keep the line technically open. My earliest memory in a railway setting of any kind is trying to move the turntable and failing at Age 5.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,712 ✭✭✭roundymac


    What were the loadings on the train like?, from what I'v seen it seems to be doing ok.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,698 ✭✭✭✭Itssoeasy


    roundymac wrote: »
    What were the loadings on the train like?, from what I'v seen it seems to be doing ok.

    Well going down early it was fairly ok and then when I left at 16:30 the crowds coming off the train was very healthy indeed. I mean crowds of people getting off. Now this was a Saturday so I don't know how that translates to weekdays. But the way they have cleaned up the station and kept the signal cabin and made it look lovely.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,779 ✭✭✭Carawaystick


    Del.Monte wrote: »
    There is no earthly way that red highlighted lines should be sanctioned for abandonment.

    Well the Mullingar Athlone line is a tarmac greenway now...


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,814 ✭✭✭✭whisky_galore


    Well the Mullingar Athlone line is a tarmac greenway now...

    Shared greenway. The rails were left in place on one side.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,292 ✭✭✭goingnowhere


    Consonata wrote: »
    It's shocking that they are closing all 400km of track for the sake of what.

    €3 million?

    An absolute drop in the ocean, where is that money even going that it is worth closing all those lines?

    Its 3 million a year, every year plus elimination of future legal liability to maintain rights of way over/under/across the line

    It doesn't impact the train service, its a total win win with no downside as lets face it we ain't seeing trains north of Tuam for decades if not ever


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 168 ✭✭Jem72


    Shared greenway. The rails were left in place on one side.

    While the rails were left in place, they are purely decorative. The greenway swaps side several times and the wooden sleepers are in such a decrepit state that a total relay would be required.

    The greenway will keep the right of way intact but there is no way it could peacefully co-exist with an active railway on that alignment. But, maintaining the right of way is the primary advantage and this should be done on pretty much every closed railway.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,814 ✭✭✭✭whisky_galore


    Jem72 wrote: »
    While the rails were left in place, they are purely decorative. The greenway swaps side several times and the wooden sleepers are in such a decrepit state that a total relay would be required.

    The greenway will keep the right of way intact but there is no way it could peacefully co-exist with an active railway on that alignment. But, maintaining the right of way is the primary advantage and this should be done on pretty much every closed railway.

    That's what I meant, those rails and sleepers couldn't take anything heavier than a rail cycle. Right of way preserved, that's all...for now.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,381 ✭✭✭✭end of the road


    Its 3 million a year, every year plus elimination of future legal liability to maintain rights of way over/under/across the line

    It doesn't impact the train service, its a total win win with no downside as lets face it we ain't seeing trains north of Tuam for decades if not ever

    plenty of downsides, but i agree with you they won't matter as long as the politicians are convinced abandoning state infrastructure will save huge money.

    I'm very highly educated. I know words, i have the best words, nobody has better words then me.



  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 14,523 Mod ✭✭✭✭marno21


    I think that if Collooney-Claremorris is ever reopened it has to be on a new/highly upgraded alignment. The current one is effectively a tramway with all the level crossings and the low speed possible on the alignment.

    It surely wouldn't cost that much more and would provide a much much better level of service.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 910 ✭✭✭XPS_Zero


    I'm surprised nobody has asked this but...is there any possible demand for this line if it opened? What's the surrounding population density and pop in general like?

    Surely it's time to scrap it OR open it, maintaining it while closed seems pointless


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,844 ✭✭✭Banjoxed


    XPS_Zero wrote: »
    I'm surprised nobody has asked this but...is there any possible demand for this line if it opened? What's the surrounding population density and pop in general like?

    Surely it's time to scrap it OR open it, maintaining it while closed seems pointless

    Given that AFAIK the track has gone back to nature beyond Midleton, its moot as to whether Irish Rail is doing anything at all with the line. Are they claiming any particular sum of money that they could "save" by its abandonment?

    The wisdom of separating track maintenance from operation is apparent.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,814 ✭✭✭✭whisky_galore


    Banjoxed wrote: »
    Given that AFAIK the track has gone back to nature beyond Midleton, its moot as to whether Irish Rail is doing anything at all with the line. Are they claiming any particular sum of money that they could "save" by its abandonment?

    The wisdom of separating track maintenance from operation is apparent.

    'Care and maintenance' is non existant, apart from putting fencing around Youghal station to prevent the local branch of Mensa from torching it again and work to road bridges, some of which have been renewed already.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,295 ✭✭✭n97 mini


    XPS_Zero wrote: »
    I'm surprised nobody has asked this but...is there any possible demand for this line if it opened? What's the surrounding population density and pop in general like?

    Surely it's time to scrap it OR open it, maintaining it while closed seems pointless

    Looking at gmaps, aside from Youghal there isn't much else. Presumably some of those inclined to use the train already drive to Midleton and park and ride from there. Midleton is not mad busy, all trains are only 4 cars.


  • Advertisement
Advertisement