Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Slope ratings being introduced in Ireland ?

  • 07-09-2016 06:59PM
    #1
    Closed Accounts Posts: 7,440 ✭✭✭


    Is it true that Irish courses are being assessed for Slope ratings ? Anyone got authoritative info on this? I had not heard about it.
    Whats the goal ?


«13

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,493 ✭✭✭✭Seve OB


    Source?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 878 ✭✭✭Montgolfier


    This thread is much more interesting.......


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,478 ✭✭✭✭PARlance


    Seve OB wrote: »
    Source?

    Source for a load of questions?

    I don't think this is the kind of story that will make the Six One News. It was mentioned by a poster in another thread. Maybe they can elaborate.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,100 ✭✭✭clog


    I don't think that the GUI are going down this route, it would be quite a lot of work. Being a quite subjective measure this also could be open to disaggrement between course raters/clubs. In a way as well the SSS/CSS takes care of this problem for clubs anyway.

    Interestingly the ILGU has been issuing slope ratings for the ladies tees for the last few years. Not sure if they have completed all affiliated clubs but we definately got one from them about 2-3 years ago and its up on display on the ladies board. (123/113).


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 346 ✭✭thegolfer


    Could be coming from the increase in American greenfees who use the slope system in the States. Making it that bit easier for them to rate a course in terms of difficulty.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,331 ✭✭✭mike12


    It has to be simple enough, par 71 sss 74, you get 3 extra shots on top of your handicap.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,005 ✭✭✭Letree


    As i mentioned in the closed thread yesterday the process has already begun. They are currently measuring courses for its introduction in a few years time.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,613 ✭✭✭BigChap1759


    Letree wrote: »
    As i mentioned in the closed thread yesterday the process has already begun. They are currently measuring courses for its introduction in a few years time.

    Where are you getting your information from out of interest? Seems odd that they would move away from the congu system when SSS/CSS would seem to cover all eventualities??


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,005 ✭✭✭Letree


    Where are you getting your information from out of interest? Seems odd that they would move away from the congu system when SSS/CSS would seem to cover all eventualities??

    They were at the club my brother plays in last week measuring up. They plan on giving each course a slope rating so when you go to a different club to play your handicap will be adjusted accordingly.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,613 ✭✭✭BigChap1759


    "They" being the GUI??


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,100 ✭✭✭clog


    Every course has the option to ask the GUI for a re-rating of their standard scratch at any time if they believe it is not representitave. In practice this is usually only invoked when large changes are made to the course. In addition clubs have to periodically send in a certified course (distance) measurement, we were asked to send a new one in earlier in the year.

    This has absolutely nothing to do with a slope rating. As the GUI has committed to the Congu regulations for the period 2016-2019 I cannot see why it would be brought in now.

    I would also think that a large scale change of this nature would have to at least go to the GUI AGM before approval as it certainly not have widespread approval from the clubs, who are after all its stakeholders.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,800 ✭✭✭Senna


    Typical American golfer plays mostly non competitive golf across a large number of courses, so the slope rating is a much better system for them.

    Would be nice for all courses to have a slope for visitors but SSS/CSS seems to suit the Irish/UK average golfer where they would be a member of a home course and play regularly in comps.

    If handicap went on slope, I could be a 15hcp at my home courses SSS - 2, but a 19hcp at a course with a SSS+2.
    Would make a huge difference in a interclub matchplay game.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 778 ✭✭✭Kingswood Rover


    Down in Dingle at the mo and i called into Ceann Sibheal gc today and they have the slope of the course displayed very prominently. Each set of tee's had a different slope, all for the septics i would imagine.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 20,796 ✭✭✭✭Rikand


    Down in Dingle at the mo and i called into Ceann Sibheal gc today and they have the slope of the course displayed very prominently. Each set of tee's had a different slope, all for the septics i would imagine.

    Septics? Didn't know it was full of those awful tanks down there


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31 InTheRough


    I think this is going to happen after the 2016-18 term of CONGU. I’ve heard the GUI have requested course measurement certs from all the clubs here.


  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 18,735 Mod ✭✭✭✭slave1


    Slope rating already in place for a lot of clubs, especially the bigger ones, US visitors can use their cards on an Irish course to adjust their handicap even for a casual round once it has a slope rating.
    Most courses have it on their cards but some just have it on the clubhouse noticeboard

    My stuff on Adverts, mostly Tesla Pre Highland Model 3

    Public Profile active ads for slave1



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 723 ✭✭✭Hoof Hearted2


    Seems to be a lot of misconceptions and misinformation as to what the slope system actually is, it's not used exclusively by the Americans, it's also currently used on the continent by the EGU and pretty much everywhere else in the world bar the CONGU nations, it's a fairer system and is a truer reflection of current golfing ability, obviously it would be tweaked for use by CONGU, i.e. no casual rounds and no mulligans etc.
    The current unified handicapping system UHS is for 2 years 2016-2018, this is unusual for CONGU, as previous editions have been for 3 year periods, reading between the lines this points towards a significant impeding change.
    Also as was mentioned by another poster, it would require approval by branch ADM's and then the national GUI AGM, as this process takes time and there has been no motion to date, it'll unlikely but not impossible that it will be on the agenda this coming Autumn, but people in the know and with their finger on the pulse, expect it will only be a matter of time before the slope system replaces the current system.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,613 ✭✭✭BigChap1759


    What makes it a fairer system?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 970 ✭✭✭Senecio


    We went through the change from the CONGU system to the US system in Australia from 2009 to 2012. It was phased in with slope being the last to be introduced. Here's my thought from someone who's been through the change.

    1. Your handicap is much more in tune with you current performance. It can come down and go out very rapidly.

    2. I like the idea of slope in place of a standard scratch. The concept of slope is that one course can be more or less difficult depending on a golfers ability. When they measure a course they take into account how a scratch marker would play each and hole and how an 18 HCP would play the same hole. If all the trouble off the tee is at the 200-230 yd mark then that hole will be more difficult for the 18HCP than the scratch marker as they don't have the power to carry the trouble.

    3. Its a fun handicap system to play. Your HCP is based on your best 8 scores from your last 20 rounds. So each week you are playing against the score that is being dropped from your last 20. If that 20th round is not one of your best then you are playing with immunity. You can't go out. However if your 20th round is one of your best 8 then you are playing against that round. It is possible to beat your handicap and still go out if the 20th round that is dropping out is one of your best. It also adds more interest if you are scrambling. Instead of trying to make buffer your target is to beat your 8th best score. As long as you beat that 8th best score you can still come down even if that score is 30-31pts.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 723 ✭✭✭Hoof Hearted2


    What makes it a fairer system?

    It reflects your current playing ability more accurately than the current UHS system, that IMO makes it fairer.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,005 ✭✭✭Letree


    What the GUI guys explained at my brothers course is that the course will be given a slope rating so people coming to play it from other courses will adjust their own handicap to suit the course. There will be a formula for calculating your handicap for any given course.

    It will have a big effect on inter club comps. You may be playing of 10 at your own course and when you go to another more difficult course to play your match you may be up to a 12.

    BTW they didn't mention anything about moving away from our current handicap system to the American slope system.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,909 ✭✭✭alxmorgan


    Senecio wrote: »
    We went through the change from the CONGU system to the US system in Australia from 2009 to 2012. It was phased in with slope being the last to be introduced. Here's my thought from someone who's been through the change.

    1. Your handicap is much more in tune with you current performance. It can come down and go out very rapidly.

    2. I like the idea of slope in place of a standard scratch. The concept of slope is that one course can be more or less difficult depending on a golfers ability. When they measure a course they take into account how a scratch marker would play each and hole and how an 18 HCP would play the same hole. If all the trouble off the tee is at the 200-230 yd mark then that hole will be more difficult for the 18HCP than the scratch marker as they don't have the power to carry the trouble.

    3. Its a fun handicap system to play. Your HCP is based on your best 8 scores from your last 20 rounds. So each week you are playing against the score that is being dropped from your last 20. If that 20th round is not one of your best then you are playing with immunity. You can't go out. However if your 20th round is one of your best 8 then you are playing against that round. It is possible to beat your handicap and still go out if the 20th round that is dropping out is one of your best. It also adds more interest if you are scrambling. Instead of trying to make buffer your target is to beat your 8th best score. As long as you beat that 8th best score you can still come down even if that score is 30-31pts.


    Seems to go against what the GUI have been doing recently in terms of 1 shot above lowest in a year.

    Some would no doubt have reservations in how the lesser spotted handicap manipulators would handle the new scenario.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,493 ✭✭✭✭Seve OB


    also sounds to me like it could result in open season for the cheats.
    if it's only your best 10 cards of your last 20 to count, and you can include casual rounds... well then it couldn't be that hard to throw in 20 sh1tty scores ahead of the captains prize or whatever you are having yourself!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,021 ✭✭✭Russman


    I wonder would it spell the end for stableford & V-par competitions, given that a no score or loss on a hole could be 8, 9 or 10 or any number really, rather than necessarily, say, a double bogey.
    Or maybe it would make no difference.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,478 ✭✭✭✭PARlance


    Seve OB wrote: »
    also sounds to me like it could result in open season for the cheats.
    if it's only your best 10 cards of your last 20 to count, and you can include casual rounds... well then it couldn't be that hard to throw in 20 sh1tty scores ahead of the captains prize or whatever you are having yourself!

    It would be an out and out disaster if implementated imo. Golf in Ireland & UK is mostly competition based and the Congu system works extremely well in that environment.

    ROW golf doesn't revolved around weekend members comps, big members comps, open days, interclub matches etc like us. They have a (very) casual system that's wide open to manipulation and relatively quick manipulation at that. Their golf is casual in nature compared to ours.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,021 ✭✭✭Russman


    PARlance wrote: »
    ROW golf doesn't revolved around weekend members comps, big members comps, open days, interclub matches etc like us. They have a (very) casual system that's wide open to manipulation and relatively quick manipulation at that. Their golf is casual in nature compared to ours.

    Yeah from what little I know about golf in the States, it seems to be the most "competition" is in the form of bets within your 3 or 4 ball.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,493 ✭✭✭✭Seve OB


    I think in the states also it is rare enough to be a member of a golf club. most of them play the field so to speak and I know from going to the Carolinas to play golf, they seemed to be all public courses. though they were no stepasides :D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,478 ✭✭✭✭PARlance


    Seve OB wrote: »
    I think in the states also it is rare enough to be a member of a golf club. most of them play the field so to speak and I know from going to the Carolinas to play golf, they seemed to be all public courses. though they were no stepasides :D

    You can have an accurate unofficial HC over there very easily via online tools / apps that just replicate the official one. All you need are your previous scores, slope & course ratings. There isn't a massive incentive to join up and get an official HC.

    I hope the GUI really think this through if it is indeed on the cards. Aside from the large fluctuations in HC's and what that could bring, they should really look into other markets and understand them. Most clubs outside large urban areas here won't survive if their revenue model goes from steady membership to casual golf based.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,493 ✭✭✭✭Seve OB


    PARlance wrote: »
    You can have an accurate unofficial HC over there very easily via online tools / apps that just replicate the official one. All you need are your previous scores, slope & course ratings. There isn't a massive incentive to join up and get an official HC.

    I hope the GUI really think this through if it is indeed on the cards. Aside from the large fluctuations in HC's and what that could bring, they should really look into other markets and understand them. Most clubs outside large urban areas here won't survive if their revenue model goes from steady membership to casual golf based.

    yea, but unlike here I always thought you can actually have an official handicap over there also without being a member of a club


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 970 ✭✭✭Senecio


    All handicapping systems can be manipulated if someone chooses to do so. Designing a system to stop the 1% is a futile exercise. Only we can do that by having the courage to call them out.

    Australia has a similar golf culture to UK/IE. Strong membership, organised comps, social golf for the once a year's who aren't interested in a handicap. It works just fine.


Advertisement
Advertisement