Should Public Prayers Be Allowed on Planes?

silverharp

In this case , this chap Gad Saad was on a plane and a religious jewish person stood up in the isle and started praying, I assume nobody stopped him. But the question is do non religious people have a right not to have public displays of religion foisted on them in particular in a confined space, plains, trains and busses?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vLnJ9cIlcYo

evolving_doors

I suppose Numpties have a right to do a singsong on the way to Euros and be commended so it's open season!

It's like asking, do you have a right to be a numpty if the airline has no policy?

Could you go a step further and start singing ed Sheerin song standing right beside him, Would that be rude?

Or... What if a guy started praying to Allah and went around the aisle chanting 'allahu akbar', now that would be awkward wouldn't it. I'd prefer the Jewish prayers for some reason.

vicwatson

Should not be allowed, could be an incitement to riot for some and on an aircraft that can be done without, pray in your head if ya want I say.

Peregrinus

silverharp wrote: »

In this case , this chap Gad Saad was on a plane and a religious jewish person stood up in the isle and started praying, I assume nobody stopped him. But the question is do non religious people have a right not to have public displays of religion foisted on them in particular in a confined space, plains, trains and busses?

I don't know why non-religious people in particular would have such a right. Are non-religious people some kind of superior being, such that they have rights that are denied to others?

Reframe the question in a less unfortunate way: do people have a right not to have public displays of religion foisted on them?

It's very hard to argue that they do, really. Most conceptions of human rights include rights to freedom of expression/free speech, and to freedom of belief/religious practice. Obviously any ban on manifestations of religion in a a public place would infringe these rights, and so would require some fairly powerful justification. I'm not saying that there couldn't be a justification; just that we need to produce one, we can't assume it. And that it needs to be a pretty convincing one.

Of course, this goes to the question of whether the law or could should ban public displays of religion on planes, buses and trains. We could ask a different question; could such a ban be imposed by airlines, bus operators, railway companies as part of the conditions of carriage? Don't they have rights too, and don't their rights include the right to control/limit/regulate the behaviour of passengers through the terms of their contracts with the passengers?

We could sidestep the question in a couple of ways. One, such a ban is totally impractical. (If I'm chanting loudly in a language that might be Hebrew but on the other hand might be Icelandic, how confident are you that I'm engaged in a public display of religion, or just giving an off-key version of the B-side of Iceland's Eurovision entry for 1994?) Two, it's unlikely that airlines, etc, would choose to impose such a ban, since it would attract controversy and almost certainly cause them more commercial damage than is caused by the (I suspect, fairly infrequent) phenomenon of public expression of religion on public conveyances of one kind or another.

But let's not sidestep the question. If, say, a private bus operator were to impose such a ban, would it be lawful? Obviously if it was a ban that was imposed on, say, just Muslims, that would be unlawful discrimination on the basis of religion. If it was a ban that targetted all religious expressions, there's a fairly strong argument that it would still be unlawful discrimination on the basis of religious belief, if expressions of belief which were otherwise similar but were not of religious belief were not banned. But a ban on disruptive, attention-seeking speech or behaviour? I think you're good to go with that one.

magicbastarder

the specific scenario above would be an easy one, i suppose. if someone stands up in the aisle without requiring to use the facilities, or to allow another passenger in or out of their seat, would generally soon be asked to sit down by the cabin crew to allow other passengers or cabin crew to pass. so leading prayer from the aisle would be an issue.

but as peregrinus points out, you'd need to prove the benefit of a ban in order to be able to justify it.

silverharp

Peregrinus wrote: »

I don't know why non-religious people in particular would have such a right. Are non-religious people some kind of superior being, such that they have rights that are denied to others?

Reframe the question in a less unfortunate way: do people have a right not to have public displays of religion foisted on them?

It's very hard to argue that they do, really. Most conceptions of human rights include rights to freedom of expression/free speech, and to freedom of belief/religious practice. Obviously any ban on manifestations of religion in a a public place would infringe these rights, and so would require some fairly powerful justification. I'm not saying that there couldn't be a justification; just that we need to produce one, we can't assume it. And that it needs to be a pretty convincing one.

Of course, this goes to the question of whether the law or could should ban public displays of religion on planes, buses and trains. We could ask a different question; could such a ban be imposed by airlines, bus operators, railway companies as part of the conditions of carriage? Don't they have rights too, and don't their rights include the right to control/limit/regulate the behaviour of passengers through the terms of their contracts with the passengers?

We could sidestep the question in a couple of ways. One, such a ban is totally impractical. (If I'm chanting loudly in a language that might be Hebrew but on the other hand might be Icelandic, how confident are you that I'm engaged in a public display of religion, or just giving an off-key version of the B-side of Iceland's Eurovision entry for 1994?) Two, it's unlikely that airlines, etc, would choose to impose such a ban, since it would attract controversy and almost certainly cause them more commercial damage than is caused by the (I suspect, fairly infrequent) phenomenon of public expression of religion on public conveyances of one kind or another.

But let's not sidestep the question. If, say, a private bus operator were to impose such a ban, would it be lawful? Obviously if it was a ban that was imposed on, say, just Muslims, that would be unlawful discrimination on the basis of religion. If it was a ban that targetted all religious expressions, there's a fairly strong argument that it would still be unlawful discrimination on the basis of religious belief, if expressions of belief which were otherwise similar but were not of religious belief were not banned. But a ban on disruptive, attention-seeking speech or behaviour? I think you're good to go with that one.

I take the point, the guy in the piece is of the same religion technically and he wasn't happy. Im not talking about the law seeking a ban, the way I view this is that these are private spaces so its for the company involved to have a policy. I have heard of a few cases on busses where the driver got angry but here there is a health and safety issue in that someone staying in the isle for a long period becomes a risk in the case of an accident but in a plane the H&S case would be a bit weaker but could be argued.
A company might not be able to have a total ban but on H&S they could say you cant block an Isle and even standing up in your seat for possibly 10 or 15 minutes is interfering with the passengers behind in terms of being able to view staff etc. if someone wants to mumble in their seat that's fine and Ive no issue with these people going to the loo.
And it may come down to consumer votes and which would hit an airline more, Muslims or Jews saying they wont fly with airline X or a public campaign to avoid airline X

Peregrinus

silverharp wrote: »

I take the point, the guy in the piece is of the same religion technically and he wasn't happy. Im not talking about the law seeking a ban, the way I view this is that these are private spaces so its for the company involved to have a policy. I have heard of a few cases on busses where the driver got angry but here there is a health and safety issue in that someone staying in the isle for a long period becomes a risk in the case of an accident but in a plane the H&S case would be a bit weaker but could be argued.
A company might not be able to have a total ban but on H&S they could say you cant block an Isle and even standing up in your seat for possibly 10 or 15 minutes is interfering with the passengers behind in terms of being able to view staff etc. if someone wants to mumble in their seat that's fine and Ive no issue with these people going to the loo.
And it may come down to consumer votes and which would hit an airline more, Muslims or Jews saying they wont fly with airline X or a public campaign to avoid airline X

All of this is true, but the inconvenience (or worse) caused by somebody blocking the aisle/getting in the way/making loud noises doesn't depend on whether he's doing it for religious reasons. So I think it would be irrelevant at best, and going out of your way to give offence and cause trouble at worst, to frame this in terms of a ban on religious expression. A ban on blocking the aisle/disruptive behaviour/whatever which makes no reference to religion would be the way to go, surely?

Stealthfins

silverharp wrote:

In this case , this chap Gad Saad was on a plane and a religious jewish person stood up in the isle and started praying, I assume nobody stopped him. But the question is do non religious people have a right not to have public displays of religion foisted on them in particular in a confined space, plains, trains and busses?

We'll also ban people who listen to or wear Iron Maiden T-shirts where people into housey music hang out.
The housey Music people may get offended.

Oh hold on we have a guy into Techno in the mix he drops an old school Techno classic....

And the beat goes on .....

Let it go let it go....

magicbastarder

i don't think such a ban on blocking the aisle is needed; you can't stand up in an aisle for fifteen minutes and refuse to get out of the way as it is. you are bound to follow the instructions of the cabin crew on a flight.

magicbastarder

Stealthfins wrote: »

We'll also ban people who listen to or wear Iron Maiden T-shirts where people into housey music hang out.

well, here's a recent flight where i suspect someone standing in the aisle (in this case, the captain) leading the passengers in a rendition of 'the number of the beast' might have been tolerated:
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/aug/12/iron-maiden-djibouti-bruce-dickinson-lands-first-passenger-jet

silverharp

Peregrinus wrote: »

All of this is true, but the inconvenience (or worse) caused by somebody blocking the aisle/getting in the way/making loud noises doesn't depend on whether he's doing it for religious reasons. So I think it would be irrelevant at best, and going out of your way to give offence and cause trouble at worst, to frame this in terms of a ban on religious expression. A ban on blocking the aisle/disruptive behaviour/whatever which makes no reference to religion would be the way to go, surely?

possibly but then it might overreach, ive no problem with a parent standing in the isle because they are trying to deal with their kids or someone with back problems standing up for several minutes, I'd assume already that if someone stood up and wanted to recite their poetry the staff would be over to them in a shot but if someone does the exact same thing for a religious reason the staff would be second guessing themselves more and thinking law suit and losing their job.

Stealthfins

magicbastarder wrote:

well, here's a recent flight where i suspect someone standing in the aisle (in this case, the captain) leading the passengers in a rendition of 'the number of the beast' might have been tolerated:

Wouldn't that be a classic,or the flight of Icarus,maybe Aces High.....

Walter H Price

Gebgbegb wrote: »

I suppose Numpties have a right to do a singsong on the way to Euros and be commended so it's open season!

It's like asking, do you have a right to be a numpty if the airline has no policy?

Could you go a step further and start singing ed Sheerin song standing right beside him, Would that be rude?

Or... What if a guy started praying to Allah and went around the aisle chanting 'allahu akbar', now that would be awkward wouldn't it. I'd prefer the Jewish prayers for some reason.

while i'm no fan of any of the religious nonsense its hard to argue with that point bin on pleantly of flights over to the football or with stag's or hen's on them with people actin the maggot like i suppose this could offend non football fans , fans of other teams or the morally sensitive :P

That said im on a plane and i hear some beardy dude praying to Allah or some young one in the bin bag getting her prayer mat out , im off see ya later :P

magicbastarder

maybe silverharp's real fear is finding the public prayer compelling to the point of conversion?

silverharp

magicbastarder wrote: »

maybe silverharp's real fear is finding the public prayer compelling to the point of conversion?

ha ha ha ha ... :rolleyes: , ill give you a C- for that, could do better :pac:

Hotblack Desiato

Nobody should have to endure anti-social behaviour, and religion should not get its traditional free pass in that regard.

In short, I wish those bloody bells would stop

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lBBlRB1HH2g

recedite

Silent prayers are OK. Loud prayers should be banned, unless the plane is actually crashing.
(A bit of turbulence doesn't count)

magicbastarder

Hotblack Desiato wrote: »

Nobody should have to endure anti-social behaviour, and religion should not get its traditional free pass in that regard.

why is praying out loud anti-social? i.e. what forms of vocalisation are anti-social, and what are not?

Fleawuss

Any behavior on a plane that could lead to disorder should be banned. Given the international nature of the passengers on most flights a Jew might well give offence to a Sunni who could give offence to a Shia etc. Equally soccer ultras chanting racist crap, BLM lying down in the aisle (if they did so) are covered. In short you need a general enough ban so that the flight gets there safely with no grandstanding.

Discretion of the captain is needed too. Someone standing in the aisle "praying" needs to be told to get out of the way and leave devotions until he gets to terra firma.

magicbastarder

Fleawuss wrote: »

Any behavior on a plane that could lead to disorder should be banned. Given the international nature of the passengers on most flights a Jew might well give offence to a Sunni who could give offence to a Shia etc.

i'm actually genuinely confused by some of the opinions in this thread. summed up by this, which i thought was an article of faith for atheists.

magicbastarder

i.e. the problem lies with the person taking the offence - if a jew prays on a plane and this offends a sunni muslim, who gets shirty, the fault lies with the muslim.

uck51js9zml2yt

Im against people clapping when the plane lands. Why should. I be subject to this imposition on my auditory senses?
Can we bring in a policy to ban it?
In fact, why should I be subjected to anything I don't like?

Fleawuss

magicbastarder wrote: »

i'm actually genuinely confused by some of the opinions in this thread. summed up by this, which i thought was an article of faith for atheists.

OED: atheism is disbelief or lack of belief in god or gods.
Sorted.

Fleawuss

magicbastarder wrote: »

i.e. the problem lies with the person taking the offence - if a jew prays on a plane and this offends a sunni muslim, who gets shirty, the fault lies with the muslim.

The point is that on a plane whether someone gives offence or someone takes offence is irrelevant if the resulting disorder leads to violence and endangers the safety of all. Hence a general rule banning all demonstrations governed by the captains discretion.

Fleawuss

Duke Purple Matrix wrote: »

Im against people clapping when the plane lands. Why should. I be subject to this imposition on my auditory senses?
Can we bring in a policy to ban it?
In fact, why should I be subjected to anything I don't like?

There was a thread about the banning of clapping somewhere on boards recently due to the health issues of someone, AFAIK.

The answer to your question is it likely to lead to disorder? In your case obviously not as you are a religious person who is peace loving.

If you are posing a hypothetical about someone objecting well the answer is that disorder thing.

branie2

How about flying to and from Lourdes?

Hotblack Desiato

magicbastarder wrote: »

why is praying out loud anti-social? i.e. what forms of vocalisation are anti-social, and what are not?

In a confined place like an aircraft, any vocalisation loud enough to be heard by someone not in the seat next to you is anti-social. I don't want to listen to the witterings of others, religious witterings or not.

Hotblack Desiato

magicbastarder wrote: »

i'm actually genuinely confused by some of the opinions in this thread. summed up by this, which i thought was an article of faith for atheists

Generally you'll find it's Religion X taking offence at Religion Y, not atheists.

Fleawuss

branie2 wrote: »

How about flying to and from Lourdes?

If they're all on the pilgrimage then the communal recitation of the 15 mysteries of the Rosary isn't going to cause disorder is it? In fact it should be de rigeur with all the trimmings; a pilgrimage has to be a pilgrimage doesn't it?

Hotblack Desiato

I think I posted before about the time my wife and I were on a flight to Dubrovnik - we didn't know but it's the main airport for pilgrimages to Medjugorje, so the plane was 1/4 twenty/thirty somethings on a sex/booze/sightseeing holiday to Dubrovnik and 3/4 pensioners on pilgrimage.

The airport is in a valley and often has strong low level turbulence, we did a couple of 45 degree rolls back and forth just above the runway and probably weren't that far off dinging a wingtip when the crew made the right decision to whack the throttles open and go around. Cue furious hail marys all around us and the rosary beads being whipped out :pac: about fifteen minutes later we landed smoothly. All in a day's work for a flight crew but the god squad thought they were going to meet their maker slightly early :pac:

Fleawuss

Hotblack Desiato wrote: »

I think I posted before about the time my wife and I were on a flight to Dubrovnik - we didn't know but it's the main airport for pilgrimages to Medjugorje, so the plane was 1/4 twenty/thirty somethings on a sex/booze/sightseeing holiday to Dubrovnik and 3/4 pensioners on pilgrimage.

The airport is in a valley and often has strong low level turbulence, we did a couple of 45 degree rolls back and forth just above the runway and probably weren't that far off dinging a wingtip when the crew made the right decision to whack the throttles open and go around. Cue furious hail marys all around us and the rosary beads being whipped out :pac: about fifteen minutes later we landed smoothly. All in a day's work for a flight crew but the god squad thought they were going to meet their maker slightly early :pac:

The extraordinary nature of it: why would a supreme being be arsed if the plane crashed? If the supreme being had the existence, the interest and the power to stop it, why would you be so craven as to beg?
Rhetorical questions. Answers on a postcard to Larry Gogan please.

magicbastarder

Hotblack Desiato wrote: »

Generally you'll find it's Religion X taking offence at Religion Y, not atheists.

not the point i was making. the person taking offence - i.e. choosing to do so - is not the person doing the praying. the person taking offence, and in this hypothetical situation, causing aggro, is the one to blame.

magicbastarder

Hotblack Desiato wrote: »

Cue furious hail marys all around us and the rosary beads being whipped out :pac: about fifteen minutes later we landed smoothly. All in a day's work for a flight crew but the god squad thought they were going to meet their maker slightly early :pac:

clearly for the god squad, their prayers were answered!

Fleawuss

magicbastarder wrote: »

not the point i was making. the person taking offence - i.e. choosing to do so - is not the person doing the praying. the person taking offence, and in this hypothetical situation, causing aggro, is the one to blame.

In the real world on a plane you avoid things getting so far as the Sunnis screaming at the rejectionists that their prayers are blasphemous and the other version of god is correct. Public space isn't your synagogue, mosque, ashram, church, temple, shrine, whatever I have forgotten. Public space needs to be neutral ground.

magicbastarder

Fleawuss wrote: »

Public space needs to be neutral ground.

define 'neutral'. in this thread it seems to be 'ban it if i don't like it', which is not what i'd define as neutral.
in religious terms, neutral/secular usually means 'no advantage given to (any) religion'. this does not meet that definition.

magicbastarder

i mean, it's clearly a major issue, religious riots on airplanes, that we're looking at considering banning people from praying out loud.

Fleawuss

magicbastarder wrote: »

define 'neutral'. in this thread it seems to be 'ban it if i don't like it', which is not what i'd define as neutral.
in religious terms, neutral/secular usually means 'no advantage given to (any) religion'. this does not meet that definition.

LOL.
OED: Not supporting or helping either side in a conflict, impartial.

I note that you have immediately offered your own definition of what you think neutral means in this thread, your definition of what neutral means in "religious terms" (I never heard that before, unusual).

A very small list of religions:
Azali Bahá'ís Under the Provisions of the Covenant Orthodox Bahá'í Faith Anabaptists (Radical Protestants) Amish Hutterites Mennonites Quakers or ("Friends") River Brethren Schwarzenau Brethren Shakers Anglicanism Anglo-Catholicism Broad church Continuing Anglican movement English Dissenters (also Nonconformists) High church Low church Open Evangelicals Puritans Baptists General Baptists (also Free Will Baptists) Landmarkism Missionary Baptists Primitive Baptists Strict Baptists (also Reformed Baptists) Black church Black liberation theology Christian deism and Christian atheism Confessing Movement Evangelicalism Charismatic movement Dispensationalist Christian Zionism Emerging church Neo-charismatic movement Neo-Evangelicalism Plymouth Brethren Exclusive Brethren Open Brethren Progressive Christianity Protestant fundamentalism Jesuism Lutheranism Pietism Methodism Calvinistic Methodists Holiness movement Church of the Nazarene The Salvation Army Wesleyanism Pentecostalism Church of God Latter Rain movement Word of Faith Proto-Protestant groups: Hussites Moravians Lollardy Waldensians Reformed churches Amyraldism (called "four-point Calvinism") Arminianism Remonstrants Calvinism Christian Reconstructionism Congregational churches Continental Reformed churches: such as the Swiss Reformed, Dutch Reformed, and French Huguenot churches Neo-Calvinism Presbyterianism Zwinglianism Restoration movement Adventism Branch Davidians Seventh-day Adventist Church Christadelphians Christian Science Churches of Christ Jehovah's Witnesses Millerism Mormonism Mormon fundamentalism Stone-Campbell movement (called "Campbellites") Roman Catholic Church (called Roman Catholicism or "Catholicism"; subsisting predominantly in the Latin Church) Affirming Catholicism Breakaway Catholics Charismatic Catholics Hebrew Catholics Independent Catholic churches Old Catholic Church (Union of Utrecht) Polish National Catholic Church Liberal Catholicism Liberation theology (Latin American Neo-Marxist Catholicism) Modernist Catholics Traditionalist Catholics Sedevacantism Unitarian Universalism Western esotericism Behmenism Christian Kabbalah Martinism Rosicrucianism Swedenborgianism (or "The New Church") Church of the East (called "Nestorian") Ancient Church of the East Assyrian Church of the East Chaldean Catholic Church Eastern Rite Roman Catholics (or Uniates): In full communion with and subject to the Roman Papacy, but retaining a diverse array of Eastern Christian liturgical rites; including the Maronites and Byzantine Catholics. Oriental Orthodox Churches (called Non-Chalcedonian or miaphysite/"monophysite"): Includes the Armenian Apostolic, Coptic, Syrian Orthodox, Ethiopian and Eritrean Orthodox Churches, as well as a portion of the St. Thomas Christians in India. Orthodox Catholic Church (called "Eastern Orthodoxy" or Orthodoxy): Includes the Greek Orthodox, Serbian Orthodox, Russian Orthodox, Romanian Orthodox, Bulgarian Orthodox, Georgian Orthodox, and several other autocephalous and autonomous Churches. Greek Old Calendarists (called "Genuine Orthodox" or "True Orthodox") Russian Old Believers (or "Old Ritualists") Bezpopovtsy Popovtsy Spiritual Christianity Doukhobor Molokan Christian Gnosticism Christian Universalism Nontrinitarianism Messianic Judaism Rastafari Unification Church Arianism Ebionites Marcionism Latter Day Saint movement Cerdonians (no longer extant) Colarbasians (no longer extant) Simonians (no longer extant) Bogomilism (no longer extant) Catharism (no longer extant) The Yazidis are a syncretic Kurdish religion with a Gnostic influence: Yazidis Persian Gnosticism Mandaeism Manichaeism (no longer extant) Bagnolians (no longer extant) Syrian-Egyptic Gnosticism None of these religions are still extant. Main article: Syrian-Egyptic Gnosticism Sethianism Basilideans Valentinianism Bardaisan#Bardesanite school Neo-Gnostic Groups Ecclesia Gnostica Ecclesia Gnostica Catholica Kalam (philosophical schools) Main article: Ilm al-Kalam Murji'ah Mu'tazila Kharijite Main article: Khawarij Azraqi Haruriyyah Ibadi (only surviving sect) Sufri Shia Islam Main article: Shia Islam Bektashi Order Isma'ilism Mustaali / Dawoodi Bohra Nizari Ja'fari jurisprudence Twelver Akhbari Shaykhism Usuli Alawites Alevism / Bektashi Order Ni'matullāhī Zaidiyyah Sufism Main article: Sufism Chishti Order Mevlevi Order Naqshbandi Jahriyya Khufiyya Qadiriyya Suhrawardiyya Tariqa Tijaniyyah Recent Sufi groups Sufi Order International Sufism Reoriented Universal Sufism Dances of Universal Peace Sunni Islam Main article: Sunni Islam Hanafi Ash'ari Barelvi Maturidi Hanbali Maliki Shafi'i Wahhabism Universalist movements Xidaotang Restorationism Main article: Islamism Ahl al-Hadith Ghair Muqallidism Deobandi Yihewani Muwahhidism Salafi movement Wahhabism Quranism Main article: Quranism Quranism Tolu-e-Islam United Submitters International Black Muslims Main article: Black Muslims (disambiguation) American Society of Muslims Five-Percent Nation Moorish Orthodox Church of America Moorish Science Temple of America Nation of Islam United Nation of Islam Ahmadiyya Main article: Ahmadiyya Ahmadiyya Muslim Community Lahore Ahmadiyya Movement for the Propagation of Islam Other Islamic groups Al-Fatiha Foundation Canadian Muslim Union European Islam Ittifaq al-Muslimin Jadid Jamaat al Muslimeen Liberal movements within Islam Mahdavia Muslim Canadian Congress Progressive British Muslims Progressive Muslim Union Riaz Ahmed Gohar Shahi Messiah Foundation International Yarsanism Sufi and Shia Alevism Bektashi Order Moorish Orthodox Church of America Rabbinic Judaism Main article: Rabbinic Judaism Conservative (Masorti) Judaism Orthodox Judaism Haredi Judaism Hasidic Judaism Modern Orthodox Judaism Reconstructionist Judaism Reform Judaism Karaite Judaism Main article: Karaite Judaism Samaritans use a slightly different version of the Pentateuch as their Torah, worshiping at Mount Gerizim instead of Jerusalem, and are possibly the descendants of the lost Northern Kingdom. They are definitely of ancient Israelite origin, but their status as Jews is disputed.[9] Noahidism is a monotheistic ideology based on the Seven Laws of Noah, and on their traditional interpretations within Rabbinic Judaism. According to Jewish law, non-Jews are not obligated to convert to Judaism, but they are required to observe the Seven Laws of Noah. Humanistic Judaism (not always identified as a religion) Jewish Renewal Historical groups Second Temple Judaism Essenes Pharisees (ancestor of Rabbinic Judaism) Sadducees (possible ancestor of Karaite Judaism) Zealots (Judea)s Sicarii Sects that believed Jesus was a prophet Ebionites Elcesaites Nazarenes Sabbateans Frankism Mandaeism Sabians Mandaean Nasaraean Sabeans Sabians of Harran Kabir Panth Ravidassia Sant Mat Divine Light Mission Eckankar Radhasoami Radha Soami Satsang Beas Radha Swami Satsang, Dinod Nikaya schools (which have historically been incorrectly called Hinayana in the West) Buddha-nature Daśabhūmikā (absorbed into Huayan) Huayan school (Avataṃsaka) Hwaeom Kegon Humanistic Buddhism Madhyamaka East Asian Mādhyamaka (Three Treatise school) Jonang Prasaṅgika Svatantrika Nichiren Buddhism Nichiren Shōshū Nichiren Shū Soka Gakkai Pure Land Buddhism Jōdo Shinshū Jōdo-shū Theravada Bangladeshi Sangharaj Nikaya Bangladeshi Mahasthabir Nikaya Burmese Dwara Nikaya Burmese Shwegyin Nikaya Burmese Thudhamma Nikaya Vipassana tradition of Mahasi Sayadaw and disciples Sri Lankan Amarapura Nikaya Sri Lankan Ramañña Nikaya Sri Lankan Siam Nikaya Thai Dhammayuttika Nikaya Thai Forest Tradition Tradition of Ajahn Chah Thai Maha Nikaya Dhammakaya Movement Vipassana movement Mahayana Tiantai Tendai Cheontae Yogācāra East Asian Yogācāra Chan Buddhism Caodong school Zen Sōtō Keizan line Jakuen line Giin line Linji school Rinzai school Ōbaku Fuke-shū Won Buddhism Kwan Um School of Zen Sanbo Kyodan Vajrayana Shingon Buddhism Tibetan Buddhism Bon Gelug Kagyu Dagpo Kagyu Karma Kagyu Barom Kagyu Drukpa Lineage Shangpa Kagyu Nyingma Sakya Jonang Bodongpa Navayana Dalit Buddhist movement New Buddhist movements Shambhala Buddhism Diamond Way Buddhism Triratna Buddhist Community New Kadampa Tradition[10] Share International True Buddha School Nipponzan-Myōhōji-Daisanga Hòa Hảo Global variants of Buddhism Buddhism in the United States Din-e Ilahi Ayyavazhi (sometimes classified as an independent religion) Lingayatism Shaivism Shaktism Shrauta Smartism Swaminarayan Tantrism Ananda Marga[11] Vaishnavism Gaudiya Vaishnavism International Society for Krishna Consciousness[12] Hindu reform movements Arya Samaj[13] Brahmo Samaj Ramakrishna Mission Satsang of Thakur Anukulchandra Satya Dharma Matua Mahasangha The Osho or Rajneesh movement Nyaya Purva mimamsa Samkhya Vaisheshika Vedanta (Uttara Mimamsa) Advaita Vedanta Integral Yoga Dvaita Vedanta Vishishtadvaita Yoga Ashtanga Yoga Bhakti yoga Jnana yoga Karma yoga Kundalini yoga Hatha yoga Raja yoga Sahaja Yoga Siddha Yoga Surat Shabd Yoga Tantric Yoga Digambara Bispanthi[14] Digambar Terapanth Kanji Panth[14] Panth of Kanji Swami Śvētāmbara Murtipujaka (Deravasi) Sthānakavāsī Svetambar Terapanth Khalsa Nihang Namdhari ("Kuka Sikhs") Ravidassia religion Sahajdhari Behafaridians Mazdakism Zurvanism Khurramites (syncretism with Shi'a Islam) Mandaeism Manichaeism Mithraism Azali Bábism Bahá'í Faith Alevi (this is contested; most Alevi consider themselves to be Shia or Sufi Muslims, but a minority adhere to the Yazdani interpretation) Yarsani Yazidi Neo-Confucianism New Confucianism Koshintō Shugendō Yoshida Shintō Konkokyo Oomoto Seicho-no-Ie Shinmeiaishinkai Tenrikyo Zenrinkyo Way of the Five Pecks of Rice Way of the Celestial Masters Zhengyi Dao ("Way of the Right Oneness") Taipingjing-based movements Shangqing School ("School of the Highest Clarity") Lingbao School ("School of the Numinous Treasure") Quanzhen School ("Way of the Fulfilled Virtue") Dragon Gate Taoism Wuliupai ("School of Wu-Liu") Yao Taoism (Meishanism) Faism (Redhead Taoism) Xuanxue (Neo-Taoism) Yiguandao Dudeism (The Church of the Latter-Day Dude) Zenarchy (Kerry Wendell Thornley) Chan Buddhism Chinese folk religion Falun Gong Yiguandao (I Kuan-Tao) Mohism Xiantiandao Cheondoism Daejongism Daesun Jinrihoe Gasin faith Jeung San Do Korean shamanism Won Buddhism Suwunism Cao Đài Đạo Bửu Sơn Kỳ Hương Đạo Dừa Batuque Candomblé Dahomey mythology Haitian mythology Kumina Macumba Mami Wata Obeah Oyotunji Palo Ifa Lucumi Hudu Quimbanda Santería (Lukumi) Umbanda[15] Vodou Aztec religion Maya religion Mixtec religion Olmec religion Purepecha religion Totonac religion Zapotec religion Berber religion Akan religion Ashanti mythology (Ghana) Dahomey (Fon) religion Bori (Hausa people) Efik mythology (Nigeria, Cameroon) Serer religion Odinani (Nigeria, Cameroon) Isoko mythology (Nigeria) Yoruba religion (Nigeria, Benin) Ifa Afa Fa Bushongo mythology (Congo) Bambuti (Pygmy) mythology (Congo) Lugbara religion (Congo) Dinka religion (Sudan) Lotuko mythology (Sudan) Masai mythology (Kenya, Tanzania) Malagasy mythology Oromo religion Badimo (Botswana) Khoisan religion Lozi mythology (Zambia) Tumbuka mythology (Malawi) Zulu religion (South Africa) Abenaki mythology Anishinaabe Blackfoot mythology Cherokee mythology Chickasaw mythology Choctaw mythology Creek mythology Crow mythology Guarani mythology Haida mythology Ho-Chunk mythology (aka: Winnebago) Hopi mythology Inca mythology Inuit mythology Iroquois mythology Keetoowah Nighthawk Society Kuksu Kwakiutl mythology Lakota mythology Leni Lenape mythology Longhouse religion Mapuche mythology Midewiwin Miwok Navajo mythology Nootka mythology Ohlone mythology Olmec mythology Pomo mythology Pawnee mythology Salish mythology Selk'nam religion Seneca mythology Southeastern Ceremonial Complex Sun Dance Tsimshian mythology Urarina Ute mythology Wyandot religion Zuni mythology Bathouism Benzhuism (indigenous religion of the Bai people) Bimoism (indigenous religion of the Yi people) Bon Chinese mythology Japanese mythology Korean shamanism Manchu shamanism Mun (Lepcha) Pemena (Karo people (Indonesia)) Shamanism in Siberia Tengrism Ua Dab (indigenous religion of the Hmong people) Vietnamese folk religion Estonian mythology Shamanism among Eskimo peoples Finnish mythology and Finnish paganism Shamanistic remnants in Hungarian folklore Sami shamanism Australian Aboriginal mythology (Dreamtime) Austronesian beliefs Balinese mythology Javanese beliefs Melanesian mythology Micronesian mythology Modekngei Nauruan indigenous religion Philippine mythology Anito Gabâ Kulam Polynesian mythology Hawaiian mythology Māori mythology Māori religion Pai Mārire Rātana Ringatū Rapa Nui mythology Moai Tangata manu John Frum Johnson cult Prince Philip Movement Vailala Madness Ancient Egyptian religion Ancient Semitic religions Canaanite mythology Canaanite religion Mesopotamian mythology Arabian mythology (pre-Islamic) Babylonian and Assyrian religion Babylonian mythology Chaldean mythology Sumerian mythology Proto-Indo-Iranian religion Historical Vedic religion Iranian mythology Armenian mythology Baltic polytheism Celtic polytheism Germanic paganism Anglo-Saxon paganism Continental Germanic mythology Norse religion Greek polytheism Hittite mythology Persian mythology Religion in ancient Rome Slavic mythology Mystery religions Eleusinian Mysteries Mithraic mysteries Orphism Pythagoreanism Gallo-Roman religion Estonian polytheism Finnish polytheism Hungarian polytheism Anthroposophy Buddhist esoteric tradition Hindu mysticism Tantra Kabbalah Christian Kabbalah Neoplatonism Pythagoreanism Neopythagoreanism Sufism Theosophy Archeosophical Society Behmenism Builders of the Adytum Fraternitas Saturni Fraternity of the Inner Light Hermetic Order of the Golden Dawn The Open Source Order of the Golden Dawn Hermeticism Martinism Ordo Aurum Solis Rosicrucian Ancient Mystical Order Rosae Crucis[16] Rosicrucian Fellowship Servants of the Light Thelema A∴A∴ Ordo Templi Orientis Typhonian Order Alchemy Ceremonial magic Enochian magic Goetia Chaos magic Illuminates of Thanateros Thee Temple ov Psychick Youth Hoodoo (folk magic) (Rootwork) Louisiana Voodoo Kulam - Filipino witchcraft Pow-wow (folk magic) Magick (Thelema) Contemporary witchcraft Adonism Church of All Worlds Church of Aphrodite Feraferia Koshintō Neo-Druidism Ár nDraíocht Féin Order of Bards, Ovates, and Druids Reformed Druids of North America Neoshamanism Neo-völkisch movements Technopaganism Wicca British Traditional Wicca Gardnerian Wicca Alexandrian Wicca Central Valley Wicca Algard Wicca Chthonioi Alexandrian Wicca Blue Star Wicca Seax-Wica Universal Eclectic Wicca Celtic Wicca Dianic Wicca Faery Wicca Feri Tradition Georgian Wicca Odyssean Wicca Wiccan church Covenant of the Goddess Armenian neopaganism Baltic neopaganism Celtic neopaganism Dievturība Estonian neopaganism Finnish neopaganism Germanic neopaganism Hellenism (religion) Italo-Roman neopaganism Kemetism Mari native religion Odinism Romuva (religion) Semitic neopaganism Slavic neopaganism Wotanism Zalmoxianism Eckankar Huna Raëlism Scientology Ausar Auset Society Black Hebrew Israelites Dini Ya Msambwa Mumboism Nation of Gods and Earths Nation of Islam Nuwaubian Nation Moorish Orthodox Church of America Moorish Science Temple of America Rastafari Black Order (Satanist group) Creativity Order of Nine Angles Thule Society Wotansvolk Ghost Dance Indian Shaker Church Native American Church Christian Science Church of Divine Science Church Universal and Triumphant Religious Science Unity Church Jewish Science Seicho-no-Ie Church of World Messianity Happy Science Konkokyo Oomoto PL Kyodan Seicho-no-Ie Tenrikyo Demonolatry Luciferianism Satanism LaVeyan Satanism Theistic Satanism Our Lady of Endor Coven (or Ophite Cultus Satanas) Temple of Set Discordianism Ethical movement Creativity (religion) Freethought North Texas Church of Freethought Jediism Moorish Orthodox Church of America Naturalistic pantheism World Pantheist Movement Religion of Humanity Syntheism Church of Euthanasia The Church of the Flying Spaghetti Monster Church of the SubGenius Dinkoism Dudeism Iglesia Maradoniana Invisible Pink Unicorn Kibology Landover Baptist Church Last Thursdayism The Satanic Temple The Circle of Reason Cult of the Supreme Being Deism Fourth Way Goddess movement Humanism Open-source religion Spiritism (Spiritualism) Subud Universal Life Church

Fleawuss

magicbastarder wrote: »

i mean, it's clearly a major issue, religious riots on airplanes, that we're looking at considering banning people from praying out loud.

You don't want a tragedy so better to head the thing off: just ban all demonstrations by atheists, humanists, BLM, etc. ( you really don't want the list again do you?) so there's peace. Neutral ground, so to speak, even though it's in the air.

Thoie

If you are doing anything on public transport that I can hear from 3 or 4 rows away (or further), you need to STFU. I don't care if you're praying, singing, having sex, playing a game or talking in a loud nasally whine. Particularly on something like a plane, where being able to hear what the flight crew are saying might be important (though 99% of the time they're just trying to sell you something). Babies under 18 months are about the only ones exempt, purely on the basis that they don't know what's happening, but don't bring their loudest toys along.

I would think it reasonable that the crew could ask you to quieten down. Ideally they'd have some kind of ejector seat set up, but I'm sure someone would probably complain.

Giacomo McGubbin

Thoie wrote: »

If you are doing anything on public transport that I can hear from 3 or 4 rows away (or further), you need to STFU. I don't care if you're praying, singing, having sex, playing a game or talking in a loud nasally whine. Particularly on something like a plane, where being able to hear what the flight crew are saying might be important (though 99% of the time they're just trying to sell you something). Babies under 18 months are about the only ones exempt, purely on the basis that they don't know what's happening, but don't bring their loudest toys along.

I would think it reasonable that the crew could ask you to quieten down. Ideally they'd have some kind of ejector seat set up, but I'm sure someone would probably complain.

I'm pretty sure you would

magicbastarder

Thoie wrote: »

I would think it reasonable that the crew could ask you to quieten down. Ideally they'd have some kind of ejector seat set up, but I'm sure someone would probably complain.

Exactly. The crew have every power to ask you to stop doing whatever you're doing if it's causing a problem or being antisocial. There's no need for an explicit ban on prayer.

Hotblack Desiato

magicbastarder wrote: »

not the point i was making. the person taking offence - i.e. choosing to do so - is not the person doing the praying. the person taking offence, and in this hypothetical situation, causing aggro, is the one to blame.

The problem isn't prayer it's making noise and causing an obstruction. I don't think any poster here is objecting on the grounds that it's prayer, they're objecting on the grounds it's annoying.

My point in an eariler post was religion often gets a free pass in relation to activities which would not be allowed if they were non-religious - e.g. RTE don't give Atheist Ireland a free minute every day on TV to tell everyone that there's no god, but the catholic church gets to promote itself every day. Atheists don't build large temples to no god and then ring bells early in the morning (or even at night) to annoy people and remind them about how there isn't any god. Atheists didn't seize control of 96% of schools to promote the message of no-godism to kids... etc.

Any unacceptable activity (such as being annoying on a plane) shouldn't be tolerated simply because that activity is claimed to be religious.

magicbastarder wrote: »

clearly for the god squad, their prayers were answered!

You could just as validly claim that it was our lack of prayer to no god which determined the outcome

silverharp

Hotblack Desiato wrote: »

The problem isn't prayer it's making noise and causing an obstruction. I don't think any poster here is objecting on the grounds that it's prayer, they're objecting on the grounds it's annoying.

My point in an eariler post was religion often gets a free pass in relation to activities which would not be allowed if they were non-religious - e.g. RTE don't give Atheist Ireland a free minute every day on TV to tell everyone that there's no god, but the catholic church gets to promote itself every day. Atheists don't build large temples to no god and then ring bells early in the morning (or even at night) to annoy people and remind them about how there isn't any god. Atheists didn't seize control of 96% of schools to promote the message of no-godism to kids... etc.

Any unacceptable activity (such as being annoying on a plane) shouldn't be tolerated simply because that activity is claimed to be religious.

yep it seems like staff dont have the confidence to enforce general rules. try recite your favourite poetry and you will be closed down quickly , do the religious equivalent and nobody is quite sure what to do

Michael OBrien

Surely airplanes are PRIVATE property, not public spaces. Just because public use it does not make it PUBLIC spaces. In private areas one can make any rule they want as long as it is not discriminatory under the law relating to that service or space.
Loud prayer in a seat would be seen as a disturbance to others, especially if others are sleeping or children are involved. Active blocking the isles would be stopped immediately as it prevents the staff and passengers free movement.
Since the passengers are captive audiences, unlike in a park or street, often for hours, it would be completely unfair to allow loud praying to occur. Quite praying in your seat, at the same volume of a quite conversation, is fine. This does not affect free speech or inhibit religion, as none of these are stopped, only the volume of the prayers.
As far as matches or parties goes, staff should be able to shut down such actions if they are also loud and/or distruptive too.

Anyone objecting to this does not understand free speech or private property or the rights of others. You cannot come into a library and start screaming prayers while you block the exits either. Or enter a cafe and block the door to force people to listen to you pray.

Finally prayer is often thinly disguised extremely offensive hate speech, certainly if someone decides to shout it in a confined space with a wide mix of other people within earshot. This would result in a rise of risk to the airplane as others get offended. Putting everyone at risk. Some preachers actively seek to be attacked and make a living off out of court settlements from offended passerbys they harass.
Compare it to a neo-nazi group screaming aryan songs looking to start trouble.

silverharp

Michael OBrien wrote: »

Surely airplanes are PRIVATE property, not public spaces.

I'd say most people would accept that, the issue seems to be whether a company ought to specifically state that "public" prayer is not acceptable ? Ive no issue of it being mentioned in a list to clarify what the company means by causing a problem on a plane. Plenty of companies have long and very specific T&C's about what you can and cannot do.

Thoie

silverharp wrote: »

I'd say most people would accept that, the issue seems to be whether a company ought to specifically state that "public" prayer is not acceptable ? Ive no issue of it being mentioned in a list to clarify what the company means by causing a problem on a plane. Plenty of companies have long and very specific T&C's about what you can and cannot do.

I wouldn't suggest that there is a specific statement against prayer of any kind, just a blanket statement of "excessive noise of any kind is not permitted, be that singing, speech or from any device".

magicbastarder

Michael OBrien wrote: »

Surely airplanes are PRIVATE property, not public spaces. Just because public use it does not make it PUBLIC spaces. In private areas one can make any rule they want as long as it is not discriminatory under the law relating to that service or space.

your caveat at the end is the important bit.
an airplane is not a private space in the same way that your living room is, for example. it's a privately owned space whose very existence depends on allowing paying members of the public into it, and is thus subject to laws which don't apply in strictly private spaces.

Thoie

magicbastarder wrote: »

your caveat at the end is the important bit.
an airplane is not a private space in the same way that your living room is, for example. it's a privately owned space whose very existence depends on allowing paying members of the public into it, and is thus subject to laws which don't apply in strictly private spaces.

If you only ban praying, then you're discriminating on the grounds of religion. If you have a blanket rule of "sit down and STFU" that covers everything, then you're hardly being discriminatory?

magicbastarder

the crew are already able to tell people who are being disruptive to cram it; it's not like any new laws or rules are required.

Chromosphere

I'm not at all religious (actually an atheist) and I strongly believe in freedom of expression.

This is political correctness gone mad!

The issue here is that someone thinks that the fact the Jewish guy is paying is offensive to a Muslim guy on the flight. That's a ridiculous standpoint and it's also mind reading. Maybe the Muslim guy just thought that the other guy was blocking the aisle or thought it was totally over the top?

If the Muslim guy had a problem with someone being Jewish he would either a biggot or has a political issue with the State of Israel but can't seem to distinguish between Israeli Government foreign policy and a Canadian airline passenger who is Jewish.

You can't just create an environment where everyone's going around freaked out in case they upset hypothetical random Narrow-minded bigots.

If someone has a ritual that maybe keeps them from panicking on a flight, that's their thing. Just let them do what they need to do. As long as it doesn't involve hugely disruptive or dangerous behaviour, does anyone care?!

magicbastarder

Chromosphere wrote: »

This is political correctness gone mad!

while i agree with you that it's a non-starter of an idea, i would argue it's the opposite of political correctness.