Are you a Black Asian Disabled Lesibian, the BBC wants you!!

drunkmonkey

I'm all for diversity but making Rules that you have to be a certain colour or sex just to be a star is PC gone mad http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3555044/BBC-says-one-six-stars-gay-lesbian-disabled-2020.html
Talent should decide if you get a Job, looks like telly is about to get a whole lot worse.

biko

If you think the far right are obsessed with skin colour, try the far left...

mightyreds

I'd say they've no chance finding a lesibian

drunkmonkey

mightyreds wrote: »

I'd say they've no chance finding a lesibian

They'll hire the leisbians but the dyslexis don't get a look in, equality my arse.

Ridiculous. I feel sorry for the people who miss their break because of this.

MilesMorales1

I'm all 4 of those things!

corks finest

drunkmonkey wrote: »

I'm all for diversity but making Rules that you have to be a certain colour or sex just to be a star is PC gone mad http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3555044/BBC-says-one-six-stars-gay-lesbian-disabled-2020.html
Talent should decide if you get a Job, looks like telly is about to get a whole lot worse.

I'm a white paddy,any good?

Pac1Man

I bagsy being the lesibian.

timthumbni

The BBC has long become a parody. It probably won't be long before it tries to drop the "British" part of its name either. Just in case it offends anyone.....

A bunch of left wing pc morons. The license fee will hopefully soon be given a red card and then it will be interesting to see how they cope in the real world. Not too good would be my guess.

20Cent

It's pc gone mad I tells ya.

The Backwards Man

I see nothing wrong with that

Imagine the furore if 50% of jobs in RTE had to go to people whose Mammy or Daddy didn't work there.

youtube!

This position discriminates clearly against the Black Asian disabled lesbians but who are also Gender fluid and bi-sexual and feel like being men once in a while, so it really should be for a Black/Asian/Disabled/Lesbian/Gender Fluid/Bi-sexual confused type person(s).

Mourinho

So in order to not discriminate against gay people, they plan to discriminate against straight people....?

The stupidity really boggles the mind.

mikeym

What about the Transgender people?

Come on BBC

RIGHTisRIGHT

Mourinho wrote: »

So in order to not discriminate against gay people, they plan to discriminate against straight people....?

The stupidity really boggles the mind.

No I can't agree with that.

They plan to discriminate against white people also.;)

Representation of ethnic minorities remains at target of 15 per cent

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3555044/BBC-says-one-six-stars-gay-lesbian-disabled-2020.html#ixzz46ldaONe2
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

Tombi!

Hang on, I'm Irish. Do I get to identify as a minority over there? Because I know what my new job is.

corks finest

Pac1Man wrote: »

I bagsy being the lesibian.

Got there b4 me

corks finest

Tombi! wrote: »

Hang on, I'm Irish. Do I get to identify as a minority over there? Because I know what my new job is.

Yep,definite,I'm Irish here,nearly a minority

Why have they are target for ethnic minorities which is higher than the proportion if them in the general population?

corks finest

drunkmonkey wrote: »

I'm all for diversity but making Rules that you have to be a certain colour or sex just to be a star is PC gone mad http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3555044/BBC-says-one-six-stars-gay-lesbian-disabled-2020.html
Talent should decide if you get a Job, looks like telly is about to get a whole lot worse.

Take it that's the British broadcasting corporation,not a big b???k c??k

RIGHTisRIGHT

Nothing new from the BBC.

The_Valeyard

Once again the ginger people are forgotten about

(Not actually ginger)

greendom

timthumbni wrote: »

The BBC has long become a parody. It probably won't be long before it tries to drop the "British" part of its name either. Just in case it offends anyone.....

A bunch of left wing pc morons. The license fee will hopefully soon be given a red card and then it will be interesting to see how they cope in the real world. Not too good would be my guess.

Rubbish - the BBC delivers amazing drama well worth the licence fee. Line of Duty and the Night Manager to name but 2 very recent productions. Absolute quality the likes of which ITV very very rarely matches

I'm British/Asian/Irish and I have a tan.

Am I in with a chance?

RIGHTisRIGHT

greendom wrote: »

Rubbish - the BBC delivers amazing drama well worth the licence fee. Line of Duty and the Night Manager to name but 2 very recent productions. Absolute quality the likes of which ITV very very rarely matches

Yes here are a couple of examples.

ToddyDoody

Do you have to be a woman? *feeling excluded*

timthumbni

greendom wrote: »

Rubbish - the BBC delivers amazing drama well worth the licence fee. Line of Duty and the Night Manager to name but 2 very recent productions. Absolute quality the likes of which ITV very very rarely matches

Hmmm. Let's put it to the test shall we. Let's forget about the compulsory license fee and let the BBC start charging a voluntary subscription.

I'm sure that they will attract loads of subscribers with their "amazing drama" as you put it. (Like no one else produces good tv standing on their own feet) The proof of the pudding is in the eating after all.... ;-)

Carlos Orange

Deleted User wrote: »

Why have they are target for ethnic minorities which is higher than the proportion if them in the general population?

Not that I agree with racial quotas but if you are going to do them they should be based on working age (18-65 or 25-65) not the general population and since they are for 2020 not now they should be based on population projections. Both possibly have a higher rate than the 2011 census general population.

12Phase

To be honest, having applied to British public bodies, I found being asked about my religion and sexual orientation a BIT intrusive.

I mean who gets to see this?
Where is it filed?
How secure is it?

Back in 2012 an NHS trust managed to have a data breach...

http://www.theguardian.com/uk/2012/aug/06/nhs-trust-fined-data-security

Rattser

Positive discrimination is all very well, but they've only got so many jobs available which makes one wonder where the money and the positions are going to come from.

suicide_circus

http://data.whicdn.com/images/22509539/large.png

youtube!

RIGHTisRIGHT wrote: »

Nothing new from the BBC.

That is a truly fascinating video !

RIGHTisRIGHT

One in six BBC stars 'must be gay or lesbian or disabled' by 2020 says new staff-hiring guidelines at the corporation

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3555044/BBC-says-one-six-stars-gay-lesbian-disabled-2020.html#ixzz46lkuIjW2
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

This is the BBC we are talking about I would be surprised if they are not way above that number already.:D

Rattser

RIGHTisRIGHT wrote: »

This is the BBC we are talking about I would be surprised if they are not way above that number already.:D

Go gay for pay?

pickarooney

Surely they can't ask those kind of questions in an interview?

How gay you to have to be to properly represent gay people? Is there a practical test?

Carlos Orange

Rattser wrote: »

Go gay for pay?

I predict a sudden surge in bisexual representation in the BBC.

timthumbni

I wonder will the BBC reserve some positions for paedophiles like they did in the past?

RIGHTisRIGHT

timthumbni wrote: »

I wonder will the BBC reserve some positions for paedophiles like they did in the past?

Only the big paying jobs.

greendom

timthumbni wrote: »

Hmmm. Let's put it to the test shall we. Let's forget about the compulsory license fee and let the BBC start charging a voluntary subscription.

I'm sure that they will attract loads of subscribers with their "amazing drama" as you put it. (Like no one else produces good tv standing on their own feet) The proof of the pudding is in the eating after all.... ;-)

Personally Speaking I'd pay for the beeb ahead of any other TV broadcaster and I don't belong to any group in their quota.

psinno

psinno wrote: »

Not that I agree with racial quotas but if you are going to do them they should be based on working age (18-65 or 25-65) not the general population and since they are for 2020 not now they should be based on population projections. Both possibly have a higher rate than the 2011 census general population.

Are they? I thought immigrants tended to have larger families.

My name is URL

pickarooney wrote: »

Surely they can't ask those kind of questions in an interview?

How gay you to have to be to properly represent gay people? Is there a practical test?

Penile plethysmograph or vaginal photoplethysmograph?

Good times ahead for phallometric testers

12Phase

Rattser wrote: »

Go gay for pay?

They'd have a very hard job proving you're not bisexual.

Rattser

RIGHTisRIGHT wrote: »

No I can't agree with that.

They plan to discriminate against white people also.;)

Are there any other native people on earth, who actually implement policies that discriminate against themselves? Or is it only a European thing?

First Up

Gay Whales against the Bomb.

12Phase

Rattser wrote: »

Are there any other native people on earth, who actually implement policies that discriminate against themselves? Or is it only a European thing?

Rare in Europe actually. Very much an American and British thing.

First Up

Rattser wrote:

Go gay for pay?

I'd be a bit nervous about the interview.

RDM_83 again

Mod-Sort in DRP. Not banned.

4068ac1elhodqr

Sure anything goes there, scary place to work I'd imagine.

BBC ‘is hiring convicted sex offender for youth talent show’
(article from A****ha Nagesh for Metro.co.uk on Thursday 21 Apr 2016 3:20 pm)

The_Valeyard

Candie wrote: »

I'm British/Asian/Irish and I have a tan.

Am I in with a chance?

No. There are over 3 billion Asians worldwide. Ye are far from a minority :P

timthumbni

greendom wrote: »

Personally Speaking I'd pay for the beeb ahead of any other TV broadcaster and I don't belong to any group in their quota.

Well that's you personally and you are not even in their area. I would be very interested to see just how many "fans" of the BBC actually would pay for it just like any other to service.

The days of them being the only broadcaster is long gone. It's not like the nhs. No one really needs tv and if they do there's plenty of alternatives out there. Adverts or not the BBC decides but hopefully the antiquated license fee is on its way out.

wakka12

Not far off a waterford whispers headline