Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Liverpool FC Team Talk/Gossip/Rumours 2016, Mod Warning in OP, 10/7

11314161819335

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,946 ✭✭✭dogbert27


    What Leicester are doing this year is what we had in 2014.

    We both didn't do much in the domestic cups.

    We both didn't have European distraction.

    We could field a nearly consistent starting 11 every week.

    Two strikers in form.

    No long term injuries.

    If anything is to be learnt from Leicester and Liverpool 13/14 is that if you want the league then focus only on the league with your strongest 11 each week.

    Ignore all other competitions.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 20,621 ✭✭✭✭Buford T. Justice XIX


    murpho999 wrote: »
    Great rant there, but anything this season has taught me is that money is not always the solution. Good management, organisiation, confidene and team spirit can take people a long way.

    We have a top class coach now, and there will be transfers in the summer. We have nothing to fear next season.
    Next year.

    Our year.......

















    Part 27:(


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,567 ✭✭✭✭martyos121


    dogbert27 wrote: »
    If money doesn't give a solution then alcohol will. They're the only two solutions to lifes problems.

    A pint of this in particular, every Liverpool fan loves the stuff:

    1664dd3d51f92482224229c95a4154ac_320x320.jpg


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,779 ✭✭✭✭Princess Consuela Bananahammock


    dogbert27 wrote: »
    What Leicester are doing this year is what we had in 2014.

    We both didn't do much in the domestic cups.

    We both didn't have European distraction.

    We could field a nearly consistent starting 11 every week.

    Two strikers in form.

    No long term injuries.

    If anything is to be learnt from Leicester and Liverpool 13/14 is that if you want the league then focus only on the league with your strongest 11 each week.

    Ignore all other competitions.

    .... and hope for no injuries.

    Spurs were in multiple compeitions until recently.

    In fairness, neither Spurs nor Leicester nad major problms in that front. If they'd lost Vardy/Mahrez or Kane/Alli for a month or six weeks, I don;t think you'd have seen a title push.

    Everything I don't like is either woke or fascist - possibly both - pick one.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,946 ✭✭✭dogbert27


    .... and hope for no injuries.

    Spurs were in multiple compeitions until recently.

    In fairness, neither Spurs nor Leicester nad major problms in that front. If they'd lost Vardy/Mahrez or Kane/Alli for a month or six weeks, I don;t think you'd have seen a title push.

    Knocked out of league cup in third round which is the key one really. If you get to the quarter final stage of the league cup, have Thursday night football with the EL and Sunday games then your pre-Christmas schedule is quite manic.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 40,059 ✭✭✭✭Harry Palmr


    I propose that Klopp throw the EL or CL and the cups next season.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,946 ✭✭✭dogbert27


    I propose that Klopp throw the EL or CL and the cups next season.

    I think he's already thinking that way. That's why he used Mig instead of Ward against Newcastle.

    He doesn't want to finish in the top 7 just in case United get 4th and win the FA Cup.

    He knows Mig will lose him the EL this year. That's why he's using him.

    Thought he got away with it in the League Cup final, Mig again being beaten by a shot that was technically harder not to save. All he had to do was stick out a leg but then we went and equalized. He must had had a huge sigh of relief when we lost on penos.

    Then he put out an under strength team in the FA Cup and thought he was away for slates as he had the perfect excuse for getting knocked out.

    He's lining everything up to be out of Europe next season with just the PL to play for.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 40,059 ✭✭✭✭Harry Palmr


    :D;)

    tin-foil-hat.jpg


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,045 ✭✭✭✭citytillidie


    Going to be a long night for those in Liverpool tonight with the news today that the Hillsborough verdicts will be released tomorrow morning @ 11am

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-36128693

    ******



  • Closed Accounts Posts: 40,059 ✭✭✭✭Harry Palmr


    You'd have to have sympathy for the jury as well, no matter what they decide on the various points some people will not be satisfied.

    Can legal proceedings follow on the back of the conclusions if they find against the South Yorkshire Police?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 43,316 ✭✭✭✭K-9


    sxxt, halfway between shyte and sexy!

    Mad Men's Don Draper : What you call love was invented by guys like me, to sell nylons.



  • Closed Accounts Posts: 11,348 ✭✭✭✭ricero


    is it a forgone conclusion that sakho will be banned or is there any chance he can get off ?

    very confusing when reading into it


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,725 ✭✭✭gafferino


    Ken Early (Liverpool fan) nailing the doping attitudes in todays IT article

    http://www.irishtimes.com/sport/soccer/ken-early-the-straight-dope-is-fans-don-t-care-1.2623213


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,799 ✭✭✭corwill


    gafferino wrote: »
    Ken Early (Liverpool fan) nailing the doping attitudes in todays IT article

    http://www.irishtimes.com/sport/soccer/ken-early-the-straight-dope-is-fans-don-t-care-1.2623213

    He's a Liverpool fan?!?!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,725 ✭✭✭gafferino


    corwill wrote: »
    He's a Liverpool fan?!?!

    Yep


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,799 ✭✭✭corwill


    gafferino wrote: »
    Yep

    It's a good article, btw. I'm just surprised that he's a Liverpool fan, I've been listening to Second Captains most weeks since it started, and OTB before that a good bit, and I never picked up on it. If anything, I thought the opposite!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,767 ✭✭✭Ben Gadot


    dogbert27 wrote: »
    No. I refuse to be magnanimous in defeat.

    For 26 God damn years I've been waiting.

    When Leeds won it in 92 I could take it. I could take it. I mean it was only 2 years since we won it last and we had Souness as manager which helped explain our league performance.

    Then United happened. Started expanding Old Trafford, commercialisation, getting ahead of the game in the money market. They had Ferguson bullying referees. They were breaking Briitish transfer records with their signings in the 90's.
    So yeah I could write off United winning stuff.

    Jack Walker bought the league for Blackburn. I could take that. Especially since it was Kenny winning it and winning it at Anfield and stop United from winning it.

    Arsenal I could take winning the league. Everyone said Wenger worked with in budgets. No he didn't. He inherited the best back line and goalkeeper in the country, Denis Bergkamp and Ray Parlour in midfield.

    He made a killing on Nicolas Anelka and that was it. All his other purchases in todays market would be considered relatively expensive. So I could take Arsenal winning the league cos Wenger inherited 6-7 great players and just had to add to it.

    Since that back line and goal keeper retired Wenger has not been able to find 5 players that could play consistently well like that defence hence Arsenal not winning the league since 2004.

    Then Chelsea came along with their money. How could we compete? They won a lot of crap by spending a lot of money. Fine. Win sxxt that way, I accept I can't compete. Give yourself a clap on the back you plastic flag waving fans. I'll have the moral high ground.

    Then City came along with their money and started doing a Chelsea. Again, fine. We can't compete. Lets hold the moral high ground.

    Then we nearly did. Nearly did it. WHY OH WHY WAS BRENDAN RODGERS NOT AS EVIL AS SIMEONE AND THROW THE SECOND BALL ON THE FIELD AFTER GERRARD SLIPPED. Looking back at what Simeone did now the man is an evil genius.

    And now Leicester. United floundering, Arsenal being their usual selves for the last 12 years, City and Chelsea at sea and look at us, LOOK AT US!!! The writing was on the wall the last day of the season when we got hammered by Stoke but instead of firing the manager we fire his back room staff, HIS BACK ROOM STAFF!! WHERE IN THE HISTORY OF THE PREMIER LEAGUE HAS A MANAGER GOT AWAY WITH SXXT PERFORMANCES BY ALLOWING HIS BACK ROOM STAFF TO GET FIRED!!! Then we let him spend 32 million on Christian Benteke and start the new season off the way we finished the season before!! It was like we had Bertie Ahern as manager.

    Madness, absolutely madness.

    So no, I'm not okay with Leicester winning the league with a team that nearly got relegated last season with a manager who got fired after being beaten by the Faroe Islands.

    Leicester will fade away like Leeds United after this. They'll get knocked out of the CL early. Will struggle in the league and Europe because of their squad size. Ranieri wil get fired when their stuck around 17th. The owner will start throwing bad money after bad money trying to recreate the glory of this season and Leicester will find themselves financially screwed.

    This was the chance, this was the chance more than 2014! Now City have hired Pep and will give him a sxxt load of money. United are going to hire Mourinho and give him a sxxt load of money. Chelsea have hired Conte and will give him a sxxt load of money.

    We need to give Klopp and even bigger sxxt load of money.

    That's my Monday rant over with. I need to get coffee.

    Agreed wholeheartedly. I just can't be having Leicester, as the better they do the more the likes of us look like absolute fcukwits.

    And I know I'm a bitter bollox, I don't care.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,294 ✭✭✭LiamoSail


    corwill wrote: »
    It's a good article, btw. I'm just surprised that he's a Liverpool fan, I've been listening to Second Captains most weeks since it started, and OTB before that a good bit, and I never picked up on it. If anything, I thought the opposite!

    My thoughts exactly. Really like Early, but always found him to be anti-Liverpool if anything. Perhaps it was in the pursuit of seeming without bias


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 43,316 ✭✭✭✭K-9


    You wouldn't know he was a Liverpool fan from listening to it so I suppose he's doing a good job. Dion Fanning seems to be a regular on Second Captain these last few weeks since he left the Indo. He's enough to stop me listening.

    As for the article, well yeah some people got pissed off at Mig, some don't even get annoyed any more because it's to be expected of Mig. Does that mean they don't care about Sakho?

    The club has suspended him, he'll probably get 6 months if found guilty.

    What do Liverpool or other football fans do? Fan protests at doping in football?

    Maybe most sports fans are too cynical about doping. Cynicism isn't a bad thing though, Hell, Ken and the boys on Second Captains have made a career out if it!

    Mad Men's Don Draper : What you call love was invented by guys like me, to sell nylons.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,033 ✭✭✭garra


    Ben Gadot wrote: »
    Agreed wholeheartedly. I just can't be having Leicester, as the better they do the more the likes of us look like absolute fcukwits.

    And I know I'm a bitter bollox, I don't care.

    They are making everyone look like fcukwits, they are breaking all the footballing & financial rules and I'm delighted that it's so upsetting to:
    every gobsh1te who has ever moaned about his club not shelling out £50m for an exotic striker,
    every Sky Sports pundit who has predicted their imminent demise week after week,
    every corporate sponsor who has shelled out millions on other clubs,
    every player paid 200K a week at other clubs,
    fans of underachieving giants who cannot get their head around how this is happening...


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,404 ✭✭✭✭Turtyturd


    Will be the first to admit I am indifferent to it, much the same as I was indifferent to anything Suarez did during his time at the club. Although it's a shame he didn't score the decisive goal in the United game.

    I am enjoying the stupidity of the usual suspects though in their rush to become experts on doping. Apparently they've deduced Klopp's Dortmund side are prime candidates because they beat Ronnie Madrid.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,740 ✭✭✭✭MD1990


    gafferino wrote: »
    Ken Early (Liverpool fan) nailing the doping attitudes in todays IT article

    http://www.irishtimes.com/sport/soccer/ken-early-the-straight-dope-is-fans-don-t-care-1.2623213
    Seen plenty of articles like this last the few weeks. Don't agree with parts since we don't know all the facts about Sakho's case. A fat burner is not much of a PED either.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,725 ✭✭✭gafferino


    corwill wrote: »
    It's a good article, btw. I'm just surprised that he's a Liverpool fan, I've been listening to Second Captains most weeks since it started, and OTB before that a good bit, and I never picked up on it. If anything, I thought the opposite!

    Yeah he can come across like that a bit but knowing him as I do he doesn't want it to seem the other way I guess but always tries to be balanced. Also as a life long Liverpool fan in his 30s he is, as many in here are, critical of a lot of things the club has done over the last 20 years and it comes across sometimes.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,725 ✭✭✭gafferino


    MD1990 wrote: »
    Seen plenty of articles like this last the few weeks. Don't agree with parts since we don't know all the facts about Sakho's case. A fat burner is not much of a PED either.

    Did you read the whole article? He states what others in here have stated I.e. Fat burners have been used to conceal other PEDs.

    I don't agree when you say 'is not much of a PED'. It either is banned or it isn't. If it is your getting punished. No excuses.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,788 ✭✭✭atilladehun


    corwill wrote: »
    It's a good article, btw. I'm just surprised that he's a Liverpool fan, I've been listening to Second Captains most weeks since it started, and OTB before that a good bit, and I never picked up on it. If anything, I thought the opposite!

    He always talks about Liverpool. more than any other team. He'll have a give out about liverpool story when the guardian don't mention them and OTB barely do.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 664 ✭✭✭price690


    MD1990 wrote: »
    Seen plenty of articles like this last the few weeks. Don't agree with parts since we don't know all the facts about Sakho's case. A fat burner is not much of a PED either.

    Red tinted glasses on there now in fairness. If its on the banned list then its a PED. Burning fat (if that is indeed what he was doing) in an unnatural way is gaining an advantage.

    A boxer who takes a diuretic for instance is gaining an unfair advantage. Id Sakho wanted to cut corners when it comes to losing weight then he is gaining an unfair advantage.

    And thats even if he was using it for those purposes, Early is not uninformed when he speaks of fat burners being used as masking agents and there is precedence for this in other sports.

    I'd say football is riddled with PED use. Stuff that is not even understood. The best way of judging it is to look at the end of season numbers akin to cycling. Players showing zero drop off in fitness levels, running power and yards covered despite a greater number of games and where its totally out of kilter with previous seasons, well then something is definately fishy.

    There is a thesis for someone there using opta analysis to fish out some of the teams/individual players posting absolutely crazy numbers that make absolutely no sense in physiological terms.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,775 ✭✭✭✭Gbear


    Our league form in the 2nd half of the season has been fairly mediocre - 1.6ppg

    I was hoping when you looked back it would paint a better picture.
    We're only so close to the top 4 because the league is rubbish from top to bottom.

    Still, with a few signings and a bit of luck on the fitness front maybe we won't be such a shambles next season.

    We're scarcely any better on the league form front than we were at the start of the season and last season but how we're approaching games is better, our best performances are a lot better and the dropped points look like things that we can work on without too much hand wringing - eg. a better keeper and more forward options getting a few more goals here and there to close games out when we're on top.

    I'm still feeling like there's a huge gap between what I should expect with this manager, these players and the amount of money being spent and what I actually expect, which is **** all given the way we tend to do things.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,740 ✭✭✭✭MD1990


    price690 wrote: »
    Red tinted glasses on there now in fairness. If its on the banned list then its a PED. Burning fat (if that is indeed what he was doing) in an unnatural way is gaining an advantage.

    A boxer who takes a diuretic for instance is gaining an unfair advantage. Id Sakho wanted to cut corners when it comes to losing weight then he is gaining an unfair advantage.

    And thats even if he was using it for those purposes, Early is not uninformed when he speaks of fat burners being used as masking agents and there is precedence for this in other sports.

    I'd say football is riddled with PED use. Stuff that is not even understood. The best way of judging it is to look at the end of season numbers akin to cycling. Players showing zero drop off in fitness levels, running power and yards covered despite a greater number of games and where its totally out of kilter with previous seasons, well then something is definately fishy.

    There is a thesis for someone there using opta analysis to fish out some of the teams/individual players posting absolutely crazy numbers that make absolutely no sense in physiological terms.
    How exactly. All I have said is a Fat Burner on its own would not be a great PED. Whether he used it as a masking agent I don't know. I'm not arguing he will or should recieve a ban. Just don't think Early's article is great at all really.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 40,059 ✭✭✭✭Harry Palmr


    Some good news - Liverpool are the first side to go 12 games without defeat since the Europa League format began.

    Coutinho in the France Football’s Under-23s team of the season -
    Oblak, Alaba, Marquinhos, Varane, Bellerin, Verratti, Pogba, Coutinho, Martial, Dybala, Kane


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 664 ✭✭✭price690


    MD1990 wrote: »
    How exactly. All I have said is a Fat Burner on its own would not be a great PED. Whether he used it as a masking agent I don't know. I'm not arguing he will or should recieve a ban. Just don't think Early's article is great at all really.

    Your comment that a fat burner is not much of a PED. Disagree with you fundamentally.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement