Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Kerbal Space Program 1.1 and beyond!

Options
  • 20-04-2016 12:45am
    #1
    Registered Users Posts: 26,578 ✭✭✭✭


    There's threads for this game already but those are for substantially earlier releases of the game. Even since its exit from Early Access this game has improved immensely (may also be read as: become even more difficult due to better all round physics engine). So is anyone playing this, doing the scenarios, contracts etc?

    1.1 was in prerelease for a few weeks but it's been given full release now. Have to the say the new UI is really really nice. The best thing though is that the frame rate is now a hell of a lot better than it used to be. Meaning those minute long burns don't take twice or three times as long as more. Sadly this has meant, for me anyway, stuffing the burn more easily as things happen that little bit faster for really fine tuned orbital inclination adjustments.

    Here's a screenshot of a gleeful Bob Kerman before he tastes Minmus surface to see if it tastes like dessert.


«1

Comments

  • Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 28,633 Mod ✭✭✭✭Shiminay


    Just spent 90 mins with it myself, definitely feels more smooth but had a couple of jitters with a jet wobbling through the surface of the runway before it even took off. It feels good though, nice to have the game running so much more smoothly, can't wait to try building some gigantic monstrosity in Sandbox :D


  • Registered Users Posts: 17,371 ✭✭✭✭Zillah


    Does the tutorial do more than leave you looking like this yet?
    dqVdu5x.jpg

    Because I know I should love this game but I never found myself picking it up a second time after being left flailing on my own try to reach Mun.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,752 ✭✭✭pablomakaveli


    I hadnt played it for a year so fired it up last night. I'm not liking the fact that the parachutes can be destroyed. Think I need to try the tutorials again.


  • Registered Users Posts: 26,578 ✭✭✭✭Turtwig


    Zillah wrote: »
    Does the tutorial do more than leave you looking like this yet?
    dqVdu5x.jpg

    Because I know I should love this game but I never found myself picking it up a second time after being left flailing on my own try to reach Mun.

    Um, if I recall correctly the tutorials in 1.0 with the exception of the orbital rendezvous and docking one weren't that bad. The rendezvous one could have been better imo but then again even NASA failed at rendezvous the first few times. It's just not that easy because in Space everything is intuitively different to how we perceive them down here. 1.1 has added an internal wikipedia, KSPedia you can browse while playing that has rather nice illustrations on it. I'll try out the tutorials before the week is out to see if anything has changed. One thing I do remember is in1.05 the moon return tutorial mission was made rather difficult by the parachutes full deployment altitude being set to 500m. Their default was changed to 1,000 but in the tutorial they never changed it. Meaning that unless you manually changed them yourself or had the almost perfect return trajectory your craft crashed into the surface.
    I hadnt played it for a year so fired it up last night. I'm not liking the fact that the parachutes can be destroyed. Think I need to try the tutorials again.

    Parachutes have speed ratings, generally around 260 m/s. You can deploy drogues that have max speed rating of around 600 to get around this. Keeping your final return stage as light as possible definitely helps too!

    Drogues aren't available in career mode though until quite a bit of science has been researched. You don't really need them either unless you're landing on a planet other than Kerbin but they do help make things easier for Kerbin returns.

    One thing I found useful in early career was to open the service bay once it had passed through the extreme heat of air friction. This adds a bit more drag and slows you down even more. Likewise, you can modifiy the reentry stage of your design to be as a drag inducing as possible. The balance here of course is that for launch you want to be as drag free as possible. Hence, the service bays, keep them closed at launch. Open after deadliest part of reentry. Then wait until your surface speed has dropped enough for the parachutes to be safe to deploy.

    Most important thing though is before attempting final re-entry bleed off as much energy from your orbit as possible i.e if you're returning from the Mun use the edges of Kerbins atmosphere to provide free aerobrakes. Use this to drop your orbital speed as much as possible before going in for the final descent. The lower your apoapsis is before making that final descent the less speed you'll have to shed to deploy a chute.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,752 ✭✭✭pablomakaveli


    I was just trying to break orbit and return in career mode but had a science lab pod attached to the command pod so the extra weight from that might have been the problem.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 13,080 ✭✭✭✭Maximus Alexander


    I dip into and get obsessed with this every few months. It's been a few months... It might be time to try 1.1 soon. :D


  • Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 28,633 Mod ✭✭✭✭Shiminay


    It's worth spending some time watching Scott Manley's YouTube channel to learn the basics. He's also a really nice chap and doesn't have a "I want to take a nail-gun to my ears" voice like a lot of YouTubers so that makes it easier.

    Speed destroying parachutes has been in for AGES, was definitely in for 1.0 and that's a year or so.

    The Scenarios are a great way to learn the mechanics too.


  • Registered Users Posts: 26,578 ✭✭✭✭Turtwig


    Been working my way through the tutorials. They're a good deal better than previously. They could still be improved upon imo. It's disappointing that the moon landing one doesn't mention you can check your actual altitude by reading the radar altitude meter in your command pod IVA. That is invaluable if you want to know how close you are to the ground before your crafts lights/shadows indicate proximity. Also disappointing that the return from Mun tutorial has you use a drogue. I'm no math wiz but unless they changed when the science of drogues unlocked in career mode you need over 3,000 points of science. It is highly unlikely a person's first return from the Mun in career will have a craft with drogues.

    Zillah, I think that face should be far less likely but if you just follow the Scott Manley stuff it should be even less likely. :)

    Edit: I should warn that Scott Manleys tutorials pre 1.05 are now outdated in some parts. The core concepts remain similar and if I do recall correctly he does state how things should likely be done for future updates. Either way his channel is highly recommended.

    Edit edit: Alas, the docking tutorial is completely unchanged and very very poor. :(


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,488 ✭✭✭mahoganygas


    I had a go at it last week. It's surprisingly difficult!

    What I love about Kerbal is the real world physics, compared to regular video games. Take The Witcher for example. I see an enemy coming towards me and I can roll out of the way knowing that every time I hit the roll button I will head in the same direction, speed, distance and dodge anything in my way.

    With KBS there are so many variables involved in movement. It's constantly changing. And once you break orbit you're dealing with forces which are atypical for the average human.

    Quill18's videos are very entertaining. He breaks out the calculator and works out how much fuel he needs to bring on a trip based on the mass of the ship, the distance traveled and the force of gravity (9.8 N/kg).

    I think I need to take this approach in future and start actually paying attention to all of the numbers at my disposal. It is a simulator after all.

    I regret doing pass Leaving Cert physics now! :(


  • Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 28,633 Mod ✭✭✭✭Shiminay


    Kerbin Engineer and MechJeb will help reduce or maybe even eliminate the need for spreadsheets and calculators - I think Quill just likes showing that he can do it :D


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 26,578 ✭✭✭✭Turtwig


    Kerbal has mods to suits all tastes but I would strongly recommend those new to the game and intent on doing career (strongly recommend starting the game in career before attempting sandbox and being overwhelmed by the amount of parts) mode long term use a sheet of paper or the craft notes (under its title in VAB) to make notes. For example when I'd acquire a new main stage engine I'd immediately start testing it under various conditions and reverting the flight then making notes. How many fuel tanks it can lift, how fast does it ascend, how much it can manoeuvre pitch and yaw, how heavy is it when using a parachute to slow down, how effective are multiple chutes etc.

    That just helps make the illusion of being part of real space agency with test flights all the more real. The best part of Kerbal is figuring out what works and what doesn't. Sub assemblies are your friend. :)


  • Registered Users Posts: 13,080 ✭✭✭✭Maximus Alexander


    Turtwig wrote: »
    Kerbal has mods to suits all tastes but I would strongly recommend those new to the game and intent on doing career mode use a sheet of paper or the craft notes (under its title in VAB) to make notes. For example when I'd acquire a new main stage engine I'd immediately start testing it under various conditions and reverting the flight then making notes. How many fuel tanks it can lift, how fast does it ascend, how much it can manoeuvre pitch and yaw, how heavy is it when using a parachute to slow down, how effective are multiple chutes etc.

    That just helps make the illusion of being part of real space agency with test flights all the more real. The best part of Kerbal is figuring out what works and what doesn't. Sub assemblies are your friend. :)

    I never went quite to those lengths, but it was very satisfying to go from "This is my rocket for getting a guy to the moon" to "Hey wait a minute, this rocket that gets a guy to the Mun can also lift X tons to orbit or Y tons to Duna." Which culminates in having multiple rocket sub-assemblies which I've rated for payload mass to various orbits. The most satisfying nerdery the gaming world has yet to provide me.


  • Registered Users Posts: 26,578 ✭✭✭✭Turtwig


    Yeah I was bit too immersive. :o. Just a sub assembly notes on DV would definitely suffice. :)

    One of my favorite moments in this game was when I covered a munar rescue, Munar temp and Eva observations, munar satellite reposition, new Minmus satellite deployment and Duna satellite deployment contract from the one launch. I launched my craft, split it up so that one part did the munar contracts, while the other headed to minmus. Split the munar craft again so that the rescued kerbal could perform the observations and head home. Rejoined the Minmus and Mun craft to use their combined fuel to reach Duna and deploy the last satelitte. Then crashed the remainder into Duna. (I like to keep Debris to a minimum). It was a super nerdy moment when everything was accomplished. An unbelievable feeling of achievement I'd rarely ever got from a video game. That's one thing kerbal does really well imo, provides you with a real sense of accomplishment and triumph.


  • Moderators, Computer Games Moderators Posts: 23,136 Mod ✭✭✭✭Kiith


    I have no idea what any of you are talking about, but now i want to play it as well :pac:


  • Registered Users Posts: 5,417 ✭✭✭FAILSAFE 00


    I just started playing this at the weekend. Its fantastic. Quite a refreshing break from the norm.

    I am currently just working my way through the tutorials.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 885 ✭✭✭Internet Friend


    Played maybe half an hour since 1.1 came out, been up to my eyes in college work, but hope to get stuck in soon. For mods, definitely use ckan to download them, you won't miss out on mod dependencies and muck up the game. For anyone who wants a real challenge download the Realism Overhaul, I haven't played it myself, just watched Scott Manley play it, but it looks amazing but very tough. Might take a week or two for it to be updated for 1.1 compatibility but it completely changes the game, in a good way.

    This, for me anyway, is one of those games you can literally loose days playing cause you get so involved, its a great game. Can totally relate to Turtwig' comment about a sense of accomplishment, you'll sometimes get a mission and say nah that's impossible, but then you do it and feel great! It's on sale at the moment, so if you're interested definitely pick it up.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,994 ✭✭✭Taylor365


    Been waiting for 1.1 to start a fresh career and fresh mods.

    Game has great replay-ability. Hope for a stable random solar system mod in the future. Would be class.


  • Registered Users Posts: 5,417 ✭✭✭FAILSAFE 00


    Finally touched down on the moon :)



  • Registered Users Posts: 26,578 ✭✭✭✭Turtwig


    Can you get back? :)


  • Registered Users Posts: 13,080 ✭✭✭✭Maximus Alexander


    Turtwig wrote: »
    Can you get back? :)

    The amount of times I left the Mun and ended up in a high Kerbin orbit, jumping out and pushing my command pod retrograde in the hopes of getting home... :pac:

    Followed by 10 to 15 orbits aerobraking at 55,000m to bring in the apoapsis.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 26,578 ✭✭✭✭Turtwig


    I'll never forget the time I got the perfect polar munar return trajectory for a (hopefully) nice aerobraking at about 48,000m. Enabled time warp.. then BOOM! Explosions all over the place. Turned out my return "orbit" actually went through the surface of the Mun first. Was so focused on getting that Kerbin Periapsis down I forgot that poor Jeb and Bob weren't able to travel through solid rock at over 800 m/s. :o


  • Registered Users Posts: 5,417 ✭✭✭FAILSAFE 00


    Turtwig wrote: »
    Can you get back? :)

    One step at a time :D

    NO!

    I finished up for the night after that.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,205 ✭✭✭cruizer101


    I must get back into this its been a long while since I played it.
    Scott Manley is very good and what I like is he actually knows his stuff when it comes to space exploration, lot of interesting facts and that, I think he actually works in the field or related to it.
    Some really great mods out there too, but must give vanilla a go now with the update.

    I recently pick up one of these going cheap secondhand so want to try have a go of flying rockets with it, my first attempt was dire, I think the last time I used a joystick it was connected to commodore64.
    411BtoyQELL.jpg


  • Registered Users Posts: 26,578 ✭✭✭✭Turtwig


    One step at a time :D

    NO!

    I finished up for the night after that.

    Indeed, baby steps, baby steps. Such is how so many of the kerbal space agency rescue missions (and rescue of those rescue missions) are born. Congrats on the succesful landing though. :)

    On one of my earliest munar landing, I was so conscious about the fuel for a return home I landed really badly on a top heavy craft. (KSC described it as an advanced lithobraking manouvre.) No worries, used Jeb to push the craft towards a bit of a hill on the crater. Rolled the craft, pulsed the engine at 1% thrust, slowly climbing the hill, then near the peak I hit full thrust and launched into space! :D

    These days I just place a service bay near the bottom that way if you land badly the action of opening the doors against the ground can tilt the craft upwards a bit. See? Service bays doors are super useful they help reorientate a badly landed craft and they can also be used to induce aerobraking drag on reentry :D.
    cruizer101 wrote: »
    Scott Manley is very good and what I like is he actually knows his stuff when it comes to space exploration, lot of interesting facts and that, I think he actually works in the field or related to it.

    He's brilliant! He studied astrophysics but he's a programmer for Apple. So he might also be a bit evil.


  • Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 28,633 Mod ✭✭✭✭Shiminay


    To be fair to Scott, he works for a company that Apple bought, I don't think he'd much say in the matter :P

    As for that Joystick - I tried my own HOTAS for KSP, it was "not better" for everything except throttle control, but you may feel different :)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 885 ✭✭✭Internet Friend


    Shiminay, they had a problem with the HOTAS controllers since they released the 1.1 update but according to their blog update on tuesday they've fixed it and should be working now.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 885 ✭✭✭Internet Friend


    Played a good few hours now of the career mode and I have to say, it's much more challenging. Took me age to get (and figure out how to get) maneuver nodes, but managed well enough without them. Just completed a pretty successful landing on the Mun, launched a satellite into orbit around it and tested a new engine in the one mission, was hard enough cause the satellite and test firing had pretty specific parameters, had limited money and still relatively low low in the tech tree. Couln't even go on EVA when I did land...

    I'm really enjoying this update, it's great! Apart from being stupid and running the 32 bit version for ages and wondering why the hell it kept crashing :rolleyes:


  • Registered Users Posts: 26,578 ✭✭✭✭Turtwig


    This is one of those games where hindsight truly does slaughter you. Had spent a considerable time painstakingly setting up a really nice polar encounter with the Duna to deploy a polar satellite. Arrived there to discover it was exactly 179° degrees off inclination. Fckkkkkk!
    Worst part is I would have had the necessary DV to correct in an orange rockomax tank but I decided to leave it in burn up on Kerbins atmosphere because there was no way I was going to need it. :(


  • Registered Users Posts: 26,578 ✭✭✭✭Turtwig


    Been a long long while since I've let this happen to me. :o
    The 3 tourists inside are gonna be on Minmus a lot longer than they'd anticipated.

    Kichael Kay Kerman was dissatisfied that no nukes were used on an impact asteroid.(Nuclear engines were though. 1 was all that was necessary but Teddon wanted 4 on his ship so he could catch his soaps. He wasn't too pleased about the prospect of 20 minute burns.)


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 885 ✭✭✭Internet Friend


    Guys, any ideas on how to set up a HOTAS X just for space planes? I've tried but doesn't seem to be detecting any input for pitch and roll...I know there's a mod for it (advanced fly by wire??), has that been updated yet for 1.1.2?


Advertisement